CRP-C0222-01 Certification Report Koji Nishigaki, Chairman Information-technology Promotion Agency, Japan Target of Evaluation Application date/ID 2008-03-28 (ITC-8220) Certification No. C0222 Sponsor Konica Minolta Business Technologies, Inc. Name of TOE Japan: bizhub PRO 1200 / 1200P / 1051 zentai seigyo software Overseas: bizhub PRO 1200 / 1200P / 1051 control software Version of TOE Image control program (Image control I1) : 00I1-G00-10 Controller control program (IC control P) : 00P1-G00-10 PP Conformance None Conformed Claim EAL3 Developer Konica Minolta Business Technologies, Inc. Evaluation Facility Information Technology Security Center Evaluation Department This is to report that the evaluation result for the above TOE is certified as follows. 2009-07-15 Takumi Yamasato, Technical Manager Information Security Certification Office IT Security Center Evaluation Criteria, etc.: This TOE is evaluated in accordance with the following criteria prescribed in the "IT Security Evaluation and Certification Scheme". - Common Criteria for Information Technology Security Evaluation Version 2.3 (ISO/IEC 15408:2005) - Common Methodology for Information Technology Security Evaluation Version 2.3 (ISO/IEC 18045:2005) Evaluation Result: Pass " Japan : bizhub PRO 1200 / 1200P / 1051 zentai seigyo software (Gazou seigyo program(Gazou seigyo I1) : 00I1-G00-10, Controller seigyo program(IC control CRP-C0222-01 P) : 00P1-G00-10), Overseas : bizhub PRO 1200 / 1200P / 1051 control software (Image control program(Image control I1) : 00I1-G00-10, Controller control program (IC control P) : 00P1-G00-10)" has been evaluated in accordance with the provision of the "IT Security Certification Procedure" by Information-technology Promotion Agency, Japan, and has met the specified assurance requirements. CRP-C0222-01 Notice: This document is the English translation version of the Certification Report published by the Certification Body of Japan Information Technology Security Evaluation and Certification Scheme. CRP-C0222-01 Table of Contents 1. Executive Summary ............................................................................... 1 1.1 Introduction ..................................................................................... 1 1.2 Evaluated Product ............................................................................ 1 1.2.1 Name of Product ......................................................................... 1 1.2.2 Product Overview ........................................................................ 1 1.2.3 Scope of TOE and Overview of Operation....................................... 3 1.2.4 TOE Functionality ....................................................................... 3 1.3 Conduct of Evaluation....................................................................... 5 1.4 Certificate of Evaluation .................................................................... 6 1.5 Overview of Report ............................................................................ 6 1.5.1 PP Conformance.......................................................................... 6 1.5.2 EAL ........................................................................................... 6 1.5.3 SOF ........................................................................................... 6 1.5.4 Security Functions ...................................................................... 6 1.5.5 Threat ........................................................................................ 9 1.5.6 Organisational Security Policy ..................................................... 9 1.5.7 Configuration Requirements ........................................................ 9 1.5.8 Assumptions for Operational Environment .................................... 9 1.5.9 Documents Attached to Product ................................................. 10 2. Conduct and Results of Evaluation by Evaluation Facility....................... 11 2.1 Evaluation Methods ........................................................................ 11 2.2 Overview of Evaluation Conducted ................................................... 11 2.3 Product Testing .............................................................................. 12 2.3.1 Developer Testing...................................................................... 12 2.3.2 Evaluator Testing...................................................................... 13 2.4 Evaluation Result ........................................................................... 14 3. Conduct of Certification ....................................................................... 15 4. Conclusion.......................................................................................... 16 4.1 Certification Result ......................................................................... 16 4.2 Recommendations ........................................................................... 16 5. Glossary ............................................................................................. 17 6. Bibliography ....................................................................................... 19 CRP-C0222-01 1. Executive Summary 1.1 Introduction This Certification Report describes the content of certification result in relation to IT Security Evaluation of " Japan : bizhub PRO 1200 / 1200P / 1051 zentai seigyo software (Gazou seigyo program(Gazou seigyo I1) : 00I1-G00-10, Controller seigyo program(IC control P) : 00P1-G00-11), Overseas : bizhub PRO 1200 / 1200P / 1051 control software (Image control program(Image control I1) : 00I1-G00-10, Controller control program (IC control P) : 00P1-G00-10)" (hereinafter referred to as "the TOE") conducted by Information Technology Security Center, Evaluation Department (hereinafter referred to as "Evaluation Facility"), and it reports to the sponsor, Konica Minolta Business Technologies, Inc. The reader of the Certification Report is advised to read the corresponding ST and manuals (please refer to "1.5.9 Documents Attached to Product" for further details) attached to the TOE together with this report. The assumed environment, corresponding security objectives, security functional and assurance requirements needed for its implementation and their summary specifications are specifically described in ST. The operational conditions and functional specifications are also described in the document attached to the TOE. Note that the Certification Report presents the certification result based on assurance requirements conformed to the TOE, and does not certify individual IT product itself. Note: In this Certification Report, IT Security Evaluation Criteria and IT Security Evaluation Method prescribed by IT Security Evaluation and Certification Scheme are named CC and CEM, respectively. 1.2 Evaluated Product 1.2.1 Name of Product The target product by this Certificate is as follows: Name of Product: Japan : bizhub PRO 1200 / 1200P / 1051 zentai seigyo software Overseas : bizhub PRO 1200 / 1200P / 1051 control software Version: Japan : Gazou seigyo program (Gazou seigyo I1) : 00I1-G00-10 Controller seigyo program (IC control P) : 00P1-G00-10 Overseas: Image control program (Image control I1): 00I1-G00-10 Controller control program(IC control P): 00P1-G00-10 Developer: Konica Minolta Business Technologies, Inc. 1.2.2 Product Overview This product (it is called "bizhub PRO 1200 control software(*1)", hereafter.), that is installed with digital MFP (it is called "bizhub PRO 1200 series") manufactured by Konica Minolta Business Technologies, Inc., is a software product for the purpose of reducing the danger for the disclosure of document data stored every user. bizhub PRO 1200 control software prevents the document data from disclosing during the use of functions such as copier and printer. To protect the document data, it has a "User BOX" function and a variety of management capabilities, additional highly confidential HDD (Hard Disk Drive) with lock system (*2) to store the document. bizhub PRO 1200 control software is provided with bizhub PRO 1200 series. 1 CRP-C0222-01 Fig 1-1 shows the expected operating environment with bizhub PRO 1200 series in office. (*1) bizhub PRO 1200 control software indicates "bizhub PRO 1200 / 1200P / 1051 zentai seigyo software" for Japan and "bizhub PRO 1200 / 1200P / 1051 control software" for overseas. (*2) HDD has the password so that the hard disk cannot be removed and read in another equipment. HDD lock password is set in the hard disk lock system. Figure 1-1 Operating Environment of bizhub PRO 1200 series bizhub PRO 1200 series including the TOE is connected with the internal network and public telephone line network as shown in Figure 1.1. The internal network is connected with the client PC of general user, mail server and FTP server, to which bizhub PRO 1200 series sends the data. The TOE does not have the interface with the external network. The TOE is connected with the external network only through Firewall, so as to protect each of equipments on the internal network. 2 CRP-C0222-01 1.2.3 Scope of TOE and Overview of Operation Figure 1-2 shows the structure of bizhub PRO 1200 series including the TOE. Figure 1-2 TOE Structure bizhub PRO 1200 series consists of the hardware and bizhub PRO 1200 control software. The components of bizhub PRO 1200 control software are the image control program and the controller control program. The hardware consists of bizhub PRO 1200 series main unit, print controller, HDD1, HDD2, operation panel, and network card. The HDD1 is the storage device that stores the data (temporary storage is also possible.). The HDD2 is the storage device that stores temporarily the data. The TOE is bizhub PRO 1200 control software and it operates with OS. The hatching parts in Fig.1-2 show the control range of TOE, namely, each function included in the TOE and the area of data extension created by the TOE. 1.2.4 TOE Functionality The TOE consists of "basic function" that operates the document data stored in the document data file of User BOX, "management function" that sets the TOE by the administrator, and "CE function" that executes the initial setting of TOE (Registration of administrator and Installation of TOE) by CE(*3). (*3) Customer Engineer is a person who is enrolled at the company undertaken the maintenance of bizhub PRO 1200 series, and carries out the maintenance of bizhub PRO 1200 series. 3 CRP-C0222-01 1.2.4.1 Basic function of TOE Basic functions are used to operate the document data. The User BOX is identified by the User BOX identifier, and the User BOX password is set for every User BOX so as to confirm the validity as the owner (general user) of each User BOX. The valid owner of User BOX can access all the document data in his/her User BOX. Fig 1-3 shows the processing overview of basic functions. The Sub BOX is created in the User BOX, and the document data is stored together into the Sub BOX. Figure 1-3 Processing Architecture of Basic Function The followings are the details of each function. (1) Scanning function By operating from the operation panel, the information of paper document is read from the scanner, converted to the document data, and stored into the HDD1 temporary storage or DRAM temporary storage. (2) PC data receiving function The document data from the client PC is stored into the HDD2 temporary storage, executed the data exchange, and stored into the HDD1 temporary storage or DRAM temporary storage. (3) BOX storage function The temporary document data in the HDD1 temporary storage or in the DRAM temporary storage is stored into the User BOX additionally. (4) BOX readout function The document data in the User BOX is temporarily read out to the HDD1 temporary storage or DRAM temporary storage. (5) Printing function The temporary document data in the HDD1 temporary storage or in the DRAM 4 CRP-C0222-01 temporary storage is printed out. (6) Email function The document data gotten by the scanning function, which is stored temporarily into the HDD1 temporary storage or DRAM temporary storage, is attached to a mail via the HDD2 temporary storage, and sent to the mail server. (7) FTP function The document data gotten by the scanning function, which is stored temporarily into the HDD1 temporary storage or DRAM temporary storage, is sent to the FTP server via the HDD2 temporary storage. (8) SMP function The document data gotten by the scanning function, which is stored temporarily into the HDD1 temporary storage or DRAM temporary storage, is sent to the shared folder of PC that is connected with the internal network via the HDD2 temporary storage. (9) Deletion function The document data in the use BOX, associated with the User BOX identifier is deleted. 1.2.4.2 Management function The administrator conducts the operational setting for the TOE functions through this management function. Moreover the management function controls the related information for the operation of digital MFP, such as the creation/attribution change/deletion of User BOX, the printing of audit information, the initialization process of HDD1 and HDD2 (setting of HDD lock password), the management of troubleshooting/toner/number of prints. 1.2.4.3 CE function The following function is provided so that the CE can execute the initial setting and the maintenance for the TOE. - Service setting mode By operating from the operation panel, the CE executes the registration and change of the administrator password by using the function of service setting mode. 1.3 Conduct of Evaluation Based on the IT Security Evaluation/Certification Program operated by the Certification Body, TOE functionality and its assurance requirements are being evaluated by evaluation facility in accordance with those publicized documents such as "IT Security Evaluation and Certification Scheme"[2], "IT Security Certification Procedure"[3] and "Evaluation Facility Approval Procedure"[4]. Scope of the evaluation is as follow. - Security design of the TOE shall be adequate; - Security functions of the TOE shall be satisfied with security functional requirements described in the security design; - This TOE shall be developed in accordance with the basic security design; - Above mentioned three items shall be evaluated in accordance with the CC Part 3 and CEM. More specific, the evaluation facility examined "Multi functional printer bizhub PRO 5 CRP-C0222-01 1200 series Security Target" as the basic design of security functions for the TOE (hereinafter referred to as "the ST") [1], the evaluation deliverables in relation to development of the TOE and the development, manufacturing and shipping sites of the TOE. The evaluation facility evaluated if the TOE is satisfied both Annex B of CC Part 1 (either of [5], [8] or [11]) and Functional Requirements of CC Part 2 (either of [6], [9] or [12]) and also evaluated if the development, manufacturing and shipping environments for the TOE is also satisfied with Assurance Requirements of CC Part 3 (either of [7], [10] or [13]) as its rationale. Such evaluation procedure and its result are presented in "bizhub PRO 1200 / 1200P / 1051 zentai seigyo software Evaluation Technical Report" (hereinafter referred to as "the Evaluation Technical Report") [17]. Further, evaluation methodology should comply with the CEM (either of [14], [15] or [16]). 1.4 Certification The Certification Body verifies the Evaluation Technical Report and Observation Report prepared by the evaluation facility and evaluation evidence materials, and confirmed that the TOE evaluation is conducted in accordance with the prescribed procedure. Certification review is also prepared for those concerns found in the certification process. Evaluation is completed with the Evaluation Technical Report dated 2009-07 submitted by the evaluation facility and those problems pointed out by the Certification Body are fully resolved and confirmed that the TOE evaluation is appropriately conducted in accordance with CC and CEM. The Certification Body prepared this Certification Report based on the Evaluation Technical Report submitted by the evaluation facility and concluded fully certification activities. 1.5 Overview of Report 1.5.1 PP Conformance There is no PP to be conformed. 1.5.2 EAL Evaluation Assurance Level of TOE defined by this ST is EAL3. 1.5.3 SOF This ST claims "SOF-basic" as its minimum strength of function. This TOE assumes the attack capability of general user to be low level. It is assumed that this TOE is operated under the condition that secures the adequate security in terms of physical and human. Therefore, SOF-Basic that can adequately resist for attacking from the threat agent with the attack capability of low level is valid for the security strength. 1.5.4 Security Functions The security functions of the TOE are as follows: 6 CRP-C0222-01 (1) Identification and authentication Function title Security function IA.ADM_ADD Registration of administrator Only the CE can operate it. The administrator is registered in the TOE by registering the administrator password. The administrator is registered if the password obeys the specification, and it is rejected if not so. IA.ADM_AUTH Identification and authentication of administrator Before the operator uses the TOE, he/she is identified to be the registered administrator in the TOE and authenticated to be the valid administrator. The operations of all the management functions are not permitted before the identification and authentication of administrator. By accessing the interface for the authentication of administrator by the operator, he/she is identified to be the administrator, and authenticated to the valid administrator using the entered password. In case of unsuccessful authentication, the access is prohibited for five seconds. IA.CE_AUTH Identification and authentication of CE Before the operator uses the TOE, he/she is identified to be the registered CE in the TOE and authenticated to be the valid CE. The operations of all the CE functions are not permitted before the identification and authentication of CE. By using the interface for the authentication of CE and the entered password by the operator, he/she is authenticated to be the valid CE. In case of unsuccessful authentication, the access is prohibited for five seconds. IA.PASS Change of password The passwords of administrator, CE, and User BOX are changed. The interface for password change is provided and entering the new password is required. The following shows the changeable passwords by the type of user. CE : CE password, Administrator password Administrator : User BOX password, Administrator password General user who owns User BOX : User BOX password of his/ her own User BOX The password is changed if it obeys the specification, and it is rejected if not so. (2) Access control Function title Security function ACL.USR Access rule and control to general user The general user who owns User BOX is identified and authenticated. After he/she is authenticated to be the valid user, the operatable coverage for the general user is limited according to the following access rules. The general user who owns User BOX is 7 CRP-C0222-01 identified and authenticated by the User BOX identifier and User BOX password. The following operation is permitted for only the User BOX that corresponds to the User BOX identifier of the general user who owns User BOX. - Reading out and printing of document In case of unsuccessful identification and authentication, the identification and authentication trials are prohibited for five seconds. (3) Audit Function title Security function AUD.LOG Record of audit information The audit information regarding the action of security functions is recorded. Auditable events are as follows. - Startup and shutdown of audit functions - Success and failure in identifying and authenticating of administrator, CE, general user who owns User BOX - Success in registering password of administrator and general user who owns User BOX - Success in changing password and HDD lock password of administrator, CE, and general user who owns User BOX - Success in reading out of document data AUD.MNG Management of audit area The area of audit storage is controlled by ring buffer format in order to create and store the audit information. (4) Management support Function title Security function MNG.MODE Setting of security reinforcement mode Only the administrator is permitted the function to stop the security reinforcement mode. MNG.ADM Management support function (Administrator) The following operations are permitted and executed by only the administrator. - Creation of User BOX, registration of User BOX identifier, and setting of User BOX password - Inquiry of audit information The registration is executed if the User BOX password obeys the specification, it is not rejected if not so. MNG.HDD HDD lock password function The following operations are permitted and executed by only the administrator. - Change of HDD lock password The HDD lock password is set and changed to HDD device if the User BOX password obeys the specification, they are rejected if not so. 8 CRP-C0222-01 1.5.5 Threat This TOE assumes the threats shown in Table 1-1 and has functions to counteract them. Table 1-1 Assumed Threats Identifier Threat T.ACCESS (Unauthenticated access to the BOX) When a general user uses the user function from the operation panel, there is a possible threat of disclosing the document data that the other general user owns in his/her User BOX. T.HDDACCESS (Unauthenticated access to the HDD) - When a general user connects the HDD1 with an illegal device, there is a possible threat of disclosing the document data in the HDD1. - When a general user connects the HDD2 with an illegal device, there is a possible threat of disclosing the document data in the HDD2. T.IMPADMIN (Impersonation of the CE and administrator) - When a general user uses illegally the interfaces for CE function and administrator function, there is a possible threat of disclosing the document data. 1.5.6 Organizational Security Policy There is no the required security policy of the organization upon use of the TOE. 1.5.7 Configuration Requirements The TOE is a software product installed to bizhub PRO 1200 series. The TOE is installed as a security function at time of bizhub PRO 1200 series shipping or built-in configuration on user site by Web downloading from CE. 1.5.8 Assumptions for Operational Environment Table 1-2 shows the assumptions in the environment where this TOE is used. When these assumptions are not fulfilled, effective operation of the security functions for the TOE is not assured. Table 1-3 Assumptions in Use of the TOE Identifier Assumptions ASM.PLACE (Installation condition for the TOE) The TOE shall be installed in the area where only the product- Related person can operate. ASM.NET (Setting condition for the internal network) The TOE shall be connected with the internal network that the disclosure of document data will not occur. ASM.ADMIN (Reliable administrator) The administrator shall not carry out an illegal act. 9 CRP-C0222-01 ASM.CE (Personal condition for the CE) The CE shall not carry out an illegal act. ASM.USR (Management of the general user) The general user shall not disclose his/her own User BOX password. 1.5.9 Documents Attached to Product The documents attached to this TOE are shown as follows. * Japanese version - bizhub PRO 1200/1051 Installation Manual Vol.1 - bizhub PRO 1200P Installation Manual Vol.1 - bizhub PRO 1200/1200P/1051 Service Manual Field Service Vol.1 - bizhub PRO 1200/1051 User's Guide Copier Vol.1 - bizhub PRO 1200/1051 User's Guide Network Scanner Vol.1 - bizhub PRO 1200/1051 User's Guide POD Administrator's Reference Vol.1 - bizhub PRO 1200/1051 User's Guide Security Vol.1 - bizhub PRO 1200P User's Guide Main Copier Vol.1 - bizhub PRO 1200P User's Guide Security Vol.1 * Overseas version - bizhub PRO 1200/1051 INSTALLATION MANUAL Vol.1 - bizhub PRO 1200P INSTALLATION MANUAL Vol.1 - bizhub PRO 1200/1200P/1051 SERVICE MANUAL Field Service Vol.1 - bizhub PRO 1200/1051 User's Guide Copier Vol.1 - bizhub PRO 1200/1051 User's Guide Network Scanner Vol.1 - bizhub PRO 1200/1051 User's Guide POD Administrator's Reference Vol.1 - bizhub PRO 1200/1051 User's Guide Security Vol.1 - bizhub PRO 1200P User's Guide Main Copier Vol.1 - bizhub PRO 1200P User's Guide Security Vol.1 10 CRP-C0222-01 2. Conduct and Results of Evaluation by Evaluation Facility 2.1 Evaluation Methods Evaluation was conducted by using the evaluation methods prescribed in CEM in accordance with the assurance requirements in CC Part 3. Details for evaluation activities are report in the Evaluation Technical Report. It described the description of overview of the TOE, and the contents and verdict evaluated by each work unit prescribed in CEM. 2.2 Overview of Evaluation Conducted The history of evaluation conducted was present in the Evaluation Technical Report as follows. Evaluation has started on 2008-04 and concluded by completion the Evaluation Technical Report dated 2009-07. The evaluation facility received a full set of evaluation deliverables necessary for evaluation provided by developer, and examined the evidences in relation to a series of evaluation conducted. Additionally, the evaluation facility directly visited the development and manufacturing sites on 2009-06 and examined procedural status conducted in relation to each work unit for configuration management, delivery and operation and lifecycle by investigating records and staff hearing. Further, the evaluation facility executed sampling check of conducted testing by developer and evaluator testing by using developer testing environment at developer site on 2009-06. As for concerns indicated during evaluation process by the Certification Body, the certification reviews were sent to the evaluation facility. These were reflected to evaluation after investigation conducted by the evaluation facility and the developer. 11 CRP-C0222-01 2.3 Product Testing An outline of the developer test evaluated by the evaluators and the evaluator test executed by the evaluator is shown as follows. 2.3.1 Developer Testing 1) Developer Test Environment Figure 2-1 shows the structure of the test system executed by the developer. bizhub PRO 1200 Testing penetration PC Mail server WindowsXP(SP3) FTP server WindowsXP(SP3) SMB server WindowsXP(SP3) CSRC Terminal Client PC Controller NIC Main body NIC Internal network Figure 2-1 Structural Diagram of the Developer Testing System 2) Outlining of Developer Test The outline of the test executed by the developer is as follows. a. Test structure Figure 2-1 shows the test structure executed by the developer. - TOE (bizhub PRO 1200 control software (Image control program (Image control I1) 00I1-G00-10, Controller control program (IC control P) 00P1-G00-10)) is installed to bizhub PRO 1200 series. - bizhub PRO 1200 is connected to the internal network (100baseT). - bizhub PRO 1200 is connected to client PC, mail server, FTP server, SMB server and CSRC terminal through the internal network. CSRC is connected only by LAN in the test structure, however, it does not have an influence on the test results of security functions because it is non security function. Therefore, it can be judged that the developer test is executed in the same TOE testing environment with the TOE structure identified in the ST. 12 CRP-C0222-01 b. Test method The following methods are used for the test. (1) The operation of security functions is confirmed by the operation of TSFI. (2) If testing of TSFI and subsystem interface cannot be performed by the operation through the external interface directly connected to bizhub PRO 1200 series, it is performed with methods by indirectly stimulating the interface. (3) For the observation of test behavior, the direct confirmation is performed if it can be confirmed by the external TSFI, the behavior of test results is confirmed by using a measuring equipment (bizhub PRO 1200) if it can not be observed. (4) By comparing the expected behavior with the actual test results obtained at test execution, whether the test objects are achieved or not, are determined. c. Scope of Testing Performed The developer tests are set for 26 test items. The coverage analysis has been executed and it was verified that all the security functions and external interfaces stipulated in the function specifications have been adequately tested. The depth analysis has been executed and it was verified that all the subsystems and subsystem interfaces stipulated in the high level design have been adequately tested. d. Result The test results by the developer confirmed that the expected test results and the actual test results are consistent. The evaluator confirmed the execution method of the developer test and the legitimacy of the executed items, and confirmed that the execution method and execution results are consistent with those shown in the test plan. 2.3.2 Evaluator Testing 1) Evaluator test environment The system structure of the test executed by the evaluator has the same structure as the developer test. 2) Outlining of the evaluator test The outline of the test executed by the evaluator is as follows. a. Test structure Figure 2-1 shows the test structure executed by the evaluator. The evaluator test executed at test environment that was same configuration as the TOE configured following ST. The penetration test executed by the evaluator executed at the test configuration of Figure 2-1 and a part of penetration test was executed at bizhub PRO 1200 installed TOE that was connected ISW by USB cable. Furthermore the evaluator confirmed test environment that was same configuration as the TOE configured following ST. 13 CRP-C0222-01 b. Testing Approach The following methods are used for the sampling test. (1) Test items selected more than 50% items from developer test. (2) Test items more than one selected for each of TSFI with each developer test. (3) Test items related all user interface selected at least more than one with developer test. (4) A set of closed test items selected with developer test. The following methods are used for the independent test. (1) This operation of security functions is confirmed by the operation of TSFI. (2) The subsystem interface is tested by the operation through the external interface connected to bizhub PRO 1200 series. (3) If test behavior cannot be checked by TSFI, it is tested with methods by indirectly stimulating the interface. (4) By comparing the expected behavior with the actual test results obtained at test execution, whether the test objects is achieved or not, is determined. The penetration test is executed by the following policy. Penetration test is executed to confirm that there is no vulnerability possible to be abused by attacker of low level in the TOE or whether there is the remaining vulnerability in the operating environment regulated in the ST. c. Range of the executed test The tests are set for the following test volume/coverage. Original test created by evaluator is 10 items, sampling test from developer test is 18 items, penetration test created by evaluator is 6 items and total volume is 34 items. d. Result All the executed evaluator tests have been properly completed and the behavior of the TOE was confirmed. The evaluator confirmed that all of the test results were consistent with the expected behavior. 2.4 Evaluation Result The evaluator had the conclusion that the TOE satisfies all work units prescribed in CEM by submitting the Evaluation Technical Report. 14 CRP-C0222-01 3. Conduct of Certification The following certification was conducted based on each materials submitted by evaluation facility during evaluation process. 1. Contents pointed out in the Observation Report shall be adequate. 2. Contents pointed out in the Observation Report shall properly be reflected. 3. Evidential materials submitted were sampled, its contents were examined, and related work units shall be evaluated as presented in the Evaluation Technical Report. 4. Rationale of evaluation verdict by the evaluator presented in the Evaluation Technical Report shall be adequate. 5. The Evaluator's evaluation methodology presented in the Evaluation Technical Report shall conform to the CEM. Concerns found in certification process were prepared as certification review, which were sent to evaluation facility. The Certification Body confirmed such concerns pointed out in Observation Reports and certification reviews were solved in the ST and the Evaluation Technical Report. 15 CRP-C0222-01 4. Conclusion 4.1 Certification Result The Certification Body verified the Evaluation Technical Report, the Observation Report and the related evaluation evidential materials submitted and confirmed that all evaluator action elements required in CC Part 3 are conducted appropriately to the TOE. The Certification Body verified the TOE is satisfied the EAL3 assurance requirements prescribed in CC Part 3. 4.2 Recommendations OE.WATCH [Administrator is monitoring to TOE not to do irregular access and forbid to enter to the TOE setting place when administrator being absent.] being security policy of environment to use TOE in secure condition is another charge of protecting to expose protected assets against attacking by HDD password made out by analysis service. 16 CRP-C0222-01 5. Glossary The abbreviations used in this report are listed below. CC: Common Criteria for Information Technology Security Evaluation CEM: Common Methodology for Information Technology Security Evaluation EAL: Evaluation Assurance Level PP: Protection Profile SOF: Strength of Function ST: Security Target TOE: Target of Evaluation TSF: TOE Security Functions The glossaries used in this report are listed below. User BOX: Directory being stored for documents data Documents data: Computerized data for text and graphic. Paper documents: Documents were written on a paper. Operating panel: Operating Unit for using bizhub PRO 1200 series by touch panel display. Internal network: This is LAN in an office which introduces bizhub PRO 1200 series, and is connected with the client PC and several servers such as mail server and FTP server. External network: Network except internal network such as the Internet SMB: This is the application protocol to communicate between the computers on the network under Microsoft-OS series. CSRC: CS Remote Care for short-Remote Management system of machine send and receive machine management data with using E-mail and phone line from machine to CS Remote Center PC. Be able to call Center PC in case of trouble occurred. 17 CRP-C0222-01 Hard Disk Lock Function: The HDD for storing the document data shall prevent the unauthenticated access by means of the HDD lock password. HDD lock password: Password that releases the forbidden state to read and write on HDD. General User: Enrollment of organization being purchased bizhub PRO 1200. He/she use copier/printer/fax. Administrator: A Person is charged of machine management. He/she belongs to enrollment of organization being purchased bizhub PRO 1200. CE: Enrollment of company being charged bizhub PRO 1200 maintenance. CE shall execute the maintenance for bizhub PRO 1200 and enter into the maintenance contract of bizhub PRO 1200 with Administrator or responsible person. Responsible person: A person belongs to organization being purchased bizhub PRO 1200. He/she shall decide administrator of bizhub PRO 1200. The product-related persons: The general user, administrator, and CE. 18 CRP-C0222-01 6. Bibliography [1] Multi functional printer bizhub PRO 1200 Series Security Target Version 6 (June 5, 2009) Konica Minolta Business Technologies, Inc. [2] IT Security Evaluation and Certification Scheme, May 2007, Information-technology Promotion Agency, Japan CCS-01 [3] IT Security Certification Procedure, May 2007, Information-technology Promotion Agency, Japan CCM-02 [4] Evaluation Facility Approval Procedure, May 2007, Information-technology Promotion Agency, Japan CCM-03 [5] Common Criteria for Information Technology Security Evaluation Part 1: Introduction and general model Version 2.3 August 2005 CCMB-2005-08-001 [6] Common Criteria for Information Technology Security Evaluation Part 2: Security functional requirements Version 2.3 August 2005 CCMB-2005-08-002 [7] Common Criteria for Information Technology Security Evaluation Part 3: Security assurance requirements Version 2.3 August 2005 CCMB-2005-08-003 [8] Common Criteria for Information Technology Security Evaluation Part 1: Introduction and general model Version 2.3 August 2005 CCMB-2005-08-001 (Translation Version 1.0 December 2005) [9] Common Criteria for Information Technology Security Evaluation Part 2: Security functional requirements Version 2.3 August 2005 CCMB-2005-08-002 (Translation Version 1.0 December 2005) [10] Common Criteria for Information Technology Security Evaluation Part 3: Security assurance requirements Version 2.3 August 2005 CCMB-2005-08-003 (Translation Version 1.0 December 2005) [11] ISO/IEC 15408-1:2005 - Information Technology - Security techniques - Evaluation criteria for IT security - Part 1: Introduction and general model [12] ISO/IEC 15408-2:2005 - Information technology - Security techniques - Evaluation criteria for IT security - Part 2: Security functional requirements [13] ISO/IEC 15408-3:2005 - Information technology - Security techniques - Evaluation criteria for IT security - Part 3: Security assurance requirements [14] Common Methodology for Information Technology Security Evaluation: Evaluation Methodology Version 2.3 August 2005 CCMB-2005-08-004 [15] Common Methodology for Information Technology Security Evaluation: Evaluation Methodology Version 2.3 August 2005 CCMB-2005-08-004 (Translation Version 1.0 December 2005) [16] ISO/IEC 18045:2005 Information technology - Security techniques - Methodology for IT security evaluation [17] bizhub PRO 1200 / 1200P / 1051 zentai seigyo software Evaluation Technical 19 CRP-C0222-01 20 Report Version 1.2, July 3, 2009, Information Technology Security Center Evaluation Department