Comparing certificates Experimental feature

You are comparing two certificates. By default, only differing attributes are shown. Use the button below to show/hide all attributes.

Showing only differing attributes.
Google Pixel Devices on Android 14
None
Following MFP with FCU (Fax Option Type 5001). MFP: Ricoh Aficio MP 4001, Ricoh Aficio MP 4001G, Ricoh Aficio MP 5001, Ricoh Aficio MP 5001G, Savin 9240, Savin 9240G, Savin 9250, Savin 9250G, Lanier LD140, Lanier LD140G, Lanier LD150, Lanier LD150G, Lanier MP 4001, Lanier MP 5001, Gestetner MP 4001, Gestetner MP 4001G, Gestetner MP 5001, Gestetner MP 5001G, nashuatec MP 4001, nashuatec MP 5001, Rex-Rotary MP 4001, Rex-Rotary MP 5001, infotec MP 4001, infotec MP 5001 FCU: Fax Option Type 5001 Version: MFP Software/Hardware Version: Software System/Copy 1.00, Network Support 7.29.3, Scanner 01.24, Printer 1.00, Fax 01.00.00, Web Support 1.00.1, Web Uapl 1.02, Network Doc Box 1.00, Hardware Ic Key 1100, Ic Hdd 01, FCU Version: GWFCU3-19(WW) 01.00.00
JISEC-CC-CRP-C0262
name Google Pixel Devices on Android 14 Following MFP with FCU (Fax Option Type 5001). MFP: Ricoh Aficio MP 4001, Ricoh Aficio MP 4001G, Ricoh Aficio MP 5001, Ricoh Aficio MP 5001G, Savin 9240, Savin 9240G, Savin 9250, Savin 9250G, Lanier LD140, Lanier LD140G, Lanier LD150, Lanier LD150G, Lanier MP 4001, Lanier MP 5001, Gestetner MP 4001, Gestetner MP 4001G, Gestetner MP 5001, Gestetner MP 5001G, nashuatec MP 4001, nashuatec MP 5001, Rex-Rotary MP 4001, Rex-Rotary MP 5001, infotec MP 4001, infotec MP 5001 FCU: Fax Option Type 5001 Version: MFP Software/Hardware Version: Software System/Copy 1.00, Network Support 7.29.3, Scanner 01.24, Printer 1.00, Fax 01.00.00, Web Support 1.00.1, Web Uapl 1.02, Network Doc Box 1.00, Hardware Ic Key 1100, Ic Hdd 01, FCU Version: GWFCU3-19(WW) 01.00.00
category Mobility Multi-Function Devices
scheme US JP
status active archived
not_valid_after 27.03.2026 02.08.2015
not_valid_before 27.03.2024 30.07.2010
cert_link https://www.commoncriteriaportal.org/nfs/ccpfiles/files/epfiles/st_vid11419-ci.pdf
report_link https://www.commoncriteriaportal.org/nfs/ccpfiles/files/epfiles/st_vid11419-vr.pdf https://www.commoncriteriaportal.org/nfs/ccpfiles/files/epfiles/c0262_erpt.pdf
st_link https://www.commoncriteriaportal.org/nfs/ccpfiles/files/epfiles/st_vid11419-st.pdf https://www.commoncriteriaportal.org/nfs/ccpfiles/files/epfiles/c0262_est.pdf
manufacturer Google LLC Ricoh Company, Ltd.
manufacturer_web https://www.google.com https://www.ricoh.com/
security_level {} EAL3
dgst d822fb20999bc557 b3e6ff57f68f0387
heuristics/cert_id JISEC-CC-CRP-C0262
heuristics/cpe_matches cpe:2.3:o:google:android:14.0:*:*:*:*:*:*:* {}
heuristics/related_cves CVE-2023-40096, CVE-2024-0039, CVE-2015-9030, CVE-2015-9050, CVE-2015-8998, CVE-2024-31316, CVE-2015-9028, CVE-2024-0037, CVE-2015-9043, CVE-2019-20606, CVE-2014-9979, CVE-2014-9972, CVE-2016-10332, CVE-2024-34741, CVE-2024-0045, CVE-2016-10386, CVE-2024-0038, CVE-2015-9023, CVE-2023-21352, CVE-2016-10391, CVE-2016-5853, CVE-2024-31332, CVE-2023-40079, CVE-2016-5859, CVE-2017-7372, CVE-2023-40095, CVE-2017-8241, CVE-2017-8253, CVE-2024-31324, CVE-2016-10380, CVE-2015-9073, CVE-2017-8268, CVE-2015-9001, CVE-2024-34738, CVE-2017-8234, CVE-2015-8595, CVE-2015-8592, CVE-2024-23713, CVE-2016-10341, CVE-2024-23704, CVE-2015-9062, CVE-2024-43084, CVE-2015-9029, CVE-2024-0036, CVE-2011-0419, CVE-2024-31323, CVE-2015-8596, CVE-2024-0018, CVE-2024-0049, CVE-2014-9965, CVE-2014-9973, CVE-2014-9974, CVE-2024-0040, CVE-2017-7364, CVE-2024-34739, CVE-2016-10381, CVE-2016-10387, CVE-2015-9051, CVE-2016-10383, CVE-2023-21355, CVE-2023-40080, CVE-2023-40084, CVE-2024-31314, CVE-2015-8996, CVE-2017-9678, CVE-2014-9963, CVE-2023-40078, CVE-2015-9027, CVE-2015-9068, CVE-2023-45776, CVE-2015-9069, CVE-2023-21360, CVE-2023-40111, CVE-2016-10339, CVE-2024-0048, CVE-2024-0022, CVE-2015-9066, CVE-2016-10384, CVE-2015-9046, CVE-2017-0843, CVE-2023-40076, CVE-2017-7367, CVE-2024-34727, CVE-2015-9036, CVE-2023-40073, CVE-2016-5867, CVE-2017-8263, CVE-2024-31331, CVE-2017-7366, CVE-2016-10392, CVE-2014-9968, CVE-2024-31317, CVE-2024-31322, CVE-2017-7371, CVE-2023-21357, CVE-2014-9937, CVE-2023-40094, CVE-2014-9935, CVE-2023-40081, CVE-2015-9065, CVE-2014-9411, CVE-2024-43081, CVE-2017-8267, CVE-2015-8999, CVE-2024-23712, CVE-2017-8240, CVE-2016-5872, CVE-2023-40082, CVE-2023-21350, CVE-2016-10338, CVE-2016-10340, CVE-2016-10239, CVE-2015-0576, CVE-2017-0862, CVE-2024-34737, CVE-2008-7298, CVE-2017-8243, CVE-2024-40661, CVE-2024-0032, CVE-2024-31339, CVE-2017-8255, CVE-2024-34740, CVE-2015-9072, CVE-2017-8237, CVE-2015-9000, CVE-2024-0019, CVE-2016-5862, CVE-2023-40114, CVE-2017-7373, CVE-2024-0017, CVE-2023-40110, CVE-2024-0047, CVE-2014-9962, CVE-2015-9031, CVE-2024-0050, CVE-2023-40090, CVE-2014-9978, CVE-2017-8233, CVE-2015-9070, CVE-2024-31326, CVE-2014-9936, CVE-2024-0053, CVE-2014-9981, CVE-2024-31325, CVE-2017-7365, CVE-2024-0052, CVE-2015-9048, CVE-2014-9964, CVE-2017-8266, CVE-2024-0046, CVE-2015-9060, CVE-2017-8239, CVE-2024-0030, CVE-2015-9054, CVE-2015-9035, CVE-2015-8593, CVE-2024-40656, CVE-2023-45781, CVE-2016-5858, CVE-2023-21373, CVE-2024-31318, CVE-2016-10342, CVE-2016-10334, CVE-2024-23708, CVE-2015-9037, CVE-2023-45777, CVE-2023-21361, CVE-2024-43089, CVE-2014-9977, CVE-2024-43086, CVE-2015-9041, CVE-2023-21351, CVE-2024-23705, CVE-2016-5861, CVE-2016-10335, CVE-2015-9052, CVE-2024-0020, CVE-2024-40652, CVE-2024-40659, CVE-2017-8256, CVE-2017-9685, CVE-2023-21364, CVE-2024-34721, CVE-2015-0574, CVE-2014-9961, CVE-2024-0023, CVE-2016-5863, CVE-2016-5347, CVE-2024-0016, CVE-2014-9976, CVE-2017-8261, CVE-2024-43088, CVE-2016-10346, CVE-2015-9032, CVE-2016-5871, CVE-2024-31315, CVE-2024-0044, CVE-2016-10389, CVE-2024-34719, CVE-2014-9969, CVE-2023-21366, CVE-2023-21374, CVE-2017-6421, CVE-2016-10343, CVE-2024-40662, CVE-2016-10390, CVE-2024-40654, CVE-2016-10344, CVE-2015-9020, CVE-2023-45774, CVE-2017-8235, CVE-2023-21353, CVE-2024-0041, CVE-2021-39810, CVE-2016-10347, CVE-2016-10333, CVE-2024-43093, CVE-2024-0014, CVE-2024-0051, CVE-2015-9055, CVE-2024-43090, CVE-2023-21354, CVE-2015-8594, CVE-2015-1529, CVE-2015-9038, CVE-2023-21359, CVE-2015-9045, CVE-2023-40077, CVE-2024-34720, CVE-2017-8272, CVE-2024-0024, CVE-2023-40091, CVE-2016-10385, CVE-2017-8260, CVE-2024-31313, CVE-2017-7370, CVE-2024-0026, CVE-2024-34743, CVE-2017-9682, CVE-2024-34731, CVE-2016-5855, CVE-2024-0031, CVE-2016-5864, CVE-2015-9022, CVE-2023-40109, CVE-2024-31327, CVE-2024-40655, CVE-2024-0027, CVE-2017-0865, CVE-2024-0025, CVE-2015-9040, CVE-2017-7369, CVE-2014-9975, CVE-2024-40657, CVE-2024-43087, CVE-2015-8997, CVE-2023-40093, CVE-2023-40075, CVE-2016-10382, CVE-2014-9966, CVE-2015-9042, CVE-2015-9067, CVE-2015-9025, CVE-2024-23717, CVE-2015-9061, CVE-2017-8238, CVE-2015-9024, CVE-2024-0021, CVE-2024-23709, CVE-2017-9679, CVE-2024-31319, CVE-2023-40107, CVE-2017-8270, CVE-2015-9044, CVE-2023-40100, CVE-2015-8995, CVE-2015-9047, CVE-2015-9049, CVE-2023-40105, CVE-2024-23707, CVE-2024-40660, CVE-2024-34722, CVE-2016-5854, CVE-2017-0864, CVE-2023-40092, CVE-2017-8257, CVE-2024-31310, CVE-2017-8236, CVE-2015-0575, CVE-2023-40106, CVE-2024-34723, CVE-2017-8262, CVE-2024-34734, CVE-2024-43083, CVE-2023-40098, CVE-2015-9064, CVE-2017-9680, CVE-2024-43085, CVE-2015-9063, CVE-2024-0035, CVE-2014-9971, CVE-2024-43091, CVE-2015-9053, CVE-2023-40087, CVE-2023-21358, CVE-2014-9980, CVE-2017-8254, CVE-2023-40088, CVE-2016-10337, CVE-2015-9033, CVE-2024-23706, CVE-2023-21356, CVE-2023-40115, CVE-2017-9684, CVE-2024-23710, CVE-2015-9034, CVE-2023-45775, CVE-2015-9021, CVE-2023-45773, CVE-2017-8242, CVE-2014-9960, CVE-2024-0033, CVE-2024-0043, CVE-2024-40658, CVE-2023-40089, CVE-2024-31312, CVE-2024-31311, CVE-2017-8265, CVE-2020-13843, CVE-2016-5860, CVE-2016-10388, CVE-2015-9003, CVE-2017-0863, CVE-2024-34736, CVE-2014-9967, CVE-2015-9002, CVE-2015-9071, CVE-2023-40103, CVE-2017-7368, CVE-2016-10336, CVE-2015-9026, CVE-2023-40083, CVE-2024-40650, CVE-2015-9039, CVE-2024-34742, CVE-2024-43080 {}
heuristics/extracted_versions 14 1.00.1, 1.02, 01.24, 01.00.00, 1.00, 7.29.3
heuristics/scheme_data
  • cert_id: JISEC-CC-CRP-C0262
  • certification_date: 01.07.2010
  • claim: EAL3
  • enhanced:
    • assurance_level: EAL3
    • cc_version: 3.1
    • cert_link: https://www.ipa.go.jp/en/security/c0262_eimg.pdf
    • description: PRODUCT DESCRIPTION Description of TOE The TOE is a digital MFP which can digitize and manage as well as print and fax paper documents. It also provides a secure environment for using copier, scanner, printer, document server, and fax (optional) functions. TOE security functionality The major security functions of the TOE are: - Audit, which creates audit logs of security events. - Identification and Authentication, which identifies and authenticates users. - Document Data Access Control, which controls each users operation of documents. - Stored Data Protection, which encrypts stored document data on hard disk. - Network Communication Data Protection, which encrypts network communications. - Security Management, which provides total management of the security function settings. - Service Mode Lock, which controls the maintenance functions. - Telephone Line Intrusion Protection, which permits fax only communication. - MFP Control Software Verification, which checks the integrity of the software.
    • evaluation_facility: Information Technology Security Center Evaluation Department
    • product: Following MFP with FCU(Fax Option Type 5001) MFP: Ricoh Aficio MP 4001, Ricoh Aficio MP 4001G, Ricoh Aficio MP 5001, Ricoh Aficio MP 5001G, Savin 9240, Savin 9240G, Savin 9250, Savin 9250G, Lanier LD140, Lanier LD140G, Lanier LD150, Lanier LD150G, Lanier MP 4001, Lanier MP 5001, Gestetner MP 4001, Gestetner MP 4001G, Gestetner MP 5001, Gestetner MP 5001G, nashuatec MP 4001, nashuatec MP 5001, Rex-Rotary MP 4001, Rex-Rotary MP 5001, infotec MP 4001, infotec MP 5001 FCU: Fax Option Type 5001
    • product_type: Multi Function Product
    • report_link: https://www.ipa.go.jp/en/security/c0262_erpt.pdf
    • target_link: https://www.ipa.go.jp/en/security/c0262_est.pdf
    • toe_version: MFP Software /Hardware Version : Software System/Copy 1.00 Network Support 7.29.3 Scanner 01.24 Printer 1.00 Fax 01.00.00 Web Support 1.00.1 Web Uapl 1.02 Network Doc Box 1.00 Ic Key 1100 Hardware Ic Hdd 01 FCU Version : GWFCU3-19(WW) 01.00.00
    • vendor: RICOH COMPANY, LTD.
  • expiration_date: 01.08.2015
  • revalidations: [frozendict({'date': '2011-02', 'link': 'https://www.ipa.go.jp/en/security/jisec/software/certified-cert/c0262_it0290_01.html'})]
  • supplier: RICOH COMPANY, LTD.
  • toe_japan_name: -----
  • toe_overseas_link: https://www.ipa.go.jp/en/security/jisec/software/certified-cert/c0262_it0290.html
  • toe_overseas_name: Following MFP with FCU(Fax Option Type 5001) MFP: Ricoh Aficio MP 4001, Ricoh Aficio MP 4001G, Ricoh Aficio MP 5001, Ricoh Aficio MP 5001G, Savin 9240, Savin 9240G, Savin 9250, Savin 9250G, Lanier LD140, Lanier LD140G, Lanier LD150, Lanier LD150G, Lanier MP 4001, Lanier MP 5001, Gestetner MP 4001, Gestetner MP 4001G, Gestetner MP 5001, Gestetner MP 5001G, nashuatec MP 4001, nashuatec MP 5001, Rex-Rotary MP 4001, Rex-Rotary MP 5001, infotec MP 4001, infotec MP 5001 FCU: Fax Option Type 5001 < Cont. >
heuristics/protection_profiles 29ba341b00e9bd10, c40ae795865a0dba, 51729b94f0ac139f, 36b1d4890baaa7f4, 83014eb399a802f3, 593b939921a117e0 {}
protection_profile_links https://www.commoncriteriaportal.org/nfs/ccpfiles/files/ppfiles/PP_MDF_V3.3.pdf, https://www.commoncriteriaportal.org/nfs/ccpfiles/files/ppfiles/MOD_WLANC_v1.0.pdf, https://www.commoncriteriaportal.org/nfs/ccpfiles/files/ppfiles/mod_mdm_agent_v1.0.pdf, https://www.commoncriteriaportal.org/nfs/ccpfiles/files/ppfiles/PKG_TLS_V1.1.pdf, https://www.commoncriteriaportal.org/nfs/ccpfiles/files/ppfiles/MOD-BIO-v1.1.pdf, https://www.commoncriteriaportal.org/nfs/ccpfiles/files/ppfiles/MOD_BT_V1.0.pdf {}
pdf_data/cert_filename st_vid11419-ci.pdf
pdf_data/report_filename st_vid11419-vr.pdf c0262_erpt.pdf
pdf_data/st_filename st_vid11419-st.pdf c0262_est.pdf
state/cert/convert_garbage True False
state/cert/download_ok True False
state/cert/pdf_hash Different Different