Certification Report
EAL 4+ Evaluation of Fortinet FortiGate™
-50B, 200A,
300A, 310B, 500A, 800, 1000A, 3016B, 3600, 3600A,
3810A-E4, 5001SX, 5001FA2, 5001A-DW and FortiWiFi-
50B Unified Threat Management Solutions and FortiOS™
3.0 CC Compliant Firmware
Issued by:
Communications Security Establishment Canada
Certification Body
Canadian Common Criteria Evaluation and Certification Scheme
© 2008 Government of Canada, Communications Security Establishment Canada
Document number: 383-4-51-CR
Version: 1.0
Date: 28 November 2008
Pagination: i to iv, 1 to 12
CCS Certification Report Fortinet Incorporated
FortiGate
___________________________________________________________________________
Version 1.0 28 November 2008
- Page i of iv -
DISCLAIMER
The Information Technology (IT) product identified in this certification report, and its
associated certificate, has been evaluated at an approved evaluation facility – established
under the Canadian Common Criteria Evaluation and Certification Scheme (CCS) – using
the Common Methodology for Information Technology Security Evaluation, Version 2.3, for
conformance to the Common Criteria for IT Security Evaluation, Version 2.3. This
certification report, and its associated certificate, apply only to the identified version and
release of the product in its evaluated configuration. The evaluation has been conducted in
accordance with the provisions of the CCS, and the conclusions of the evaluation facility in
the evaluation report are consistent with the evidence adduced. This report, and its associated
certificate, are not an endorsement of the IT product by the Communications Security
Establishment Canada, or any other organization that recognizes or gives effect to this report,
and its associated certificate, and no warranty for the IT product by the Communications
Security Establishment Canada, or any other organization that recognizes or gives effect to
this report, and its associated certificate, is either expressed or implied.
CCS Certification Report Fortinet Incorporated
FortiGate
___________________________________________________________________________
Version 1.0 28 November 2008
- Page ii of iv -
FOREWORD
The Canadian Common Criteria Evaluation and Certification Scheme (CCS) provides a
third-party evaluation service for determining the trustworthiness of Information Technology
(IT) security products. Evaluations are performed by a commercial Common Criteria
Evaluation Facility (CCEF) under the oversight of the CCS Certification Body, which is
managed by the Communications Security Establishment Canada.
A CCEF is a commercial facility that has been approved by the CCS Certification Body to
perform Common Criteria evaluations; a significant requirement for such approval is
accreditation to the requirements of ISO Standard 17025, General requirements for the
accreditation of calibration and testing laboratories. Accreditation is performed under the
Program for the Accreditation of Laboratories Canada (PALCAN), administered by the
Standards Council of Canada.
The CCEF that carried out this evaluation is EWA-Canada located in Ottawa, Ontario.
By awarding a Common Criteria certificate, the CCS Certification Body asserts that the
product complies with the security requirements specified in the associated security target. A
security target is a requirements specification document that defines the scope of the
evaluation activities. The consumer of certified IT products should review the security target,
in addition to this certification report, in order to gain an understanding of any assumptions
made during the evaluation, the IT product's intended environment, its security requirements,
and the level of confidence (i.e., the evaluation assurance level) that the product satisfies the
security requirements.
This certification report is associated with the certificate of product evaluation dated 28
November 2008, and the security target identified in Section 4 of this report.
The certification report, certificate of product evaluation and security target are posted on the
CCS Certified Products list at: http://www.cse-cst.gc.ca/services/common-criteria/trusted-
products-e.html and http://www.commoncriteria.es/
This certification report makes reference to the following trademarked names:
• FortiGate™
which is a trademark of Fortinet Incorporated.
• FortiOS™
which is a trademark of Fortinet Incorporated.
• FortiASIC™
which is a trademark of Fortinet Incorporated.
Reproduction of this report is authorized provided the report is reproduced in its entirety.
CCS Certification Report Fortinet Incorporated
FortiGate
___________________________________________________________________________
Version 1.0 28 November 2008
- Page iii of iv -
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Disclaimer....................................................................................................................................... i
Foreword........................................................................................................................................ii
Executive Summary...................................................................................................................... 1
1 Identification of Target of Evaluation ................................................................................ 2
2 TOE Description ................................................................................................................... 2
3 Evaluated Security Functionality........................................................................................ 3
4 Security Target...................................................................................................................... 4
5 Common Criteria Conformance.......................................................................................... 4
6 Security Policy....................................................................................................................... 5
7 Assumptions and Clarification of Scope............................................................................. 5
7.1 SECURE USAGE ASSUMPTIONS................................................................................... 6
7.2 ENVIRONMENTAL ASSUMPTIONS ............................................................................... 6
7.3 CLARIFICATION OF SCOPE.......................................................................................... 6
8 Architectural Information ................................................................................................... 6
9 Evaluated Configuration...................................................................................................... 7
10 Documentation ...................................................................................................................... 7
11 Evaluation Analysis Activities ............................................................................................. 8
12 ITS Product Testing.............................................................................................................. 9
12.1 ASSESSING DEVELOPER TESTS................................................................................... 9
12.2 INDEPENDENT FUNCTIONAL TESTING ........................................................................ 9
12.3 INDEPENDENT PENETRATION TESTING..................................................................... 10
12.4 CONDUCT OF TESTING ............................................................................................. 11
12.5 TESTING RESULTS.................................................................................................... 11
13 Results of the Evaluation.................................................................................................... 11
14 Evaluator Comments, Observations and Recommendations ......................................... 11
15 Acronyms, Abbreviations and Initializations................................................................... 11
CCS Certification Report Fortinet Incorporated
FortiGate
___________________________________________________________________________
Version 1.0 28 November 2008
- Page iv of iv -
16 References............................................................................................................................ 12
CCS Certification Report Fortinet Incorporated
FortiGate
___________________________________________________________________________
Version 1.0 28 November 2008
- Page 1 of 12 -
Executive Summary
FortiGate™
-50B, 200A, 300A, 310B, 500A, 800, 1000A, 3016B, 3600, 3600A, 3810A-E4,
5001SX, 5001FA2, 5001A-DW and FortiWiFi-50B Unified Threat Management Solutions
and FortiOS™
3.0 CC Compliant Firmware (hereafter referred to as FortiGate), from Fortinet
Incorporated, is the Target of Evaluation for this Evaluation Assurance Level (EAL) 4
augmented evaluation.
FortiGate secures a wide range of network environments, from the remote office and branch
office to the enterprise and the service provider. FortiGate detects and eliminates damaging,
content-based threats from email and Web traffic such as viruses, worms, intrusion attempts,
and inappropriate Web content in real-time without degrading network performance.
FortiGate units can operate independently, as part of a cluster to provide high availability of
services, or collectively with a centralized management system to provide multiple security
enforcement points within large networks.
FortiGate units support the IPSec industry standard for Virtual Private Networks (VPN),
allowing VPNs to be configured between a FortiGate unit and any compatible Internet
Protocol Security (IPSec) VPN client, gateway, or firewall. FortiGate also provide Secure
Sockets Layer (SSL) VPN gateway and tunneling services.
Firewall, IPSec VPN, antivirus, and intrusion prevention functionality are included in this
evaluation; antispam, Web filtering, traffic shaping, SSL VPN and centralized management
capabilities are excluded. Section 2 of the security target provides details on functionality
included, and excluded, from this evaluation.
FortiGate incorporates FIPS PUB 140-2 validated cryptography.
EWA-Canada is the Common Criteria Evaluation Facility that conducted the evaluation. This
evaluation was completed on 17 November 2008 and was carried out in accordance with the
rules of the Canadian Common Criteria Evaluation and Certification Scheme (CCS).
The scope of the evaluation is defined by the security target, which identifies assumptions
made during the evaluation, the intended environment for the FortiGate, the security
requirements, and the level of confidence (evaluation assurance level) at which the product is
intended to satisfy the security requirements. Consumers are advised to verify that their
operating environment is consistent with that specified in the security target, and to give due
consideration to the comments, observations and recommendations in this certification
report.
CCS Certification Report Fortinet Incorporated
FortiGate
___________________________________________________________________________
Version 1.0 28 November 2008
- Page 2 of 12 -
The results documented in the Evaluation Technical Report (ETR)1
for this product provide
sufficient evidence that it meets the EAL 4 augmented assurance requirements for the
evaluated security functionality. The evaluation was conducted using the Common
Methodology for Information Technology Security Evaluation, Version 2.3 (with applicable
final interpretations), for conformance to the Common Criteria for Information Technology
Security Evaluation, Version 2.3. The following augmentation is claimed: ALC_FLR.3 –
Systematic flaw remediation.
FortiGate is conformant with the Intrusion Detection System Sensor Protection Profile (IDSS
PP) Version 1.2, April 27, 2005.
Communications Security Establishment Canada, as the CCS Certification Body, declares
that the FortiGate evaluation meets all the conditions of the Arrangement on the Recognition
of Common Criteria Certificates and that the product will be listed on the CCS Certified
Products list (CPL) and the Common Criteria portal (the official website of the Common
Criteria Project).
1 Identification of Target of Evaluation
The Target of Evaluation (TOE) for this Evaluation Assurance Level (EAL) 4 augmented
evaluation is FortiGate™
-50B, 200A, 300A, 310B, 500A, 800, 1000A, 3016B, 3600, 3600A,
3810A-E4, 5001SX, 5001FA2, 5001A-DW and FortiWiFi-50B Unified Threats Management
Solutions and FortiOS™
3.0 CC Compliant Firmware (hereafter referred to as FortiGate),
from Fortinet Incorporated.
2 TOE Description
FortiGate secures a wide range of network environments, from the remote office and branch
office (ROBO) to the enterprise and the service provider. FortiGate detects and eliminates
damaging, content-based threats from email and Web traffic such as viruses, worms,
intrusion attempts, and inappropriate Web content in real-time without degrading network
performance. FortiGate units can operate independently, as part of a cluster to provide high
availability of services, or collectively with a centralized management system to provide
multiple security enforcement points within large networks.
FortiGate units support the IPSec industry standard for Virtual Private Networks (VPN),
allowing VPNs to be configured between a FortiGate unit and any compatible Internet
Protocol Security (IPSec) VPN client, gateway, or firewall. FortiGate also provides Secure
Sockets Layer (SSL) VPN gateway and tunneling services.
1
The ETR is a CCS document that contains information proprietary to the developer and/or the evaluator, and
is not releasable for public review.
CCS Certification Report Fortinet Incorporated
FortiGate
___________________________________________________________________________
Version 1.0 28 November 2008
- Page 3 of 12 -
Firewall, IPSec VPN, antivirus, and intrusion prevention functionality are included in this
evaluation; antispam, Web filtering, traffic shaping, SSL VPN and centralized management
capabilities are excluded. Section 2 of the security target provides details on functionality
included, and excluded, from this evaluation.
3 Evaluated Security Functionality
The complete list of evaluated security functionality for the FortiGate is identified in Section
5 of the Security Target.
The following cryptographic modules were evaluated to the FIPS 140-2 standard:
Cryptographic Module Certificate #
FG-50B 945
FG-200A 807, 905
FG-300A 807, 905
FG-310B Pending
FG-500A 807, 905
FG-800 905
FG-1000A 810
FG-3016B Pending
FG-3600 810
FG-3600A Pending
FG-3810A-E4 Pending
FG-5001SX 789
FG-5001FA2 789
FG-5001A-DW Pending
FortiWiFi-50B Pending
CCS Certification Report Fortinet Incorporated
FortiGate
___________________________________________________________________________
Version 1.0 28 November 2008
- Page 4 of 12 -
The following Government of Canada approved cryptographic algorithms were evaluated for
correct implementation in FortiGate:
Cryptographic Algorithm Standard Certificate #
Triple-DES (3DES) FIPS 46-3 486, 487, 489, 490, 582,
583, 584
Advanced Encryption Standard (AES) FIPS 197 471, 472, 475, 476, 612,
613, 614
Rivest Shamir Adleman (RSA) FIPS 186-2 193, 284, 285
Secure Hash Algorithm (SHA-1) FIPS 180-2 539, 540, 543, 544, 660,
661, 662
Keyed-Hash Message Authentication
Code (HMAC)
FIPS 198 228, 229, 232, 233, 315,
316, 317
4 Security Target
The ST associated with this Certification Report is identified by the following nomenclature:
Title: Security Target for the FortiGate™
-50B, 200A, 300A, 310B, 500A, 800, 1000A,
3016B, 3600, 3600A, 3810A-E4, 5001SX, 5001FA2, 5001A-DW and FortiWiFi-
50B Unified Threat Management Solutions and FortiOS™
3.0 CC Compliant
Firmware: EAL 4+
Version: 0.25
Date: 17 November 2008
5 Common Criteria Conformance
The evaluation was conducted using the Common Methodology for Information Technology
Security Evaluation, Version 2.3, for conformance to the Common Criteria for Information
Technology Security Evaluation, Version 2.3.
FortiGate is:
a. Common Criteria Part 2 extended, with functional requirements based upon functional
components in Part 2, except for the following explicitly stated requirements defined in
the ST:
• FAU_ARP_ACK_EXP.1 – Security Alarm Acknowledgement;
CCS Certification Report Fortinet Incorporated
FortiGate
___________________________________________________________________________
Version 1.0 28 November 2008
- Page 5 of 12 -
• FAV_ACT_EXP.1 – Anti Virus Actions;
• FCS_BCM_EXP.1 – Baseline Cryptographic Module;
• FIP_ACT_EXP.1 – Intrusion Prevention Actions;
• IDS_COL_EXP.1 – Sensor Data Collection;
• IDS_RDR_EXP.1 – Restricted Data Review;
• IDS_STG_EXP.1 – Guarantee of Sensor Data Availability; and
• IDS_STG_EXP.2 – Prevention of Sensor Data Loss.
b. Common Criteria Part 3 conformant, with security assurance requirements based only
upon assurance components in Part 3; and
c. Common Criteria EAL 4 augmented, containing all security assurance requirements in
the EAL 4 package, as well as ALC_FLR.3 - Systematic flaw remediation.
6 Security Policy
The FortiGate implements four information flow control policies. These policies govern the
following:
• unauthenticated information flow between the protected network and the external
network;
• authenticated information flow between the protected network and the external network;
• access of unauthenticated users to services provided by the TOE; and
• establishment of a virtual private network between the TOE and an authenticated external
entity.
A high level description of these security policies is found in Section 2 of the ST; a detailed
description is found in Sections 5 and 6 of the ST.
In addition, FortiGate implements policies pertaining to security audit, self protection,
identification and authentication, security administration, encryption and the use of trusted
paths and channels. A high level description of these security policies is found in Section 2
of the ST; a detailed description is found in Sections 5 and 6 of the ST.
7 Assumptions and Clarification of Scope
Consumers of FortiGate should consider assumptions about usage and environmental
settings as requirements for the product’s installation and its operating environment. This
will ensure the proper and secure operation of the TOE.
CCS Certification Report Fortinet Incorporated
FortiGate
___________________________________________________________________________
Version 1.0 28 November 2008
- Page 6 of 12 -
7.1 Secure Usage Assumptions
The following Secure Usage Assumption is listed in the ST:
• Competent individuals are assigned to manage the TOE and these individuals are not
careless, willfully negligent or hostile and will follow the instructions provided in the
TOE documentation.
7.2 Environmental Assumptions
The following Environmental Assumptions are listed in the ST:
• The TOE will be located in controlled access facilities thereby preventing unauthorized
physical access to the TOE.
• The network which the TOE is intended to protect will be configured such that all
information passing between the network and an external network must pass through the
TOE.
For more information about the TOE security environment, refer to Section 3 of the ST (TOE
Security Environment).
7.3 Clarification of Scope
The FortiGate units provide a wide variety of services, not all of which were subject to
evaluation. In particular, the following capabilities were excluded from the evaluation:
• dynamic routing;
• update of the FortiOS™
firmware;
• update of the FortiGate Anti-Virus and Intrusion Prevention System engines;
• spam filtering;
• traffic shaping; and
• web content filtering.
For a complete list of the capabilities both included and excluded from the evaluation, refer
to Section 2 of the ST.
8 Architectural Information
FortiGate units comprise hardware and firmware components.
CCS Certification Report Fortinet Incorporated
FortiGate
___________________________________________________________________________
Version 1.0 28 November 2008
- Page 7 of 12 -
The FortiGate hardware comprises the processor, memory, the FortiASIC™
and the
input/output (I/O) interfaces. The FortiASIC™
performs security and content processing.
Different FortiGate models have different I/O capabilities. Refer to Section 2 of the ST for
interface detail.
The FortiGate firmware comprises the custom FortiOS™
operating system.
Further details about the system architecture are proprietary to the developer, and are not
provided in this report.
9 Evaluated Configuration
The FortiGate Security Target includes the following evaluated configurations of the TOE:
• FG-50B;
• FG-200A;
• FG-300A;
• FG-310B;
• FG-500A;
• FG-800;
• FG-1000A;
• FG-3016B;
• FG-3600;
• FG-3600A;
• FG-3810A-E4;
• FG-5001SX;
• FG-5001FA2;
• FG-5001A-DW; and
• FortiWiFi-50B.
Each of these units may be used either as a stand alone unit or along with other units of the
same model in a high availability cluster.
10 Documentation
Fortinet documents provided to the consumer are as follows:
a. FortiGate Installation Guide (one document available for each FortiGate model type);
CCS Certification Report Fortinet Incorporated
FortiGate
___________________________________________________________________________
Version 1.0 28 November 2008
- Page 8 of 12 -
b. FortiGate Administration Guide, v3.0 MR4, 2 January 2007;
c. FortiGate CLI Reference, v3.0, MR4, 1 March 2007;
d. FortiGate HA Guide, FortiOS v3.0 MR3, 20 October 2006;
e. FortiGate IPSec VPN User Guide, v3.0, MR5, 16 July 2007;
f. FortiGate IPS User Guide, v3.0, MR4, 10 January 2007;
g. FortiGate User Authentication User Guide, v3.0 MR4, 1 March 2007; and
h. FortiGate FIPS-Common Criteria Compliant Operation Technical Note, FortiOS v3.0
MR4, 10 July 2008.
11 Evaluation Analysis Activities
The evaluation analysis activities involved a structured evaluation of the FortiGate, including
the following areas:
Configuration management: An analysis of the FortiGate configuration management
system and associated documentation was performed. The evaluators found that the
FortiGate configuration items were clearly marked, and could be modified and controlled,
and that the configuration management system supported generation of the TOE. The
developer’s configuration management system was observed during site visits, and it was
found to be mature and well developed.
Secure delivery and operation: The evaluators examined the delivery documentation and
determined that it described all of the procedures required to maintain the integrity of
FortiGate during distribution to the consumer. The evaluators examined and tested the
installation, generation and start-up procedures, and determined that they were complete and
sufficiently detailed to result in a secure configuration.
Design documentation: The evaluators analysed the FortiGate functional specification,
high-level design, low-level design, and a subset of the implementation representation; they
determined that the documents were internally consistent, and completely and accurately
instantiated all interfaces and security functions. The evaluators also independently verified
that the correspondence mappings between the design documents were correct.
Guidance documents: The evaluators examined the FortiGate user and administrator
guidance documentation and determined that it sufficiently and unambiguously described
how to securely use and administer the product, and that it was consistent with the other
documents supplied for evaluation.
Life-cycle support: The evaluators examined the development security procedures during
site visits and determined that they detailed sufficient security measures for the development
CCS Certification Report Fortinet Incorporated
FortiGate
___________________________________________________________________________
Version 1.0 28 November 2008
- Page 9 of 12 -
environment to protect the confidentiality and integrity of FortiGate design and
implementation. The evaluators determined that the developer has used a documented model
of the TOE life-cycle and well-defined development tools that yield consistent and
predictable results.
The evaluators reviewed the flaw remediation procedures used by Fortinet for the FortiGate.
The evaluators determined that the procedures describe the tracking of security flaws, the
identification of corrective actions, and the distribution of corrective action information to
product users. Additionally, the evaluators determined that the developer’s procedures
provide for the corrections of security flaws, for the receipt of flaw reports from product
users, and for assurance that the corrections introduce no new security flaws.
Vulnerability assessment: The FortiGate ST’s strength of function claims were validated
through independent evaluator analysis. The evaluators examined the developer’s
vulnerability analysis for FortiGate and found that it sufficiently described each of the
potential vulnerabilities along with a sound rationale as to why it was not exploitable in the
intended environment. Additionally, the evaluators conducted an independent review of
public domain vulnerability databases, and all evaluation deliverables to provide assurance
that the developer has considered all potential vulnerabilities.
All these evaluation activities resulted in PASS verdicts.
12 ITS Product Testing
Testing at EAL 4 consists of the following three steps: assessing developer tests, performing
independent functional tests, and performing penetration tests.
12.1 Assessing Developer Tests
The evaluators verified that the developer has met their testing responsibilities by examining
their test evidence, and reviewing their test results, as documented in the ETR2
.
The evaluators analyzed the developer’s test coverage analysis and found it to be complete
and accurate. The correspondence between the tests identified in the developer’s test
documentation and the functional specification was complete.
12.2 Independent Functional Testing
During this evaluation, the evaluator developed independent functional tests by examining
design and guidance documentation, examining the developer's test documentation,
2
The ETR is a CCS document that contains information proprietary to the developer and/or the evaluator, and
is not releasable for public review.
CCS Certification Report Fortinet Incorporated
FortiGate
___________________________________________________________________________
Version 1.0 28 November 2008
- Page 10 of 12 -
executing a sample of the developer's test cases, and creating test cases that augmented the
developer tests.
All testing was planned and documented to a sufficient level of detail to allow repeatability
of the testing procedures and results. Resulting from this test coverage approach was the
following list of EWA-Canada test goals:
a. Repeat of Developer's Tests: The objective of this test goal is to repeat a subset of the
developer's tests;
b. Administration: The objective of this test goal is to confirm that FortiGate can be
administered in a secure manner;
c. Audit: The objective of this test goal is to confirm that the FortiGate audit functions
meets the audit requirements listed in the ST;
d. Firewall Services: The objective of this test goal is to confirm that FortiGate provides
firewall policies that conform with the information flow control policies stated in the ST;
e. Anti-virus Services: The objective of this test goal is to confirm that FortiGate provides
anti-virus services as described by the explicit requirement listed in the security target;
f. Intrusion Detection Services: The objective of this test goal is to confirm that the
FortiGate detects attempted intrusion in accordance with the requirements listed in the
claimed PP;
g. Intrusion Prevention Services: The objective of this test goal is to confirm that the
FortiGate prevents intrusions as described by the explicit requirement listed in the
security target; and
h. High Availability Services: The objective of this test goal is to confirm that a FortiGate
cluster satisfies the high availability requirements described in the ST.
12.3 Independent Penetration Testing
Subsequent to the examination of the developer's vulnerability analysis, independent
vulnerability analysis, and the independent review of public domain vulnerability databases
and all evaluation deliverables, limited independent evaluator penetration testing was
conducted. The penetration tests focused on:
• Generic vulnerabilities;
• Direct attacks; and
• Misuse.
CCS Certification Report Fortinet Incorporated
FortiGate
___________________________________________________________________________
Version 1.0 28 November 2008
- Page 11 of 12 -
The independent penetration testing did not uncover any exploitable vulnerabilities in the
anticipated operating environment.
12.4 Conduct of Testing
FortiGate was subjected to a comprehensive suite of formally documented, independent
functional and penetration tests. The testing took place at the Information Technology
Security Evaluation and Test (ITSET) Facility at EWA-Canada. The CCS Certification Body
witnessed a portion of the independent testing. The detailed testing activities, including
configurations, procedures, test cases, expected results and observed results are documented
in a separate Test Results document.
12.5 Testing Results
The developer’s tests and the independent functional tests yielded the expected results,
giving assurance that the FortiGate behaves as specified in its ST and functional
specification.
13 Results of the Evaluation
This evaluation has provided the basis for an EAL 4+ level of assurance. The overall verdict
for the evaluation is PASS. These results are supported by evidence in the ETR.
14 Evaluator Comments, Observations and Recommendations
Fortinet employs a rigorous testing process that tests the changes and fixes in each release of
the FortiGate. Comprehensive regression testing is conducted for all releases.
15 Acronyms, Abbreviations and Initializations
Acronym/Abbreviation/
Initialization
Description
CCEF Common Criteria Evaluation Facility
CCS Canadian Common Criteria Evaluation and
Certification Scheme
CPL Certified Products list
EAL Evaluation Assurance Level
ETR Evaluation Technical Report
I/O Input/Output
IPSec Internet Protocol Security
IT Information Technology
ITSET Information Technology Security Evaluation
and Testing
NIST National Institute of Standards and
CCS Certification Report Fortinet Incorporated
FortiGate
___________________________________________________________________________
Version 1.0 28 November 2008
- Page 12 of 12 -
Acronym/Abbreviation/
Initialization
Description
Technology
PALCAN Program for the Accreditation of Laboratories
Canada
SANS SysAdmin, Audit, Network, Security
SSL Secure Sockets Layer
ST Security Target
TOE Target of Evaluation
TSF TOE Security Function
VPN Virtual Private Network
16 References
This section lists all documentation used as source material for this report:
a. CCS Publication #4, Technical Oversight, Version 1.0.
b. Common Criteria for Information Technology Security Evaluation, Version 2.3,
August 2005.
c. Common Methodology for Information Technology Security Evaluation, CEM,
Version 2.3, August 2005.
d. Security Target for the Fortinet FortiGate™
-50B, 200A, 300A, 310B, 500A, 800,
1000A, 3016B, 3600, 3600A, 3810A-E4, 5001SX, 5001FA2, 5001A-DW and
FortiWiFi-50B Unified Threat Management Solutions and FortiOS™
3.0 CC
Compliant Firmware: EAL 4+, Revision No. 0.25, 17 November 2008.
e. Evaluation Technical Report (ETR) Fortinet FortiGate™
-50B, 200A, 300A, 310B,
500A, 800, 1000A, 3016B, 3600, 3600A, 3810A-E4, 5001SX, 5001FA2, 5001A-DW
and FortiWiFi-50B Unified Threat Management Solutions and FortiOS™
3.0 CC
Compliant Firmware, EAL 4+ Evaluation, Common Criteria Evaluation Number:
383-4-51, Document No. 1523-000-D002, Version 1.0, 17 November 2008.
f. Intrusion Detection System Sensor Protection Profile (IDSS PP) Version 1.2, April
27, 2005.