Certification Report
HP Cloud Service Automation v4.10
Issued by:
Communications Security Establishment
Certification Body
Canadian Common Criteria Evaluation and Certification Scheme
© Government of Canada, Communications Security Establishment, 2015
Document number: 383-4-322-CR
Version: 1.0
Date: September 15, 2015
Pagination: i to iii, 1 to 9
CCS Certification Report Hewett Packard Enterprise Development L.P.
Cloud Service Automation v4.10
___________________________________________________________________________
Version 1.0 15 September 2015
- Page i of iii -
DISCLAIMER
The Information Technology (IT) product identified in this certification report, and its
associated certificate, has been evaluated at an approved evaluation facility – established
under the Canadian Common Criteria Evaluation and Certification Scheme (CCS) – using the
Common Methodology for Information Technology Security Evaluation, Version 3.1 Revision
4, for conformance to the Common Criteria for Information Technology Security Evaluation,
Version 3.1 Revision 4. This certification report, and its associated certificate, applies only to
the identified version and release of the product in its evaluated configuration. The evaluation
has been conducted in accordance with the provisions of the CCS, and the conclusions of the
evaluation facility in the evaluation report are consistent with the evidence adduced. This
report, and its associated certificate, are not an endorsement of the IT product by the
Communications Security Establishment, or any other organization that recognizes or gives
effect to this report, and its associated certificate, and no warranty for the IT product by the
Communications Security Establishment, or any other organization that recognizes or gives
effect to this report, and its associated certificate, is either expressed or implied.
CCS Certification Report Hewett Packard Enterprise Development L.P.
Cloud Service Automation v4.10
___________________________________________________________________________
Version 1.0 15 September 2015
- Page ii of iii -
FOREWORD
The Canadian Common Criteria Evaluation and Certification Scheme (CCS) provides a
third-party evaluation service for determining the trustworthiness of Information Technology
(IT) security products. Evaluations are performed by a commercial Common Criteria
Evaluation Facility (CCEF) under the oversight of the CCS Certification Body, which is
managed by the Communications Security Establishment.
A CCEF is a commercial facility that has been approved by the CCS Certification Body to
perform Common Criteria evaluations; a significant requirement for such approval is
accreditation to the requirements of ISO/IEC 17025:2005, the General Requirements for the
Competence of Testing and Calibration Laboratories. Accreditation is performed under the
Program for the Accreditation of Laboratories - Canada (PALCAN), administered by the
Standards Council of Canada.
The CCEF that carried out this evaluation is CGI IT Security Evaluation & Test Facility.
By awarding a Common Criteria certificate, the CCS Certification Body asserts that the
product complies with the security requirements specified in the associated security target. A
security target is a requirements specification document that defines the scope of the
evaluation activities. The consumer of certified IT products should review the security target,
in addition to this certification report, in order to gain an understanding of any assumptions
made during the evaluation, the IT product's intended environment, the evaluated security
functionality, and the testing and analysis conducted by the CCEF.
This certification report is associated with the certificate of product evaluation dated
September 15, 2015, and the security target identified in Section 4 of this report.
The certification report, certificate of product evaluation and security target are posted on the
CCS Certified Products list (CPL) and the Common Criteria portal (the official website of the
Common Criteria Project).
Reproduction of this report is authorized provided the report is reproduced in its entirety.
CCS Certification Report Hewett Packard Enterprise Development L.P.
Cloud Service Automation v4.10
___________________________________________________________________________
Version 1.0 15 September 2015
- Page iii of iii -
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Disclaimer....................................................................................................................................... i
Foreword........................................................................................................................................ii
Executive Summary...................................................................................................................... 1
1 Identification of Target of Evaluation................................................................................. 2
2 TOE Description ................................................................................................................... 2
3 Security Policy....................................................................................................................... 3
4 Security Target...................................................................................................................... 3
5 Common Criteria Conformance.......................................................................................... 3
6 Assumptions and Clarification of Scope............................................................................. 4
6.1 SECURE USAGE ASSUMPTIONS................................................................................... 4
6.2 ENVIRONMENTAL ASSUMPTIONS ............................................................................... 4
7 Evaluated Configuration...................................................................................................... 5
8 Documentation ...................................................................................................................... 5
9 Evaluation Analysis Activities ............................................................................................. 6
10 ITS Product Testing.............................................................................................................. 7
10.1 ASSESSMENT OF DEVELOPER TESTS .......................................................................... 7
10.2 INDEPENDENT FUNCTIONAL TESTING ........................................................................ 7
10.3 INDEPENDENT PENETRATION TESTING....................................................................... 8
10.4 CONDUCT OF TESTING ............................................................................................... 8
10.5 TESTING RESULTS...................................................................................................... 8
11 Results of the Evaluation...................................................................................................... 8
12 Acronyms, Abbreviations and Initializations..................................................................... 8
13 References.............................................................................................................................. 9
CCS Certification Report Hewett Packard Enterprise Development L.P.
Cloud Service Automation v4.10
___________________________________________________________________________
Version 1.0 September 15, 2015
- Page 1 of 9 -
Executive Summary
HP Cloud Service Automation v4.10 (hereafter referred to as HP CSA), from Hewlett
Packard Enterprise Development L.P., is the Target of Evaluation. The results of this
evaluation demonstrate that HP CSA meets the requirements of Evaluation Assurance Level
(EAL) 2 augmented for the evaluated security functionality.
HP CSA is a software-only solution designed to help cloud service providers by automating
their ability to broker cloud services to their customers. HP CSA integrates and leverages the
strengths of several HP datacenter management and automation products, adding resource
management, service offering design, and a customer portal to create a comprehensive
service automation solution.
The product provides an environment that can be used by cloud service provider personnel to
design templates for demanded services, and by their consumers to automatically broker the
provisioning of these services among available resources.
CGI IT Security Evaluation & Test Facility is the CCEF that conducted the evaluation. This
evaluation was completed on September 15, 2015 and was carried out in accordance with the
rules of the Canadian Common Criteria Evaluation and Certification Scheme (CCS).
The scope of the evaluation is defined by the security target, which identifies assumptions
made during the evaluation, the intended environment for HP CSA, and the security
functional/assurance requirements. Consumers are advised to verify that their operating
environment is consistent with that specified in the security target, and to give due
consideration to the comments, observations and recommendations in this certification
report.
Communications Security Establishment, as the CCS Certification Body, declares that the
HP CSA evaluation meets all the conditions of the Arrangement on the Recognition of
Common Criteria Certificates and that the product will be listed on the CCS Certified
Products list (CPL) and the Common Criteria portal (the official website of the Common
Criteria Project).
CCS Certification Report Hewett Packard Enterprise Development L.P.
Cloud Service Automation v4.10
___________________________________________________________________________
Version 1.0 September 15, 2015
- Page 2 of 9 -
1 Identification of Target of Evaluation
The Target of Evaluation (TOE) for this EAL 2+ evaluation is HP Cloud Service Automation
v4.10 (hereafter referred to as HP CSA), from Hewlett Packard Enterprise Development L.P.
2 TOE Description
HP CSA is a software-only solution designed to help cloud service providers by automating
their ability to broker cloud services to their customers. HP CSA integrates and leverages the
strengths of several HP datacenter management and automation products, adding resource
management, service offering design, and a customer portal to create a comprehensive
service automation solution.
The product provides an environment that can be used by cloud service provider personnel to
design templates for demanded services, and by their consumers to automatically broker the
provisioning of these services among available resources.
A diagram of the HP CSA architecture is as follows:
CCS Certification Report Hewett Packard Enterprise Development L.P.
Cloud Service Automation v4.10
___________________________________________________________________________
Version 1.0 September 15, 2015
- Page 3 of 9 -
3 Security Policy
HP CSA implements a role-based access control policy to control administrative access to
the system. In addition, HP CSA implements policies pertaining to the following security
functional classes:
Security Audit;
Cryptographic Support;
User Data Protection;
Identification and Authentication;
Security Management;
Protection of the TSF;
TOE Access; and
Trusted Path/Channels.
The following cryptographic modules were evaluated to the FIPS 140-2 standard:
Cryptographic Module Certificate
RSA B-SAFE Crypto-J JSAFE and JCE Cryptographic
Library version 6.1
2057
OpenSSL FIPS Object Module, Software Version v2.0.7
1747
4 Security Target
The ST associated with this Certification Report is identified below:
Hewlett Packard Enterprise Development L.P., Cloud Service Automation v4.10 Security
Target, August 13, 2015, version 1.6
5 Common Criteria Conformance
The evaluation was conducted using the Common Methodology for Information Technology
Security Evaluation, Version 3.1 Revision 4, for conformance to the Common Criteria for
Information Technology Security Evaluation, Version 3.1 Revision 4.
HP CSA is:
a. EAL 2 augmented, containing all security assurance requirements listed, as well as the
following:
ALC_FLR.2 – Flaw Reporting Procedures.
b. Common Criteria Part 2 conformant; with security functional requirements based only
upon functional components in Part 2;
c. Common Criteria Part 3 conformant, with security assurance requirements based only
upon assurance components in Part 3.
CCS Certification Report Hewett Packard Enterprise Development L.P.
Cloud Service Automation v4.10
___________________________________________________________________________
Version 1.0 September 15, 2015
- Page 4 of 9 -
6 Assumptions and Clarification of Scope
Consumers of HP CSA should consider assumptions about usage and environmental settings
as requirements for the product’s installation and its operating environment. This will ensure
the proper and secure operation of the TOE.
6.1 Secure Usage Assumptions
The following Secure Usage Assumptions are listed in the ST:
 There are one or more competent individuals assigned to manage the TOE and the
security of the information it contains;
 The Users who manage the TOE are non-hostile, appropriately trained, and follow
all guidance; and
 The TOE software will be protected from unauthorized modification.
6.2 Environmental Assumptions
The following Environmental Assumptions are listed in the ST:
 The TOE environment will be able to maintain user security attributes when the TOE
is configured to use external authentication;
 The TOE is installed on the appropriate, dedicated hardware, OS, and runtime
environment;
 The TOE is located within a controlled access facility;
 The TOE environment provides the network connectivity required to allow the TOE to
provide secure routing and switching functions; and
 The TOE environment provides the TOE with the necessary reliable timestamps.
CCS Certification Report Hewett Packard Enterprise Development L.P.
Cloud Service Automation v4.10
___________________________________________________________________________
Version 1.0 September 15, 2015
- Page 5 of 9 -
7 Evaluated Configuration
The evaluated configuration for HP Cloud Service Automation v4.10 comprises the
following components:
 MPP (Market Place Portal) Web Application;
 OpenSSL;
 MPP Tool;
 IdM (Identity Management);
 CSA (Cloud Service Automation) Tools;
 CSA WAR (Web Application Archive); and
 BSAFE Crypto-J.
The following environmental components are required for the proper operation of the TOE in
the evaluated configuration:
 A GPC running Microsoft Windows Server 2012 R2 Standard 64-bit;
 A DB Server;
 An LDAP Server;
 A Certificate Server; and
 An HP OO Server.
The publications entitled:
 HP Cloud Service Automation v4.10 - Installation Guide
 HP Cloud Service Automation v4.10 - Windows Configuration Guide, August 2014
 HP Cloud Service Automation v4.10 - Process Definition Tool
 HP Cloud Service Automation v4.10 - API Reference, July 2014
 HP Cloud Service Automation v4.10 - Marketplace Portal Help, July 2014
 HP Cloud Service Automation v4.10 Guidance Documentation Supplement v1.3
describe the procedures necessary to install and operate HP CSA in its evaluated
configuration.
8 Documentation
The Hewlett Packard Enterprise Development L.P. documents provided to the consumer are
as follows:
 HP CSA 4.10 – API Quick Start, July 2014;
 HP CSA 4.10 – API Reference, July 2014;
 HP CSA 4.10 – Content Archive Tool, July 2014;
 HP CSA 4.10 – Concepts Guide bb;
 HP CSA 4.10 – Configuration Guide (Windows) ;
 HP CSA 4.10 – FIPS 140-2 Compliance Statement , August 2014;
CCS Certification Report Hewett Packard Enterprise Development L.P.
Cloud Service Automation v4.10
___________________________________________________________________________
Version 1.0 September 15, 2015
- Page 6 of 9 -
 HP CSA 4.10 – Installation Guide;
 HP CSA 4.10 – Integration Pack, July 2014;
 HP CSA 4.10 – Marketplace Portal Help, July 2014;
 HP CSA 4.10 – Open Source and Third-Party Software License Agreements;
 HP CSA 4.10 – Provider Configuration Tool, July 2014;
 HP CSA 4.10 – Process Definition Tool;
 HP CSA 4.10 – Release Notes;
 HP CSA 4.10 – Cloud Service Management Console Help;
 HP CSA 4.10 – System and Software Support Matrix;
 HP CSA 4.10 – Troubleshooting Guide, August 2014;
 HP CSA 4.10 – Upgrade Guide; and
 HP CSA 4.10 – What’s New in Cloud Service Automation 4.10.
9 Evaluation Analysis Activities
The evaluation analysis activities involved a structured evaluation of HP CSA, including the
following areas:
Development: The evaluators analyzed the HP CSA functional specification and design
documentation; they determined that the design completely and accurately describes the TOE
security functionality (TSF) interfaces, the TSF subsystems and how the TSF implements the
security functional requirements (SFRs). The evaluators analyzed the HP CSA security
architectural description and determined that the initialization process is secure, that the
security functions are protected against tamper and bypass, and that security domains are
maintained. The evaluators also independently verified that the correspondence mappings
between the design documents are correct.
Guidance Documents: The evaluators examined the HP CSA preparative user guidance and
operational user guidance and determined that it sufficiently and unambiguously describes
how to securely transform the TOE into its evaluated configuration and how to use and
administer the product. The evaluators examined and tested the preparative and operational
guidance, and determined that they are complete and sufficiently detailed to result in a secure
configuration.
Life-cycle support: An analysis of the HP CSA configuration management system and
associated documentation was performed. The evaluators found that the HP CSA
configuration items were clearly marked.
The evaluators examined the delivery documentation and determined that it described all of
the procedures required to maintain the integrity of HP CSA during distribution to the
consumer.
The evaluators reviewed the flaw remediation procedures used by developer for the HP CSA.
During a site visit, the evaluators also examined the evidence generated by adherence to the
procedures. The evaluators concluded that the procedures are adequate to track and correct
CCS Certification Report Hewett Packard Enterprise Development L.P.
Cloud Service Automation v4.10
___________________________________________________________________________
Version 1.0 September 15, 2015
- Page 7 of 9 -
security flaws, and distribute the flaw information and corrections to consumers of the
product.
All these evaluation activities resulted in PASS verdicts.
10 ITS Product Testing
Testing consists of the following three steps: assessing developer tests, performing
independent functional tests, and performing penetration tests.
10.1 Assessment of Developer Tests
The evaluators verified that the developer has met their testing responsibilities by examining
their test evidence, and reviewing their test results, as documented in the ETR1
.
The evaluators analyzed the developer’s test coverage analysis and found it to be complete
and accurate. The correspondence between the tests identified in the developer’s test
documentation and the functional specification was complete.
10.2 Independent Functional Testing
During this evaluation, the evaluator developed independent functional tests by examining
design and guidance documentation.
All testing was planned and documented to a sufficient level of detail to allow repeatability
of the testing procedures and results. Resulting from this test coverage approach is the
following list of test goals:
a. Repeat of Developer's Tests: The objective of this test goal is to repeat a subset of the
developer's tests;
b. Administrative Actions: The objective of this test goal is to verify that all administrative
actions generate an audit record;
c. Password and Message Obfuscation: The objective of this test goal is to confirm that
passwords are not displayed in the clear and that any failure message is ambiguous;
d. Access before Authentication: The objective of this test goal is to confirm the ability of a
user to use certain CLI tools prior to authentication to the TOE;
e. User Roles and Access Control: The objective of this test goal is to verify user role`s
permissions and what options are available to each role when logged in;
f. Secure Communication: The objective of this test goal is to confirm the REST API
communicates over a secure channel; and
g. Subscription Request Denial: The objective of this test goal is to demonstrate the ability
of an administrator to deny a subscription request via the REST API.
1
The ETR is a CCS document that contains information proprietary to the developer and/or the evaluator, and
is not releasable for public review.
CCS Certification Report Hewett Packard Enterprise Development L.P.
Cloud Service Automation v4.10
___________________________________________________________________________
Version 1.0 September 15, 2015
- Page 8 of 9 -
10.3 Independent Penetration Testing
Subsequent to the independent review of public domain vulnerability databases and all
evaluation deliverables, limited independent evaluator penetration testing was conducted.
The penetration tests focused on:
a. Use of automated vulnerability scanning tools to discover potential network, platform and
application layer vulnerabilities; and
b. Disclosure of Ports: The objective of this test goal is to scan for open ports and then
determine if the open ports should be open.
The independent penetration testing did not uncover any exploitable vulnerabilities in the
intended operating environment.
10.4 Conduct of Testing
HP CSA was subjected to a comprehensive suite of formally documented, independent
functional and penetration tests. The detailed testing activities, including configurations,
procedures, test cases, expected results and observed results are documented in a separate
Test Results document.
10.5 Testing Results
The developer’s tests and the independent functional tests yielded the expected results,
providing assurance that HP CSA behaves as specified in its ST and functional specification.
11 Results of the Evaluation
This evaluation has provided the basis for a EAL 2+ level of assurance. The overall verdict
for the evaluation is PASS. These results are supported by evidence in the ETR.
12 Acronyms, Abbreviations and Initializations
Acronym/Abbreviation/
Initialization
Description
CCEF Common Criteria Evaluation Facility
CCS Canadian Common Criteria Evaluation and
Certification Scheme
CPL Certified Products list
CM Configuration Management
CSA Cloud Service Automation
EAL Evaluation Assurance Level
ETR Evaluation Technical Report
FIPS Federal Information Processing Standards
GPC General Purpose Computer
HP OO Server HP Operations Orchestration Server
IDM Identity Management
IT Information Technology
ITSET Information Technology Security
CCS Certification Report Hewett Packard Enterprise Development L.P.
Cloud Service Automation v4.10
___________________________________________________________________________
Version 1.0 September 15, 2015
- Page 9 of 9 -
Acronym/Abbreviation/
Initialization
Description
Evaluation and Testing
LDAP Lightweight Directory Access Protocol
MPP Market Place Portal
PALCAN Program for the Accreditation of
Laboratories - Canada
REST API Representational State Transfer Application
Programming Interface
SFR Security Functional Requirement
ST Security Target
TOE Target of Evaluation
TSF TOE Security Function
WAR Web Application Archive
13 References
This section lists all documentation used as source material for this report:
a. CCS Publication #4, Technical Oversight, Version 1.8, October 2010.
b. Common Criteria for Information Technology Security Evaluation, Version 3.1
Revision 4, September 2012.
c. Common Methodology for Information Technology Security Evaluation, CEM,
Version 3.1 Revision 4, September 2012.
d. Hewlett Packard Enterprise Development L.P., Cloud Service Automation v4.10
Security Target, August 13, 2015, version 1.6
e. Hewlett Packard Enterprise Development L.P., Cloud Service Automation v4.10
Evaluation Technical Report, September 15, 2015, v1.0.