UNCLASSIFIED / NON CLASSIFIÉ
599-LSS
COMMON CRITERIA CERTIFICATION REPORT
Dell PowerMax with PowerMaxOS 10
Solutions Enabler 10.0, and Unisphere for
PowerMax 10.0
20 October 2023
2
TLP:WHITE
UNCLASSIFIED / NON CLASSIFIÉ
FOREWORD
This certification report is an UNCLASSIFIED publication, issued under the authority of the Chief, Communications Security
Establishment (CSE).
The Information Technology (IT) product identified in this certification report, and its associated certificate, has been
evaluated at an approved testing laboratory established under the Canadian Centre for Cyber Security (a branch of CSE).
This certification report, and its associated certificate, applies only to the identified version and release of the product in its
evaluated configuration. The evaluation has been conducted in accordance with the provisions of the Canadian Common
Criteria Program, and the conclusions of the testing laboratory in the evaluation report are consistent with the evidence
adduced.
This report, and its associated certificate, are not an endorsement of the IT product by Canadian Centre for Cyber Security, or
any other organization that recognizes or gives effect to this report, and its associated certificate, and no warranty for the IT
product by the Canadian Centre for Cyber Security, or any other organization that recognizes or gives effect to this report,
and its associated certificate, is either expressed or implied.
If your organization has identified a requirement for this certification report based on business needs and would like more
detailed information, please contact:
Canadian Centre for Cyber Security
Contact Centre and Information Services
contact@cyber.gc.ca | 1-833-CYBER-88 (1-833-292-3788)
3
TLP:WHITE
UNCLASSIFIED / NON CLASSIFIÉ
OVERVIEW
The Canadian Common Criteria Program provides a third-party evaluation service for determining the trustworthiness of
Information Technology (IT) security products. Evaluations are performed by a commercial Common Criteria Testing
Laboratory (CCTL) under the oversight of the Certification Body, which is managed by the Canadian Centre for Cyber
Security.
A CCTL is a commercial facility that has been approved by the Certification Body to perform Common Criteria evaluations; a
significant requirement for such approval is accreditation to the requirements of ISO/IEC 17025, the General Requirements
for the Competence of Testing and Calibration Laboratories.
By awarding a Common Criteria certificate, the Certification Body asserts that the product complies with the security
requirements specified in the associated security target. A security target is a requirements specification document that
defines the scope of the evaluation activities. The consumer of certified IT products should review the security target, in
addition to this certification report, to gain an understanding of any assumptions made during the evaluation, the IT
product's intended environment, the evaluated security functionality, and the testing and analysis conducted by the CCTL.
The certification report, certificate of product evaluation and security target are posted to the Common Criteria portal (the
official website of the International Common Criteria Program).
4
TLP:WHITE
UNCLASSIFIED / NON CLASSIFIÉ
TABLE OF CONTENTS
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .................................................................................................................................... 6
1 Identification of Target of Evaluation ........................................................................................................... 7
1.1 Common Criteria Conformance.......................................................................................................................... 7
1.2 TOE Description................................................................................................................................................. 7
1.3 TOE Architecture ............................................................................................................................................... 7
2 Security Policy......................................................................................................................................... 8
2.1 Cryptographic Functionality ............................................................................................................................... 8
3 Assumptions and Clarification of Scope ....................................................................................................... 9
3.1 Usage and Environmental Assumptions.............................................................................................................. 9
3.2 Clarification of Scope ........................................................................................................................................ 9
4 Evaluated Configuration............................................................................................................................10
4.1 Documentation.................................................................................................................................................10
5 Evaluation Analysis Activities....................................................................................................................12
5.1 Development....................................................................................................................................................12
5.2 Guidance Documents........................................................................................................................................12
5.3 Life-Cycle Support ............................................................................................................................................12
6 Testing Activities ....................................................................................................................................13
6.1 Assessment of Developer tests.........................................................................................................................13
6.2 Conduct of Testing...........................................................................................................................................13
6.3 Independent Testing.........................................................................................................................................13
6.3.1 Independent Testing Results .........................................................................................................................13
6.4 Vulnerability Analysis .......................................................................................................................................14
6.4.1 Vulnerability Analysis Results........................................................................................................................14
7 Results of the Evaluation ..........................................................................................................................15
7.1 Recommendations/Comments..........................................................................................................................15
8 Supporting Content..................................................................................................................................16
8.1 List of Abbreviations.........................................................................................................................................16
5
TLP:WHITE
UNCLASSIFIED / NON CLASSIFIÉ
8.2 References.......................................................................................................................................................16
LIST OF FIGURES
TOE Architecture..................................................................................................................................................7
LIST OF TABLES
Table 1: TOE Identification ................................................................................................................................................7
Table 2: Cryptographic Implementation(s).........................................................................................................................8
6
TLP:WHITE
UNCLASSIFIED / NON CLASSIFIÉ
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Dell PowerMax with PowerMaxOS 10 Solutions Enabler 10.0, and Unisphere for PowerMax 10.0 (hereafter referred to as
the Target of Evaluation, or TOE), from Dell Technologies, was the subject of this Common Criteria evaluation. A description
of the TOE can be found in Section 1.2. The results of this evaluation demonstrate that the TOE meets the requirements of
the conformance claim listed in Section 1.1 for the evaluated security functionality.
Lightship Security is the CCTL that conducted the evaluation. This evaluation was completed on 20 October 2023 and was
carried out in accordance with the rules of the Canadian Common Criteria Program.
The scope of the evaluation is defined by the Security Target, which identifies assumptions made during the evaluation, the
intended environment for the TOE, and the security functional/assurance requirements. Consumers are advised to verify
that their operating environment is consistent with that specified in the security target, and to give due consideration to the
comments, observations, and recommendations in this Certification Report.
The Canadian Centre for Cyber Security, as the Certification Body, declares that this evaluation meets all the conditions of
the Arrangement on the Recognition of Common Criteria Certificates and that the product is listed on the Certified Products
list (CPL) for the Canadian Common Criteria Program and the Common Criteria portal (the official website of the
International Common Criteria Program).
7
TLP:WHITE
UNCLASSIFIED / NON CLASSIFIÉ
1 IDENTIFICATION OF TARGET OF EVALUATION
The Target of Evaluation (TOE) is identified as follows:
Table 1: TOE Identification
TOE Name and Version Dell PowerMax with PowerMaxOS 10 Solutions Enabler 10.0, and Unisphere for
PowerMax 10.0
Developer Dell Technologies
1.1 COMMON CRITERIA CONFORMANCE
The evaluation was conducted using the Common Methodology for Information Technology Security Evaluation, Version 3.1
Revision 5, for conformance to the Common Criteria for Information Technology Security Evaluation, Version 3.1 Revision 5.
The TOE claims the following conformance:
EAL 2+ (ALC_FLR.2)
1.2 TOE DESCRIPTION
The TOE is a hardware and software solution that provides a platform for large scale storage operations, managing large
amounts of block storage. The TOE is managed using the Solutions Enabler Command Line Interface, or the Unisphere for
PowerMax Graphical User Interface.
1.3 TOE ARCHITECTURE
A diagram of the TOE architecture is as follows:
TOE Architecture
8
TLP:WHITE
UNCLASSIFIED / NON CLASSIFIÉ
2 SECURITY POLICY
The TOE implements and enforces policies pertaining to the following security functionality:
 Security Audit
 Cryptographic Operation
 User Data Protection
 Identification and Authentication
 Security Management
 Protection of the TSF
 Trusted Path/Channels
Complete details of the security functional requirements (SFRs) can be found in the Security Target (ST) referenced in
section 8.2.
2.1 CRYPTOGRAPHIC FUNCTIONALITY
The following cryptographic implementations are used by the TOE and have been evaluated by the CAVP:
Table 2: Cryptographic Implementation(s)
Cryptographic Algorithm Certificate Number
AES-256-XTS C1271, C1292
9
TLP:WHITE
UNCLASSIFIED / NON CLASSIFIÉ
3 ASSUMPTIONS AND CLARIFICATION OF SCOPE
Consumers of the TOE should consider assumptions about usage and environmental settings as requirements for the
product’s installation and its operating environment. This will ensure the proper and secure operation of the TOE.
3.1 USAGE AND ENVIRONMENTAL ASSUMPTIONS
The following assumptions are made regarding the use and deployment of the TOE:
 The TOE will rely on the operating system in the environment for performing administrative user authentication for
Solutions Enabler.
 The TOE will be located within controlled access facilities, which will prevent unauthorized physical and logical
access.
 The authorized administrators are not careless, wilfully negligent, or hostile, are appropriately trained and will follow
the instructions provided by the TOE documentation.
3.2 CLARIFICATION OF SCOPE
The following functions have not been evaluated:
 Multi-factor authentication
 End-to-end Efficient Encryption
 The REST API is not used in the evaluated configuration, nor does it support any TOE management functionality.
 Dell Secure Remote Service is not connected and not used in the evaluated configuration.
10
TLP:WHITE
UNCLASSIFIED / NON CLASSIFIÉ
4 EVALUATED CONFIGURATION
The evaluated configuration for the TOE comprises:
TOE Software/Firmware PowerMaxOS 10.0.1.2
Unisphere for PowerMax 10.0.1.0 Build 5
Solutions Enabler 10.0.1.1
TOE Hardware PowerMax 2500, PowerMax 8500
Environmental Support The TOE makes use of an administrative server to host the Solutions Enabler and Unisphere
for PowerMax. Windows Server 2019 is the host OS used in the evaluated configuration.
An administrator workstation is required to access and manage the TOE. Windows 10 is the
host OS in the evaluated configuration.
The TOE makes use of a SAN-connected block storage host device.
4.1 DOCUMENTATION
The following documents are provided to the consumer to assist in the configuration and installation of the TOE:
a) Dell Solutions Enabler 10.0.0, Installation and Configuration Guide, July 2023
https://dl.dell.com/content/manual47008612-dell-solutions-enabler-installation-andconfiguration-
guide.pdf?language=en-us&ps=true
b) Dell Unisphere for PowerMax 10.0.0, Installation Guide, July 2022
https://dl.dell.com/content/manual34878027-dell-unisphere-for-powermax-10-0-0-installation-
guide.pdf?language=en-us&ps=true
c) Dell Solutions Enabler, CLI Reference Guide, 10.0, July 2022
https://dl.dell.com/content/manual29232065-dell-solutions-enabler-cli-referenceguide-10-0-0.pdf?language=en-us
d) Dell PowerMax Family Security Configuration Guide, PowerMax OS, March 2023
https://dl.dell.com/content/manual37372498-dell-powermax-family-securityconfiguration-guide-powermaxos-
10.pdf?language=en-us
e) Dell PowerMax Family Site Planning Guide, PowerMax 2500 and PowerMax 8500, October 2023
https://dl.dell.com/content/manual49083949-dell-powermax-family-site-planningguide-powermax-2500-and-
powermax-8500.pdf?language=en-us&ps=true
f) Dell Unisphere for PowerMax Product Guide, 10.0.0, March 2023
https://dl.dell.com/content/manual34945916-dell-unisphere-for-powermax-10-0-0-product-guide.pdf?language=en-
us&ps=true
11
TLP:WHITE
UNCLASSIFIED / NON CLASSIFIÉ
g) Dell Unisphere for PowerMax, Online Help, 10.0.0. Note: Online Help is delivered to customers as a .zip file available
at: https://supportkb.dell.com/attachment/ka06P000000Y27hQAC/Unisphere for PowerMax Online
Help10.0.0_pkb_en_US_1.zip. Customers must download and extract the file, and then double-click the index.html
file to start and view the Online Help application.
h) Dell_PowerMax_EAL2_AGD_1.5.pdf (available upon request).
12
TLP:WHITE
UNCLASSIFIED / NON CLASSIFIÉ
5 EVALUATION ANALYSIS ACTIVITIES
The evaluation analysis activities involved a structured evaluation of the TOE. Documentation and process dealing with
Development, Guidance Documents, and Life-Cycle Support were evaluated.
5.1 DEVELOPMENT
The evaluators analyzed the documentation provided by the vendor; they determined that the design completely and
accurately describes the TOE security functionality (TSF) interfaces and how the TSF implements the security functional
requirements. The evaluators determined that the initialization process is secure, that the security functions are protected
against tamper and bypass, and that security domains are maintained.
5.2 GUIDANCE DOCUMENTS
The evaluators examined the TOE preparative user guidance and operational user guidance and determined that it
sufficiently and unambiguously describes how to securely transform the TOE into its evaluated configuration and how to use
and administer the product. The evaluators examined and tested the preparative and operational guidance and determined
that they are complete and sufficiently detailed to result in a secure configuration.
Section 4.1 provides details on the guidance documents.
5.3 LIFE-CYCLE SUPPORT
An analysis of the TOE configuration management system and associated documentation was performed. The evaluators
found that the TOE configuration items were clearly marked.
The evaluators examined the delivery documentation and determined that it described all the procedures required to
maintain the integrity of the TOE during distribution to the consumer.
13
TLP:WHITE
UNCLASSIFIED / NON CLASSIFIÉ
6 TESTING ACTIVITIES
Testing consists of the following three steps: assessing developer tests, performing independent tests, and performing a
vulnerability analysis.
6.1 ASSESSMENT OF DEVELOPER TESTS
The evaluators verified that the developer has met their testing responsibilities by examining their test evidence, and
reviewing their test results, as documented in the Evaluation Test Report (ETR). The correspondence between the tests
identified in the developer’s test documentation and the functional specification was complete.
6.2 CONDUCT OF TESTING
The TOE was subjected to a comprehensive suite of formally documented, independent functional and penetration tests. The
detailed testing activities, including configurations, procedures, test cases, expected results and observed results are
documented in a separate Test Results document.
6.3 INDEPENDENT TESTING
During this evaluation, the evaluator developed independent functional & penetration tests by examining design and
guidance documentation.
All testing was planned and documented to a sufficient level of detail to allow repeatability of the testing procedures and
results. The following testing activities were performed:
a. Repeat of Developer's Tests: The evaluator repeated a subset of the developer's tests.
b. Interoperability Testing: The evaluator verified the interoperability between the TOE and a FIPS-validated
implementation.
c. Unidentified User Access: The evaluator verified that attempts to perform security management functions with an
account that is not associated with a security role on the TOE failed.
d. Audit Events: The evaluator verified that changes to time on the administrative server does not affect auditing
events on the TOE.
6.3.1 INDEPENDENT TESTING RESULTS
The developer’s tests and the independent tests yielded the expected results, providing assurance that the TOE behaves as
specified in its ST and functional specification.
14
TLP:WHITE
UNCLASSIFIED / NON CLASSIFIÉ
6.4 VULNERABILITY ANALYSIS
The vulnerability analysis focused on 4 flaw hypotheses.
 Public Vulnerability based (Type 1)
 Technical community sources (Type 2)
 Evaluation team generated (Type 3)
 Tool Generated (Type 4)
The evaluators conducted an independent review of all evaluation evidence, public domain vulnerability databases and
technical community sources (Type 1 & 2). Additionally, the evaluators used automated vulnerability scanning tools to
discover potential network, platform, and application layer vulnerabilities (Type 4). Based upon this review, the evaluators
formulated flaw hypotheses (Type 3), which they used in their vulnerability analysis.
Type 1 & 2 searches were conducted on 19 September 2023 and included the following search terms:
PowerMax PowerMax 2500, 8500 Unisphere (10.0)
Solutions Enabler (10.0) Java (11.0.19.0.1 2023-04-18 LTS) JRE 18 (18.9)
JSSE (11.0.19.0.1 2023-04-18 LTS) Wildfly (24.0.1) Log4j (1.2.16)
Samsung NVMe TCG Opal SSC SEDs
PM1733 Series
TCG Opal PM1733
Vulnerability searches were conducted using the following sources:
NIST National Vulnerability Database
https://nvd.nist.gov
Dell Security Advisories and Notices
https://www.dell.com/support/security/en-ca/
CISA – Known exploited vulnerabilities Catalog
https://www.cisa.gov/known-exploited-vulnerabilities-
catalog
6.4.1 VULNERABILITY ANALYSIS RESULTS
The vulnerability analysis did not uncover any security relevant residual exploitable vulnerabilities in the intended operating
environment.
15
TLP:WHITE
UNCLASSIFIED / NON CLASSIFIÉ
7 RESULTS OF THE EVALUATION
The Information Technology (IT) product identified in this certification report, and its associated certificate, has been
evaluated at an approved testing laboratory established under the Canadian Centre for Cyber Security. This certification
report, and its associated certificate, apply only to the specific version and release of the product in its evaluated
configuration.
This evaluation has provided the basis for the conformance claim documented in Table 1. The overall verdict for this
evaluation is PASS. These results are supported by evidence in the ETR.
7.1 RECOMMENDATIONS/COMMENTS
It is recommended that all guidance outlined in Section 4.1 be followed to configure the TOE in the evaluated configuration.
16
TLP:WHITE
UNCLASSIFIED / NON CLASSIFIÉ
8 SUPPORTING CONTENT
8.1 LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS
Term Definition
CAVP Cryptographic Algorithm Validation Program
CCTL Common Criteria Testing Laboratory
CMVP Cryptographic Module Validation Program
CSE Communications Security Establishment
EAL Evaluation Assurance Level
ETR Evaluation Technical Report
IT Information Technology
ITS Information Technology Security
PP Protection Profile
SFR Security Functional Requirement
ST Security Target
TOE Target of Evaluation
TSF TOE Security Function
8.2 REFERENCES
Reference
Common Criteria for Information Technology Security Evaluation, Version 3.1 Revision 5, April 2017.
Common Methodology for Information Technology Security Evaluation, CEM, Version 3.1 Revision 5, April 2017.
Dell Technologies PowerMax with PowerMaxOS 10 Security Target, Version 1.9, October 20, 2023.
Dell Technologies PowerMax with PowerMaxOS 10 Evaluation Technical Report, Version 1.0, October 20, 2023.