Certification Report
HP Operations Orchestration 10.20
Issued by:
Communications Security Establishment
Certification Body
Canadian Common Criteria Evaluation and Certification Scheme
© Government of Canada, Communications Security Establishment, 2015
Document number: 383-4-321-CR
Version: 1.0
Date: 12 August 2015
Pagination: i to iii, 1 to 10
CCS Certification Report Hewlett Packard Enterprise Development L.P.
HP Operations Orchestration 10.20
___________________________________________________________________________
Version 1.0 12 August 2015
- Page i of iii -
DISCLAIMER
The Information Technology (IT) product identified in this certification report, and its
associated certificate, has been evaluated at an approved evaluation facility – established
under the Canadian Common Criteria Evaluation and Certification Scheme (CCS) – using the
Common Methodology for Information Technology Security Evaluation, Version 3.1 Revision
4, for conformance to the Common Criteria for Information Technology Security Evaluation,
Version 3.1 Revision 4. This certification report, and its associated certificate, applies only to
the identified version and release of the product in its evaluated configuration. The evaluation
has been conducted in accordance with the provisions of the CCS, and the conclusions of the
evaluation facility in the evaluation report are consistent with the evidence adduced. This
report, and its associated certificate, are not an endorsement of the IT product by the
Communications Security Establishment, or any other organization that recognizes or gives
effect to this report, and its associated certificate, and no warranty for the IT product by the
Communications Security Establishment, or any other organization that recognizes or gives
effect to this report, and its associated certificate, is either expressed or implied.
CCS Certification Report Hewlett Packard Enterprise Development L.P.
HP Operations Orchestration 10.20
___________________________________________________________________________
Version 1.0 12 August 2015
- Page ii of iii -
FOREWORD
The Canadian Common Criteria Evaluation and Certification Scheme (CCS) provides a
third-party evaluation service for determining the trustworthiness of Information Technology
(IT) security products. Evaluations are performed by a commercial Common Criteria
Evaluation Facility (CCEF) under the oversight of the CCS Certification Body, which is
managed by the Communications Security Establishment.
A CCEF is a commercial facility that has been approved by the CCS Certification Body to
perform Common Criteria evaluations; a significant requirement for such approval is
accreditation to the requirements of ISO/IEC 17025:2005, the General Requirements for the
Competence of Testing and Calibration Laboratories. Accreditation is performed under the
Program for the Accreditation of Laboratories - Canada (PALCAN), administered by the
Standards Council of Canada.
The CCEF that carried out this evaluation is CGI IT Security Evaluation & Test Facility.
By awarding a Common Criteria certificate, the CCS Certification Body asserts that the
product complies with the security requirements specified in the associated security target. A
security target is a requirements specification document that defines the scope of the
evaluation activities. The consumer of certified IT products should review the security target,
in addition to this certification report, in order to gain an understanding of any assumptions
made during the evaluation, the IT product's intended environment, the evaluated security
functionality, and the testing and analysis conducted by the CCEF.
This certification report is associated with the certificate of product evaluation dated 12
August 2015, and the security target identified in Section 4 of this report.
The certification report, certificate of product evaluation and security target are posted on the
CCS Certified Products list (CPL) and the Common Criteria portal (the official website of the
Common Criteria Project).
Reproduction of this report is authorized provided the report is reproduced in its entirety.
CCS Certification Report Hewlett Packard Enterprise Development L.P.
HP Operations Orchestration 10.20
___________________________________________________________________________
Version 1.0 12 August 2015
- Page iii of iii -
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Disclaimer....................................................................................................................................... i
Foreword........................................................................................................................................ii
Executive Summary...................................................................................................................... 1
1 Identification of Target of Evaluation................................................................................. 2
2 TOE Description ................................................................................................................... 2
3 Security Policy....................................................................................................................... 3
4 Security Target...................................................................................................................... 3
5 Common Criteria Conformance.......................................................................................... 3
6 Assumptions and Clarification of Scope............................................................................. 4
6.1 SECURE USAGE ASSUMPTIONS................................................................................... 4
6.2 ENVIRONMENTAL ASSUMPTIONS ............................................................................... 4
6.3 CLARIFICATION OF SCOPE.......................................................................................... 4
7 Evaluated Configuration...................................................................................................... 5
8 Documentation ...................................................................................................................... 5
9 Evaluation Analysis Activities ............................................................................................. 6
10 ITS Product Testing.............................................................................................................. 7
10.1 ASSESSMENT OF DEVELOPER TESTS .......................................................................... 7
10.2 INDEPENDENT FUNCTIONAL TESTING ........................................................................ 7
10.3 INDEPENDENT PENETRATION TESTING....................................................................... 7
10.4 CONDUCT OF TESTING ............................................................................................... 8
10.5 TESTING RESULTS...................................................................................................... 8
11 Results of the Evaluation...................................................................................................... 8
12 Evaluator Comments, Observations and Recommendations ........................................... 8
13 Acronyms, Abbreviations and Initializations..................................................................... 9
14 References............................................................................................................................ 10
CCS Certification Report Hewlett Packard Enterprise Development L.P.
HP Operations Orchestration 10.20
___________________________________________________________________________
Version 1.0 12 August 2015
- Page 1 of 10 -
Executive Summary
HP Operations Orchestration 10.20 (hereafter referred to as HP OO v10.20), from Hewlett
Packard Enterprise Development L.P., is the Target of Evaluation. The results of this
evaluation demonstrate that HP OO v10.20 meets the requirements of Evaluation Assurance
Level (EAL) 2 augmented for the evaluated security functionality.
HP OO v10.20 is a process automation system. The TOE is a system designed for creating
and executing actions in structured sequences (referred to as flows), which enable IT
administrators to maintain, troubleshoot, repair, and provision IT resources. Using the TOE,
organizations can automate the following tasks:
 Checking, diagnosing, and repairing networks, servers, services, software
applications, and workstations;
 Checking clients, servers and virtual machines for needed software and updates, and
if needed, automatically deploying the required software and updates; and
 Performing repetitive tasks, such as checking the status of websites, both internal and
external.
CGI IT Security Evaluation & Test Facility is the CCEF that conducted the evaluation. This
evaluation was completed on 12 August 2015 and was carried out in accordance with the
rules of the Canadian Common Criteria Evaluation and Certification Scheme (CCS).
The scope of the evaluation is defined by the security target, which identifies assumptions
made during the evaluation, the intended environment for HP OO v10.20, and the security
functional/assurance requirements. Consumers are advised to verify that their operating
environment is consistent with that specified in the security target, and to give due
consideration to the comments, observations and recommendations in this certification
report.
Communications Security Establishment, as the CCS Certification Body, declares that the
HP OO v10.20 evaluation meets all the conditions of the Arrangement on the Recognition of
Common Criteria Certificates and that the product will be listed on the CCS Certified
Products list (CPL) and the Common Criteria portal (the official website of the Common
Criteria Project).
CCS Certification Report Hewlett Packard Enterprise Development L.P.
HP Operations Orchestration 10.20
___________________________________________________________________________
Version 1.0 12 August 2015
- Page 2 of 10 -
1 Identification of Target of Evaluation
The Target of Evaluation (TOE) for this EAL 2+ evaluation is HP Operations Orchestration
10.20 (hereafter referred to as HP OO v10.20), from Hewlett Packard Enterprise
Development L.P..
2 TOE Description
HP OO v10.20 is a process automation system. The TOE is a system designed for creating
and executing actions in structured sequences (referred to as flows), which enable IT
administrators to maintain, troubleshoot, repair, and provision IT resources. Using the TOE,
organizations can automate the following tasks:
• Checking, diagnosing, and repairing networks, servers, services, software applications, and
workstations;
• Checking clients, servers and virtual machines for needed software and updates, and if
needed, automatically deploying the required software and updates; and
• Performing repetitive tasks, such as checking the status of websites, both internal and
external.
A diagram of the HP OO v10.20 architecture is as follows:
CCS Certification Report Hewlett Packard Enterprise Development L.P.
HP Operations Orchestration 10.20
___________________________________________________________________________
Version 1.0 12 August 2015
- Page 3 of 10 -
3 Security Policy
HP OO v10.20 implements a role-based access control policy to control administrative
access to the system. In addition, HP OO v10.20 implements policies pertaining to the
following security functional classes:
 Security Audit
 Cryptographic Support
 User Data Protection
 Identification and Authentication
 Security Management
 Protection of the TSF
 TOE Access
 Trusted Path/Channels
The following cryptographic modules were evaluated to the FIPS 140-2 standard:
Cryptographic Module Certificate
RSA BSAFE® Crypto-J JSAFE and JCE Software Module
(Software Version: 6.1or 6.1.1.0.1)
#2057
4 Security Target
The ST associated with this Certification Report is identified below:
Hewlett Packard Enterprise Development LP., Operations Orchestration v10.20, Security
Target EAL2+ Version 0.14, August 11, 2015
5 Common Criteria Conformance
The evaluation was conducted using the Common Methodology for Information Technology
Security Evaluation, Version 3.1 Revision 4, for conformance to the Common Criteria for
Information Technology Security Evaluation, Version 3.1 Revision 4.
HP OO v10.20 is:
a. EAL 2 augmented, containing all security assurance requirements listed, as well as the
following:
 ALC_FLR.2 – Flaw Reporting Procedures
b. Common Criteria Part 2 conformant, with security functional requirements based only
upon functional components in Part 2;
c. Common Criteria Part 3 conformant, with security assurance requirements based only
upon assurance components in Part 3.
CCS Certification Report Hewlett Packard Enterprise Development L.P.
HP Operations Orchestration 10.20
___________________________________________________________________________
Version 1.0 12 August 2015
- Page 4 of 10 -
6 Assumptions and Clarification of Scope
Consumers of HP OO v10.20 should consider assumptions about usage and environmental
settings as requirements for the product’s installation and its operating environment. This
will ensure the proper and secure operation of the TOE.
6.1 Secure Usage Assumptions
The following Secure Usage Assumptions are listed in the ST:
 The users who manage the TOE are non-hostile, appropriately trained, and follow all
guidance.
 TOE users will use compatible applications in order to access the TOE.
 The users who manage the TOE environment are authorized to access the TOE
environment.
6.2 Environmental Assumptions
The following Environmental Assumptions are listed in the ST:
 The TOE is installed on the appropriate operating system and runtime environment.
 The TOE and its environmental components are located within a controlled access
facility.
 The TOE environment provides the network connectivity required to allow the TOE
to perform secure routing and switching functions.
 The TOE environment provides the TOE with the necessary reliable timestamps.
6.3 Clarification of Scope
The HP OO Studio and HP OO Content functionalities are not included in the scope of the
evaluation; see Section 1.5.3 of the ST. Users are provided with default templates that can be
modified as the user requires.
CCS Certification Report Hewlett Packard Enterprise Development L.P.
HP Operations Orchestration 10.20
___________________________________________________________________________
Version 1.0 12 August 2015
- Page 5 of 10 -
7 Evaluated Configuration
The evaluated configuration for HP OO v10.20 comprises:
 The TOE installed on a server running Microsoft Windows Server 2012 R2
o OO Central v10.20
o OO RAS v10.20
o RSA BSAFE Crypto-J JSAFE and JCE Software Module v6.1
o Apache Tomcat server v7.0.47
 A GPC workstation running the following;
o Internet browser
o Java SE Runtime Environment (JRE) 7
 Microsoft SQL Server 2012
 An LDAP server in the environment for external LDAP authentication
 SAML 2.0 Identity Provider in the environment for SAML authentication
8 Documentation
The Hewlett Packard Enterprise Development L.P. documents provided to the consumer are
as follows:
a. Hewlett Packard Enterprise Development LP, Operations Orchestration v10.20, Guidance
Documentation Supplement EAL2+ Version 0.7, July 23, 2015
b. HP Operations Orchestration: Installation Guide, Software Version 10.20, November,
2014
c. HP Operations Orchestration: Administration Guide, Software Version 10.20, November,
2014
d. HP Operations Orchestration: Concepts Guide, Software Version 10.20, November, 2014
e. HP Operations Orchestration: Central User Guide, Software Version 10.20, November,
2014
f. HP Operations Orchestration: Application Program Interface (API) Guide, Software
Version 10.20, November, 2014
g. HP Operations Orchestration: Operations Orchestration Shell User Guide, Software
Version 10.20, November, 2014
h. HP Operations Orchestration: Studio Authoring Guide, Software Version 10.20,
November, 2014
i. HP Operations Orchestration: Hardening Guide, Software Version 10.20, November,
2014
j. HP Operations Orchestration: System Requirements, Software Version 10.20, March,
2015
CCS Certification Report Hewlett Packard Enterprise Development L.P.
HP Operations Orchestration 10.20
___________________________________________________________________________
Version 1.0 12 August 2015
- Page 6 of 10 -
k. HP Operations Orchestration: Architecture Guide, Software Version 10.20, November,
2014
l. HP Operations Orchestration: Database Guide, Software Version 10.20, November, 2014.
9 Evaluation Analysis Activities
The evaluation analysis activities involved a structured evaluation of HP OO v10.20,
including the following areas:
Development: The evaluators analyzed the HP OO v10.20 functional specification and
design documentation; they determined that the design completely and accurately describes
the TOE security functionality (TSF) interfaces, the TSF subsystems and how the TSF
implements the security functional requirements (SFRs). The evaluators analyzed the HP OO
v10.20 security architectural description and determined that the initialization process is
secure, that the security functions are protected against tamper and bypass, and that security
domains are maintained. The evaluators also independently verified that the correspondence
mappings between the design documents are correct.
Guidance Documents: The evaluators examined the HP OO v10.20 preparative user
guidance and operational user guidance and determined that it sufficiently and
unambiguously describes how to securely transform the TOE into its evaluated configuration
and how to use and administer the product. The evaluators examined and tested the
preparative and operational guidance, and determined that they are complete and sufficiently
detailed to result in a secure configuration.
Life-cycle support: An analysis of the HP OO v10.20 configuration management system and
associated documentation was performed. The evaluators found that the HP OO v10.20
configuration items were clearly marked.
The evaluators examined the delivery documentation and determined that it described all of
the procedures required to maintain the integrity of HP OO v10.20 during distribution to the
consumer.
The evaluators reviewed the flaw remediation procedures used by developer for the HP OO
v10.20. During a site visit, the evaluators also examined the evidence generated by adherence
to the procedures. The evaluators concluded that the procedures are adequate to track and
correct security flaws, and distribute the flaw information and corrections to consumers of
the product
All these evaluation activities resulted in PASS verdicts.
CCS Certification Report Hewlett Packard Enterprise Development L.P.
HP Operations Orchestration 10.20
___________________________________________________________________________
Version 1.0 12 August 2015
- Page 7 of 10 -
10 ITS Product Testing
Testing consists of the following three steps: assessing developer tests, performing
independent functional tests, and performing penetration tests.
10.1 Assessment of Developer Tests
The evaluators verified that the developer has met their testing responsibilities by examining
their test evidence, and reviewing their test results, as documented in the ETR1
.
The evaluators analyzed the developer’s test coverage analysis and found it to be complete
and accurate. The correspondence between the tests identified in the developer’s test
documentation and the functional specification was complete.
10.2 Independent Functional Testing
During this evaluation, the evaluator developed independent functional tests by examining
design and guidance documentation.
All testing was planned and documented to a sufficient level of detail to allow repeatability
of the testing procedures and results. Resulting from this test coverage approach is the
following list of test goals:
a. Repeat of Developer's Tests: The objective of this test goal is to repeat a subset of the
developer's tests;
b. Generation of audit records: The objective of this test goal is to confirm that the TOE can
generate audit records for events not tested by the developer;
c. User Privileges: The objective of this test goal is confirm that user privileges cannot be
escalated;
d. Permissions verification: The objective of this test goal is to verify that users without
permissions are not capable of deploying content packs; and
e. TOE management via REST API Calls: The objective of this test goal is to verify that
the users are able to manage the TOE via REST API calls.
10.3 Independent Penetration Testing
Subsequent to the independent review of public domain vulnerability databases and all
evaluation deliverables, limited independent evaluator penetration testing was conducted.
The penetration tests focused on:
a. Use of automated vulnerability scanning tools to discover potential network, platform and
application layer vulnerabilities.
The independent penetration testing did not uncover any exploitable vulnerabilities in the
intended operating environment.
1
The ETR is a CCS document that contains information proprietary to the developer and/or the evaluator, and
is not releasable for public review.
CCS Certification Report Hewlett Packard Enterprise Development L.P.
HP Operations Orchestration 10.20
___________________________________________________________________________
Version 1.0 12 August 2015
- Page 8 of 10 -
10.4 Conduct of Testing
HP OO v10.20 was subjected to a comprehensive suite of formally documented, independent
functional and penetration tests. The detailed testing activities, including configurations,
procedures, test cases, expected results and observed results are documented in a separate
Test Results document.
10.5 Testing Results
The developer’s tests and the independent functional tests yielded the expected results,
providing assurance that HP OO v10.20 behaves as specified in its ST and functional
specification.
11 Results of the Evaluation
This evaluation has provided the basis for a EAL 2+ level of assurance. The overall verdict
for the evaluation is PASS. These results are supported by evidence in the ETR.
12 Evaluator Comments, Observations and Recommendations
Consumers of the HP should be familiar with the excluded functionality as detailed in
section 1.5.3 “Product Physical/Logical Features and Functionality not included in the TOE”
of the Security Target document. No claims are made against them and no vulnerability
analysis was performed on them. Additionally, the users should consult the appropriate
guidance documentation to place the TOE in the evaluated configuration during the
installation process.
CCS Certification Report Hewlett Packard Enterprise Development L.P.
HP Operations Orchestration 10.20
___________________________________________________________________________
Version 1.0 12 August 2015
- Page 9 of 10 -
13 Acronyms, Abbreviations and Initializations
Acronym/Abbreviation/
Initialization
Description
CCEF Common Criteria Evaluation Facility
CCS Canadian Common Criteria Evaluation and
Certification Scheme
CPL Certified Products list
CM Configuration Management
EAL Evaluation Assurance Level
ETR Evaluation Technical Report
IT Information Technology
ITSET Information Technology Security
Evaluation and Testing
PALCAN Program for the Accreditation of
Laboratories - Canada
REST API Representational State Transfer Application
Programming Interface
SAML Security Assertion Markup Language
SFR Security Functional Requirement
ST Security Target
TOE Target of Evaluation
TSF TOE Security Function
CCS Certification Report Hewlett Packard Enterprise Development L.P.
HP Operations Orchestration 10.20
___________________________________________________________________________
Version 1.0 12 August 2015
- Page 10 of 10 -
14 References
This section lists all documentation used as source material for this report:
a. CCS Publication #4, Technical Oversight, Version 1.8, October 2010.
b. Common Criteria for Information Technology Security Evaluation, Version 3.1
Revision 4, September 2012.
c. Common Methodology for Information Technology Security Evaluation, CEM,
Version 3.1 Revision 4, September 2012.
d. Hewlett Packard Enterprise Development LP., Operations Orchestration v10.20,
Security Target EAL2+ Version 0.14, August 11, 2015
e. Hewlett Packard Enterprise Development LP. Operations Orchestration 10.20
Common Criteria EAL2 Evaluation CGI IT Security Evaluation & Test Facility
Evaluation Technical Report v1.0, August 12 2015.