BSI-CC-PP-0090-2016
for
Common Criteria PP Configuration
Machine Readable Electronic Documents -
Optionales Nachladen (Optional Post-Emission
Updates) [MR.ED-ON-PP]
developed by
Federal Office for Information Security
Federal Office for Information Security (BSI), Postfach 20 03 63, 53133 Bonn, Germany
Phone +49 (0)228 99 9582-0, Fax +49 (0)228 9582-5477, Infoline +49 (0)228 99 9582-111
Certification Report V1.0 CC-PP-414 V3.0
BSI-CC-PP-0090-2016
Common Criteria Protection Profile
Common Criteria PP Configuration Machine Readable Electronic
Documents - Optionales Nachladen (Optional Post-Emission
Updates) [MR.ED-ON-PP]
developed by Federal Office for Information Security
Assurance Package claimed in the Protection Profile:
Common Criteria Part 3 conformant
EAL 4 augmented by
ALC_DVS.2, ATE_DPT.2 and AVA_VAN.5
Valid until 06 September 2026
The Protection Profile identified in this certificate has been evaluated at an approved
evaluation facility using the Common Methodology for IT Security Evaluation (CEM),
Version 3.1 for conformance to the Common Criteria for IT Security Evaluation (CC),
Version 3.1. CC and CEM are also published as ISO/IEC 15408 and ISO/IEC 18045.
This certificate applies only to the specific version and release of the Protection Profile
and in conjunction with the complete Certification Report.
The evaluation has been conducted in accordance with the provisions of the certification
scheme of the German Federal Office for Information Security (BSI) and the conclusions
of the evaluation facility in the evaluation technical report are consistent with the
evidence adduced.
This certificate is not an endorsement of the Protection Profile by the Federal Office for
Information Security or any other organisation that recognises or gives effect to this
certificate, and no warranty of the Protection Profile by the Federal Office for Information
Security or any other organisation that recognises or gives effect to this certificate, is
either expressed or implied.
Common Criteria
Recognition
Arrangement
Bonn, 07 September 2016
For the Federal Office for Information Security
Joachim Weber
Head of Division
Bundesamt für Sicherheit in der Informationstechnik
Godesberger Allee 185-189 - D-53175 Bonn - Postfach 20 03 63 - D-53133 Bonn
Phone +49 (0)228 99 9582-0 - Fax +49 (0)228 9582-5477 - Infoline +49 (0)228 99 9582-111
SOGIS Recognition
Agreement
Certification Report BSI-CC-PP-0090-2016
This page is intentionally left blank.
4 / 15
BSI-CC-PP-0090-2016 Certification Report
Contents
A Certification.........................................................................................................................6
1 Preliminary Remarks.......................................................................................................6
2 Specifications of the Certification Procedure..................................................................6
3 Recognition Agreements.................................................................................................7
3.1 European Recognition of ITSEC/CC – Certificates (SOGIS-MRA)..........................7
3.2 International Recognition of CC – Certificates (CCRA)............................................7
4 Performance of Evaluation and Certification...................................................................7
5 Validity of the certification result......................................................................................8
6 Publication.......................................................................................................................8
B Certification Results............................................................................................................9
1 Protection Profile Overview...........................................................................................10
2 Security Functional Requirements.................................................................................11
3 Assurance Requirements..............................................................................................12
4 Results of the PP-Evaluation.........................................................................................12
5 Obligations and notes for the usage.............................................................................12
6 Protection Profile Document..........................................................................................12
7 Definitions......................................................................................................................13
7.1 Acronyms................................................................................................................13
7.2 Glossary..................................................................................................................13
8 Bibliography...................................................................................................................14
C Annexes............................................................................................................................15
5 / 15
Certification Report BSI-CC-PP-0090-2016
A Certification
1 Preliminary Remarks
Under the Act on the Federal Office for Information Security (BSIG), the Federal Office for
Information Security (BSI) has the task of issuing certificates for information technology
products as well as for Protection Profiles (PP).
A PP defines an implementation-independent set of IT security requirements for a category
of products which are intended to meet common consumer needs for IT security. A PP
claimed by a user, consumer or stakeholder for IT gives them the possibility to express
their IT security needs without referring to a special product. Product certifications can be
based on Protection Profiles. For products which have been certified based on a
Protection Profile an individual certificate will be issued but the results from a PP
certification can be re-used for the Security Taget evaluation within a product evaluation
when conformance to the PP has been claimed.
Certification of the Protection Profile is carried out on the instigation of the BSI or a
sponsor. A part of the procedure is the technical examination (evaluation) of the Protection
Profile according to Common Criteria [1]. The evaluation is normally carried out by an
evaluation facility recognised by the BSI or by BSI itself. The result of the certification
procedure is the present Certification Report. This report contains among others the
certificate (summarised assessment) and the detailed Certification Results.
2 Specifications of the Certification Procedure
The certification body conducts the procedure according to the criteria laid down in the
following:
● Act on the Federal Office for Information Security (BSIG)1
● BSI Certification and Approval Ordinance2
● BSI Schedule of Costs3
● Special decrees issued by the Bundesministerium des Innern (Federal Ministry of the
Interior)
● DIN EN ISO/IEC 17065 standard
● BSI certification: Scheme documentation describing the certification process
(CC-Produkte) [3], including PP Certification
● BSI certification: Scheme documentation on requirements for the Evaluation Facility, its
approval and licencing process (CC-Stellen) [3]
● Common Criteria for IT Security Evaluation (CC), Version 3.144
[1] also published as
ISO/IEC 15408
1
Act on the Federal Office for Information Security (BSI-Gesetz - BSIG) of 14 August 2009,
Bundesgesetzblatt I p. 2821
2
Ordinance on the Procedure for Issuance of Security Certificates and approval by the Federal Office for
Information Security (BSI-Zertifizierungs- und -Anerkennungsverordnung - BSIZertV) of 17 December
2014, Bundesgesetzblatt 2014, part I, no. 61, p. 2231
3
Schedule of Cost for Official Procedures of the Bundesamt für Sicherheit in der Informationstechnik
(BSI-Kostenverordnung, BSI-KostV) of 03 March 2005, Bundesgesetzblatt I p. 519
4
Proclamation of the Bundesministerium des Innern of 12 February 2007 in the Bundesanzeiger dated
23 February 2007
6 / 15
BSI-CC-PP-0090-2016 Certification Report
● Common Methodology for IT Security Evaluation, Version 3.1 [2] also published as
ISO/IEC 18045
● BSI certification: Application Notes and Interpretation of the Scheme (AIS) [4]
● Internal procedure for the issuance of a PP certificate
3 Recognition Agreements
In order to avoid multiple certification of the same Protection Profile in different countries a
mutual recognition of IT security certificates - as far as such certificates are based on CC -
under certain conditions was agreed. Therefore, the results of this evaluation and
certification procedure can be re-used by the product certificate issuing scheme in the
evaluation of a Security Target within a subsequent product evaluation and certification
procedure.
3.1 European Recognition of ITSEC/CC – Certificates (SOGIS-MRA)
The SOGIS-Mutual Recognition Agreement (SOGIS-MRA) Version 3 became effective in
April 2010. It defines the recognition of certificates for IT-Products at a basic recognition
level up to and including Common Criteria (CC) Evaluation Assurance Levels EAL 4 and
ITSEC Evaluation Assurance Levels E 3 (basic), and in addition at higher recognition
levels for IT-Products related to certain technical domains only. In addition, certificates
issued for Protection Profiles based on Common Criteria are part of the recognition
agreement.
The SOGIS-MRA logo printed on the certificate indicates that it is recognised under the
terms of this agreement by the nations involved.
Details on recognition, technical domains and the agreement itself can be found at
http://www.sogisportal.eu.
3.2 International Recognition of CC – Certificates (CCRA)
The international Common Criteria Recognition Arrangement (CCRA) became effictive in
September 2014 in its current version. It defines the recognition of certificates for
IT-products based on collaborative Protection Profiles (cPP) (exact use), CC certificates
based on assurance components up to and including EAL 2 or the assurance family Flaw
Remediation (ALC_FLR) and CC certificates for Protection Profiles and for collaborative
Protection Profiles (cPP). In certain cases certificates issued during a transition period until
September 2017 are recognised up to EAL 4.
The Common Criteria Recognition Arrangement logo printed on the certificate indicates
that this certification is recognised under the terms of this agreement by the nations
involved.
Details on recognition and the agreement itself can be found at
http://www.commoncriteriaportal.org.
4 Performance of Evaluation and Certification
The certification body monitors each individual evaluation to ensure a uniform procedure, a
uniform interpretation of the criteria and uniform ratings.
7 / 15
Certification Report BSI-CC-PP-0090-2016
The Common Criteria PP Configuration Machine Readable Electronic Documents -
Optionales Nachladen (Optional Post-Emission Updates) [MR.ED-ON-PP] has undergone
the certification procedure at BSI.
The evaluation of the Common Criteria PP Configuration Machine Readable Electronic
Documents - Optionales Nachladen (Optional Post-Emission Updates) [MR.ED-ON-PP]
was conducted by the ITSEF T-Systems GEI GmbH. The evaluation was completed on 23
August 2016. The ITSEF T-Systems GEI GmbH is an evaluation facility (ITSEF)5
recognised by the certification body of BSI.
For this certification procedure the sponsor and applicant is:
Bundesamt für Sicherheit in der Informationstechnik.
The certification is concluded with the comparability check and the production of this
Certification Report. This work was completed by the BSI.
5 Validity of the certification result
This Certification Report only applies to the version of the Protection Profile as indicated.
In case of changes to the certified version of the Protection Profile, the validity can be
extended to new versions and releases, provided the sponsor applies for assurance
continuity (i.e. re-certification or maintenance) of the modified Protection Profile, in
accordance with the procedural requirements, and the evaluation does not reveal any
security deficiencies.
For the meaning of the assurance levels please refer to the excerpts from the criteria at
the end of the Certification Report.
The validity of this certificate ends as outlined on the certificate. The applicant and the
sponsor of this certificate are recommended to review the technical content of the
Protection Profile certified according to the evolvement of the technology and of the
intended operational environment of the type of product concerned as well as according to
the evolvement of the evaluation criteria. Such review should result in an update and a
re-certification of the Protection Profile accordingly. Typically, technical standards are
reviewed on a five years basis.
The limitation of validity of this PP certificate does not necessarily impact the validity
period of a product certificate referring to this Protection Profile, but the certification body
issuing a product certificate based on this Protection Profile should take it into its
consideration on validity.
6 Publication
The Common Criteria PP Configuration Machine Readable Electronic Documents -
Optionales Nachladen (Optional Post-Emission Updates) [MR.ED-ON-PP] has been
included in the BSI list of the certified Protection Profiles, which is published regularly (see
also Internet: https://www.bsi.bund.de and [4]). Further information can be obtained from
BSI-Infoline +49 228 9582-111.
The Certification Report may be obtained in electronic form at the internet address stated
above.
5
Information Technology Security Evaluation Facility
8 / 15
BSI-CC-PP-0090-2016 Certification Report
B Certification Results
The following results represent a summary of
● the certified Protection Profile,
● the relevant evaluation results from the evaluation facility, and
● complementary notes and stipulations of the certification body.
9 / 15
Certification Report BSI-CC-PP-0090-2016
1 Protection Profile Overview
The Target of Evaluation (TOE) is the
● Common Criteria PP Configuration Machine Readable Electronic Documents -
Optionales Nachladen (Optional Post-Emission Updates) [MR.ED-ON-PP], identified
with BSI-CC-PP-0090-2016, Version 0.9.2, 18.08.2016 [6].
A Protection Profile Configuration is equivalent to a standard Protection Profile.
This PP Configuration is defined in Chapter 8 of [6] and is based on a PP module and one
base PP.
The module is
● Common Criteria PP-Module Machine Readable Electronic Documents - Optionales
Nachladen (Optional Post-Emission Updates), identified with [MR.ED-ON-PP-Module]
and defined in Chapter 2 to 7 of [6].
The base PP is
● Common Criteria Protection Profile, Machine-Readable Electronic Document based on
BSI TR-03110 for Official Use [MR.ED-PP], BSI-CC-PP-0087-V2-2016-MA-01, Version
2.0.3, 18.06.2016 [10].
The concept of PP Configurations, Modules and base PPs is specified in [11].
The Common Criteria PP Configuration Machine Readable Electronic Documents -
Optionales Nachladen (Optional Post-Emission Updates) [MR.ED-ON-PP] [6] is
established by the Bundesamt für Sicherheit in der Informationstechnik as a basis for the
development of Security Targets in order to perform a certification of an IT-product, the
Target of Evaluation (TOE). The TOE described in the Common Criteria PP Configuration
Machine Readable Electronic Documents - Optionales Nachladen (Optional Post-Emission
Updates) [MR.ED-ON-PP] is a smartcard programmed according to Technische Richtlinie
BSI TR-03110-1 [8] and TR-03110-2 [9]. The TOE additionally has the ability to update its
TOE software during the life-cycle phase “operational use” by an update mechanism. The
smartcard contains multiple applications (at least one). The programmed smartcard is
called an electronic document as a whole. Here, an application is a collection of
data(groups) and their access conditions. The TOE uses the following user data:
● EAC1-protected data, sensitive user data protected by EAC1 (cf. [8]),
● EAC2-protected data, sensitive user data protected by EAC2 (cf. [9]), and
● all other (common) user data, other user data protected by Password Authenticated
Connection Establishment (PACE, cf. also [9]).
Applications considered in [9] are an electronic passport (ePass) application, an electronic
identity (eID) application, and a signature (eSign) application. The Protection Profile
Common Criteria PP Configuration Machine Readable Electronic Documents - Optionales
Nachladen (Optional Post-Emission Updates) [MR.ED-ON-PP] [6] however does not make
any assumptions on what kind of applications, and how many applications are included.
The TOE comprises at least:
● the circuitry of the chip, including all integrated circuit (IC) dedicated software that is
active in the operational phase of the TOE,
10 / 15
BSI-CC-PP-0090-2016 Certification Report
● the IC embedded software, i.e. the operating system,
● all access mechanisms, associated protocols and corresponding data,
● one or several applications, and
● the associated guidance documentation.
The following TOE security features are the most significant for its operational use: The
TOE ensures that
● only authenticated terminals can get access to the user data stored on the TOE and use
security functionality of the electronic document,
● the electronic document holder can control access by consciously presenting his
electronic document and/or by entering his secret PIN,
● authenticity and integrity of user data can be verified,
● confidentiality of user data in the communication channel between the TOE and the
connected terminal is provided,
● inconspicuous tracing of the electronic document is averted,
● its security functionality and the data stored inside are self-protected, and
● digital signatures can be created, if the TOE contains an eSign application.
The assets to be protected by a TOE claiming conformance to this PP are defined in [6],
chapter 4.1.1. Based on these assets the security problem definition is defined in terms of
assumptions, threats and organisational security policies. This is outlined in [6], chapter
4.4, 4.2 and 4.3.
These assumptions, threats and organisational security policies are split into security
objectives to be fulfilled by a TOE claiming conformance to this PP and security objectives
to be fulfilled by the operational environment of a TOE claiming conformance to this PP.
These objectives are outlined in [6], chapter 5.
The Protection Profile [6] requires a Security Target based on this PP or another PP
claiming this PP to fulfil the CC requirements for strict conformance.
2 Security Functional Requirements
Based on the security objectives to be fulfilled by a TOE claiming conformance to this PP
Configuration the security policy is expressed by the set of security functional
requirements (SFR) to be implemented by a TOE. It covers the following issues:
● Class FCS: Cryptographic Support
● Class FIA: Identification and Authentication
● Class FDP: User Data Protection
● Class FTP: Trusted Path/Channels
● Class FAU: Security Audit
● Class FMT: Security Management
● Class FPT: Protection of the Security Functions
11 / 15
Certification Report BSI-CC-PP-0090-2016
These TOE security functional requirements are outlined in [6], chapter 7.1. They are
selected from Common Criteria Part 2 and some of them are newly defined. Thus the SFR
claim is called:
Common Criteria Part 2 extended
3 Assurance Requirements
The TOE security assurance package claimed in the Protection Profile is based entirely on
the assurance components defined in part 3 of the Common Criteria. Thus, this assurance
package is called:
Common Criteria Part 3 conformant
EAL 4 augmented by
ALC_DVS.2, ATE_DPT.2 and AVA_VAN.5
(for the definition and scope of assurance packages according to CC see part C or [1], part
3 for details).
4 Results of the PP-Evaluation
The Evaluation Technical Report (ETR) [7] was provided by the ITSEF according to the
Common Criteria [1], the Methodology [2], the requirements of the Scheme [3] and all
Application Notes and Interpretations of the Scheme (AIS) [4] as relevant for the TOE.
As a result of the evaluation the verdict PASS is confirmed for the assurance components
of the classes APE and ACE.
The following assurance components were used:
APE_INT.1 PP introduction
APE_CCL.1 Conformance claims
APE_SPD.1 Security problem definition
APE_OBJ.2 Security objectives
APE_ECD.1 Extended components definition
APE_REQ.2 Derived security requirements
ACE_MCO.1 PP-module consistency
ACE_CCO.1 PP-configuration concistency
The results of the evaluation are only applicable to the Protection Profile as defined in
chapter 1.
5 Obligations and notes for the usage
The following aspects need to be fulfilled when using the Protection Profile:
-None-
It is recommend to the user to consider the application notes to gain additional information
and specific explanations.
6 Protection Profile Document
The Protection Profile Common Criteria PP Configuration Machine Readable Electronic
Documents - Optionales Nachladen (Optional Post-Emission Updates) [MR.ED-ON-PP][6]
is being provided within a separate document as Annex A of this report.
12 / 15
BSI-CC-PP-0090-2016 Certification Report
7 Definitions
7.1 Acronyms
AIS Application Notes and Interpretations of the Scheme
BSI Bundesamt für Sicherheit in der Informationstechnik / Federal Office for
Information Security, Bonn, Germany
BSIG BSI-Gesetz / Act on the Federal Office for Information Security
CCRA Common Criteria Recognition Arrangement
CC Common Criteria for IT Security Evaluation
CEM Common Methodology for Information Technology Security Evaluation
EAC Extended Access Control
EAL Evaluation Assurance Level
ETR Evaluation Technical Report
IT Information Technology
ITSEF Information Technology Security Evaluation Facility
PACE Password Authenticated Connection Establishment
PP Protection Profile
SAR Security Assurance Requirement
SF Security Function
SFP Security Function Policy
SFR Security Functional Requirement
ST Security Target
TOE Target of Evaluation
TSF TOE Security Functionality
7.2 Glossary
Augmentation - The addition of one or more requirement(s) to a package.
Extension - The addition to an ST or PP of functional requirements not contained in part 2
and/or assurance requirements not contained in part 3 of the CC.
Formal - Expressed in a restricted syntax language with defined semantics based on
well-established mathematical concepts.
Informal - Expressed in natural language.
Object - A passive entity in the TOE, that contains or receives information, and upon which
subjects perform operations.
Protection Profile - An implementation-independent statement of security needs for a
TOE type.
Security Target - An implementation-dependent statement of security needs for a specific
identified TOE.
13 / 15
Certification Report BSI-CC-PP-0090-2016
Semiformal - Expressed in a restricted syntax language with defined semantics.
Subject - An active entity in the TOE that performs operations on objects.
Target of Evaluation - A set of software, firmware and/or hardware possibly accompanied
by guidance.
TOE Security Functionality - Combined functionality of all hardware, software, and
firmware of a TOE that must be relied upon for the correct enforcement of the SFRs.
8 Bibliography
[1] Common Criteria for Information Technology Security Evaluation, Version 3.1,
Part 1: Introduction and general model, Revision 4, September 2012
Part 2: Security functional components, Revision 4, September 2012
Part 3: Security assurance components, Revision 4, September 2012
http://www.commoncriteriaportal.org
[2] Common Methodology for Information Technology Security Evaluation (CEM),
Evaluation Methodology, Version 3.1, Revision 4, September 2012
http://www.commoncriteriaportal.org
[3] BSI certification: Scheme documentation describing the certification process
(CC-Produkte) and Scheme documentation on requirements for the Evaluation
Facility, approval and licencing (CC-Stellen), https://www.bsi.bund.de/zertifizierung
[4] Application Notes and Interpretations of the Scheme (AIS) as relevant for the TOE6
.
[5] German IT Security Certificates (BSI 7148), periodically updated list published also
on the BSI Website[
[6] Common Criteria PP Configuration Machine Readable Electronic Documents -
Optionales Nachladen (Optional Post-Emission Updates) [MR.ED-ON-PP], Version
0.9.2, BSI-CC-PP-0090-2016, Federal Office for Information Security, 18.08.2016
[7] Evaluation Technical Report, Version 1.3, 23.08.2016, Evaluation Technical Report
BSI-CC-PP-0090-2016, T-Systems GEI GmbH (confidential document)
[8] BSI: TR-03110-1 - Advanced Security Mechanisms for Machine Readable Travel
Documents. Part 1 - eMRTDs with BAC/PACEv2 and EACv1, v2.10, Federal Office
for Information Security, 20 March 2012
[9] BSI: TR-03110-2 - Advanced Security Mechanisms for Machine Readable Travel
Documents. Part 2 - Extended Access Control Version 2 (EACv2), Password
Authenticated Connection Establishment (PACE), and Restricted Identification (RI)
v2.10, Federal Office for Information Security, 20 March 2012
[10] Common Criteria Protection Profile, Machine-Readable Electronic Document based
on BSI TR-03110 for Official Use [MR.ED-PP], BSI-CC-PP-0087-V2-2016-MA-01,
Version 2.0.3, 18.06.2016, BSI
[11] Common Criteria, CC and CEM addenda, Modular PP, Version 1.1, August 2014,
CCDB-2014-03-001
6
specially
• AIS 32, Version 7, CC-Interpretationen im deutschen Zertifizierungsschema
14 / 15
BSI-CC-PP-0090-2016 Certification Report
C Annexes
List of annexes of this certification report
Annex A: Protection Profile Common Criteria PP Configuration Machine Readable
Electronic Documents - Optionales Nachladen (Optional Post-Emission
Updates) [MR.ED-ON-PP] [6] provided within a separate document.
Note: End of report
15 / 15