Certification Report
McAfee File and Removable Media Protection 4.3.1 and
ePolicy Orchestrator 5.1.2
Issued by:
Communications Security Establishment
Certification Body
Canadian Common Criteria Evaluation and Certification Scheme
© Government of Canada, Communications Security Establishment, 2015
Document number: 383-4-277-CR
Version: 1.0
Date: 25 September 2015
Pagination: i to iii, 1 to 11
CCS Certification Report Intel Corporation
McAfee FRMP 4.3.1 and ePO 5.1.2
___________________________________________________________________________
Version 1.0 25 September 2015
- Page i of iii -
DISCLAIMER
The Information Technology (IT) product identified in this certification report, and its
associated certificate, has been evaluated at an approved evaluation facility – established
under the Canadian Common Criteria Evaluation and Certification Scheme (CCS) – using the
Common Methodology for Information Technology Security Evaluation, Version 3.1 Revision
4, for conformance to the Common Criteria for Information Technology Security Evaluation,
Version 3.1 Revision 4. This certification report, and its associated certificate, applies only to
the identified version and release of the product in its evaluated configuration. The evaluation
has been conducted in accordance with the provisions of the CCS, and the conclusions of the
evaluation facility in the evaluation report are consistent with the evidence adduced. This
report, and its associated certificate, are not an endorsement of the IT product by the
Communications Security Establishment, or any other organization that recognizes or gives
effect to this report, and its associated certificate, and no warranty for the IT product by the
Communications Security Establishment, or any other organization that recognizes or gives
effect to this report, and its associated certificate, is either expressed or implied.
CCS Certification Report Intel Corporation
McAfee FRMP 4.3.1 and ePO 5.1.2
___________________________________________________________________________
Version 1.0 25 September 2015
- Page ii of iii -
FOREWORD
The Canadian Common Criteria Evaluation and Certification Scheme (CCS) provides a
third-party evaluation service for determining the trustworthiness of Information Technology
(IT) security products. Evaluations are performed by a commercial Common Criteria
Evaluation Facility (CCEF) under the oversight of the CCS Certification Body, which is
managed by the Communications Security Establishment.
A CCEF is a commercial facility that has been approved by the CCS Certification Body to
perform Common Criteria evaluations; a significant requirement for such approval is
accreditation to the requirements of ISO/IEC 17025:2005, the General Requirements for the
Competence of Testing and Calibration Laboratories. Accreditation is performed under the
Program for the Accreditation of Laboratories - Canada (PALCAN), administered by the
Standards Council of Canada.
The CCEF that carried out this evaluation is EWA-Canada.
By awarding a Common Criteria certificate, the CCS Certification Body asserts that the
product complies with the security requirements specified in the associated security target. A
security target is a requirements specification document that defines the scope of the
evaluation activities. The consumer of certified IT products should review the security target,
in addition to this certification report, in order to gain an understanding of any assumptions
made during the evaluation, the IT product's intended environment, the evaluated security
functionality, and the testing and analysis conducted by the CCEF.
This certification report is associated with the certificate of product evaluation dated 25
September 2015, and the security target identified in Section 4 of this report.
The certification report, certificate of product evaluation and security target are posted on the
CCS Certified Products list (CPL) and the Common Criteria portal (the official website of the
Common Criteria Project).
Reproduction of this report is authorized provided the report is reproduced in its entirety.
CCS Certification Report Intel Corporation
McAfee FRMP 4.3.1 and ePO 5.1.2
___________________________________________________________________________
Version 1.0 25 September 2015
- Page iii of iii -
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Disclaimer....................................................................................................................................... i
Foreword........................................................................................................................................ii
Executive Summary...................................................................................................................... 1
1 Identification of Target of Evaluation................................................................................. 2
2 TOE Description ................................................................................................................... 2
3 Security Policy....................................................................................................................... 3
4 Security Target...................................................................................................................... 3
5 Common Criteria Conformance.......................................................................................... 4
6 Assumptions and Clarification of Scope............................................................................. 5
6.1 SECURE USAGE ASSUMPTIONS................................................................................... 5
6.2 ENVIRONMENTAL ASSUMPTIONS ............................................................................... 5
6.3 CLARIFICATION OF SCOPE.......................................................................................... 5
7 Evaluated Configuration...................................................................................................... 6
8 Documentation ...................................................................................................................... 6
9 Evaluation Analysis Activities ............................................................................................. 7
10 ITS Product Testing.............................................................................................................. 8
10.1 ASSESSMENT OF DEVELOPER TESTS .......................................................................... 8
10.2 INDEPENDENT FUNCTIONAL TESTING ........................................................................ 8
10.3 INDEPENDENT PENETRATION TESTING....................................................................... 8
10.4 CONDUCT OF TESTING ............................................................................................... 9
10.5 TESTING RESULTS...................................................................................................... 9
11 Results of the Evaluation...................................................................................................... 9
12 Acronyms, Abbreviations and Initializations................................................................... 10
13 References............................................................................................................................ 11
CCS Certification Report Intel Corporation
McAfee FRMP 4.3.1 and ePO 5.1.2
___________________________________________________________________________
Version 1.0 25 September 2015
- Page 1 of 11 -
Executive Summary
McAfee File and Removable Media Protection 4.3.1 and ePolicy Orchestrator 5.1.2
(hereafter referred to as McAfee FRMP 4.3.1 and ePO 5.1.2), from Intel Corporation, is the
Target of Evaluation. The results of this evaluation demonstrate that McAfee FRMP 4.3.1
and ePO 5.1.2 meets the requirements of Evaluation Assurance Level (EAL) 2 augmented for
the evaluated security functionality.
McAfee FRMP 4.3.1 and ePO 5.1.2 is a file encryption product. The TOE allows selective
control of access to data held in file systems and on removable media, based on user
permissions. This protection depends on Microsoft Windows user accounts and works in
real-time to authenticate the user, to access the encryption keys, and to retrieve the correct
policy. The TOE acts as a Persistent Encryption engine. When a file is encrypted and is
moved or copied to another location, it remains encrypted. If it is moved out of an encrypted
directory, it still remains encrypted.
EWA-Canada is the CCEF that conducted the evaluation. This evaluation was completed on
25 September 2015 and was carried out in accordance with the rules of the Canadian
Common Criteria Evaluation and Certification Scheme (CCS).
The scope of the evaluation is defined by the security target, which identifies assumptions
made during the evaluation, the intended environment for McAfee FRMP 4.3.1 and ePO
5.1.2, and the security functional/assurance requirements. Consumers are advised to verify
that their operating environment is consistent with that specified in the security target, and to
give due consideration to the comments, observations and recommendations in this
certification report.
Communications Security Establishment, as the CCS Certification Body, declares that the
McAfee FRMP 4.3.1 and ePO 5.1.2 evaluation meets all the conditions of the Arrangement
on the Recognition of Common Criteria Certificates and that the product will be listed on the
CCS Certified Products list (CPL) and the Common Criteria portal (the official website of the
Common Criteria Project).
CCS Certification Report Intel Corporation
McAfee FRMP 4.3.1 and ePO 5.1.2
___________________________________________________________________________
Version 1.0 25 September 2015
- Page 2 of 11 -
1 Identification of Target of Evaluation
The Target of Evaluation (TOE) for this EAL 2+ evaluation is McAfee File and Removable
Media Protection 4.3.1 and ePolicy Orchestrator 5.1.2 (hereafter referred to as McAfee
FRMP 4.3.1 and ePO 5.1.2), from Intel Corporation.
2 TOE Description
McAfee FRMP 4.3.1 and ePO 5.1.2 is a file encryption product. The TOE allows selective
control of access to data held in file systems and on removable media, based on user
permissions. This protection depends on Microsoft Windows user accounts and works in
real-time to authenticate the user, to access the encryption keys, and to retrieve the correct
policy. The TOE acts as a Persistent Encryption engine. When a file is encrypted and is
moved or copied to another location, it remains encrypted. If it is moved out of an encrypted
directory, it still remains encrypted.
A diagram of the McAfee FRMP 4.3.1 and ePO 5.1.2 architecture is as follows:
CCS Certification Report Intel Corporation
McAfee FRMP 4.3.1 and ePO 5.1.2
___________________________________________________________________________
Version 1.0 25 September 2015
- Page 3 of 11 -
3 Security Policy
McAfee FRMP 4.3.1 and ePO 5.1.2 implements a role-based access control policy to control
administrative access to the system. In addition, McAfee FRMP 4.3.1 and ePO 5.1.2
implements policies pertaining to the following security functional classes:
 Cryptographic support
 User data protection
 Security Management
 Identification and authentication
 Protection of the TSF
The following cryptographic modules were evaluated to the FIPS 140-2 standard:
Cryptographic Module Certificate
McAfee Core Cryptographic Module (user)
(Software Version: 1.0)
#2239
McAfee Core Cryptographic Module (kernel)
(Software Version: 1.0)
#2223
OpenSSL FIPS Object Module
(Software Version: 1.2, 1.2.1, 1.2.2, 1.2.3 or 1.2.4)
#1051
RSA BSAFE® Crypto-C Micro Edition
(Software Version: 4.0.1)
#2097
4 Security Target
The ST associated with this Certification Report is identified below:
Security Target McAfee File and Removable Media Protection 4.3.1 and ePolicy
Orchestrator 5.1.2, Version 1.0, 6 September 2015
CCS Certification Report Intel Corporation
McAfee FRMP 4.3.1 and ePO 5.1.2
___________________________________________________________________________
Version 1.0 25 September 2015
- Page 4 of 11 -
5 Common Criteria Conformance
The evaluation was conducted using the Common Methodology for Information Technology
Security Evaluation, Version 3.1 Revision 4, for conformance to the Common Criteria for
Information Technology Security Evaluation, Version 3.1 Revision 4.
McAfee FRMP 4.3.1 and ePO 5.1.2 is:
a. EAL 2 augmented, containing all security assurance requirements listed, as well as the
following:
 ALC_FLR.2 – Flaw Reporting Procedures
b. Common Criteria Part 2 extended; with functional requirements based upon functional
components in Part 2, except for the following explicitly stated requirements defined in
the ST:
 FCS_RBG_EXT - Cryptographic operation: random bit generation
c. Common Criteria Part 3 conformant, with security assurance requirements based only
upon assurance components in Part 3.
CCS Certification Report Intel Corporation
McAfee FRMP 4.3.1 and ePO 5.1.2
___________________________________________________________________________
Version 1.0 25 September 2015
- Page 5 of 11 -
6 Assumptions and Clarification of Scope
Consumers of McAfee FRMP 4.3.1 and ePO 5.1.2 should consider assumptions about usage
and environmental settings as requirements for the product’s installation and its operating
environment. This will ensure the proper and secure operation of the TOE.
6.1 Secure Usage Assumptions
The following Secure Usage Assumptions are listed in the ST:
 Authorized administrators will not leave the machine in a mode where sensitive
information persists in non-volatile storage (e.g. power it down or enter a power
managed state, such as a “hibernation mode”).
 Authorized administrators are appropriately trained and follow all appropriate
guidance documentation.
 An authorized administrator will be responsible for ensuring that passwords have
sufficient strength and entropy to reflect the sensitivity of the data being protected.
6.2 Environmental Assumptions
The following Environmental Assumptions are listed in the ST:
 The TOE will be installed on a platform that supports individual user identification
and authentication.
 Authorized administrators will exercise due diligence in physically protecting the
TOE, and will ensure that the IT environment will sufficiently protect against logical
attacks.
6.3 Clarification of Scope
Two of the cryptographic modules used by the TOE (#1051, #2057) have been vendor
affirmed as per I.G5 of the CMVP implementation guidance.
CCS Certification Report Intel Corporation
McAfee FRMP 4.3.1 and ePO 5.1.2
___________________________________________________________________________
Version 1.0 25 September 2015
- Page 6 of 11 -
7 Evaluated Configuration
The evaluated configuration for McAfee FRMP 4.3.1 and ePO 5.1.2 comprises:
The TOE software;
 FRP 4.3.1.114
 McAfee Agent 5.0.0.2620
Installed on a managed system running one of the following operating systems:
 Windows 8.1 (32/64 bit)
 Windows 7 SP1 (32/64 bit)
And a server PC running the following;
 ePolicy Orchestrator 5.1.2.348 (also TOE software)
 Windows Server 2008 R2
With support from the following in the environment:
 Microsoft SQL Server 2008 R2, 2012
 LDAP server
The publication entitled Intel Security Common Criteria Evaluated Configuration Guide
McAfee File and Removable Media Protection 4.3.1 With ePolicy Orchestrator 5.1.1, draft
150315 describes the procedures necessary to install and operate McAfee FRMP 4.3.1 and
ePO 5.1.2 in its evaluated configuration.
8 Documentation
The Intel Corporation documents provided to the consumer are as follows:
a. Intel Security Common Criteria Evaluated Configuration Guide McAfee File and
Removable Media Protection 4.3.1 With ePolicy Orchestrator 5.1.1, draft 150315
b. Installation Guide McAfee ePolicy Orchestrator 5.1, Revision B, downloaded Nov 27,
2014
c. Product Guide McAfee ePolicy Orchestrator 5.1, Revision B, downloaded Nov 27, 2014
d. Product Guide McAfee File and Removable Media Protection (FRP) 4.3.0 For use with
ePolicy Orchestrator 4.6.6, 4.6.7, 5.0.1, 5.1 Software, downloaded Nov 27, 2014; and
e. User Guide McAfee File and Removable Media Protection (FRP) 4.3.0 For use with
ePolicy Orchestrator 4.6.6, 4.6.7, 5.0.1, 5.1 Software, downloaded Nov 27, 2014
CCS Certification Report Intel Corporation
McAfee FRMP 4.3.1 and ePO 5.1.2
___________________________________________________________________________
Version 1.0 25 September 2015
- Page 7 of 11 -
9 Evaluation Analysis Activities
The evaluation analysis activities involved a structured evaluation of McAfee FRMP 4.3.1
and ePO 5.1.2, including the following areas:
Development: The evaluators analyzed the McAfee FRMP 4.3.1 and ePO 5.1.2 functional
specification and design documentation; they determined that the design completely and
accurately describes the TOE security functionality (TSF) interfaces, the TSF subsystems and
how the TSF implements the security functional requirements (SFRs). The evaluators
analyzed the McAfee FRMP 4.3.1 and ePO 5.1.2 security architectural description and
determined that the initialization process is secure, that the security functions are protected
against tamper and bypass, and that security domains are maintained. The evaluators also
independently verified that the correspondence mappings between the design documents are
correct.
Guidance Documents: The evaluators examined the McAfee FRMP 4.3.1 and ePO 5.1.2
preparative user guidance and operational user guidance and determined that it sufficiently
and unambiguously describes how to securely transform the TOE into its evaluated
configuration and how to use and administer the product. The evaluators examined and tested
the preparative and operational guidance, and determined that they are complete and
sufficiently detailed to result in a secure configuration.
Life-cycle support: An analysis of the McAfee FRMP 4.3.1 and ePO 5.1.2 configuration
management system and associated documentation was performed. The evaluators found that
the McAfee FRMP 4.3.1 and ePO 5.1.2 configuration items were clearly marked.
The evaluators examined the delivery documentation and determined that it described all of
the procedures required to maintain the integrity of McAfee FRMP 4.3.1 and ePO 5.1.2
during distribution to the consumer.
The evaluators reviewed the flaw remediation procedures used by developer for the McAfee
FRMP 4.3.1 and ePO 5.1.2. During a site visit, the evaluators also examined the evidence
generated by adherence to the procedures. The evaluators concluded that the procedures are
adequate to track and correct security flaws, and distribute the flaw information and
corrections to consumers of the product.
All these evaluation activities resulted in PASS verdicts.
CCS Certification Report Intel Corporation
McAfee FRMP 4.3.1 and ePO 5.1.2
___________________________________________________________________________
Version 1.0 25 September 2015
- Page 8 of 11 -
10 ITS Product Testing
Testing consists of the following three steps: assessing developer tests, performing
independent functional tests, and performing penetration tests.
10.1 Assessment of Developer Tests
The evaluators verified that the developer has met their testing responsibilities by examining
their test evidence, and reviewing their test results, as documented in the ETR1
.
The evaluators analyzed the developer’s test coverage analysis and found it to be complete
and accurate. The correspondence between the tests identified in the developer’s test
documentation and the functional specification was complete.
10.2 Independent Functional Testing
During this evaluation, the evaluator developed independent functional tests by examining
design and guidance documentation.
All testing was planned and documented to a sufficient level of detail to allow repeatability
of the testing procedures and results. Resulting from this test coverage approach is the
following list of test goals:
a. Repeat of Developer's Tests: The objective of this test goal is to repeat a subset of the
developer's tests;
b. Agent uninstall: The objective of this test goal is to confirm that a user with or without
admin privileges cannot uninstall the McAfee agent from their local workstation;
c. Key deletion: The objective of this test goal is to confirm that a user with the appropriate
privileges to Create, Delete, Edit are unable to delete a regular key in the Active state;
and
d. Concurrent administrators: The objective of this test goal is to confirm that changes
made in McAfee ePO by two Administrators can be tracked.
10.3 Independent Penetration Testing
Subsequent to the independent review of public domain vulnerability databases and all
evaluation deliverables, limited independent evaluator penetration testing was conducted.
The penetration tests focused on:
a. Use of automated vulnerability scanning tools to discover potential network, platform and
application layer vulnerabilities; and
b. Information Leakage Verification: The objective of this test goal is to attempt to capture
sensitive information during start-up and shutdown of the TOE.
1
The ETR is a CCS document that contains information proprietary to the developer and/or the evaluator, and
is not releasable for public review.
CCS Certification Report Intel Corporation
McAfee FRMP 4.3.1 and ePO 5.1.2
___________________________________________________________________________
Version 1.0 25 September 2015
- Page 9 of 11 -
The independent penetration testing did not uncover any exploitable vulnerabilities in the
intended operating environment.
10.4 Conduct of Testing
McAfee FRMP 4.3.1 and ePO 5.1.2 was subjected to a comprehensive suite of formally
documented, independent functional and penetration tests. The detailed testing activities,
including configurations, procedures, test cases, expected results and observed results are
documented in a separate Test Results document.
10.5 Testing Results
The developer’s tests and the independent functional tests yielded the expected results,
providing assurance that McAfee FRMP 4.3.1 and ePO 5.1.2 behaves as specified in its ST
and functional specification.
11 Results of the Evaluation
This evaluation has provided the basis for a EAL 2+ level of assurance. The overall verdict
for the evaluation is PASS. These results are supported by evidence in the ETR.
CCS Certification Report Intel Corporation
McAfee FRMP 4.3.1 and ePO 5.1.2
___________________________________________________________________________
Version 1.0 25 September 2015
- Page 10 of 11 -
12 Acronyms, Abbreviations and Initializations
Acronym/Abbreviation/
Initialization
Description
CCEF Common Criteria Evaluation Facility
CCS Canadian Common Criteria Evaluation and
Certification Scheme
CPL Certified Products list
CM Configuration Management
EAL Evaluation Assurance Level
ePO ePolicy Orchestrator
ETR Evaluation Technical Report
IT Information Technology
ITSET Information Technology Security
Evaluation and Testing
PALCAN Program for the Accreditation of
Laboratories - Canada
SFR Security Functional Requirement
ST Security Target
TOE Target of Evaluation
TSF TOE Security Function
CCS Certification Report Intel Corporation
McAfee FRMP 4.3.1 and ePO 5.1.2
___________________________________________________________________________
Version 1.0 25 September 2015
- Page 11 of 11 -
13 References
This section lists all documentation used as source material for this report:
a. CCS Publication #4, Technical Oversight, Version 1.8, October 2010.
b. Common Criteria for Information Technology Security Evaluation, Version 3.1
Revision 4, September 2012.
c. Common Methodology for Information Technology Security Evaluation, CEM,
Version 3.1 Revision 4, September 2012.
d. Security Target McAfee File and Removable Media Protection 4.3.1 and ePolicy
Orchestrator 5.1.2, Version 1.0, 6 September 2015
e. Evaluation Technical Report for EAL 2+ Common Criteria Evaluation of McAfee
Inc. McAfee File and Removable Media Protection 4.3.1 with ePolicy Orchestrator
5.1.2, version 1.0, 25 September 2015.