BSI-DSZ-CC-0782-V4-2018 for Infineon Security Controller M7892 B11 with optional RSA2048/4096 v1.02.013 or v2.07.003, EC v1.02.013 or v2.07.003, SHA-2 v1.01, SCL v2.02.012, Base v1.02.013 or v2.07.003, and Toolbox v1.02.013 or v2.07.003 libraries and with specific IC dedicated software (firmware) from Infineon Technologies AG BSI - Bundesamt für Sicherheit in der Informationstechnik, Postfach 20 03 63, D-53133 Bonn Phone +49 (0)228 99 9582-0, Fax +49 (0)228 9582-5477, Infoline +49 (0)228 99 9582-111 Certification Report V1.0 CC-Zert-327 V5.2 BSI-DSZ-CC-0782-V4-2018 (*) Infineon Security Controller M7892 B11 with optional RSA2048/4096 v1.02.013 or v2.07.003, EC v1.02.013 or v2.07.003, SHA-2 v1.01, SCL v2.02.012, Base v1.02.013 or v2.07.003, and Toolbox v1.02.013 or v2.07.003 libraries and with specific IC dedicated software (firmware) from Infineon Technologies AG PP Conformance: Security IC Platform Protection Profile, Version 1.0, 15 June 2007, BSI-CC-PP-0035-2007 Functionality: PP conformant plus product specific extensions Common Criteria Part 2 conformant extended Assurance: Common Criteria Part 3 conformant EAL 6 augmented by ALC_FLR.1 The IT Product identified in this certificate has been evaluated at an approved evaluation facility using the Common Methodology for IT Security Evaluation (CEM), Version 3.1 extended by Scheme Interpretations by advice of the Certification Body for components beyond EAL 5 and CC Supporting Documents as listed in the Certification Report for conformance to the Common Criteria for IT Security Evaluation (CC), Version 3.1. CC and CEM are also published as ISO/IEC 15408 and ISO/IEC 18045. (*) This certificate applies only to the specific version and release of the product in its evaluated configuration and in conjunction with the complete Certification Report and Notification. For details on the validity see Certification Report part A chapter 4 The evaluation has been conducted in accordance with the provisions of the certification scheme of the German Federal Office for Information Security (BSI) and the conclusions of the evaluation facility in the evaluation technical report are consistent with the evidence adduced. This certificate is not an endorsement of the IT Product by the Federal Office for Information Security or any other organisation that recognises or gives effect to this certificate, and no warranty of the IT Product by the Federal Office for Information Security or any other organisation that recognises or gives effect to this certificate, is either expressed or implied. Bonn, 9 January 2018 For the Federal Office for Information Security Joachim Weber L.S. Head of Branch SOGIS Recognition Agreement Common Criteria Recognition Arrangement recognition for components up to EAL 2 and ALC_FLR only Bundesamt für Sicherheit in der Informationstechnik Godesberger Allee 185-189 - D-53175 Bonn - Postfach 20 03 63 - D-53133 Bonn Phone +49 (0)228 99 9582-0 - Fax +49 (0)228 9582-5477 - Infoline +49 (0)228 99 9582-111 Certification Report BSI-DSZ-CC-0782-V4-2018 This page is intentionally left blank. 4 / 31 BSI-DSZ-CC-0782-V4-2018 Certification Report Contents A. Certification.......................................................................................................................7 1. Preliminary Remarks.....................................................................................................7 2. Specifications of the Certification Procedure................................................................7 3. Recognition Agreements...............................................................................................8 4. Performance of Evaluation and Certification.................................................................9 5. Validity of the Certification Result..................................................................................9 6. Publication...................................................................................................................10 B. Certification Results........................................................................................................11 1. Executive Summary....................................................................................................12 2. Identification of the TOE..............................................................................................13 3. Security Policy.............................................................................................................16 4. Assumptions and Clarification of Scope......................................................................17 5. Architectural Information..............................................................................................17 6. Documentation............................................................................................................18 7. IT Product Testing........................................................................................................18 8. Evaluated Configuration..............................................................................................19 9. Results of the Evaluation.............................................................................................19 10. Obligations and Notes for the Usage of the TOE......................................................21 11. Security Target...........................................................................................................22 12. Definitions..................................................................................................................22 13. Bibliography...............................................................................................................25 C. Excerpts from the Criteria...............................................................................................27 D. Annexes..........................................................................................................................29 5 / 31 Certification Report BSI-DSZ-CC-0782-V4-2018 This page is intentionally left blank. 6 / 31 BSI-DSZ-CC-0782-V4-2018 Certification Report A. Certification 1. Preliminary Remarks Under the BSIG1 Act, the Federal Office for Information Security (BSI) has the task of issuing certificates for information technology products. Certification of a product is carried out on the instigation of the vendor or a distributor, hereinafter called the sponsor. A part of the procedure is the technical examination (evaluation) of the product according to the security criteria published by the BSI or generally recognised security criteria. The evaluation is normally carried out by an evaluation facility recognised by the BSI or by BSI itself. The result of the certification procedure is the present Certification Report. This report contains among others the certificate (summarised assessment) and the detailed Certification Results. The Certification Results contain the technical description of the security functionality of the certified product, the details of the evaluation (strength and weaknesses) and instructions for the user. 2. Specifications of the Certification Procedure The certification body conducts the procedure according to the criteria laid down in the following: ● Act on the Federal Office for Information Security1 ● BSI Certification and Approval Ordinance2 ● BSI Schedule of Costs3 ● Special decrees issued by the Bundesministerium des Innern (Federal Ministry of the Interior) ● DIN EN ISO/IEC 17065 standard ● BSI certification: Scheme documentation describing the certification process (CC- Produkte) [3] ● BSI certification: Scheme documentation on requirements for the Evaluation Facility, its approval and licencing process (CC-Stellen) [3] ● Common Criteria for IT Security Evaluation (CC), Version 3.14 [1] also published as ISO/IEC 15408. 1 Act on the Federal Office for Information Security (BSI-Gesetz - BSIG) of 14 August 2009, Bundesgesetzblatt I p. 2821 2 Ordinance on the Procedure for Issuance of Security Certificates and approval by the Federal Office for Information Security (BSI-Zertifizierungs- und -Anerkennungsverordnung - BSIZertV) of 17 December 2014, Bundesgesetzblatt 2014, part I, no. 61, p. 2231 3 Schedule of Cost for Official Procedures of the Bundesamt für Sicherheit in der Informationstechnik (BSI-Kostenverordnung, BSI-KostV) of 03 March 2005, Bundesgesetzblatt I p. 519 7 / 31 Certification Report BSI-DSZ-CC-0782-V4-2018 ● Common Methodology for IT Security Evaluation (CEM), Version 3.1 [2] also published as ISO/IEC 18045. ● BSI certification: Application Notes and Interpretation of the Scheme (AIS) [4] 3. Recognition Agreements In order to avoid multiple certification of the same product in different countries a mutual recognition of IT security certificates - as far as such certificates are based on ITSEC or CC - under certain conditions was agreed. 3.1. European Recognition of CC – Certificates (SOGIS-MRA) The SOGIS-Mutual Recognition Agreement (SOGIS-MRA) Version 3 became effective in April 2010. It defines the recognition of certificates for IT-Products at a basic recognition level and, in addition, at higher recognition levels for IT-Products related to certain SOGIS Technical Domains only. The basic recognition level includes Common Criteria (CC) Evaluation Assurance Levels EAL 1 to EAL 4. For "Smartcards and similar devices" a SOGIS Technical Domain is in place. For "HW Devices with Security Boxes" a SOGIS Technical Domains is in place, too. In addition, certificates issued for Protection Profiles based on Common Criteria are part of the recognition agreement. The current list of signatory nations and approved certification schemes, details on recognition, and the history of the agreement can be seen on the website at https://www.sogisportal.eu. The SOGIS-MRA logo printed on the certificate indicates that it is recognised under the terms of this agreement by the related bodies of the signatory nations. A disclaimer beneath the logo indicates the specific scope of recognition. This certificate is recognized under SOGIS-MRA for all assurance components selected. 3.2. International Recognition of CC – Certificates (CCRA) The international arrangement on the mutual recognition of certificates based on the CC (Common Criteria Recognition Arrangement, CCRA-2014) has been ratified on 08 September 2014. It covers CC certificates based on collaborative Protection Profiles (cPP) (exact use), CC certificates based on assurance components up to and including EAL 2 or the assurance family Flaw Remediation (ALC_FLR) and CC certificates for Protection Profiles and for collaborative Protection Profiles (cPP). The current list of signatory nations and approved certification schemes can be seen on the website: http://www.commoncriteriaportal.org. The Common Criteria Recognition Arrangement logo printed on the certificate indicates that this certification is recognised under the terms of this agreement by the related bodies of the signatory nations. A disclaimer beneath the logo indicates the specific scope of recognition. 4 Proclamation of the Bundesministerium des Innern of 12 February 2007 in the Bundesanzeiger dated 23 February 2007, p. 3730 8 / 31 BSI-DSZ-CC-0782-V4-2018 Certification Report 4. Performance of Evaluation and Certification The certification body monitors each individual evaluation to ensure a uniform procedure, a uniform interpretation of the criteria and uniform ratings. The product Infineon Security Controller M7892 B11 with optional RSA2048/4096 v1.02.013 or v2.07.003, EC v1.02.013 or v2.07.003, SHA-2 v1.01, SCL v2.02.012, Base v1.02.013 or v2.07.003, and Toolbox v1.02.013 or v2.07.003 libraries and with specific IC dedicated software (firmware) has undergone the certification procedure at BSI. This is a re-certification based on BSI-DSZ-CC-0782-V3-2017. Specific results from the evaluation process BSI-DSZ-CC-0782-V3-2017 were re-used. The evaluation of the product Infineon Security Controller M7892 B11 with optional RSA2048/4096 v1.02.013 or v2.07.003, EC v1.02.013 or v2.07.003, SHA-2 v1.01, SCL v2.02.012, Base v1.02.013 or v2.07.003, and Toolbox v1.02.013 or v2.07.003 libraries and with specific IC dedicated software (firmware) was conducted by TÜV Informationstechnik GmbH. The evaluation was completed on 27 December 2017. TÜV Informationstechnik GmbH is an evaluation facility (ITSEF)5 recognised by the certification body of BSI. For this certification procedure the sponsor and applicant is: Infineon Technologies AG. The product was developed by: Infineon Technologies AG. The certification is concluded with the comparability check and the production of this Certification Report. This work was completed by the BSI. 5. Validity of the Certification Result This Certification Report applies only to the version of the product as indicated. The confirmed assurance package is valid on the condition that ● all stipulations regarding generation, configuration and operation, as given in the following report, are observed, ● the product is operated in the environment described, as specified in the following report and in the Security Target. For the meaning of the assurance components and assurance levels please refer to CC itself. Detailed references are listed in part C of this report. The Certificate issued confirms the assurance of the product claimed in the Security Target at the date of certification. As attack methods evolve over time, the resistance of the certified version of the product against new attack methods needs to be re-assessed. Therefore, the sponsor should apply for the certified product being monitored within the assurance continuity program of the BSI Certification Scheme (e.g. by a re-assessment or re-certification). Specifically, if results of the certification are used in subsequent evaluation and certification procedures, in a system integration process or if a user's risk management needs regularly updated results, it is recommended to perform a re- assessment on a regular e.g. annual basis. In order to avoid an indefinite usage of the certificate when evolved attack methods would require a re-assessment of the products resistance to state of the art attack methods, the maximum validity of the certificate has been limited. The certificate issued on 9 January 2018 is valid until 8 January 2023. Validity can be re-newed by re-certification. 5 Information Technology Security Evaluation Facility 9 / 31 Certification Report BSI-DSZ-CC-0782-V4-2018 The owner of the certificate is obliged: 1. when advertising the certificate or the fact of the product's certification, to refer to the Certification Report as well as to provide the Certification Report, the Security Target and user guidance documentation mentioned herein to any customer of the product for the application and usage of the certified product, 2. to inform the Certification Body at BSI immediately about vulnerabilities of the product that have been identified by the developer or any third party after issuance of the certificate, 3. to inform the Certification Body at BSI immediately in the case that security relevant changes in the evaluated life cycle, e.g. related to development and production sites or processes, occur, or the confidentiality of documentation and information related to the Target of Evaluation (TOE) or resulting from the evaluation and certification procedure where the certification of the product has assumed this confidentiality being maintained, is not given any longer. In particular, prior to the dissemination of confidential documentation and information related to the TOE or resulting from the evaluation and certification procedure that do not belong to the deliverables according to the Certification Report part B, or for those where no dissemination rules have been agreed on, to third parties, the Certification Body at BSI has to be informed. In case of changes to the certified version of the product, the validity can be extended to the new versions and releases, provided the sponsor applies for assurance continuity (i.e. re-certification or maintenance) of the modified product, in accordance with the procedural requirements, and the evaluation does not reveal any security deficiencies. 6. Publication The product Infineon Security Controller M7892 B11 with optional RSA2048/4096 v1.02.013 or v2.07.003, EC v1.02.013 or v2.07.003, SHA-2 v1.01, SCL v2.02.012, Base v1.02.013 or v2.07.003, and Toolbox v1.02.013 or v2.07.003 libraries and with specific IC dedicated software (firmware) has been included in the BSI list of certified products, which is published regularly (see also Internet: https://www.bsi.bund.de and [5]). Further information can be obtained from BSI-Infoline +49 228 9582-111. Further copies of this Certification Report can be requested from the developer6 of the product. The Certification Report may also be obtained in electronic form at the internet address stated above. 6 Infineon Technologies AG Am Campeon 1-12 85579 Neubiberg 10 / 31 BSI-DSZ-CC-0782-V4-2018 Certification Report B. Certification Results The following results represent a summary of ● the Security Target of the sponsor for the Target of Evaluation, ● the relevant evaluation results from the evaluation facility, and ● complementary notes and stipulations of the certification body. 11 / 31 Certification Report BSI-DSZ-CC-0782-V4-2018 1. Executive Summary The Target of Evaluation (TOE) is the Infineon Security Controller M7892 B11 with optional RSA2048/4096 v1.02.013 or v2.07.003, EC v1.02.013 or v2.07.003, SHA-2 v1.01, SCL v2.02.012, Base v1.02.013 or v2.07.003, and Toolbox v1.02.013 or v2.07.003 libraries and with specific IC dedicated software (firmware). The TOE provides a real 16-bit CPU- architecture and is compatible to the Intel 80251 architecture. The major components of the core system are the dual CPU (Central Processing Units), the MMU (Memory Management Unit) and MED (Memory Encryption/Decryption Unit). The dual interface controller is able to communicate using either the contact based or the contactless interface. The TOE consists of a hardware, a firmware and a software part. The software part can be separated into the cryptographic libraries SCL, RSA, EC and SHA-2, as well as the supporting libraries Toolbox and Base. The SCL, RSA, EC, SHA-2 and Toolbox libraries provide the smartcard embedded software with specific functionalities. The Toolbox- and Base libraries do not implement any security functionality. This TOE is intended to be used in smart cards for particularly security relevant applications and for its previous use as developing platform for smart card operating systems. The term Smartcard Embedded Software is used in the following for all operating systems and applications stored and executed on the TOE. The TOE is the platform for the Smartcard Embedded Software. The Security Target [6] is the basis for this certification. It is based on the certified Protection Profile Security IC Platform Protection Profile, Version 1.0, 15 June 2007, BSI- CC-PP-0035-2007 [8]. The TOE Security Assurance Requirements (SAR) are based entirely on the assurance components defined in Part 3 of the Common Criteria (see part C or [1], Part 3 for details). The TOE meets the assurance requirements of the Evaluation Assurance Level EAL 6 augmented by ALC_FLR.1. The TOE Security Functional Requirements (SFR) relevant for the TOE are outlined in the Security Target [6] and [9], chapter 7. They are selected from Common Criteria Part 2 and some of them are newly defined. Thus the TOE is CC Part 2 extended. The TOE Security Functional Requirements are implemented by the following TOE Security Functionality: TOE Security Functionality Addressed issue SF_DPM Device Phase Management SF_PS Protection against Snopping SF_PMA Protection against Modification Attacks SF_PLA Protection against Logical Attacks SF_CS Cryptographic Support Table 1: TOE Security Functionalities For more details please refer to the Security Target [6] and [9], chapter 8 (TOE Summary Specification). 12 / 31 BSI-DSZ-CC-0782-V4-2018 Certification Report The assets to be protected by the TOE are defined in the Security Target [6] and [9], chapter 4.1.2. Based on these assets the TOE Security Problem is defined in terms of Assumptions, Threats and Organisational Security Policies. This is outlined in the Security Target [6] and [9], chapter 4.3, 4.1 and 4.2, respectively. This certification covers the configurations of the TOE as outlined in chapter 8. Compared to the previous certification of M7892 B11 (BSI-DSZ-CC-0782-V3-2017) the TOE in this re-evaluation is identical with the exception of the following aspects: ● In contrast to the previous certification, the TOE can be delivered with two different optional asymmetric cryptographic libraries (RSA, EC, Toolbox, and Base Library), either v1.02.013 (same as in the previous certification) or v2.07.003 (new). ● An additional user guidance document for the new version of the asymmetric crypto library v2.07.003 was added. The vulnerability assessment results as stated within this certificate do not include a rating for those cryptographic algorithms and their implementation suitable for encryption and decryption (see BSIG Section 9, Para. 4, Clause 2). See also section 9.2 of this certification report. The certification results only apply to the version of the product indicated in the certificate and on the condition that all the stipulations are kept as detailed in this Certification Report. This certificate is not an endorsement of the IT product by the Federal Office for Information Security (BSI) or any other organisation that recognises or gives effect to this certificate, and no warranty of the IT product by BSI or any other organisation that recognises or gives effect to this certificate, is either expressed or implied. 2. Identification of the TOE The Target of Evaluation (TOE) is called: Infineon Security Controller M7892 B11 with optional RSA2048/4096 v1.02.013 or v2.07.003, EC v1.02.013 or v2.07.003, SHA-2 v1.01, SCL v2.02.012, Base v1.02.013 or v2.07.003, and Toolbox v1.02.013 or v2.07.003 libraries and with specific IC dedicated software (firmware). The following table outlines the TOE deliverables: Type Identifier Release Form of Delivery / Note HW M7892 Smart Card IC B11 (produced in Dresden) Complete module, package, with or without inlay mounting, in form of plain wafers, in an IC case or in bare dies. FW Flash Loader FW Identifier 78.015.14.0 or 78.015.14.1 or 78.015.14.2 Stored in reserved area of ROM on the IC (patch in NVM) FW STS Self Test Software (the IC Dedicated Test Software) FW Identifier 78.015.14.0 or 78.015.14.1 or 78.015.14.2 Stored in Test ROM on the IC (patch in NVM) 13 / 31 Certification Report BSI-DSZ-CC-0782-V4-2018 Type Identifier Release Form of Delivery / Note FW RMS Resource Management System (the IC Dedicated Support Software) FW Identifier 78.015.14.0 or 78.015.14.1 or 78.015.14.2 Stored in reserved area of ROM on the IC (patch in NVM) FW SAM library FW Identifier 78.015.14.0 or 78.015.14.1 or 78.015.14.2 Stored in reserved area of ROM on the IC (patch in NVM) SW NVM image (including Embedded Software and crypto libraries) – Stored in Flash memory on the IC SW RSA library (optional) RSA2048 v1.02.013 or v2.07.003 RSA4096 v1.02.013 or v2.07.003 Object code in electronic form SW EC library (optional) EC v1.02.013 or v2.07.003 Object code in electronic form SW SHA-2 library (optional) SHA-2 v1.01 Object code in electronic form SW Toolbox (optional) v1.02.013 or v2.07.003 Object code in electronic form SW Base library (optional) v1.02.013 or v2.07.003 Object code in electronic form SW SCL (optional) v2.02.012 Object code in electronic form DOC AMM Advanced Mode for Mifare-Compatible Technology Addendum to M7892 Hardware Reference Manual 2013-09-24 Hardcopy or pdf-file DOC M7892 Controller Family for Security Applications Hardware Reference Manual 2015-09-21 Hardcopy or pdf-file DOC M7892 Errata Sheet 2017-06-21 Hardcopy or pdf-file DOC M7892 Security Guidelines 2017-06-28 Hardcopy or pdf-file DOC 16-bit Controller Family SLE 70 Programmer’s Reference Manual 2017-09-14 Hardcopy and pdf-file DOC SLE70 Asymmetric Crypto Library for Crypto@2304T RSA / ECC / Toolbox (1.02.013) 2017-06-20 Hardcopy and pdf-file 14 / 31 BSI-DSZ-CC-0782-V4-2018 Certification Report Type Identifier Release Form of Delivery / Note DOC SLE70 Asymmetric Crypto Library for Crypto@2304T RSA / ECC / Toolbox (2.07.003) 2017-05-15 Hardcopy and pdf-file DOC SCL78 Symmetric Crypto Library for SCPv3 DES / AES 16-bit Security Controller User Interface 2017-05-02 Hardcopy and pdf-file DOC Crypto@2304T User Manual 2010-03-23 Hardcopy and pdf-file DOC SLx70 Family Secure Hash Algorithm SHA-2 (SHA 256/224, SHA 512/384) Library Version V1.01 2009-11 Hardcopy and pdf-file DOC SLx 70 Family Production and Personalization User’ Manual 2015-04-01 Hardcopy and pdf-file Table 2: Deliverables of the TOE The delivery documentation describes all procedures that are necessary to maintain security when distributing versions of the TOE or parts of it to the user’s site including the necessary intermediate delivery procedures. Furthermore, the delivery documentation describes in a sufficient manner how the various procedures and technical measures provide for the detection of modifications and any discrepancies between the TOE respective parts of it send by the TOE Manufacturer and the version received by the Composite Product Manufacturer. Three different delivery procedures have to be taken into consideration: ● Delivery of the IC dedicated software components (IC dedicated SW, guidance) from the TOE Manufacturer to the IC Embedded Software Developer. ● Delivery of the IC Embedded Software (ROM / Flash data, initialisation and pre- personalisation data) from the IC Embedded Software Developer to the TOE Manufacturer. ● Delivery of the final TOE from the TOE Manufacturer to the Composite Product Manufacturer. After phase 3 the TOE is delivered in form of wafers or sawn wafers, after phase 4 in form of modules (with or without inlay antenna). Respective distribution centers are listed in Appendix B (see below). The individual TOE hardware is uniquely identified by its identification data. The identification data contains the lot number, the wafer number and the coordinates of the chip on the wafer. Each individual TOE can therefore be traced unambiguously and thus assigned to the entire development and production process. The hardware part of the TOE is identified by M7892 B11. Another characteristic of the TOE are the chip identification data. These chip identification data is accessible via the Generic Chip Identification Mode (GCIM). 15 / 31 Certification Report BSI-DSZ-CC-0782-V4-2018 This GCIM outputs a variety of unique information in order to uniquely determine the underlying hardware configuration. Additionally, a dedicated RMS function (see [15] section 9.16) allows a customer to extract the present hardware configuration and the original Chip Identifier Byte, which was valid before blocking. The firmware part of the TOE is also identified also via the GCIM for all of the firmware parts STS, RMS, SAM, FL and Mifare. The SCL (optional), RSA (optional), EC (optional), SHA-2 (optional), Toolbox (optional), and Base library (optional), as separate software parts of the TOE, are also identified by their unique version numbers. The user can identify these versions by calculating the hash signatures of the provided library files. The mapping of these hash signatures to the version numbers is provided in the Security Target [6] and [9] section 10. For further, detailed information regarding TOE identification see [9], section 1.2. Please also note, that as the TOE is under control of the user software, the TOE Manufacturer can only guarantee the integrity up to the delivery procedure. It is in the responsibility of the Composite Product Manufacturer to include mechanisms in the implemented software (developed by the IC Embedded Software Developer) which allows detection of modifications after the delivery. 3. Security Policy The security policy is expressed by the given set of Security Functional Requirements and implemented by the TOE. It covers the following issues: The Security Policy of the TOE is to provide basic security functionalities to be used by the smart card operating system and the smart card application, thus providing an overall smart card system security. Therefore, the TOE implements a symmetric cryptographic block cipher algorithm (Triple-DES and AES) to ensure the confidentiality of plain text data by encryption and to support secure authentication protocols and it will provide a True Random Number Generator (TRNG). The SCL uses the symmetric cryptographic co-processor (SCP) of the hardware to provide the user with a software interface to the TDES and AES calculations and adds countermeasures against leakage and fault attacks. The RSA library is used to provide a high level interface to RSA (Rivest, Shamir, Adleman) cryptography implemented on the hardware component Crypto@2304T and includes countermeasures against SPA, DPA and DFA attacks. The EC library is used to provide a high level interface to Elliptic Curve cryptography implemented on the hardware component Crypto@2304T and includes countermeasures against SPA, DPA and DFA attacks. The SHA-2 library provides the calculation of a hash value of freely chosen data input in the CPU. As the TOE is a hardware security platform, the security policy of the TOE is also to provide protection against leakage of information (e.g. to ensure the confidentiality of cryptographic keys during AES, Triple-DES, RSA and EC cryptographic functions performed by the TOE), against physical probing, against malfunctions, against physical manipulations and against abuse of functionality. Hence the TOE shall ● maintain the integrity and the confidentiality of data stored in the memory of the TOE and 16 / 31 BSI-DSZ-CC-0782-V4-2018 Certification Report ● maintain the integrity, the correct operation and the confidentiality of security functionalities (security mechanisms and associated functions) provided by the TOE. Specific details concerning the above mentioned security policies can be found in the Security Target [6] and [9], chapter 7. 4. Assumptions and Clarification of Scope The Assumptions defined in the Security Target and some aspects of Threats and Organisational Security Policies are not covered by the TOE itself. These aspects lead to specific security objectives to be fulfilled and measures to be taken by the IT environment and the user or the risk manager. The following topics are of relevance: The ST only includes two security objectives for the IC Embedded Software Developer, the objectives OE.Plat-Appl and OE.Resp-Appl. The objective OE.Plat-Appl states that the IC Embedded Software Developer shall design his software so that the requirements from the data sheet, the TOE application notes, other guidance documents and findings of the TOE evaluation report are implemented. As all these documents ([12] - [22]) are identified as parts of the TOE and delivered to the IC Embedded Software Developer, the objective OE.Plat-Appl is fulfilled. The objective OE.Resp-Appl states that the IC Embedded Software Developer shall treat user data (especially keys) appropriately. The IC Embedded Software Developer gets sufficient information on how to protect user data adequate in the security guidelines [21]. Details can be found in the Security Target [6] and [9], chapters 5.2.1 and 5.2.2. 5. Architectural Information The TOE is an integrated circuit (IC) providing a platform for an operating sytem and application software used in smartcards but also in any other device or form factor requiring a high level of resistance against attackers. A top level block diagram and a list of subsystems can be found within the TOE description of the Security Target [6], chapter 2.1. The TOE provides a real 16-bit CPU-architecture and is compatible to the Intel 80251 architecture. The major components of the core system are the two CPUs (Central Processing Units), the MMU (Memory Management Unit) and MED (Memory Encryption/Decryption Unit). The two CPUs control each other in order to detect faults and serve by this for data integrity. The TOE implements a full 16 MByte linear addressable memory space for each privilege level, a simple scalable Memory Management concept and a scalable stack size. The flexible memory concept consists of ROM- and Flash- memory as part of the non volatile memory (NVM), respectively Infineon SOLID FLASH™. For the Infineon SOLID FLASH™ memory the Unified Channel Programming (UCP) memory technology is used. Note that there is no user available on-chip ROM module. The user software and data are now located in a dedicated and protected part of the Infineon SOLID FLASH™. The two cryptographic co-processors serve the need of modern cryptography: The symmetric co-processor (SCP) combines both AES and Triple-DES with dual-key or triple- key hardware acceleration. The Asymmetric Crypto Co-processor, called Crypto2304T in the following, is an optimized version of the Crypto@1408 used in the SLE88-family with performance improvements for RSA-2048 bit (4096-bit with CRT) and Elliptic Curve (EC) cryptography. 17 / 31 Certification Report BSI-DSZ-CC-0782-V4-2018 The software part of the TOE consists of the cryptographic RSA-, EC-, SCL- and the SHA- 2 libraries and the supporting Toolbox and Base libraries. If RSA or EC or Toolbox or combinations hereof are part of the shipment, automatically the Base Library is included. The Flash Loader is a firmware located in the ROM (Read-Only Memory; patch in NVM) and enables the download of the user software or parts of it to the Infineon SOLID FLASH™ memory. After completion of the download the Flash Loader shall be locked by the by the user. For more details please refer to the Security Target [6] and [9], chapters 1.3 and 2.2. 6. Documentation The evaluated documentation as outlined in table 2 is being provided with the product to the customer. This documentation contains the required information for secure usage of the TOE in accordance with the Security Target. Additional obligations and notes for secure usage of the TOE as outlined in chapter 10 of this report have to be followed. 7. IT Product Testing The tests performed by the developer were divided into five categories: ● Simulation tests (design verification), ● Qualification tests, ● Verification Tests, ● Security Evaluation Tests, ● Production Tests. The developer tests cover all security functionalities and all security mechanisms as identified in the security architecture description. The evaluators were able to repeat the tests of the developer either using the library of programs, tools and prepared chip samples delivered to the evaluator or at the developer’s site. They performed independent tests to supplement, augment and to verify the tests performed by the developer. For the developer tests repeated by the evaluators other test parameters were used and the test equipment was varied. Security features of the TOE realised by specific design and layout measures were checked by the evaluators during layout inspections both in design data and on the final product. The evaluation has shown that the actual version of the TOE provides the security functionalities as specified by the developer. The test results confirm the correct implementation of the TOE security functionalities. For penetration testing the evaluators took all security functionalities into consideration. Intensive penetration testing was planned based on the analysis results and performed for the underlying mechanisms of security functionalities. The penetration tests considered both the physical tampering of the TOE and attacks which do not modify the TOE physically. The penetration tests results confirm that the TOE is resistant to attackers with high attack potential in the intended environment for the TOE. 18 / 31 BSI-DSZ-CC-0782-V4-2018 Certification Report 8. Evaluated Configuration This certification covers the following configurations of the TOE: ● Security Controller M7892 B11 (produced in Dresden). Depending on the blocking configuration a M7892 product can have a different user available configuration as described in Security Target [6] and [9], chapter 1.1 and 1.2. The available options are summed up in the Security Target [6] and [9], section 1.2: ● The available memory sizes of the SOLID FLASH™ NVM and RAM. Note that there is no user available ROM on the TOE, ● The availability of the cryptographic coprocessors, ● The availability and free combinations of the cryptographic libraries, ● The availability of the Flash Loader for available interfaces like ISO-7816, contactless ISO-14443, ● The availability of various interface options, ● The possibility to tailor the product by blocking on his own premises, ● The degree of freedom of the chip configuration is predefined by Infineon Technologies AG and made available via the order tool. All possible TOE configurations are covered by the certificate. Note that there is no user available on-chip ROM module. The user software and data are now located in a dedicated and protected part of the SOLID FLASH™. According to the BPU option, a variety of configurations of the TOE may occur in the field. The number of various configurations depends on the order and purchase contract only. 9. Results of the Evaluation 9.1. CC specific results The Evaluation Technical Report (ETR) [7] was provided by the ITSEF according to the Common Criteria [1], the Methodology [2], the requirements of the Scheme [3] and all interpretations and guidelines of the Scheme (AIS) [4] as relevant for the TOE. The Evaluation Methodology CEM [2] was used for those components up to EAL 5 extended by advice of the Certification Body for components beyond EAL 5 and guidance specific for the technology of the product [4] (AIS 34). The following guidance specific for the technology was used: ● The Application of CC to Integrated Circuits ● The Application of Attack Potential to Smartcards ● Functionality classes and evaluation methodology of physical random number generators For RNG assessment the scheme interpretations AIS 31 was used (see [4], AIS 25, AIS 26, AIS 31). To support composite evaluations according to AIS 36 the document ETR for composite evaluation [10] was provided and approved. This document provides details of this 19 / 31 Certification Report BSI-DSZ-CC-0782-V4-2018 platform evaluation that have to be considered in the course of a composite evaluation on top. The assurance refinements outlined in the Security Target were followed in the course of the evaluation of the TOE. As a result of the evaluation the verdict PASS is confirmed for the following assurance components: ● All components of the EAL 6 package including the class ASE as defined in the CC (see also part C of this report) ● The components ALC_FLR.1 augmented for this TOE evaluation. As the evaluation work performed for this certification procedure was carried out as a re- evaluation based on the certificate BSI-DSZ-CC-0782-V3-2017, re-use of specific evaluation tasks was possible. The focus of this re-evaluation was on a newly included asymmetric crypto library and adjustments respective documentation. The evaluation has confirmed: ● PP Conformance: Security IC Platform Protection Profile, Version 1.0, 15 June 2007, BSI-CC-PP-0035-2007 [8] ● for the Functionality: PP conformant plus product specific extensions Common Criteria Part 2 conformant extended ● for the Assurance: Common Criteria Part 3 conformant EAL 6 augmented by ALC_FLR.1 For specific evaluation results regarding the development and production environment see annex B in part D of this report. The results of the evaluation are only applicable to the TOE as defined in chapter 2 and the configuration as outlined in chapter 8 above. 9.2. Results of cryptographic assessment The strength of the cryptographic algorithms was not rated in the course of this certification procedure (see BSIG Section 9, Para. 4, Clause 2). But Cryptographic Functionalities with a security level of lower than 100 bits can no longer be regarded as secure without considering the application context. Therefore, for these functionalities it shall be checked whether the related crypto operations are appropriate for the intended system. Some further hints and guidelines can be derived from the 'Technische Richtlinie BSI TR-02102' (https://www.bsi.bund.de). The Security Target [6] and [9] (table 18 therein) provides a table detailing the available cryptographic functionality. Any Cryptographic Functionality therein, that is marked as 'Security Level above 100 Bits', achieves a security level of at least 100 Bits (in general context). In addition to [6] and [9], the following rating applies: Purpose Cryptographic Mechanism Standard of Implementation Key Size in Bits Security Level above 100 Bits Comments Key Generation (ACL v2.07.003) RSA Key Generation in ACL v2.07.003, utilizing the preparative function “CryptoGeneratePrime()” n/a 1976 - 4096 Yes -- 20 / 31 BSI-DSZ-CC-0782-V4-2018 Certification Report Purpose Cryptographic Mechanism Standard of Implementation Key Size in Bits Security Level above 100 Bits Comments or the function “CryptoRSAKeyGen()” Table 3: TOE cryptographic functionality For the Cryptographic Functionality ● CryptoGeneratePrimeMask() which might be used in conjunction with RSA Key Generation in ACL v2.07.003, no statement on the respective cryptographic strength can be given. 10. Obligations and Notes for the Usage of the TOE The documents as outlined in table 2 contain necessary information about the usage of the TOE and all security hints therein have to be considered. In addition all aspects of Assumptions, Threats and OSPs as outlined in the Security Target not covered by the TOE itself need to be fulfilled by the operational environment of the TOE. The customer or user of the product shall consider the results of the certification within his system risk management process. In order for the evolution of attack methods and techniques to be covered, he should define the period of time until a re-assessment of the TOE is required and thus requested from the sponsor of the certificate. The limited validity for the usage of cryptographic algorithms as outlined in chapter 9 has to be considered by the user and his system risk management process. Some security measures are partly implemented in this certified TOE, but require additional configuration or control or measures to be implemented by a product layer on top, e.g. the IC Dedicated Support Software or Embedded Software using the TOE. For this reason the TOE includes guidance documentation (see table 2) which contains obligations and guidelines for the developer of the product layer on top on how to securely use this certified TOE and which measures have to be implemented in order to fulfil the security requirements of the Security Target of the TOE. In the course of the evaluation of the composite product or system it must be examined if the required measures have been correctly and effectively implemented by the product layer on top. Additionally, the evaluation of the composite product or system must also consider the evaluation results as outlined in the document ETR for composite evaluation [10]. In addition, the following aspects need to be fulfilled when using the TOE: ● All security hints described in the delivered documents [12] to [21] have to be considered. The Composite Product Manufacturer receives all necessary recommendations and hints to develop his software in form of the delivered documentation. ● All security hints described in [22] have to be considered. In addition the following hint resulting from the evaluation of the ALC evaluation aspect has to be considered: ● The IC Embedded Software Developer can deliver his software either to Infineon to let them implement it in the TOE (in Flash memory) or to the Composite Product Manufacturer to let him download the software in the Flash memory. 21 / 31 Certification Report BSI-DSZ-CC-0782-V4-2018 The delivery procedure from the IC Embedded Software Developer to the Composite Product Manufacturer is not part of this evaluation and a secure delivery is required. 11. Security Target For the purpose of publishing, the Security Target [9] of the Target of Evaluation (TOE) is provided within a separate document as Annex A of this report. It is a sanitised version of the complete Security Target [6] used for the evaluation performed. Sanitisation was performed according to the rules as outlined in the relevant CCRA policy (see AIS 35 [4]). 12. Definitions 12.1. Acronyms AES Advanced Encryption Standard AIS Application Notes and Interpretations of the Scheme APB™ Advanced Peripheral Bus APDU Application Protocol Data Unit API Application Programming Interface AXI™ Advanced eXtensible Interface Bus Protocol BPU Bill Per Use BSI Bundesamt für Sicherheit in der Informationstechnik / Federal Office for Information Security, Bonn, Germany BOS Boot Software BSIG BSI-Gesetz / Act on the Federal Office for Information Security CC Common Criteria for IT Security Evaluation CEM Common Methodology for Information Technology Security Evaluation CPU Central Processing Unit CCRA Common Criteria Recognition Arrangement Crypto2304T Asymmetric Cryptographic Processor CRC Cyclic Redundancy Check CRT Chinese Reminder Theorem DES Data Encryption Standard; symmetric block cipher algorithm DPA Differential Power Analysis DFA Differential Failure Analysis EAL Evaluation Assurance Level EC Elliptic Curve Cryptography ECC Error Correction Code ECDH Elliptic Curve Diffie–Hellman ECDSA Elliptic Curve Digital Signature Algorithm 22 / 31 BSI-DSZ-CC-0782-V4-2018 Certification Report EDC Error Detection Code EDU Error Detection Unit EEPROM Electrically Erasable and Programmable Read Only Memory EMA Electro Magnetic Analysis ETR Evaluation Technical Report Flash EEPROM Flash Memory FL Flash Loader software FTL Flash Translation Layer FW Firmware GCIM Generic Chip Identification Mode GPIO General Purpose IO HW Hardware IC Integrated Circuit ID Identification IT Information Technology ITSEF Information Technology Security Evaluation Facility I/O Input/Output IRAM Internal Random Access Memory MED Memory Encryption and Decryption MMU Memory Management Unit NVM Non-Volatile Memory OS Operating system PP Protection Profile PRNG Pseudo Random Number Generator PROM Programmable Read Only Memory RAM Random Access Memory RMS Resource Management System RNG Random Number Generator ROM Read Only Memory RSA Rives-Shamir-Adleman Algorithm SAM Service Algorithm Minimal SAR Security Assurance Requirement SCP Symmetric Cryptographic Processor SF Security Feature SFP Security Functional Policy 23 / 31 Certification Report BSI-DSZ-CC-0782-V4-2018 SFR Special Function Register, as well as Security Functional Requirement, the specific meaning is given in the context SOLID FLASH™ An Infineon Trade Mark and Stands for Flash EEPROM Technology SPA Simple Power Analysis SPI Serial Peripheral Interface SSC Synchronous Serial Communication ST Security Target STS Self Test Software SW Software SO Security Objective SWP Single Wire Protocol TOE Target of Evaluation TM Test Mode (STS) TSF TOE Security Functions TRNG True Random Number Generator TSC TOE Security Functions Control TSF TOE Security Functionality UART Universal Asynchronous Receiver/Transmitter UM User Mode (STS) UmSLC User Mode Security Life Control WLP Wafer Level Package 3DES Triple DES Encryption Standards 12.2. Glossary Augmentation - The addition of one or more requirement(s) to a package. Collaborative Protection Profile - A Protection Profile collaboratively developed by an International Technical Community endorsed by the Management Committee. Extension - The addition to an ST or PP of functional requirements not contained in CC part 2 and/or assurance requirements not contained in CC part 3. Formal - Expressed in a restricted syntax language with defined semantics based on well- established mathematical concepts. Informal - Expressed in natural language. Object - A passive entity in the TOE, that contains or receives information, and upon which subjects perform operations. Package - named set of either security functional or security assurance requirements Protection Profile - A formal document defined in CC, expressing an implementation independent set of security requirements for a category of IT Products that meet specific consumer needs. 24 / 31 BSI-DSZ-CC-0782-V4-2018 Certification Report Security Target - An implementation-dependent statement of security needs for a specific identified TOE. Semiformal - Expressed in a restricted syntax language with defined semantics. Subject - An active entity in the TOE that performs operations on objects. Target of Evaluation - An IT Product and its associated administrator and user guidance documentation that is the subject of an Evaluation. TOE Security Functionality - Combined functionality of all hardware, software, and firmware of a TOE that must be relied upon for the correct enforcement of the SFRs. 13. Bibliography [1] Common Criteria for Information Technology Security Evaluation, Version 3.1, Part 1: Introduction and general model, Revision 5, April 2017 Part 2: Security functional components, Revision 5, April 2017 Part 3: Security assurance components, Revision 5, April 2017 http://www.commoncriteriaportal.org [2] Common Methodology for Information Technology Security Evaluation (CEM), Evaluation Methodology, Version 3.1, Rev. 5, April 2017, http://www.commoncriteriaportal.org [3] BSI certification: Scheme documentation describing the certification process (CC- Produkte) and Scheme documentation on requirements for the Evaluation Facility, approval and licencing (CC-Stellen), https://www.bsi.bund.de/zertifizierung [4] Application Notes and Interpretations of the Scheme (AIS) as relevant for the TOE7 https://www.bsi.bund.de/AIS [5] German IT Security Certificates (BSI 7148), periodically updated list published also on the BSI Website, https://www.bsi.bund.de/zertifizierungsreporte 7 specifically • AIS1, Durchführung der Ortsbesichtigung in der Entwicklungsumgebung des Herstellers, Version 14, 2017-10-11, • AIS14, Anforderungen an Aufbau und Inhalt der ETR-Teile (Evaluation Technical Report) für Evaluationen nach CC (Common Criteria), Version 7, 03.08.2010, • AIS19, Anforderungen an Aufbau und Inhalt der Zusammenfassung des ETR (Evaluation Technical Report) für Evaluationen nach CC (Common Criteria) und ITSEC, Version 9, 03.11.2014, • AIS20, Funktionalitätsklassen und Evaluationsmethodologie für deterministische Zufallszahlengeneratoren, Version 3.0, 15.05.2013, • AIS25, Anwendung der CC auf Integrierte Schaltungen, Version 9, 15.03.2017, • AIS26, Evaluationsmethodologie für in Hardware integrierte Schaltungen, Version 9, 21.03.2013, • AIS31, Funktionalitätsklassen und Evaluationsmethodologie für physikalische Zufallszahlengeneratoren, Version 3.0, 15.05.2013, • AIS32, CC-Interpretationen im deutschen Zertifizierungsschema, Version 6, 08.07.2011, • AIS34, Evaluation Methodology for CC Assurance Classes for EAL5+, Version 3, 03.09.2009, • AIS35, Öffentliche Fassung eines Security Target (ST-lite), Version 2, 12.11.2007, • AIS36, Kompositionsevaluierung, Version 5, 15.03.2017, • AIS38, Wiederverwendung von Evaluationsergebnissen, Version 2, 28.09.2007, • AIS46, Informationen zur Evaluierung von kryptographischen Algorithmen und ergänzende Hinweise für die Evaluierung von Zufallszahlengeneratoren, Version 3, 04.12.2013. 25 / 31 Certification Report BSI-DSZ-CC-0782-V4-2018 [6] Security Target BSI-DSZ-CC-0782-V4-2018, Version 3.2, 2017-11-09, “Confidential Security Target M7892 B11 Recertification Common Criteria CCv3.1 EAL6 augmented (EAL6+)”, Infineon Technologies AG (confidential document) [7] Evaluation Technical Report for BSI-DSZ-CC-0782-V4-2018, Version 1, 2017-11-15, “Evaluation Technical Report – ETR (Summary)”, Tüv Informationstechnik GmbH, (confidential document) [8] Security IC Platform Protection Profile, Version 1.0, 15 June 2007, BSI-CC-PP- 0035-2007 [9] Security Target BSI-DSZ-CC-0782-V4-2018, Version 3.0, 2017-11-10, “Security Target Lite M7892 B11 Recertification Common Criteria CCv3.1 EAL6 augmented (EAL6+)” (sanitised public document) [10] ETR for composite evaluation according to AIS 36 for the Product BSI-DSZ-CC- 0782-V4-2018, Version 1, 2017-11-15, “Evaluation Technical Report for composite Evaluation (ETR Comp)”, TÜV Informationstechnik GmbH (confidential document) [11] Configuration list for the TOE, Version 3.0, 2017-09-29, “Configuration Management Scope ALC for Common Criteria with Evaluation Assurance Level EAL6 augmented (EAL6+) M7892 B11” (confidential document) [12] SCL78 Symmetric Crypto Library for SCPv3 DES / AES 16-bit Security Controller User Interface, 2017-05-02, Infineon Technologies AG (confidential document) [13] SLE70 Asymmetric Crypto Library for Crypto@2304T RSA / ECC / Toolbox (1.02.013), 2017-06-20, Infineon Technologies AG (confidential document) [14] SLE70 Asymmetric Crypto Library for Crypto@2304T RSA / ECC / Toolbox (2.07.003), 2017-05-15, Infineon Technologies AG (confidential document) [15] Crypto@2304T User Manual, 2010-03-23, Infineon Technologies AG [16] 16-bit Controller Family SLE 70 Programmer’s Reference Manual, 2017-09-14, Infineon Technologies AG (confidential document) [17] M7892 Errata Sheet, 2017-06-21, Infineon Technologies AG [18] M7892 SOLID FLASH Controller for Security Applications 16-bit Security Controller Family Hardware Reference Manual, Version 1.7.1, 2015-09-21, Infineon Technologies AG (confidential document) [19] AMM Advanced Mode for Mifare-Compatible Technology Addendum to M7892 Hardware Reference Manual. Version 1.1, 2013-09-24, Infineon Technologies AG (confidential document) [20] SLx 70 Family Secure Hash Algorithm SHA-2 (SHA 256/224, SHA 512/384) Library, Version 1.01, 2009-11, Infineon Technologies AG (confidential document) [21] M7892 Security Guidelines, 2017-06-28, Infineon Technologies AG (confidential document) [22] SLx 70 Family Production and Personalization User’s Manual, 2015-04-01, Infineon Technologies AG (confidential document) 26 / 31 BSI-DSZ-CC-0782-V4-2018 Certification Report C. Excerpts from the Criteria For the meaning of the assurance components and levels the following references to the Common Criteria can be followed: • On conformance claim definitions and descriptions refer to CC part 1 chapter 10.5 • On the concept of assurance classes, families and components refer to CC Part 3 chapter 7.1 • On the concept and definition of pre-defined assurance packages (EAL) refer to CC Part 3 chapters 7.2 and 8 • On the assurance class ASE for Security Target evaluation refer to CC Part 3 chapter 12 • On the detailled definitions of the assurance components for the TOE evaluation refer to CC Part 3 chapters 13 to 17 • The table in CC part 3, Annex E summarizes the relationship between the evaluation assurance levels (EAL) and the assurance classes, families and components. The CC are published at http://www.commoncriteriaportal.org/cc/ 27 / 31 Certification Report BSI-DSZ-CC-0782-V4-2018 This page is intentionally left blank. 28 / 31 BSI-DSZ-CC-0782-V4-2018 Certification Report D. Annexes List of annexes of this certification report Annex A: Security Target provided within a separate document. Annex B: Evaluation results regarding development and production environment 29 / 31 Certification Report BSI-DSZ-CC-0782-V4-2018 Annex B of Certification Report BSI-DSZ-CC-0782-V4-2018 Evaluation results regarding development and production environment The IT product Infineon Security Controller M7892 B11 with optional RSA2048/4096 v1.02.013 or v2.07.003, EC v1.02.013 or v2.07.003, SHA-2 v1.01, SCL v2.02.012, Base v1.02.013 or v2.07.003, and Toolbox v1.02.013 or v2.07.003 libraries and with specific IC dedicated software (firmware) (Target of Evaluation, TOE) has been evaluated at an approved evaluation facility using the Common Methodology for IT Security Evaluation (CEM), Version 3.1 extended by Scheme Interpretations and by advice of the Certification Body for components beyond EAL 5 and CC Supporting Documents for conformance to the Common Criteria for IT Security Evaluation (CC), Version 3.1. As a result of the TOE certification, dated 9 January 2018, the following results regarding the development and production environment apply. The Common Criteria assurance requirements ALC – Life cycle support (i.e. ALC_CMC.5, ALC_CMS.5, ALC_DEL.1, ALC_DVS.2, ALC_FLR.1, ALC_LCD.1, ALC_TAT.3) are fulfilled for the development and production sites of the TOE. The relevant TOE distribution centers are as follows: Distribution Center name Address DHL Singapore DHL Exel Supply Chain Richland Business Centre 11 Bedok North Ave 4, Level 3, Singapore 489949 G&D Nitra Giesecke & Devrient Slovakia, s.r.o. Dolné Hony 11 94901 Nitra Slovakia IFX Morgan Hill Infineon Technologies North America Corp. 18275 Serene Drive Morgan Hill, CA 95037 USA K&N Großostheim Infineon Technology AG Distribution Center Europe (DCE) Kühne & Nagel Stockstädter Strasse 10 – Building 8A 63762 Großostheim Germany 30 / 31 BSI-DSZ-CC-0782-V4-2018 Certification Report Distribution Center name Address K&N Hayward Kuehne & Nagel 30805 Santana Street Hayward, CA 94544 USA Table 4: TOE Distribution Centers For the sites listed above, the requirements have been specifically applied in accordance with the Security Target [6]. The evaluators verified, that the threats, security objectives and requirements for the TOE life cycle phases up to delivery (as stated in the Security Target [6] and [9]) are fulfilled by the procedures of these sites. Note: End of report 31 / 31