TÜV Rheinland Nederland B.V.
Head Office:
Westervoortsedijk 73
NL-6827 AV Arnhem
P.O. Box 2220
NL-6802 CE Arnhem
The Netherlands
Location Leek:
Eiberkamp 10
NL-9351 VT Leek
P.O. Box 37
NL-9350 AA Leek
The Netherlands
info@nl.tuv.com
www.tuv.com/nl
Tel. +31 (0)88 888 7 888
Fax +31 (0)88 888 7 879
TÜV Rheinland Nederland B.V. is a
registered company at the
Netherlands Chamber of Commerce
(KVK), under number 27288788.
VAT number: NL815820380B01
IBAN: NL61DEUT0265155096
Version
2022-02
®
TÜV,
TUEV
and
TUV
are
registered
trademarks.
Any
use
or
application
requires
prior
approval.
Certification Report
Qualcomm Secure Processor Unit SPU270 (Version: 6.1) in
SM8550 SoC (Qualcomm® Snapdragon™ 8 Gen 2) with
symmetric and asymmetric crypto support
Sponsor and developer: Qualcomm Technologies, Inc.
5775 Morehouse Dr
San Diego, CA 92121
USA
Evaluation facility: Riscure B.V.
Delftechpark 49
2628 XJ Delft
The Netherlands
Report number: NSCIB-CC-0569293-CR
Report version: 2
Project number: 0569293
Author(s): Jordi Mujal
Date: 14 February 2023
Number of pages: 13
Number of appendices: 0
Reproduction of this report is authorised only if the report is reproduced in its entirety.
Page: 2/13 of report number: NSCIB-CC-0569293-CR, dated 14 February 2023
®
TÜV,
TUEV
and
TUV
are
registered
trademarks.
Any
use
or
application
requires
prior
approval.
CONTENTS
Foreword 3
Recognition of the Certificate 4
International recognition 4
European recognition 4
1 Executive Summary 5
2 Certification Results 6
2.1 Identification of Target of Evaluation 6
2.2 Security Policy 6
2.3 Assumptions and Clarification of Scope 7
2.3.1 Assumptions 7
2.3.2 Clarification of scope 7
2.4 Architectural Information 8
2.5 Documentation 8
2.6 IT Product Testing 9
2.6.1 Testing approach and depth 9
2.6.2 Independent penetration testing 9
2.6.3 Test configuration 9
2.6.4 Test results 10
2.7 Reused Evaluation Results 10
2.8 Evaluated Configuration 10
2.9 Evaluation Results 10
2.10 Comments/Recommendations 11
3 Security Target 12
4 Definitions 12
5 Bibliography 13
Page: 3/13 of report number: NSCIB-CC-0569293-CR, dated 14 February 2023
®
TÜV,
TUEV
and
TUV
are
registered
trademarks.
Any
use
or
application
requires
prior
approval.
Foreword
The Netherlands Scheme for Certification in the Area of IT Security (NSCIB) provides a third-party
evaluation and certification service for determining the trustworthiness of Information Technology (IT)
security products. Under this NSCIB, TÜV Rheinland Nederland B.V. has the task of issuing
certificates for IT security products, as well as for protection profiles and sites.
Part of the procedure is the technical examination (evaluation) of the product, protection profile or site
according to the Common Criteria assessment guidelines published by the NSCIB. Evaluations are
performed by an IT Security Evaluation Facility (ITSEF) under the oversight of the NSCIB Certification
Body, which is operated by TÜV Rheinland Nederland B.V. in cooperation with the Ministry of the
Interior and Kingdom Relations.
An ITSEF in the Netherlands is a commercial facility that has been licensed by TÜV Rheinland
Nederland B.V. to perform Common Criteria evaluations; a significant requirement for such a licence is
accreditation to the requirements of ISO Standard 17025 “General requirements for the accreditation
of calibration and testing laboratories”.
By awarding a Common Criteria certificate, TÜV Rheinland Nederland B.V. asserts that the product or
site complies with the security requirements specified in the associated (site) security target, or that
the protection profile (PP) complies with the requirements for PP evaluation specified in the Common
Criteria for Information Security Evaluation. A (site) security target is a requirements specification
document that defines the scope of the evaluation activities.
The consumer should review the (site) security target or protection profile, in addition to this
certification report, to gain an understanding of any assumptions made during the evaluation, the IT
product's intended environment, its security requirements, and the level of confidence (i.e., the
evaluation assurance level) that the product or site satisfies the security requirements stated in the
(site) security target.
Reproduction of this report is authorised only if the report is reproduced in its entirety.
Page: 4/13 of report number: NSCIB-CC-0569293-CR, dated 14 February 2023
®
TÜV,
TUEV
and
TUV
are
registered
trademarks.
Any
use
or
application
requires
prior
approval.
Recognition of the Certificate
The presence of the Common Criteria Recognition Arrangement (CCRA) and the SOG-IS logos on the
certificate indicates that this certificate is issued in accordance with the provisions of the CCRA and
the SOG-IS Mutual Recognition Agreement (SOG-IS MRA) and will be recognised by the participating
nations.
International recognition
The CCRA was signed by the Netherlands in May 2000 and provides mutual recognition of certificates
based on the Common Criteria (CC). Since September 2014 the CCRA has been updated to provide
mutual recognition of certificates based on cPPs (exact use) or STs with evaluation assurance
components up to and including EAL2+ALC_FLR.
For details of the current list of signatory nations and approved certification schemes, see
http://www.commoncriteriaportal.org.
European recognition
The SOG-IS MRA Version 3, effective since April 2010, provides mutual recognition in Europe of
Common Criteria and ITSEC certificates at a basic evaluation level for all products. A higher
recognition level for evaluation levels beyond EAL4 (respectively E3-basic) is provided for products
related to specific technical domains. This agreement was signed initially by Finland, France,
Germany, The Netherlands, Norway, Spain, Sweden and the United Kingdom. Italy joined the SOG-IS
MRA in December 2010.
For details of the current list of signatory nations, approved certification schemes and the list of
technical domains for which the higher recognition applies, see https://www.sogis.eu.
Page: 5/13 of report number: NSCIB-CC-0569293-CR, dated 14 February 2023
®
TÜV,
TUEV
and
TUV
are
registered
trademarks.
Any
use
or
application
requires
prior
approval.
1 Executive Summary
This Certification Report states the outcome of the Common Criteria security evaluation of the
Qualcomm Secure Processor Unit SPU270 (Version: 6.1) in SM8550 SoC (Qualcomm®
Snapdragon™ 8 Gen 2) with symmetric and asymmetric crypto support. The developer of the
Qualcomm Secure Processor Unit SPU270 (Version: 6.1) in SM8550 SoC (Qualcomm®
Snapdragon™ 8 Gen 2) with symmetric and asymmetric crypto support is Qualcomm Technologies,
Inc. located in San Diego, USA and they also act as the sponsor of the evaluation. A Certification
Report is intended to assist prospective consumers when judging the suitability of the IT security
properties of the product for their particular requirements.
The TOE is an integrated Secure Element, composed by the subsystem called Secure Processor Unit
(SPU), which is integrated in the SoC within a stacked DDR package on SoC package (package form
factor is non-TOE). It is designed as a tamper resistant device providing secure storage and a secure
execution environment for processing of sensitive data and for performing cryptographic operations
using protected keys stored in its secure storage. Secure Elements can be used for multiple
application areas that require a high level of security.
The TOE has been evaluated by Riscure B.V. located in Delft, The Netherlands. The evaluation was
completed on 20 January 2023 with the approval of the ETR. The certification procedure has been
conducted in accordance with the provisions of the Netherlands Scheme for Certification in the Area of
IT Security [NSCIB].
The scope of the evaluation is defined by the security target [ST], which identifies assumptions made
during the evaluation, the intended environment for the Qualcomm Secure Processor Unit SPU270
(Version: 6.1) in SM8550 SoC (Qualcomm® Snapdragon™ 8 Gen 2) with symmetric and asymmetric
crypto support, the security requirements, and the level of confidence (evaluation assurance level) at
which the product is intended to satisfy the security requirements. Consumers of the Qualcomm
Secure Processor Unit SPU270 (Version: 6.1) in SM8550 SoC (Qualcomm® Snapdragon™ 8 Gen 2)
with symmetric and asymmetric crypto support are advised to verify that their own environment is
consistent with the security target, and to give due consideration to the comments, observations and
recommendations in this certification report.
The results documented in the evaluation technical report [ETR] 1 for this product provide sufficient
evidence that the TOE meets the EAL4 augmented (EAL4+) assurance requirements for the evaluated
security functionality. This assurance level is augmented with ALC_DVS.2 (Sufficiency of security
measures) and AVA_VAN.5 (Advanced methodical vulnerability analysis).
The evaluation was conducted using the Common Methodology for Information Technology Security
Evaluation, Version 3.1 Revision 5 [CEM] for conformance to the Common Criteria for Information
Technology Security Evaluation, Version 3.1 Revision 5 [CC] (Parts I, II and III).
TÜV Rheinland Nederland B.V., as the NSCIB Certification Body, declares that the evaluation meets
all the conditions for international recognition of Common Criteria Certificates and that the product will
be listed on the NSCIB Certified Products list. Note that the certification results apply only to the
specific version of the product as evaluated.
Version 1 of this document was issued on 20th January 2023.
Version 2 of this document was issued on 14th February 2023 to correct a typographical error in
section 2.1.
1 The Evaluation Technical Report contains information proprietary to the developer and/or the
evaluator, and is not available for public review.
Page: 6/13 of report number: NSCIB-CC-0569293-CR, dated 14 February 2023
®
TÜV,
TUEV
and
TUV
are
registered
trademarks.
Any
use
or
application
requires
prior
approval.
2 Certification Results
2.1 Identification of Target of Evaluation
The Target of Evaluation (TOE) for this evaluation is the Qualcomm Secure Processor Unit SPU270
(Version: 6.1) in SM8550 SoC (Qualcomm® Snapdragon™ 8 Gen 2) with symmetric and asymmetric
crypto support from Qualcomm Technologies, Inc. located in San Diego, USA.
The TOE is comprised of the following main components:
Delivery
item type
Identifier Version
Hardware
SPU hard macro embedded in SM8550 SoC2 6.1
Foundry ID embedded in SM8550 SoC
0
Firmware
SPU ROM code
• PBL
• Mission ROM
77100000
Software
SPU MCP image, which includes MCP and following system
applications:
• cryptoapp
• asym_cryptoapp
• nvm_sysproc
SPSS.A1.1.7-
00071-KAILUA-1
To ensure secure usage a set of guidance documents is provided, together with the Qualcomm
Secure Processor Unit SPU270 (Version: 6.1) in SM8550 SoC (Qualcomm® Snapdragon™ 8 Gen 2)
with symmetric and asymmetric crypto support. For details, see section 2.5 “Documentation” of this
report.
For a detailed and precise description of the TOE lifecycle, see the [ST-lite], Chapter 3.2.10.
2.2 Security Policy
The TOE maintains:
• the integrity and confidentiality of code and data stored in its memories as defined in the [ST].
• the integrity, the correct operation and the confidentiality of security functionality provided by
the TOE.
This is ensured by the construction of the TOE and its security functionality. The major security
features of the TOE are described in Section 2.3 of [ST] and are categorized as follows:
• Internal Security functions
o Access control to the various memories (OTP, RAM, ROM) and peripherals
o Access control to keys managed in hardware through enforcement of key policy
o Secure boot and secure loading of TOE software stored outside the TOE using the
TOE root of trust (ROM code)
o Protection of User Data stored outside the TOE
o Secure loading of user applications stored outside the TOE
o Secure update mechanism of the TOE software or applications
2 TOE is integrated into SM8550 SoC with identifier A0030000.
Page: 7/13 of report number: NSCIB-CC-0569293-CR, dated 14 February 2023
®
TÜV,
TUEV
and
TUV
are
registered
trademarks.
Any
use
or
application
requires
prior
approval.
o Domain separation between applications executed by the TOE (for both user and
system applications)
o Anti-replay island and software freshness protection
• Cryptographic services (API):
o Generation of random numbers (used for key generation)
o Secure key storage providing the possibility to have keys stored in the SP-CMU that
are not readable by the SP-CPU. The SP-CPU can only request to perform
cryptographic operations using those keys.
o Secure key generation and zeroization
o Symmetric encryption and decryption using the following:
o AES with 128 bit and 256 bit keys
o TDES with 112 bit and 168 bit keys
o Hash functions: SHA-1, SHA-256, SHA-384, SHA-512
o HMAC using keys up to 512 bit length and using SHA-1, SHA-256, SHA-384 or SHA-
512
o CMAC with AES using 128 bit and 256 bit keys
o Asymmetric cryptographic operations:
▪ RSA 1024 bit and 2048 bit
▪ Elliptic curves cryptography with NIST P-192/224/256/384/521, Brainpool P-
192/224/256/320/384/512 non-twisted (r1) and Curve25519 curves.
2.3 Assumptions and Clarification of Scope
2.3.1 Assumptions
The assumptions defined in the Security Target are not covered by the TOE itself. These aspects lead
to specific Security Objectives to be fulfilled by the TOE-Environment. For detailed information on the
security objectives that must be fulfilled by the TOE environment, see section 6.2 of the [ST-lite].
2.3.2 Clarification of scope
The evaluation did not reveal any threats to the TOE that are not countered by the evaluated security
functions of the product.
Page: 8/13 of report number: NSCIB-CC-0569293-CR, dated 14 February 2023
®
TÜV,
TUEV
and
TUV
are
registered
trademarks.
Any
use
or
application
requires
prior
approval.
2.4 Architectural Information
The following figure depicts the main HW TOE architecture
The figure below depicts the IC Dedicated Software block decomposition of the TOE.
2.5 Documentation
The following documentation is provided with the product by the developer to the customer:
Identifier Version
Secure Processor Unit (SPU) – Anti-replay Island (ARI) Overview
for SM8550
80-33265-16, Revision AB
SM8550 Secure Boot Enablement 80-35348-14, Revision AA
Page: 9/13 of report number: NSCIB-CC-0569293-CR, dated 14 February 2023
®
TÜV,
TUEV
and
TUV
are
registered
trademarks.
Any
use
or
application
requires
prior
approval.
Qualcomm® Secure Processing Unit Enablement for SM8550
Devices – User Guide
80-35348-150, Revision AC
SM8550 Security Guidance for Secure Processing Unit
Application Developers
80-35348-152, Revision AB
SM8550 Secure Processor Unit SDK – API Reference 80-PV579-21, Revision AE
Qualcomm® Snapdragon™ Secure Processing Unit (SPU)
Application Development User Guide
80-NU430-7, Revision AB
SMT Assembly Guidelines SM80-P0982-1, Revision E
2.6 IT Product Testing
Testing (depth, coverage, functional tests, independent testing): The evaluators examined the
developer’s testing activities documentation and verified that the developer has met their testing
responsibilities.
2.6.1 Testing approach and depth
The developer performed extensive testing on functional specification, subsystem and SFR-enforcing
module level.
All parameter choices were addressed at least once. All boundary cases identified were tested
explicitly, and additionally the near-boundary conditions were covered probabilistically. The testing
was largely automated using industry standard and proprietary test suites. Test scripts were used
extensively to verify that the functions return the expected values.
For the testing performed by the evaluators, the developer provided samples and a test environment.
The evaluators reproduced a selection of the developer tests, as well as executing a small number of
test cases designed by the evaluator.
All test results were as expected. No deviations were found.
2.6.2 Independent penetration testing
The methodical analysis performed was conducted along the following steps:
• When evaluating the evidence in the classes ASE, ADV and AGD the evaluator considered
whether potential vulnerabilities could already be identified due to the TOE type and/or
specified behaviour in such an early stage of the evaluation.
• For ADV_IMP a thorough implementation representation review was performed on the TOE
focused on the TOE hardware and the IC Dedicated Software. During this attack-oriented
analysis, the protection of the TOE is analysed using the knowledge gained from all previous
evaluation classes. This resulted in the identification of (additional) potential vulnerabilities.
The analysis was performed taking into account the attack methods in [JIL-AM] and applicable
attack papers with rating according to [JIL-AAPS].
• All potential vulnerabilities were analysed using the knowledge gained from all evaluation
classes and information from the public domain. A judgment was made on how to assure that
these potential vulnerabilities are not exploitable. The potential vulnerabilities were addressed
by penetration testing, a guidance update or in other ways that are deemed appropriate.
The total test effort expended by the evaluators was 26 weeks. During that test campaign, 40% of the
total time was spent on Perturbation attacks and 60% on side-channel testing.
2.6.3 Test configuration
The TOE hardware and firmware versions for all executed tests were the same as stated in section 2.1
above. The majority of the tests were executed using Test OS as custom test commands were
required. The Test OS provided capabilities to disable some countermeasures for the evaluation
Page: 10/13 of report number: NSCIB-CC-0569293-CR, dated 14 February 2023
®
TÜV,
TUEV
and
TUV
are
registered
trademarks.
Any
use
or
application
requires
prior
approval.
purposes. When Test OS was used, the JTAG interface for both the SPU and SoC was unlocked for
the test devices for communication with SPU, ease of programming the devices with Test OS as well
as to enable faster boot without involving the entire SoC bring up. The evaluator verified that testing
on Test OS provides the targeted security functionalities and environment which are representative of
the TOE configuration and countermeasures.
2.6.4 Test results
The testing activities, including configurations, procedures, test cases, expected results and observed
results are summarised in the [ETR], with references to the documents containing the full details.
The developer’s tests and the independent functional tests produced the expected results, giving
assurance that the TOE behaves as specified in its [ST] and functional specification.
No exploitable vulnerabilities were found with the independent penetration tests.
The algorithmic security level of cryptographic functionality has not been rated in this certification
process, but the current consensus on the algorithmic security level in the open domain, i.e., from the
current best cryptanalytic attacks published, has been taken into account.
Not all key sizes specified in the [ST] have sufficient cryptographic strength for satisfying the
AVA_VAN.5 “high attack potential”. The TOE supports a wider range of key sizes (see [ST]), including
those with sufficient algorithmic security level to exceed 100 bits as required for high attack potential
(AVA_VAN.5).
The strength of the implementation of the cryptographic functionality has been assessed in the
evaluation, as part of the AVA_VAN activities.
For composite evaluations, please consult the [ETRfC] for details.
2.7 Reused Evaluation Results
There has been extensive reuse of the ALC aspects for the sites involved in the development and
production of the TOE, by use of 2 site certificates and 6 Site Technical Audit Reports.
2.8 Evaluated Configuration
The TOE is defined uniquely by its name and version number Qualcomm Secure Processor Unit
SPU270 (Version: 6.1) in SM8550 SoC (Qualcomm® Snapdragon™ 8 Gen 2) with symmetric and
asymmetric crypto support. The TOE can be identified as described in 80-35348-150, Revision AC, as
referenced in the [ST].
2.9 Evaluation Results
The evaluation lab documented their evaluation results in the [ETR], which references an ASE
Intermediate Report and other evaluator documents, and Site Technical Audit Reports for the sites
[STAR_AMK], [STAR_BA], [STAR_HA], [STAR_SA], [STAR_SD], [STAR_SIN], [STAR_TSMC]3. To
support composite evaluations according to [COMP] a derived document [ETRfC] was provided and
approved. This document provides details of the TOE evaluation that must be considered when this
TOE is used as platform in a composite evaluation.
The verdict of each claimed assurance requirement is “Pass”.
Based on the above evaluation results the evaluation lab concluded the Qualcomm Secure Processor
Unit SPU270 (Version: 6.1) in SM8550 SoC (Qualcomm® Snapdragon™ 8 Gen 2) with symmetric and
asymmetric crypto support, to be CC Part 2 extended, CC Part 3 conformant, and to meet the
requirements of EAL 4 augmented with ALC_DVS.2 and AVA_VAN.5. This implies that the product
satisfies the security requirements specified in Security Target [ST].
The Security Target claims strict conformance to the Protection Profile [PP].
3 The Site Technical Audit Report contains information necessary to an evaluation lab and
certification body for the reuse of the site audit report in a TOE evaluation.
Page: 11/13 of report number: NSCIB-CC-0569293-CR, dated 14 February 2023
®
TÜV,
TUEV
and
TUV
are
registered
trademarks.
Any
use
or
application
requires
prior
approval.
2.10 Comments/Recommendations
The user guidance as outlined in section 2.5 “Documentation” contains necessary information about
the usage of the TOE. Certain aspects of the TOE’s security functionality, in particular the
countermeasures against attacks, depend on accurate conformance to the user guidance of both the
software and the hardware part of the TOE. There are no particular obligations or recommendations
for the user apart from following the user guidance. Please note that the documents contain relevant
details concerning the resistance against certain attacks.
In addition, all aspects of assumptions, threats and policies as outlined in the Security Target not
covered by the TOE itself must be fulfilled by the operational environment of the TOE.
The customer or user of the product shall consider the results of the certification within his system risk
management process. For the evolution of attack methods and techniques to be covered, the
customer should define the period of time until a re-assessment for the TOE is required and thus
requested from the sponsor of the certificate.
The strength of the cryptographic algorithms and protocols was not rated in the course of this
evaluation. This specifically applies to the following proprietary or non-standard algorithms, protocols
and implementations: None.
Not all key sizes specified in the [ST] have sufficient cryptographic strength to satisfy the AVA_VAN.5
“high attack potential”. To be protected against attackers with a "high attack potential", appropriate
cryptographic algorithms with sufficiently large cryptographic key sizes shall be used (references can
be found in national and international documents and standards).
Page: 12/13 of report number: NSCIB-CC-0569293-CR, dated 14 February 2023
®
TÜV,
TUEV
and
TUV
are
registered
trademarks.
Any
use
or
application
requires
prior
approval.
3 Security Target
The Qualcomm SPU270 Security Target, 80-NU430-11 Rev. AC, 15 December 2022. [ST] is
included here by reference.
Please note that, to satisfy the need for publication, a public version [ST-lite] has been created and
verified according to [ST-SAN].
4 Definitions
This list of acronyms and definitions contains elements that are not already defined by the CC or CEM:
AES Advanced Encryption Standard
CBC Cipher Block Chaining (a block cipher mode of operation)
CBC-MAC Cipher Block Chaining Message Authentication Code
DES Data Encryption Standard
DDR Double Date Rate
DFA Differential Fault Analysis
ECB Electronic Code Book (a block-cipher mode of operation)
ECC Elliptic Curve Cryptography
ECDH Elliptic Curve Diffie-Hellman algorithm
ECDSA Elliptic Curve Digital Signature Algorithm
IC Integrated Circuit
IT Information Technology
ITSEF IT Security Evaluation Facility
JIL Joint Interpretation Library
MAC Message Authentication Code
NSCIB Netherlands Scheme for Certification in the area of IT Security
NVM Non-Volatile Memory
PP Protection Profile
RNG Random Number Generator
RSA Rivest-Shamir-Adleman Algorithm
SHA Secure Hash Algorithm
SOC System on Chip
SPA/DPA Simple/Differential Power Analysis
TOE Target of Evaluation
TRNG True Random Number Generator
Page: 13/13 of report number: NSCIB-CC-0569293-CR, dated 14 February 2023
®
TÜV,
TUEV
and
TUV
are
registered
trademarks.
Any
use
or
application
requires
prior
approval.
5 Bibliography
This section lists all referenced documentation used as source material in the compilation of this
report.
[CC] Common Criteria for Information Technology Security Evaluation, Parts I, II and
III, Version 3.1 Revision 5, April 2017
[CEM] Common Methodology for Information Technology Security Evaluation,
Version 3.1 Revision 5, April 2017
[COMP] Joint Interpretation Library, Composite product evaluation for Smart Cards and
similar devices, Version 1.5.1, May 2018
[ETR] Evaluation Technical Report for Qualcomm Secure Processor Unit SPU270
(Version: 6.1) in SM8550 SoC with symmetric and asymmetric crypto support,
2130050-D3, version 1.1, 17 January 2023.
[ETRfC] ETR for composite evaluation Qualcomm Secure Processor Unit SPU270
(Version: 6.1) in SM8550 SoC with symmetric and asymmetric crypto support,
2130050-D4, version 1.1, 17 January 2023.
[JIL-AAPS] JIL Application of Attack Potential to Smartcards, Version 3.1, June 2020
[JIL-AM] Attack Methods for Smartcards and Similar Devices, Version 2.4, January 2020
(sensitive with controlled distribution)
[NSCIB] Netherlands Scheme for Certification in the Area of IT Security, Version 2.5,
28 March 2019
[PP] Security IC Platform Protection Profile with Augmentation Packages, registered
under the reference BSI-CC-PP-0084-2014, Version 1.0, 13 January 2014
[ST] Qualcomm SPU270 Security Target, 80-NU430-11 Rev. AC, 15 December
2022.
[ST-lite] Qualcomm SPU270 Security Target Lite, 80-NU430-12 Rev. AB, 15 December
2022.
[ST-SAN] ST sanitising for publication, CC Supporting Document CCDB-2006-04-004,
April 2006
[STAR_AMK] Site Technical Audit Report for Amkor K3, K4 & K5, 2130050-D22, version 1.1,
04 January 2023.
[STAR_BA] Site Technical Audit Report for Qualcomm, Bangalore, 2130050-D20, version
1.1, 02 January 2023.
[STAR_HA] Site Technical Audit Report for Qualcomm, Haifa, 2130050-D19, version 1.1, 4
January 2023.
[STAR_SD] Site Technical Audit Report for Qualcomm, San Diego, 2130050-D24, version
1.1, 02 January 2023.
[STAR_SA] Site Technical Audit Report for Shinko Arai Plant, 2130050-D23, version 1.1,
23 December 2022
[STAR_SIN] Site Technical Audit Report (STAR) Qualcomm TCE, Singapore, 2130050-D13,
Version 1.1, 04 January 2023.
[STAR_TSMC] Site Technical Audit Report for TSMC, site AP6 and F18, 2130050-D19,
version 1.1, 02 January 2023.
(This is the end of this report.)