TÜV Rheinland Nederland B.V.
Head Office:
Westervoortsedijk 73
NL-6827 AV Arnhem
P.O. Box 2220
NL-6802 CE Arnhem
The Netherlands
Location Leek:
Eiberkamp 10
NL-9351 VT Leek
P.O. Box 37
NL-9350 AA Leek
The Netherlands
info@nl.tuv.com
www.tuv.com/nl
Tel. +31 (0)88 888 7 888
Fax +31 (0)88 888 7 879
TÜV Rheinland Nederland B.V. is a
registered company at the
Netherlands Chamber of Commerce
(KVK), under number 27288788.
VAT number: NL815820380B01
IBAN: NL61DEUT0265155096
Version
2022-02
®
TÜV,
TUEV
and
TUV
are
registered
trademarks.
Any
use
or
application
requires
prior
approval.
Certification Report
xFusion FusionDirector 1.7.1.SPC3
Sponsor and developer: xFusion Digital Technologies Co., Ltd.
9th Floor, Building 1, Zensun Boya Square, Longzihu
Wisdom Island,
Zhengdong New District 450046,
Zhengzhou, Henan Province
Peoples Republic of China
Evaluation facility: UL
De Heyderweg, 2
Leiden, 2314XZ
The Netherlands
Report number: NSCIB-CC-0568093-CR
Report version: 1
Project number: 0568093
Author(s): Andy Brown
Date: 24 July 2023
Number of pages: 11
Number of appendices: 0
Reproduction of this report is authorised only if the report is reproduced in its entirety.
Page: 2/11 of report number: NSCIB-CC-0568093-CR, dated 24 July 2023
®
TÜV,
TUEV
and
TUV
are
registered
trademarks.
Any
use
or
application
requires
prior
approval.
CONTENTS
Foreword 3
Recognition of the Certificate 4
International recognition 4
European recognition 4
1 Executive Summary 5
2 Certification Results 6
2.1 Identification of Target of Evaluation 6
2.2 Security Policy 6
2.3 Assumptions and Clarification of Scope 6
2.3.1 Assumptions 6
2.3.2 Clarification of scope 7
2.4 Architectural Information 7
2.5 Documentation 7
2.6 IT Product Testing 7
2.6.1 Testing approach and depth 7
2.6.2 Independent penetration testing 8
2.6.3 Test configuration 8
2.6.4 Test results 8
2.7 Reused Evaluation Results 8
2.8 Evaluated Configuration 8
2.9 Evaluation Results 8
2.10 Comments/Recommendations 9
3 Security Target 10
4 Definitions 10
5 Bibliography 11
Page: 3/11 of report number: NSCIB-CC-0568093-CR, dated 24 July 2023
®
TÜV,
TUEV
and
TUV
are
registered
trademarks.
Any
use
or
application
requires
prior
approval.
Foreword
The Netherlands Scheme for Certification in the Area of IT Security (NSCIB) provides a third-party
evaluation and certification service for determining the trustworthiness of Information Technology (IT)
security products. Under this NSCIB, TÜV Rheinland Nederland B.V. has the task of issuing
certificates for IT security products, as well as for protection profiles and sites.
Part of the procedure is the technical examination (evaluation) of the product, protection profile or site
according to the Common Criteria assessment guidelines published by the NSCIB. Evaluations are
performed by an IT Security Evaluation Facility (ITSEF) under the oversight of the NSCIB Certification
Body, which is operated by TÜV Rheinland Nederland B.V. in cooperation with the Ministry of the
Interior and Kingdom Relations.
An ITSEF in the Netherlands is a commercial facility that has been licensed by TÜV Rheinland
Nederland B.V. to perform Common Criteria evaluations; a significant requirement for such a licence is
accreditation to the requirements of ISO Standard 17025 “General requirements for the accreditation
of calibration and testing laboratories”.
By awarding a Common Criteria certificate, TÜV Rheinland Nederland B.V. asserts that the product or
site complies with the security requirements specified in the associated (site) security target, or that
the protection profile (PP) complies with the requirements for PP evaluation specified in the Common
Criteria for Information Security Evaluation. A (site) security target is a requirements specification
document that defines the scope of the evaluation activities.
The consumer should review the (site) security target or protection profile, in addition to this
certification report, to gain an understanding of any assumptions made during the evaluation, the IT
product's intended environment, its security requirements, and the level of confidence (i.e., the
evaluation assurance level) that the product or site satisfies the security requirements stated in the
(site) security target.
Reproduction of this report is authorised only if the report is reproduced in its entirety.
Page: 4/11 of report number: NSCIB-CC-0568093-CR, dated 24 July 2023
®
TÜV,
TUEV
and
TUV
are
registered
trademarks.
Any
use
or
application
requires
prior
approval.
Recognition of the Certificate
The presence of the Common Criteria Recognition Arrangement (CCRA) and the SOG-IS logos on the
certificate indicates that this certificate is issued in accordance with the provisions of the CCRA and
the SOG-IS Mutual Recognition Agreement (SOG-IS MRA) and will be recognised by the participating
nations.
International recognition
The CCRA was signed by the Netherlands in May 2000 and provides mutual recognition of certificates
based on the Common Criteria (CC). Since September 2014 the CCRA has been updated to provide
mutual recognition of certificates based on cPPs (exact use) or STs with evaluation assurance
components up to and including EAL2+ALC_FLR.
For details of the current list of signatory nations and approved certification schemes, see
http://www.commoncriteriaportal.org.
European recognition
The SOG-IS MRA Version 3, effective since April 2010, provides mutual recognition in Europe of
Common Criteria and ITSEC certificates at a basic evaluation level for all products. A higher
recognition level for evaluation levels beyond EAL4 (respectively E3-basic) is provided for products
related to specific technical domains. This agreement was signed initially by Finland, France,
Germany, The Netherlands, Norway, Spain, Sweden and the United Kingdom. Italy joined the SOG-IS
MRA in December 2010.
For details of the current list of signatory nations, approved certification schemes and the list of
technical domains for which the higher recognition applies, see https://www.sogis.eu.
Page: 5/11 of report number: NSCIB-CC-0568093-CR, dated 24 July 2023
®
TÜV,
TUEV
and
TUV
are
registered
trademarks.
Any
use
or
application
requires
prior
approval.
1 Executive Summary
This Certification Report states the outcome of the Common Criteria security evaluation of the xFusion
FusionDirector 1.7.1.SPC3. The developer of the xFusion FusionDirector 1.7.1.SPC3 is xFusion
Digital Technologies Co., Ltd. located in Zhengzhou, Peoples Republic of China and they also act as
the sponsor of the evaluation and certification. A Certification Report is intended to assist prospective
consumers when judging the suitability of the IT security properties of the product for their particular
requirements.
The TOE is a software TOE used for unified server hardware operation and maintenance (O&M) and
server management, including server query, status monitoring, configuration, firmware upgrade and
OS deployment functions
Public cloud and enterprise customers can use the TOE to perform simple and efficient O&M.
The TOE implements visualized management and fault diagnosis for servers, and provides lifecycle
management capabilities such as device management, device configuration, firmware upgrade, device
monitoring, and OS deployment for xFusion servers.
The TOE has been evaluated by UL located in Leiden, The Netherlands. The evaluation was
completed on 24 July 2023 with the approval of the ETR. The certification procedure has been
conducted in accordance with the provisions of the Netherlands Scheme for Certification in the Area of
IT Security [NSCIB].
The scope of the evaluation is defined by the security target [ST], which identifies assumptions made
during the evaluation, the intended environment for the xFusion FusionDirector 1.7.1.SPC3, the
security requirements, and the level of confidence (evaluation assurance level) at which the product is
intended to satisfy the security requirements. Consumers of the xFusion FusionDirector 1.7.1.SPC3
are advised to verify that their own environment is consistent with the security target, and to give due
consideration to the comments, observations and recommendations in this certification report.
The results documented in the evaluation technical report [ETR] 1 for this product provide sufficient
evidence that the TOE meets the EAL2: augmented (EAL2+) assurance requirements for the
evaluated security functionality. This assurance level is augmented with ALC_FLR.1 (Basic Flaw
Remediation)
The evaluation was conducted using the Common Methodology for Information Technology Security
Evaluation, Version 3.1 Revision 5 [CEM] for conformance to the Common Criteria for Information
Technology Security Evaluation, Version 3.1 Revision 5 [CC] (Parts I, II and III).
TÜV Rheinland Nederland B.V., as the NSCIB Certification Body, declares that the evaluation meets
all the conditions for international recognition of Common Criteria Certificates and that the product will
be listed on the NSCIB Certified Products list. Note that the certification results apply only to the
specific version of the product as evaluated.
1 The Evaluation Technical Report contains information proprietary to the developer and/or the
evaluator, and is not available for public review.
Page: 6/11 of report number: NSCIB-CC-0568093-CR, dated 24 July 2023
®
TÜV,
TUEV
and
TUV
are
registered
trademarks.
Any
use
or
application
requires
prior
approval.
2 Certification Results
2.1 Identification of Target of Evaluation
The Target of Evaluation (TOE) for this evaluation is the xFusion FusionDirector 1.7.1.SPC3 from
xFusion Digital Technologies Co., Ltd. located in Zhengzhou, Peoples Republic of China.
The TOE is comprised of the following main components:
Delivery
item type
Identifier Version
Software FusionDirector_1.7.1.SPC3_ENT_x86-64.qcow2 1.7.1.SPC3
To ensure secure usage a set of guidance documents is provided, together with the xFusion
FusionDirector 1.7.1.SPC3. For details, see section 2.5 “Documentation” of this report.
2.2 Security Policy
The TOE provides the following security features:
 Authentication
 Authorization
 Access Control
 Auditing
 Communication Security
 Cryptographic Functions
 Digital Signature for Software Integrity
 Protocol Security:
o SSHv2: provided by open-source software openssl in FusionDirector
o SFTP: provided by open-source software openssl in FusionDirector
o NTP: provided by open-source software ntp in FusionDirector
o NFS: provided by open-source software nfs-utils in FusionDirector
o HTTPS(TLS1.2/1.3): provided by open-source software Nginx in
FusionDirector
o Docker swarm overlay network with vxlan: provided by Docker Engine
2.3 Assumptions and Clarification of Scope
2.3.1 Assumptions
The assumptions defined in the Security Target are not covered by the TOE itself. These aspects lead
to specific Security Objectives to be fulfilled by the TOE-Environment. For detailed information on the
security objectives that must be fulfilled by the TOE environment, see section 4.2 of the [ST].
Page: 7/11 of report number: NSCIB-CC-0568093-CR, dated 24 July 2023
®
TÜV,
TUEV
and
TUV
are
registered
trademarks.
Any
use
or
application
requires
prior
approval.
2.3.2 Clarification of scope
The evaluation did not reveal any threats to the TOE that are not countered by the evaluated security
functions of the product.
2.4 Architectural Information
The TOE consists of the “FusionDirector” software except the underlying OS (Guest) (indicated by the
red box in the diagram below).
The TOE is a server management software. Its main function is to implement server status monitoring,
configuration, firmware upgrade, OS deployment functions. The TOE can run on a virtual machine like
KVM, VMware, Windows Hyper-V. The TOE can also operate on hardware servers like 1288H V5 or
2288H V5. Specific installation environment requirements are in the installation guidance.
2.5 Documentation
The following documentation is provided with the product by the developer to the customer:
Identifier Version
xFusion FusionDirector 1.7.1.SPC3 - Operational User Guidance v1.10
xFusion FusionDirector 1.7.1.SPC3 - Preparative Procedures for Users V1.6
2.6 IT Product Testing
The evaluators examined the developer’s testing activities documentation and verified that the
developer has met their testing responsibilities.
2.6.1 Testing approach and depth
The evaluators concluded that the testing approach used by the developer provided the correct depth
and adequacy for this assurance level. For coverage, the developer tested 73% of the TSFI’s. The
remaining TSFI’s were covered by evaluator testing.
Page: 8/11 of report number: NSCIB-CC-0568093-CR, dated 24 July 2023
®
TÜV,
TUEV
and
TUV
are
registered
trademarks.
Any
use
or
application
requires
prior
approval.
The repetition of developer testing was performed using developer’s tools at the evaluators’ premise.
Sampling was done on the developer test cases based on the TFSIs. Test cases selected covered
more than the 50% of the original developer testing and also fully covered all of the TSFIs tested by
the developer.
2.6.2 Independent penetration testing
The evaluators performed a vulnerability analysis using a vulnerability-centric approach. The evaluator
also performed a public vulnerability search, including a literature review.
The search provided the evaluator with a view of the vulnerabilities at the time of the TOE analysis.
In combination with the search for known vulnerabilities (referred to as "public domain vulnerabilities")
the evaluator performed an independent vulnerability analysis of the TOE documentation.
After all the analysis evaluator has performed, evaluator derived a number of different penetration
tests that cover concerns of public vulnerability and vulnerability analysis.
The attacks are based on Authentication Policy, Communication Protocols, Man in the Middle, Replay
attack, Integrity check and Information Disclose.
All of the attacks performed, their analysis and results have been presented in the Vulnerability
Analysis.
The total test effort expended by the evaluators was 3 weeks. During that test campaign, 100% of the
total time was spent on 100% on logical tests.
2.6.3 Test configuration
The configuration of the sample used for independent evaluator testing and penetration testing was
the same as described in the [ST].
2.6.4 Test results
The testing activities, including configurations, procedures, test cases, expected results and observed
results are summarised in the [ETR], with references to the documents containing the full details.
The developer’s tests and the independent functional tests produced the expected results, giving
assurance that the TOE behaves as specified in its [ST] and functional specification.
No exploitable vulnerabilities were found with the independent penetration tests.
The algorithmic security level of cryptographic functionality has not been rated in this certification
process, but the current consensus on the algorithmic security level in the open domain, i.e., from the
current best cryptanalytic attacks published, has been taken into account.
2.7 Reused Evaluation Results
There is no reuse of evaluation results in this certification.
2.8 Evaluated Configuration
The TOE is defined uniquely by its name and version number xFusion FusionDirector 1.7.1.SPC3.
2.9 Evaluation Results
The evaluation lab documented their evaluation results in the [ETR], which references an ASE
Intermediate Report and other evaluator documents.
The verdict of each claimed assurance requirement is “Pass”.
Based on the above evaluation results the evaluation lab concluded the xFusion FusionDirector
1.7.1.SPC3, to be CC Part 2 extended, CC Part 3 conformant, and to meet the requirements of EAL
2 augmented with ALC_FLR.1. This implies that the product satisfies the security requirements
specified in Security Target [ST].
Page: 9/11 of report number: NSCIB-CC-0568093-CR, dated 24 July 2023
®
TÜV,
TUEV
and
TUV
are
registered
trademarks.
Any
use
or
application
requires
prior
approval.
2.10 Comments/Recommendations
The user guidance as outlined in section 2.5 “Documentation” contains necessary information about
the usage of the TOE. Certain aspects of the TOE’s security functionality, in particular the
countermeasures against attacks, depend on accurate conformance to the user guidance of both the
software and the hardware part of the TOE. There are no particular obligations or recommendations
for the user apart from following the user guidance. Please note that the documents contain relevant
details concerning the resistance against certain attacks.
In addition, all aspects of assumptions, threats and policies as outlined in the Security Target not
covered by the TOE itself must be fulfilled by the operational environment of the TOE.
The customer or user of the product shall consider the results of the certification within his system risk
management process. For the evolution of attack methods and techniques to be covered, the
customer should define the period of time until a re-assessment for the TOE is required and thus
requested from the sponsor of the certificate.
The strength of the cryptographic algorithms and protocols was not rated in the course of this
evaluation. This specifically applies to the following proprietary or non-standard algorithms, protocols
and implementations: <none>.
Page: 10/11 of report number: NSCIB-CC-0568093-CR, dated 24 July 2023
®
TÜV,
TUEV
and
TUV
are
registered
trademarks.
Any
use
or
application
requires
prior
approval.
3 Security Target
The xFusion FusionDirector 1.7.1.SPC3 Security Target, V1.11, 10 July 2023 [ST] is included here by
reference.
4 Definitions
This list of acronyms and definitions contains elements that are not already defined by the CC or CEM:
IT Information Technology
ITSEF IT Security Evaluation Facility
NSCIB Netherlands Scheme for Certification in the area of IT Security
TOE Target of Evaluation
LAN Local Area Network
SSH Secure Shell
SSL Secure Sockets Layer
Page: 11/11 of report number: NSCIB-CC-0568093-CR, dated 24 July 2023
®
TÜV,
TUEV
and
TUV
are
registered
trademarks.
Any
use
or
application
requires
prior
approval.
5 Bibliography
This section lists all referenced documentation used as source material in the compilation of this
report.
[CC] Common Criteria for Information Technology Security Evaluation, Parts I, II and
III, Version 3.1 Revision 5, April 2017
[CEM] Common Methodology for Information Technology Security Evaluation,
Version 3.1 Revision 5, April 2017
[ETR] xFusion FusionDirector 1.7.1.SPC3 Evaluation Technical Report,
UL14366853/ETR, Version 3.0, 11 July 2023
[NSCIB] Netherlands Scheme for Certification in the Area of IT Security, Version 2.5,
28 March 2019
[ST] xFusion FusionDirector 1.7.1.SPC3 Security Target, V1.11, 10 July 2023
(This is the end of this report.)