TrustCB B.V.
Registered address:
Van den Berghlaan 48, 2132 AT
Hoofddorp, The Netherlands
nscib@trustcb.com
https://trustcb.com/common-criteria/nscib/
https://nscib.nl
TrustCB B.V. is a registered company at the
Netherlands Chamber of Commerce (KVK),
under number 858360275.
Version
2023-06
®
TrustCB
is
a
registered
trademark.
Any
use
or
application
requires
prior
approval.
Certification Report
STRONGV4P00 of S5E9945 with Specific IC Dedicated
Software Revision 1.0
Sponsor and developer: SAMSUNG Electronics Co. Ltd.
Security & Power product development team DSR,
Samsungjeonja-ro 1-1
Hwaseong-si, Gyeonggi-Do
South Korea
Evaluation facility: SGS Brightsight B.V.
Brassersplein 2
2612 CT Delft
The Netherlands
Report number: NSCIB-CC-2300085-01-CR
Report version: 1
Project number: NSCIB-2300085-01
Author(s): Jordi Mujal
Date: 26 March 2024
Number of pages: 12
Number of appendices: 0
Reproduction of this report is authorised only if the report is reproduced in its entirety.
Page: 2/12 of report number: NSCIB-CC-2300085-01-CR, dated 26 March 2024
®
TrustCB
is
a
registered
trademark.
Any
use
or
application
requires
prior
approval.
CONTENTS
Foreword 3
Recognition of the Certificate 4
International recognition 4
European recognition 4
1 Executive Summary 5
2 Certification Results 6
2.1 Identification of Target of Evaluation 6
2.2 Security Policy 6
2.3 Assumptions and Clarification of Scope 7
2.3.1 Assumptions 7
2.3.2 Clarification of scope 7
2.4 Architectural Information 7
2.5 Documentation 8
2.6 IT Product Testing 8
2.6.1 Testing approach and depth 8
2.6.2 Independent penetration testing 8
2.6.3 Test configuration 9
2.6.4 Test results 9
2.7 Reused Evaluation Results 10
2.8 Evaluated Configuration 10
2.9 Evaluation Results 10
2.10 Comments/Recommendations 10
3 Security Target 11
4 Definitions 11
5 Bibliography 12
Page: 3/12 of report number: NSCIB-CC-2300085-01-CR, dated 26 March 2024
®
TrustCB
is
a
registered
trademark.
Any
use
or
application
requires
prior
approval.
Foreword
The Netherlands Scheme for Certification in the Area of IT Security (NSCIB) provides a third-party
evaluation and certification service for determining the trustworthiness of Information Technology (IT)
security products. Under this NSCIB, TrustCB B.V. has the task of issuing certificates for IT security
products, as well as for protection profiles and sites.
Part of the procedure is the technical examination (evaluation) of the product, protection profile or site
according to the Common Criteria assessment guidelines published by the NSCIB. Evaluations are
performed by an IT Security Evaluation Facility (ITSEF) under the oversight of the NSCIB Certification
Body, which is operated by TrustCB B.V. in cooperation with the Ministry of the Interior and Kingdom
Relations.
An ITSEF in the Netherlands is a commercial facility that has been licensed by TrustCB B.V. to
perform Common Criteria evaluations; a significant requirement for such a licence is accreditation to
the requirements of ISO Standard 17025 “General requirements for the accreditation of calibration and
testing laboratories”.
By awarding a Common Criteria certificate, TrustCB B.V. asserts that the product or site complies with
the security requirements specified in the associated (site) security target, or that the protection profile
(PP) complies with the requirements for PP evaluation specified in the Common Criteria for
Information Security Evaluation. A (site) security target is a requirements specification document that
defines the scope of the evaluation activities.
The consumer should review the (site) security target or protection profile, in addition to this
certification report, to gain an understanding of any assumptions made during the evaluation, the IT
product's intended environment, its security requirements, and the level of confidence (i.e., the
evaluation assurance level) that the product or site satisfies the security requirements stated in the
(site) security target.
Reproduction of this report is authorised only if the report is reproduced in its entirety.
Page: 4/12 of report number: NSCIB-CC-2300085-01-CR, dated 26 March 2024
®
TrustCB
is
a
registered
trademark.
Any
use
or
application
requires
prior
approval.
Recognition of the Certificate
Presence of the Common Criteria Recognition Arrangement (CCRA) and the SOG-IS logos on the
certificate indicates that this certificate is issued in accordance with the provisions of the CCRA and
the SOG-IS Mutual Recognition Agreement (SOG-IS MRA) and will be recognised by the participating
nations.
International recognition
The CCRA was signed by the Netherlands in May 2000 and provides mutual recognition of certificates
based on the Common Criteria (CC). Since September 2014 the CCRA has been updated to provide
mutual recognition of certificates based on cPPs (exact use) or STs with evaluation assurance
components up to and including EAL2+ALC_FLR.
For details of the current list of signatory nations and approved certification schemes, see
http://www.commoncriteriaportal.org.
European recognition
The SOG-IS MRA Version 3, effective since April 2010, provides mutual recognition in Europe of
Common Criteria and ITSEC certificates at a basic evaluation level for all products. A higher
recognition level for evaluation levels beyond EAL4 (respectively E3-basic) is provided for products
related to specific technical domains. This agreement was signed initially by Finland, France,
Germany, The Netherlands, Norway, Spain, Sweden and the United Kingdom. Italy joined the SOG-IS
MRA in December 2010.
For details of the current list of signatory nations, approved certification schemes and the list of
technical domains for which the higher recognition applies, see https://www.sogis.eu.
Page: 5/12 of report number: NSCIB-CC-2300085-01-CR, dated 26 March 2024
®
TrustCB
is
a
registered
trademark.
Any
use
or
application
requires
prior
approval.
1 Executive Summary
This Certification Report states the outcome of the Common Criteria security evaluation of the
STRONGV4P00 of S5E9945 with Specific IC Dedicated Software Revision 1.0. The developer of the
STRONGV4P00 of S5E9945 with Specific IC Dedicated Software Revision 1.0 is SAMSUNG
Electronics Co. Ltd. located in Hwaseong-si, South Korea and they also act as the sponsor of the
evaluation and certification. A Certification Report is intended to assist prospective consumers when
judging the suitability of the IT security properties of the product for their particular requirements.
The TOE is a Secure Sub-System (3S) with defined physical boundaries, implemented in a SoC that is
designed and packaged specifically for mobile applications. The TOE is a complete solution,
implementing a secure integrated circuit (secure IC) as defined in the Protection Profile [PP], and
designed and packaged specifically for mobile applications.
The TOE has been evaluated by SGS Brightsight B.V. located in Delft, The Netherlands. The
evaluation was completed on 26 March 2024 with the approval of the ETR. The certification procedure
has been conducted in accordance with the provisions of the Netherlands Scheme for Certification in
the Area of IT Security [NSCIB].
The scope of the evaluation is defined by the security target [ST], which identifies assumptions made
during the evaluation, the intended environment for the STRONGV4P00 of S5E9945 with Specific IC
Dedicated Software Revision 1.0, the security requirements, and the level of confidence (evaluation
assurance level) at which the product is intended to satisfy the security requirements. Consumers of
the STRONGV4P00 of S5E9945 with Specific IC Dedicated Software Revision 1.0 are advised to
verify that their own environment is consistent with the security target, and to give due consideration to
the comments, observations and recommendations in this certification report.
The results documented in the evaluation technical report [ETR] 1 for this product provide sufficient
evidence that the TOE meets the EAL5 augmented (EAL5+) assurance requirements for the evaluated
security functionality. This assurance level is augmented with ALC_DVS.2 (Sufficiency of security
measures), AVA_VAN.5 (Advanced methodical vulnerability analysis) and ALC_FLR.2 (Flaw
Reporting Procedures).
The evaluation was conducted using the Common Methodology for Information Technology Security
Evaluation, Version 3.1 Revision 5 [CEM] for conformance to the Common Criteria for Information
Technology Security Evaluation, Version 3.1 Revision 5 [CC] (Parts I, II and III).
TrustCB B.V., as the NSCIB Certification Body, declares that the evaluation meets all the conditions
for international recognition of Common Criteria Certificates and that the product will be listed on the
NSCIB Certified Products list. Note that the certification results apply only to the specific version of the
product as evaluated.
1 The Evaluation Technical Report contains information proprietary to the developer and/or the
evaluator, and is not available for public review.
Page: 6/12 of report number: NSCIB-CC-2300085-01-CR, dated 26 March 2024
®
TrustCB
is
a
registered
trademark.
Any
use
or
application
requires
prior
approval.
2 Certification Results
2.1 Identification of Target of Evaluation
The Target of Evaluation (TOE) for this evaluation is the STRONGV4P00 of S5E9945 with Specific IC
Dedicated Software Revision 1.0 from SAMSUNG Electronics Co. Ltd. located in Hwaseong-si, South
Korea.
The TOE is comprised of the following main components:
Delivery
item type
Identifier Version
Hardware STRONGV4P00 Secure Sub-System on the SoC-related
hardware
1.0
SoC S5E9945, embedding the TOE 1.0
SoC Package 1730-
FOWLP-
14.0X16.3
Software Secure Boot loader 1.1
AH3 Secure RSA/ECC/SHA Library (optional) 3.10
TRNG HS_MRO9 library 2.4
To ensure secure usage a set of guidance documents is provided, together with the STRONGV4P00
of S5E9945 with Specific IC Dedicated Software Revision 1.0. For details, see section 2.5
“Documentation” of this report.
For a detailed and precise description of the TOE lifecycle, see the [ST], Chapter 1.2.5.
2.2 Security Policy
The TOE encompasses the following features:
• Security sensors or detectors including High and Low Temperature detectors, High and Low
Supply Voltage detectors, Supply Voltage Glitch detector and Laser detectors
• Active Shields against physical intrusive attacks
• Life time detector for protection of detector signals
• Dedicated tamper-resistant design based on synthesizable glue logic and secure topology
• Dedicated hardware mechanisms against side-channel attacks, such as Random Branch
Insertion and ROM and RAM encryption mechanisms
• Dedicated hardware mechanisms against Fault Injection attacks, such as redundancy
• Secure TDES and AES Symmetric Cryptography support
• TORNADOTM-H cryptographic coprocessor
• Key Manager: KDF (block KEYMGR in the Security Controller)
• ECC/ Parity/ CRC-32 calculators
• One True Random Number Generator (TRNG HS_MRO9) that meets PTG.2 class of BSI-AIS-
20/31
• (German scheme)SHA-2/ SHA-3/ HMAC hardware engines
• Direct Memory Access (SC_DMA)
Page: 7/12 of report number: NSCIB-CC-2300085-01-CR, dated 26 March 2024
®
TrustCB
is
a
registered
trademark.
Any
use
or
application
requires
prior
approval.
• Secure AXI Bridge
• Memory Management Unit (MMU)
• The IC Dedicated Software includes:
- AH3 Secure RSA/ECC/SHA library for the support of RSA, ECC and SHA
cryptographic operations (optional)
- TRNG HS_MRO9 library built around a hardware TRNG HS_MRO9, together with
corresponding TRNG HS_MRO9 application notes. This library meets PTG.2
class of BSI-AIS-20/31 (German scheme)
- Secure Boot Loader is a loader for copying the firmware from an external FLASH
storage into the internal SRAM
2.3 Assumptions and Clarification of Scope
2.3.1 Assumptions
The assumptions defined in the Security Target are not covered by the TOE itself. These aspects lead
to specific Security Objectives to be fulfilled by the TOE-Environment. For detailed information on the
security objectives that must be fulfilled by the TOE environment, see section 4.2 of the [ST].
2.3.2 Clarification of scope
The evaluation did not reveal any threats to the TOE that are not countered by the evaluated security
functions of the product.
The following functionality is also present without specific security claims:
• SHA2 in the CRYPTO block
• DMA (PL080)
• SSP_DMA
• Key manager KEYMGT in SYSCON
• Code execution through the Secure AXI bridge (eXecute In Place, XIP)
• PQC
2.4 Architectural Information
The TOE architecture, originating from the Security Target [ST] of the TOE can be depicted as follows:
Page: 8/12 of report number: NSCIB-CC-2300085-01-CR, dated 26 March 2024
®
TrustCB
is
a
registered
trademark.
Any
use
or
application
requires
prior
approval.
2.5 Documentation
The following documentation is provided with the product by the developer to the customer:
Identifier Version
STRONGV4P00 HW TRNG HS_MRO9 and TRNG HS_MRO9 Library
Application Note
1.3
AH3 Secure RSA /ECC/SHA Library API Manual 3.13
Hardware User’s manual (STRONGV4P00 of S5E9945, 32-bit RISC
Microcontroller for Secure Element Platform)
0.5
Security Application Note for STRONGV4P00 0.6
S5E9945 Chip Delivery Specification 0.0
STRONGV4P00 Secure Bootloader Manual for S5E9945 0.1
CORTEX-M35P Reference manual 0.0
2.6 IT Product Testing
Testing (depth, coverage, functional tests, independent testing): The evaluators examined the
developer’s testing activities documentation and verified that the developer has met their testing
responsibilities.
2.6.1 Testing approach and depth
The developer performed extensive testing on functional specification, subsystem and module level.
All parameter choices were addressed at least once. All boundary cases identified were tested
Page: 9/12 of report number: NSCIB-CC-2300085-01-CR, dated 26 March 2024
®
TrustCB
is
a
registered
trademark.
Any
use
or
application
requires
prior
approval.
explicitly, and additionally the near-boundary conditions were covered probabilistically. The testing
was largely automated using industry standard and proprietary test suites. Test scripts were used
extensively to verify that the functions return the expected values.
The underlying hardware and crypto-library test results are extendable to composite evaluations,
because the underlying platform is operated according to its guidance and the composite evaluation
requirements are met.
For the testing performed by the evaluators, the developer provided samples and a test environment.
The evaluators reproduced a selection of the developer tests, as well as a small number of test cases
designed by the evaluator.
2.6.2 Independent penetration testing
The independent vulnerability analysis performed was conducted along the following steps:
• When evaluating the evidence in the classes ASE, ADV and AGD the evaluator considered
whether potential vulnerabilities could already be identified due to the TOE type and/or specified
behaviour in such an early stage of the evaluation.
• For ADV_IMP a thorough implementation representation review was performed on the TOE.
During this attack-oriented analysis the protection of the TOE was analysed using the knowledge
gained from all evaluation classes. This resulted in the identification of (additional) potential
vulnerabilities. This analysis was performed considering the attack methods in [JIL-AM] and
[JIL-AAPS].
• All potential vulnerabilities were analysed using the knowledge gained from all evaluation classes
and information from the public domain. A judgment was made on how to assure that these
potential vulnerabilities are not exploitable. The potential vulnerabilities were addressed by
penetration testing, a guidance update or in other ways that are deemed appropriate.
The total test effort expended by the evaluators was 40 weeks. During that test campaign, 29% of the
total time was spent on Perturbation attacks, 69% on side-channel testing, and 2% on logical tests.
2.6.3 Test configuration
The configuration of the sample used for independent evaluator testing and penetration testing was
the same as described in the [ST].
For some tests, the evaluator used an earlier version of the TOE. Nevertheless, the Lab assessed the
differences and confirmed the equivalence of the test results.
2.6.4 Test results
The testing activities, including configurations, procedures, test cases, expected results and observed
results are summarised in the [ETR], with references to the documents containing the full details.
The developer’s tests and the independent functional tests produced the expected results, giving
assurance that the TOE behaves as specified in its [ST] and functional specification.
No exploitable vulnerabilities were found with the independent penetration tests.
The algorithmic security level of cryptographic functionality has not been rated in this certification
process, but the current consensus on the algorithmic security level in the open domain, i.e., from the
current best cryptanalytic attacks published, has been taken into account.
Not all key sizes specified in the [ST] have sufficient cryptographic strength for satisfying the
AVA_VAN.5 “high attack potential”. The TOE supports a wider range of key sizes (see [ST]), including
those with sufficient algorithmic security level to exceed 100 bits as required for high attack potential
(AVA_VAN.5).
The strength of the implementation of the cryptographic functionality has been assessed in the
evaluation, as part of the AVA_VAN activities.
For composite evaluations, please consult the [ETRfC] for details.
Page: 10/12 of report number: NSCIB-CC-2300085-01-CR, dated 26 March 2024
®
TrustCB
is
a
registered
trademark.
Any
use
or
application
requires
prior
approval.
2.7 Reused Evaluation Results
There is no reuse of evaluation results in this certification.
There has been extensive reuse of the ALC aspects for the sites involved in the development and
production of the TOE, by use of 3 site certificates 4 Site Technical Audit Report{s}.
No sites have been visited as part of this evaluation.
2.8 Evaluated Configuration
The TOE is defined uniquely by its name and version number STRONGV4P00 of S5E9945 with
Specific IC Dedicated Software Revision 1.0.
2.9 Evaluation Results
The evaluation lab documented their evaluation results in the [ETR], which references an ASE
Intermediate Report and other evaluator documents. To support composite evaluations according to
[COMP] a derived document [ETRfC] was provided and approved. This document provides details of
the TOE evaluation that must be considered when this TOE is used as platform in a composite
evaluation.
The verdict of each claimed assurance requirement is “Pass”.
Based on the above evaluation results the evaluation lab concluded the STRONGV4P00 of S5E9945
with Specific IC Dedicated Software Revision 1.0, to be CC Part 2 extended, CC Part 3 conformant,
and to meet the requirements of EAL 5 augmented with AVA_VAN.5, ALC_DVS.2 and ALC_FLR.2.
This implies that the product satisfies the security requirements specified in Security Target [ST].
The Security Target claims ’strict’ conformance to the Protection Profile [PP].
2.10 Comments/Recommendations
The user guidance as outlined in section 2.5 “Documentation” contains necessary information about
the usage of the TOE. Certain aspects of the TOE’s security functionality, in particular the
countermeasures against attacks, depend on accurate conformance to the user guidance of both the
software and the hardware part of the TOE. There are no particular obligations or recommendations
for the user apart from following the user guidance. Please note that the documents contain relevant
details concerning the resistance against certain attacks.
In addition, all aspects of assumptions, threats and policies as outlined in the Security Target not
covered by the TOE itself must be fulfilled by the operational environment of the TOE.
The customer or user of the product shall consider the results of the certification within his system risk
management process. For the evolution of attack methods and techniques to be covered, the
customer should define the period of time until a re-assessment for the TOE is required and thus
requested from the sponsor of the certificate.
The strength of the cryptographic algorithms and protocols was not rated in the course of this
evaluation. This specifically applies to the following proprietary or non-standard algorithms, protocols
and implementations: none.
Not all key sizes specified in the [ST] have sufficient cryptographic strength to satisfy the AVA_VAN.5
“high attack potential”. To be protected against attackers with a "high attack potential", appropriate
cryptographic algorithms with sufficiently large cryptographic key sizes shall be used (references can
be found in national and international documents and standards).
Page: 11/12 of report number: NSCIB-CC-2300085-01-CR, dated 26 March 2024
®
TrustCB
is
a
registered
trademark.
Any
use
or
application
requires
prior
approval.
3 Security Target
The Security Target of STRONGV4P00 of S5E9945 with Specific IC Dedicated Software, version 1.6,
12 March 2024 [ST] is included here by reference.
Please note that, to satisfy the need for publication, a public version [ST-lite] has been created and
verified according to [ST-SAN].
4 Definitions
This list of acronyms and definitions contains elements that are not already defined by the CC or CEM:
AES Advanced Encryption Standard
CBC Cipher Block Chaining (a block cipher mode of operation)
CBC-MAC Cipher Block Chaining Message Authentication Code
DES Data Encryption Standard
DDR Double Date Rate
DFA Differential Fault Analysis
ECB Electronic Code Book (a block-cipher mode of operation)
ECC Elliptic Curve Cryptography
ECDH Elliptic Curve Diffie-Hellman algorithm
ECDSA Elliptic Curve Digital Signature Algorithm
IC Integrated Circuit
IT Information Technology
ITSEF IT Security Evaluation Facility
JIL Joint Interpretation Library
MAC Message Authentication Code
NSCIB Netherlands Scheme for Certification in the area of IT Security
NVM Non-Volatile Memory
PP Protection Profile
RNG Random Number Generator
RSA Rivest-Shamir-Adleman Algorithm
SHA Secure Hash Algorithm
SOC System on Chip
SPA/DPA Simple/Differential Power Analysis
TOE Target of Evaluation
TRNG True Random Number Generator
Page: 12/12 of report number: NSCIB-CC-2300085-01-CR, dated 26 March 2024
®
TrustCB
is
a
registered
trademark.
Any
use
or
application
requires
prior
approval.
5 Bibliography
This section lists all referenced documentation used as source material in the compilation of this
report.
[CC] Common Criteria for Information Technology Security Evaluation, Parts I, II and
III, Version 3.1 Revision 5, April 2017
[CEM] Common Methodology for Information Technology Security Evaluation,
Version 3.1 Revision 5, April 2017
[COMP] Joint Interpretation Library, Composite product evaluation for Smart Cards and
similar devices, Version 1.5.1, May 2018
[ETR] Evaluation Technical Report of Samsung “STRONGV4P00 of S5E9945” –
EAL5+, 23-RPT-1028, 12 March 2024
[ETRfC] Evaluation Technical Report of Samsung “STRONGV4P00 of S5E9945” –
EAL5+, 23-RPT-133, version 2.0, 12 March 2024
[JIL-AAPS] JIL Application of Attack Potential to Smartcards, Version 3.2, November 2022
[JIL-AM] Attack Methods for Smartcards and Similar Devices, Version 2.4, January 2020
(sensitive with controlled distribution)
[NSCIB] Netherlands Scheme for Certification in the Area of IT Security, Version 2.6,
02 August 2022
[PP] Secure Sub-System in System-on-Chip (3S in SoC), BSI-CC-PP-0117,
Version 1.5, 28 February 2022
[ST] Security Target of STRONGV4P00 of S5E9945 with Specific IC Dedicated
Software, version 1.6, 12 March 2024
[ST-lite] Security Target Lite of STRONGV4P00 of S5E9945 with Specific IC Dedicated
Software, version 0.1, 12 March 2024
[ST-SAN] ST sanitising for publication, CC Supporting Document CCDB-2006-04-004,
April 2006
(This is the end of this report.)