National Information Assurance Partnership
Common Criteria Evaluation and Validation Scheme
Validation Report
Trned Micro, Inc.
Trend Micro Virtual Mobile
Infrastructure (TMVMI), Version 6
Report Number: CCEVS-VR-VID11083-2020
Dated: July 6, 2020
Version: 1.0
National Institute of Standards and Technology National Security Agency
Information Technology Laboratory Information Assurance Directorate
100 Bureau Drive 9800 Savage Road STE 6940
Gaithersburg, MD 20899 Fort George G. Meade, MD 20755-6940
Trend Micro VMI Validation Report Version 1.0, July 6, 2020
ii
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
Validation Team
Sheldon Durrant
Patrick Mallett, PhD
Lisa Mitchell
The MITRE Corporation
Ken Elliott
Meredith Hennan
Aerospace Corporation
Common Criteria Testing Laboratory
Justin Bettencourt
Raymond Smoley
Gossamer Security Solutions, Inc.
Catonsville, MD
Trend Micro VMI Validation Report Version 1.0, July 6, 2020
iii
Table of Contents
1 Executive Summary.................................................................................................... 1
2 Identification............................................................................................................... 1
3 Architectural Information ........................................................................................... 2
3.1 TOE Evaluated Platforms ......................................................................................... 3
3.2 TOE Architecture...................................................................................................... 4
3.3 Physical Boundaries.................................................................................................. 4
4 Security Policy............................................................................................................ 4
4.1 Cryptographic support .............................................................................................. 4
4.2 User data protection .................................................................................................. 4
4.3 Identification and authentication............................................................................... 5
4.4 Security management................................................................................................ 5
4.5 Protection of the TSF................................................................................................ 5
4.6 Trusted path/channels ............................................................................................... 5
5 Assumptions................................................................................................................ 5
6 Clarification of Scope ................................................................................................. 6
7 Documentation............................................................................................................ 6
8 IT Product Testing ...................................................................................................... 6
8.1 Developer Testing..................................................................................................... 6
8.2 Evaluation Team Independent Testing ..................................................................... 6
9 Evaluated Configuration ............................................................................................. 7
10 Results of the Evaluation ............................................................................................ 7
10.1 Evaluation of the Security Target (ASE)................................................................ 7
10.2 Evaluation of the Development (ADV) .................................................................. 7
10.3 Evaluation of the Guidance Documents (AGD) ..................................................... 7
10.4 Evaluation of the Life Cycle Support Activities (ALC) ......................................... 8
10.5 Evaluation of the Test Documentation and the Test Activity (ATE) ..................... 8
10.6 Vulnerability Assessment Activity (VAN)............................................................. 8
10.7 Summary of Evaluation Results.............................................................................. 9
11 Validator Comments/Recommendations .................................................................... 9
12 Annexes....................................................................................................................... 9
13 Security Target............................................................................................................ 9
14 Glossary ...................................................................................................................... 9
15 Bibliography ............................................................................................................. 10
Trend Micro VMI Validation Report Version 1.0, July 6, 2020
1
1 Executive Summary
This report documents the assessment of the National Information Assurance Partnership
(NIAP) Validation Team of the evaluation of Trend Micro Virtual Mobile Infrastructure
(TMVMI), version 6 solution provided by Trend Micro, Inc. It presents the evaluation
results, their justifications, and the conformance results. This Validation Report is not an
endorsement of the Target of Evaluation by any agency of the U.S. government, and no
warranty is either expressed or implied.
The evaluation was performed by the Gossamer Security Solutions (Gossamer) Common
Criteria Testing Laboratory (CCTL) in Catonsville, MD, United States of America, and
was completed in July 2020. The information in this report is largely derived from the
Evaluation Technical Report (ETR) and associated test reports, all written by Gossamer
Security Solutions. The evaluation determined that the product is both Common Criteria
Part 2 Extended and Part 3 Conformant, and meets the assurance requirements of the
Protection Profile for Application Software, Version 1.3, 01 March 2019 (ASPP13) with
Functional Package for Transport Layer Security (TLS), Version 1.1, 1 March 2019
(PKGTLS11).
The Target of Evaluation (TOE) is the Trend Micro Virtual Mobile Infrastructure
(TMVMI), version 6.
The Target of Evaluation (TOE) identified in this Validation Report has been evaluated at a
NIAP approved Common Criteria Testing Laboratory using the Common Methodology for
IT Security Evaluation (Version 3.1, Rev 5) for conformance to the Common Criteria for
IT Security Evaluation (Version 3.1, Rev 5). This Validation Report applies only to the
specific version of the TOE as evaluated. The evaluation has been conducted in
accordance with the provisions of the NIAP Common Criteria Evaluation and Validation
Scheme and the conclusions of the testing laboratory in the evaluation technical report are
consistent with the evidence provided.
The Validation Team monitored the activities of the Evaluation Team, provided guidance
on technical issues and evaluation processes, and reviewed the individual work units and
successive versions of the ETR. The Validation Team found that the evaluation showed
that the product satisfies all of the functional requirements and assurance requirements
stated in the Security Target (ST). Therefore, the Validation Team concludes that the
testing laboratory’s findings are accurate, the conclusions justified, and the conformance
results are correct. The conclusions of the testing laboratory in the evaluation technical
report are consistent with the evidence produced.
The technical information included in this report was obtained from the Trend Micro
Virtual Mobile Infrastructure (TMVMI), Version 6 (ASPP13) Security Target, Version 0.4,
06/29/2020 and analysis performed by the Validation Team.
2 Identification
The CCEVS is a joint National Security Agency (NSA) and National Institute of Standards
and Technology (NIST) effort to establish commercial facilities to perform trusted product
evaluations. Under this program, security evaluations are conducted by commercial testing
Trend Micro VMI Validation Report Version 1.0, July 6, 2020
2
laboratories called Common Criteria Testing Laboratories (CCTLs) using the Common
Evaluation Methodology (CEM) in accordance with National Voluntary Laboratory
Assessment Program (NVLAP) accreditation.
The NIAP Validation Body assigns Validators to monitor the CCTLs to ensure quality and
consistency across evaluations. Developers of information technology products desiring a
security evaluation contract with a CCTL and pay a fee for their product’s evaluation.
Upon successful completion of the evaluation, the product is added to NIAP’s Validated
Products List.
Table 1 provides information needed to completely identify the product, including:
 The Target of Evaluation (TOE): the fully qualified identifier of the product as
evaluated.
 The Security Target (ST), describing the security features, claims, and assurances of the
product.
 The conformance result of the evaluation.
 The Protection Profile to which the product is conformant.
 The organizations and individuals participating in the evaluation.
Table 1: Evaluation Identifiers
Item Identifier
Evaluation Scheme United States NIAP Common Criteria Evaluation and Validation Scheme
TOE Trend Micro Virtual Mobile Infrastructure (TMVMI), Version 6
PP
(Specific models identified in Section 3.1)
Protection Profile for Application Software, Version 1.3 (PP_APP_V1.3) with
Functional Package for Transport Layer Security (TLS), Version 1.1, 1 March
2019 (PKGTLS11)
ST Trend Micro Virtual Mobile Infrastructure (TMVMI), Version 6 (ASPP13)
Security Target, Version 0.4, 06/29/2020
Evaluation Technical
Report
Evaluation Technical Report for Trend Micro Virtual Mobile Infrastructure
(TMVMI), Version 6, Version 0.2 June 29, 2020
CC Version Common Criteria for Information Technology Security Evaluation, Version 3.1,
rev 5
Conformance Result CC Part 2 extended, CC Part 3 conformant
Sponsor SK Infosec, Inc.
Developer Trend Micro, Inc.
Common Criteria
Testing Lab (CCTL)
Gossamer Security Solutions, Inc.
CCEVS Validators
3 Architectural Information
Note: The following architectural description is based on the description presented in the
Security Target.
Trend Micro VMI Validation Report Version 1.0, July 6, 2020
3
The Target of Evaluation (TOE) is the Trend Micro Virtual Mobile Infrastructure
(TMVMI), Version 6.
The TOE is the Virtual Mobile Infrastructure Client application for Android and iOS
platforms. The TOE is a thin client providing access to a Trend Micro Virtual Mobile
Infrastructure (VMI) server from a mobile device.
3.1 TOE Evaluated Platforms
The TOE was tested on the following mobile devices.
Device Name Processor Operating System
Samsung Galaxy S10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 (SDM855) Android 9.0
Apple iPhone 7 Apple A10 Apple iOS 13.1
Table 1 - Tested Devices
The TOE runs on a Samsung Galaxy S10, Note 10, S9, Note 9, S8, and Note 8 devices
running Android 9. The TOE also runs on Apple iOS 13.1 on iPhone devices including
iPhone X, 8, 7, and 6. The same application runs on all Android devices and the same
application runs on all iPhone devices. The S10 was used for Android testing and iPhone 7
was used for iOS testing. All other devices are claimed as equivalent.
Device Name Processor Operating System
Samsung Devices
Galaxy S10+ Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 (SDM855) Android 9.0
Galaxy S10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 (SDM855) Android 9.0
Galaxy Note10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 (SDM855) Android 9.0
Galaxy Note10+ Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 (SDM855) Android 9.0
Galaxy Note10+ 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 (SDM855) Android 9.0
Galaxy S9+ Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (SDM845) Android 9.0
Galaxy S9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (SDM845) Android 9.0
Galaxy Note 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (SDM845) Android 9.0
Galaxy S8+ Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (SDM845) Android 9.0
Galaxy S8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (SDM845) Android 9.0
Galaxy Note 8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (SDM845) Android 9.0
Apple Devices
iPhone XS Apple A12 Bionic iOS 13.1
iPhone XS Max Apple A12 Bionic iOS 13.1
iPhone XR Apple A12 Bionic iOS 13.1
iPhone X Apple A11 iOS 13.1
iPhone 8 Plus Apple A11 iOS 13.1
iPhone 8 Apple A11 iOS 13.1
iPhone 7 Plus Apple A10 iOS 13.1
iPhone 7 Apple A10 iOS 13.1
iPhone 6 Plus Apple A9 iOS 13.1
iPhone 6 Apple A9 iOS 13.1
Table 2 - Equivalent Devices
Trend Micro VMI Validation Report Version 1.0, July 6, 2020
4
3.2 TOE Architecture
A VMI client is a service that hosts independent workspaces for every user. A user
workspace is based on the Android operating system, which is accessible via the VMI
mobile client application installed on an Android or iOS mobile device. Using the VMI
client application, users can access the same mobile environment that includes all their
applications and data from any location, without being tied to a single mobile device. The
VMI client presents only the interface offered by the VMI server and ensures that
communication with the server utilizes secured protocols.
The TOE when executed, connects to the specified Trend Micro Virtual Mobile
Infrastructure (VMI) server, authenticating the server's certificate received while
negotiating the HTTPS or TLS session. The TOE is responsible only for protecting data-
in-transit between the physical mobile device and the VMI server.
3.3 Physical Boundaries
The physical boundary of the TOE is the physical perimeter of the device on which the
TOE resides.
4 Security Policy
This section summarizes the security functionality of the TOE:
1. Cryptographic support
2. User data protection
3. Identification and authentication
4. Security management
5. Privacy
6. Protection of the TSF
7. Trusted path/channels
4.1 Cryptographic support
The VMI client utilizes platform APIs to provide secure network communication using
HTTPS. The client also uses its own cryptography to establish trusted TLS channels to
transmit data to the VMI Server.
4.2 User data protection
The VMI client informs a user of hardware and software resources the TOE accesses. It
uses the platform’s permission mechanism to get a user’s approval for access. The user
initiates a secure network connection to the VMI server using the TOE. In general,
sensitive data resides on the VMI server and not the VMI Client, although the client does
store encrypt credentials.
Trend Micro VMI Validation Report Version 1.0, July 6, 2020
5
4.3 Identification and authentication
The VMI client performs certificate validation checking for TLS connections. Both
Android and iOS applications support OCSP stapling when performing validity checks.
4.4 Security management
The VMI client does not include any predefined or default credentials, and utilize the
platform recommended storage process for configuration options
4.5 Privacy
The VMI client does not collect any PII and does not transmit any PII over a network.
4.6 Protection of the TSF
The VMI client relies on the physical boundary of the evaluated platform as well as the
Android and iOS operating system for the protection of the TOE’s application components.
All compiled VMI client code is designed to utilize compiler provided anti-exploitation
capabilities. The VMI client application is available through the Google Play store and the
Apple store.
4.7 Trusted path/channels
The VMI client utilizes platform API to establish HTTPS connections to a VMI server. The
client also uses OpenSSL to establish TLS connections to a VMI server.
5 Assumptions
The Security Problem Definition, including the assumptions, may be found in the following
documents:
 Protection Profile for Application Software, Version 1.3 (ASPP13) with Functional
Package for Transport Layer Security (TLS), Version 1.1, 1 March 2019
(PKGTLS11)
That information has not been reproduced here and the ASPP13/PKGTLS11 should be
consulted if there is interest in that material.
The scope of this evaluation was limited to the functionality and assurances covered in the
ASPP13/PKGTLS11 as described for this TOE in the Security Target. Other functionality
included in the product was not assessed as part of this evaluation. All other functionality
provided by the devices needs to be assessed separately, and no further conclusions can be
drawn about their effectiveness.
Trend Micro VMI Validation Report Version 1.0, July 6, 2020
6
6 Clarification of Scope
All evaluations (and all products) have limitations, as well as potential misconceptions that
need clarification. This text covers some of the more important limitations and
clarifications of this evaluation. Note that:
 As with any evaluation, this evaluation only shows that the evaluated configuration
meets the security claims made with a certain level of assurance (the assurance
activities specified in the ASPP13/PKGTLS11 and performed by the Evaluation
Team).
 This evaluation covers only the specific device models and software as identified in
this document, and not any earlier or later versions released or in process.
7 Documentation
The following document was available with the TOE for evaluation:
 Trend Micro Virtual Mobile Infrastructure (TMVMI) User’s Guide, Version 0.3,
06/29/2020
Any additional customer documentation provided with the product, or that is available
online was not included in the scope of the evaluation and therefore should not to be relied
upon when configuring or operating the device as evaluated.
To use the product in the evaluated configuration, the product must be configured as
specified in the Guidance Documentation listed above. Consumers are encouraged to
download the configuration guides from the NIAP website to ensure the device is
configured as evaluated.
8 IT Product Testing
This section describes the testing efforts of the developer and the Evaluation Team. It is
derived from information contained in the proprietary Detailed Test Report for Trend
Micro Virtual Mobile Infrastructure (TMVMI), Version 0.2, June 29, 2020 (DTR), as
summarized in the evaluation Assurance Activity Report.
8.1 Developer Testing
No evidence of developer testing is required in the assurance activities for this product.
8.2 Evaluation Team Independent Testing
The Evaluation Team verified the product according a Common Criteria Certification
document and ran the tests specified in the ASPP13/PKGTLS11 including the tests
associated with optional requirements. The AAR, in sections 1.1 and 3.4.1, lists the tested
devices, provides a list of test tools, and has diagrams of the test environment.
Trend Micro VMI Validation Report Version 1.0, July 6, 2020
7
9 Evaluated Configuration
See Section 3.1.
10 Results of the Evaluation
The results of the assurance requirements are generally described in this section and are
presented in detail in the proprietary ETR. The reader of this document can assume that all
assurance activities and work units received a passing verdict.
A verdict for an assurance component is determined by the resulting verdicts assigned to
the corresponding evaluator action elements. The evaluation was conducted based upon
CC version 3.1 rev 5 and CEM version 3.1 rev 5. The evaluation determined the Trend
Micro Virtual Mobile Infrastructure (TMVMI) TOE to be Part 2 extended, and to meet the
SARs contained in the ASPP13/PKGTLS11.
10.1 Evaluation of the Security Target (ASE)
The Evaluation Team applied each ASE CEM work unit. The ST evaluation ensured the
ST contains a description of the environment in terms of policies and assumptions, a
statement of security requirements claimed to be met by the Trend Micro Virtual Mobile
Infrastructure (TMVMI) products that are consistent with the Common Criteria, and
product security function descriptions that support the requirements.
The validators reviewed the work of the Evaluation Team, and found that sufficient
evidence and justification was provided by the Evaluation Team to confirm that the
evaluation was conducted in accordance with the requirements of the CEM, and that the
conclusion reached by the Evaluation Team was justified.
10.2 Evaluation of the Development (ADV)
The Evaluation Team applied each ADV CEM work unit. The Evaluation Team assessed
the design documentation and found it adequate to aid in understanding how the TSF
provides the security functions. The design documentation consists of a functional
specification contained in the Security Target and Guidance documents. Additionally, the
Evaluation Team performed the assurance activities specified in the ASPP13/PKGTLS11
related to the examination of the information contained in the TSS.
The validators reviewed the work of the Evaluation Team and found that sufficient
evidence and justification was provided by the Evaluation Team to confirm that the
evaluation was conducted in accordance with the requirements of the CEM, and that the
conclusion reached by the Evaluation Team was justified.
10.3 Evaluation of the Guidance Documents (AGD)
The Evaluation Team applied each AGD CEM work unit. The Evaluation Team ensured
the adequacy of the user guidance in describing how to use the operational TOE.
Additionally, the Evaluation Team ensured the adequacy of the administrator guidance in
Trend Micro VMI Validation Report Version 1.0, July 6, 2020
8
describing how to securely administer the TOE. All of the guides were assessed during the
design and testing phases of the evaluation to ensure they were complete.
The validators reviewed the work of the Evaluation Team and found that sufficient
evidence and justification was provided by the Evaluation Team to confirm that the
evaluation was conducted in accordance with the requirements of the CEM, and that the
conclusion reached by the Evaluation Team was justified.
10.4 Evaluation of the Life Cycle Support Activities (ALC)
The Evaluation Team applied each ALC CEM work unit. The Evaluation Team found that
the TOE was identified.
The validators reviewed the work of the Evaluation Team and found that sufficient
evidence and justification was provided by the Evaluation Team to confirm that the
evaluation was conducted in accordance with the requirements of the CEM, and that the
conclusion reached by the Evaluation Team was justified.
10.5 Evaluation of the Test Documentation and the Test Activity (ATE)
The Evaluation Team applied each ATE CEM work unit. The Evaluation Team ran the set
of tests specified by the assurance activities in the ASPP13/PKGTLS11 and recorded the
results in a Test Report, summarized in the AAR.
The validators reviewed the work of the Evaluation Team and found that sufficient
evidence and justification was provided by the Evaluation Team to confirm that the
evaluation was conducted in accordance with the requirements of the CEM, and that the
conclusion reached by the Evaluation Team was justified.
10.6 Vulnerability Assessment Activity (VAN)
The Evaluation Team applied each AVA CEM work unit. The vulnerability analysis is in
the Detailed Test Report (DTR) prepared by the evaluator. The evaluator searched the
National Vulnerability Database (https://web.nvd.nist.gov/vuln/search), Vulnerability
Notes Database (http://www.kb.cert.org/vuls/) on 6/25/2020 with the following search
terms: "Trend Micro", "VMI", "SKInfosec", "Trend Micro VMI", "openSSL",
"AFNetworking", "ASIHTTPRequest", "Libegal", "Libjpeg", "LibOpenGLRender",
"FMDB", "G726", "EGOImageLoading", "MBProgressHUD", "SFHFKeychainUtils",
"Reachability", "SBJson", "SPLockScreen", "TheSidebarController", "JSBadgeView",
"Skia", "x264-152", "ffmpeg", "com.google.code.gson", "org.samba.jcifs",
"fr.avianey.com.viewpagerindicator", "com.github.anzaizai:EasySwipeMenuLayout". No
residual vulnerabilities exist in the TOE.
Additionally, the evaluator used Windows Defender Security to scan the TOE for viruses,
ensuring to check that definitions were current first. In each application variant no issues
were identified.
The validators reviewed the work of the Evaluation Team, and found that sufficient
evidence and justification was provided by the Evaluation Team to confirm that the
Trend Micro VMI Validation Report Version 1.0, July 6, 2020
9
evaluation was conducted in accordance with the requirements of the CEM, and that the
conclusion reached by the Evaluation Team was justified.
10.7 Summary of Evaluation Results
The Evaluation Team’s assessment of the evaluation evidence demonstrates that the claims
in the ST are met. Additionally, the Evaluation Team’s testing also demonstrated the
accuracy of the claims in the ST.
The Validation Team’s assessment of the evidence provided by the Evaluation Team is that
it demonstrates that the Evaluation Team followed the procedures defined in the CEM, and
correctly verified that the product meets the claims in the ST.
11 Validator Comments/Recommendations
The validation team notes that the evaluated configuration is dependent upon the TOE
being configured per the evaluated configuration instructions in the CC Guide document.
No versions of the TOE and software, either earlier or later were evaluated. Please note that
the functionality evaluated is scoped exclusively to the security functional requirements
specified in the Security Target. Other functionality included in the product was not
assessed as part of this evaluation.
12 Annexes
Not applicable
13 Security Target
The Security Target is identified as: Trend Micro Virtual Mobile Infrastructure (TMVMI),
Version 6 (ASPP13) Security Target, Version 0.4, 06/29/2020.
14 Glossary
The following definitions are used throughout this document:
 Common Criteria Testing Laboratory (CCTL). An IT security evaluation facility
accredited by the National Voluntary Laboratory Accreditation Program (NVLAP) and
approved by the CCEVS Validation Body to conduct Common Criteria-based
evaluations.
 Conformance. The ability to demonstrate in an unambiguous way that a given
implementation is correct with respect to the formal model.
 Evaluation. The assessment of an IT product against the Common Criteria using the
Common Criteria Evaluation Methodology to determine whether or not the claims
made are justified; or the assessment of a protection profile against the Common
Criteria using the Common Evaluation Methodology to determine if the Profile is
Trend Micro VMI Validation Report Version 1.0, July 6, 2020
10
complete, consistent, technically sound and hence suitable for use as a statement of
requirements for one or more TOEs that may be evaluated.
 Evaluation Evidence. Any tangible resource (information) required from the sponsor
or developer by the evaluator to perform one or more evaluation activities.
 Feature. Part of a product that is either included with the product or can be ordered
separately.
 Target of Evaluation (TOE). A group of IT products configured as an IT system, or
an IT product, and associated documentation that is the subject of a security evaluation
under the CC.
 Validation. The process carried out by the CCEVS Validation Body leading to the
issue of a Common Criteria certificate.
 Validation Body. A governmental organization responsible for carrying out validation
and for overseeing the day-to-day operation of the NIAP Common Criteria Evaluation
and Validation Scheme.
15 Bibliography
The Validation Team used the following documents to produce this Validation Report:
[1] Common Criteria for Information Technology Security Evaluation: Part 1:
Introduction and General Model, Version 3.1, Revision 5, April 2017.
[2] Common Criteria for Information Technology Security Evaluation Part 2: Security
functional components, Version 3.1, Revision 5, April 2017.
[3] Common Criteria for Information Technology Security Evaluation Part 3: Security
assurance components, Version 3.1 Revision 5, April 2017.
[4] Protection Profile for Application Software, Version 1.3, 01 March 2019 (ASPP13)
with Functional Package for Transport Layer Security (TLS), Version 1.1, 1 March
2019 (PKGTLS11).
[5] Trend Micro Virtual Mobile Infrastructure (TMVMI), Version 6 (ASPP13) Security
Target, Version 0.4, 06/29/2020 (ST).
[6] Assurance Activity Report (ASPP13/PKGTLS11) for Trend Micro Virtual Mobile
Infrastructure (TMVMI), Version 6, Version 0.2, June 29, 2020 (AAR).
[7] Detailed Test Report for Trend Micro Virtual Mobile Infrastructure (TMVMI),
Version 0.2, June 29, 2020 (DTR).
[8] Evaluation Technical Report for Trend Micro Virtual Mobile Infrastructure
(TMVMI), Version 6, Version 0.2, June 29, 2020 (ETR).