Certification Report
HP Universal CMDB and Universal Discovery v10.21
Issued by:
Communications Security Establishment
Certification Body
Canadian Common Criteria Evaluation and Certification Scheme
© Government of Canada, Communications Security Establishment, 2016
Document number: 383-4-336-CR
Version: 1.0
Date: 14 March 2016
Pagination: i to iii, 1 to 11
CCS Certification Report HP Universal CMDB and Universal Discovery v10.21
Hewlett Packard Enterprise Development LP
___________________________________________________________________________
Version 1.0 14 March 2016
- Page i of iii -
DISCLAIMER
The Information Technology (IT) product identified in this certification report, and its
associated certificate, has been evaluated at an approved evaluation facility – established
under the Canadian Common Criteria Evaluation and Certification Scheme (CCS) – using the
Common Methodology for Information Technology Security Evaluation, Version 3.1 Revision
4, for conformance to the Common Criteria for Information Technology Security Evaluation,
Version 3.1 Revision 4. This certification report, and its associated certificate, applies only to
the identified version and release of the product in its evaluated configuration. The evaluation
has been conducted in accordance with the provisions of the CCS, and the conclusions of the
evaluation facility in the evaluation report are consistent with the evidence adduced. This
report, and its associated certificate, are not an endorsement of the IT product by the
Communications Security Establishment, or any other organization that recognizes or gives
effect to this report, and its associated certificate, and no warranty for the IT product by the
Communications Security Establishment, or any other organization that recognizes or gives
effect to this report, and its associated certificate, is either expressed or implied.
CCS Certification Report HP Universal CMDB and Universal Discovery v10.21
Hewlett Packard Enterprise Development LP
___________________________________________________________________________
Version 1.0 14 March 2016
- Page ii of iii -
FOREWORD
The Canadian Common Criteria Evaluation and Certification Scheme (CCS) provides a
third-party evaluation service for determining the trustworthiness of Information Technology
(IT) security products. Evaluations are performed by a commercial Common Criteria
Evaluation Facility (CCEF) under the oversight of the CCS Certification Body, which is
managed by the Communications Security Establishment.
A CCEF is a commercial facility that has been approved by the CCS Certification Body to
perform Common Criteria evaluations; a significant requirement for such approval is
accreditation to the requirements of ISO/IEC 17025:2005, the General Requirements for the
Competence of Testing and Calibration Laboratories. Accreditation is performed under the
Program for the Accreditation of Laboratories - Canada (PALCAN), administered by the
Standards Council of Canada.
The CCEF that carried out this evaluation is CGI IT Security Evaluation & Test Facility.
By awarding a Common Criteria certificate, the CCS Certification Body asserts that the
product complies with the security requirements specified in the associated security target. A
security target is a requirements specification document that defines the scope of the
evaluation activities. The consumer of certified IT products should review the security target,
in addition to this certification report, in order to gain an understanding of any assumptions
made during the evaluation, the IT product's intended environment, the evaluated security
functionality, and the testing and analysis conducted by the CCEF.
This certification report is associated with the certificate of product evaluation dated 14
March 2016, and the security target identified in Section 4 of this report.
The certification report, certificate of product evaluation and security target are posted on the
CCS Certified Products list (CPL) and the Common Criteria portal (the official website of the
Common Criteria Project).
Reproduction of this report is authorized provided the report is reproduced in its entirety.
CCS Certification Report HP Universal CMDB and Universal Discovery v10.21
Hewlett Packard Enterprise Development LP
___________________________________________________________________________
Version 1.0 14 March 2016
- Page iii of iii -
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Disclaimer....................................................................................................................................... i
Foreword........................................................................................................................................ii
Executive Summary...................................................................................................................... 1
1 Identification of Target of Evaluation................................................................................. 2
2 TOE Description ................................................................................................................... 2
3 Security Policy....................................................................................................................... 3
4 Security Target...................................................................................................................... 4
5 Common Criteria Conformance.......................................................................................... 4
6 Assumptions and Clarification of Scope............................................................................. 5
6.1 SECURE USAGE ASSUMPTIONS................................................................................... 5
6.2 ENVIRONMENTAL ASSUMPTIONS ............................................................................... 5
7 Evaluated Configuration...................................................................................................... 6
8 Documentation ...................................................................................................................... 6
9 Evaluation Analysis Activities ............................................................................................. 7
10 ITS Product Testing.............................................................................................................. 8
10.1 ASSESSMENT OF DEVELOPER TESTS .......................................................................... 8
10.2 INDEPENDENT FUNCTIONAL TESTING ........................................................................ 8
10.3 INDEPENDENT PENETRATION TESTING....................................................................... 9
10.4 CONDUCT OF TESTING ............................................................................................... 9
10.5 TESTING RESULTS...................................................................................................... 9
11 Results of the Evaluation...................................................................................................... 9
12 Acronyms, Abbreviations and Initializations................................................................... 10
13 References............................................................................................................................ 11
CCS Certification Report HP Universal CMDB and Universal Discovery v10.21
Hewlett Packard Enterprise Development LP
___________________________________________________________________________
Version 1.0 14 March 2016
- Page 1 of 11 -
Executive Summary
HP Universal CMDB and Universal Discovery v10.21, from Hewlett Packard Enterprise
Development LP, is the Target of Evaluation. The results of this evaluation demonstrate that
HP Universal CMDB and Universal Discovery v10.21 meets the requirements of Evaluation
Assurance Level (EAL) 2 augmented for the evaluated security functionality.
HP Universal CMDB and Universal Discovery v10.21 is a federated CMS (Configuration
Management System) that discovers and collects data from physical and logical entities and
services in the IT network. To discover the physical and logical network entities, the TOE
uses Discovery Activities. Each Discovery Activity contains a discovery schedule and the
required credentials to access the network entities.
Collected data is stored and analyzed upon reception by the TOE, allowing TOE
administrators to perform impact analysis on proposed configuration changes, policy
management and enforcement, and change tracking and control. Each physical or logical
entities discovered and collected by the TOE is referred to as a CI (Configuration Item). The
TOE maintains baseline profiles for CIs, known as CITs (Configuration Item Templates). If a
CI is detected to be different than the configuration specified in the CIT, TOE administrators
may notify the CI’s stakeholders, asking whether a change is required to address the
discrepancy. In addition to comparing the CIs with the expected configuration according to a
CIT, the TOE is able to compare the CI against TOE administrator configured policies. These
policies can be related to the physical resources, configuration, or deployment needs of the
CI.
The TOE provides management capabilities through the UCMDB user interface (UI), a JMX
interface to the UCMDB server, the exposed SDK API of the UCMDB server, the CM UI, a
JMX interface to CM, and a JMX interface to the UD (Universal Discovery)Probe. The
management capabilities available over the UCMDB SDK API are identical to the
management capabilities available over the UCMDB UI.
CGI IT Security Evaluation & Test Facility is the CCEF that conducted the evaluation. This
evaluation was completed on 14 March 2016 and was carried out in accordance with the
rules of the Canadian Common Criteria Evaluation and Certification Scheme (CCS).
The scope of the evaluation is defined by the security target, which identifies assumptions
made during the evaluation, the intended environment for HP Universal CMDB and
Universal Discovery v10.21, and the security functional/assurance requirements. Consumers
are advised to verify that their operating environment is consistent with that specified in the
security target, and to give due consideration to the comments, observations and
recommendations in this certification report.
Communications Security Establishment, as the CCS Certification Body, declares that the
HP Universal CMDB and Universal Discovery v10.21 evaluation meets all the conditions of
the Arrangement on the Recognition of Common Criteria Certificates and that the product
will be listed on the CCS Certified Products list (CPL) and the Common Criteria portal (the
official website of the Common Criteria Project).
CCS Certification Report HP Universal CMDB and Universal Discovery v10.21
Hewlett Packard Enterprise Development LP
___________________________________________________________________________
Version 1.0 14 March 2016
- Page 2 of 11 -
1 Identification of Target of Evaluation
The Target of Evaluation (TOE) for this EAL 2+ evaluation is HP Universal CMDB and
Universal Discovery v10.21 (hereafter referred to as HP Universal CMDB and Universal
Discovery v10.21), from Hewlett Packard Enterprise Development LP.
2 TOE Description
HP Universal CMDB and Universal Discovery v10.21 is a federated CMS (Configuration
Management System) that discovers and collects data from physical and logical entities and
services in the IT network. To discover the physical and logical network entities, the TOE
uses Discovery Activities. Each Discovery Activity contains a discovery schedule and the
required credentials to access the network entities.
Collected data is stored and analyzed upon reception by the TOE, allowing TOE
administrators to perform impact analysis on proposed configuration changes, policy
management and enforcement, and change tracking and control. Each physical or logical
entities discovered and collected by the TOE is referred to as a CI (Configuration Item). The
TOE maintains baseline profiles for CIs, known as CITs (Configuration Item Templates). If a
CI is detected to be different than the configuration specified in the CIT, TOE administrators
may notify the CI’s stakeholders, asking whether a change is required to address the
discrepancy. In addition to comparing the CIs with the expected configuration according to a
CIT, the TOE is able to compare the CI against TOE administrator configured policies. These
policies can be related to the physical resources, configuration, or deployment needs of the
CI.
The TOE provides management capabilities through the UCMDB user interface (UI), a JMX
interface to the UCMDB server, the exposed SDK API of the UCMDB server, the CM UI, a
JMX interface to CM, and a JMX interface to the UD (Universal Discovery)Probe. The
management capabilities available over the UCMDB SDK API are identical to the
management capabilities available over the UCMDB UI.
CCS Certification Report HP Universal CMDB and Universal Discovery v10.21
Hewlett Packard Enterprise Development LP
___________________________________________________________________________
Version 1.0 14 March 2016
- Page 3 of 11 -
A diagram of the HP Universal CMDB and Universal Discovery v10.21 architecture is as
follows:
3 Security Policy
HP Universal CMDB and Universal Discovery v10.21 implements a role-based access
control policy to control administrative access to the system. In addition, HP Universal
CMDB and Universal Discovery v10.21 implements policies pertaining to the following
security functional classes:
• Security Audit
• Cryptographic Support
• Identification and Authentication
• Security Management
• Protection of the TSF
• TOE Access
• Trusted path/channels
• Universal Discovery and Configuration Management
CCS Certification Report HP Universal CMDB and Universal Discovery v10.21
Hewlett Packard Enterprise Development LP
___________________________________________________________________________
Version 1.0 14 March 2016
- Page 4 of 11 -
The following cryptographic modules were evaluated to the FIPS 140-2 standard:
Cryptographic Module Certificate
RSA BSAFE Crypto-J JSAFE and JCE Software Module,
Software Version 6.1
#2057
OpenSSL FIPS Object Module, Software Version 2.0.7 #1747
4 Security Target
The ST associated with this Certification Report is identified below:
Security Target: Hewlett Packard Enterprise Development LP HP Universal CMDB and
Universal Discovery v10.21 Security Target, version 1.1, March 11, 2016
5 Common Criteria Conformance
The evaluation was conducted using the Common Methodology for Information Technology
Security Evaluation, Version 3.1 Revision 4, for conformance to the Common Criteria for
Information Technology Security Evaluation, Version 3.1 Revision 4.
HP Universal CMDB and Universal Discovery v10.21 is:
a. EAL 2 augmented, containing all security assurance requirements listed, as well as the
following:
• ALC_FLR.2 – Flaw Reporting Procedures
b. Common Criteria Part 2 extended; with functional requirements based upon functional
components in Part 2, except for the following explicitly stated requirements defined in
the ST:
• EXT_UDC_CID - Configuration Item Discovery
• EXT_UDC_PCC - Policy Creation and Compliance
• EXT_UDC_PCA - Policy Compliance Alerting
• EXT_UDC_RDR - Restricted data review
c. Common Criteria Part 3 conformant, with security assurance requirements based only
upon assurance components in Part 3.
CCS Certification Report HP Universal CMDB and Universal Discovery v10.21
Hewlett Packard Enterprise Development LP
___________________________________________________________________________
Version 1.0 14 March 2016
- Page 5 of 11 -
6 Assumptions and Clarification of Scope
Consumers of HP Universal CMDB and Universal Discovery v10.21 should consider
assumptions about usage and environmental settings as requirements for the product’s
installation and its operating environment. This will ensure the proper and secure operation
of the TOE.
6.1 Secure Usage Assumptions
The following Secure Usage Assumptions are listed in the ST:
• There are one or more competent individuals assigned to manage the TOE and the
security of the information it contains; and
• Administrators are non-hostile, appropriately trained, and follow all administrator
guidance.
6.2 Environmental Assumptions
The following Environmental Assumptions are listed in the ST:
• The TOE is installed on the appropriate, dedicated hardware and operating system;
• The TOE is located within a controlled access facility;
• The TOE environment provides the network connectivity required to allow the TOE
to perform its intended functions;
• The TOE software will be protected from unauthorized modification;
• The TOE environment will provide the TOE with the necessary reliable timestamps;
and
• The TOE environment will include a trusted network that is protected from external
interference and tampering.
CCS Certification Report HP Universal CMDB and Universal Discovery v10.21
Hewlett Packard Enterprise Development LP
___________________________________________________________________________
Version 1.0 14 March 2016
- Page 6 of 11 -
7 Evaluated Configuration
The evaluated configuration for HP Universal CMDB and Universal Discovery v10.21
comprises The TOE components (see section 2) installed on the following;
• GPC server running RHEL v5.9 (UCMDB Server only),
• GPC server running Windows Server 2008 R2 64-bit OS (UCMDB Browser, CM,
and UD Probe), and
• GPC running Windows 7 64-bit OS (UD Agent only).
The following environmental components are required;
• Authentication Server to support LDAP
• Oracle 11g Database Server
• Simple Mail Transfer Protocol (SMTP) Server
The publication entitled HP Universal CMDB and Universal Discovery v10.21 Guidance
Documentation Supplement v0.7 describes the procedures necessary to install and operate
HP Universal CMDB and Universal Discovery v10.21 in its evaluated configuration.
8 Documentation
The Hewlett Packard Enterprise Development LP documents provided to the consumer are as
follows:
a. HP Universal CMDB, Software Version 10.21, Administration Guide, Document Release
Date: July 2015, Software Release Date: July 2015;
b. HP Universal CMDB, Software Version 10.21, Developer Reference Guide, Document
Release Date: July 2015, Software Release Date: July 2015;
c. HP Universal CMDB, Software Version 10.21, JMX Reference Guide, Document
Release Date: July 2015, Software Release Date: July 2015;
d. HP Universal CMDB and Configuration Manager, Software Version 10.21, Hardening
Guide, Document Release Date: July 2015, Software Release Date: July 2015;
e. HP Universal CMDB Configuration Manager, Software Version 10.21, User Guide,
Document Release Date: July 2015, Software Release Date: July 2015;
f. HP Universal CMDB, Software Version 10.21, HP UCMDB 10.21 Release Notes,
Document Release Date: July 2015, Software Release Date: July 2015; and
g. HP Universal CMDB, Software Version 10.21, Support Matrix, Document Release Date:
July 2015, Software Release Date: July 2015.
CCS Certification Report HP Universal CMDB and Universal Discovery v10.21
Hewlett Packard Enterprise Development LP
___________________________________________________________________________
Version 1.0 14 March 2016
- Page 7 of 11 -
9 Evaluation Analysis Activities
The evaluation analysis activities involved a structured evaluation of HP Universal CMDB
and Universal Discovery v10.21, including the following areas:
Development: The evaluators analyzed the HP Universal CMDB and Universal Discovery
v10.21 functional specification and design documentation; they determined that the design
completely and accurately describes the TOE security functionality (TSF) interfaces, the TSF
subsystems and how the TSF implements the security functional requirements (SFRs). The
evaluators analyzed the HP Universal CMDB and Universal Discovery v10.21 security
architectural description and determined that the initialization process is secure, that the
security functions are protected against tamper and bypass, and that security domains are
maintained. The evaluators also independently verified that the correspondence mappings
between the design documents are correct.
Guidance Documents: The evaluators examined the HP Universal CMDB and Universal
Discovery v10.21 preparative user guidance and operational user guidance and determined
that it sufficiently and unambiguously describes how to securely transform the TOE into its
evaluated configuration and how to use and administer the product. The evaluators examined
and tested the preparative and operational guidance, and determined that they are complete
and sufficiently detailed to result in a secure configuration.
Life-cycle support: An analysis of the HP Universal CMDB and Universal Discovery
v10.21 configuration management system and associated documentation was performed. The
evaluators found that the HP Universal CMDB and Universal Discovery v10.21
configuration items were clearly marked.
The evaluators examined the delivery documentation and determined that it described all of
the procedures required to maintain the integrity of HP Universal CMDB and Universal
Discovery v10.21 during distribution to the consumer.
The evaluators reviewed the flaw remediation procedures used by developer for the HP
Universal CMDB and Universal Discovery v10.21. The evaluators concluded that the
procedures are adequate to track and correct security flaws, and distribute the flaw
information and corrections to consumers of the product.
All these evaluation activities resulted in PASS verdicts.
CCS Certification Report HP Universal CMDB and Universal Discovery v10.21
Hewlett Packard Enterprise Development LP
___________________________________________________________________________
Version 1.0 14 March 2016
- Page 8 of 11 -
10 ITS Product Testing
Testing consists of the following three steps: assessing developer tests, performing
independent functional tests, and performing penetration tests.
10.1 Assessment of Developer Tests
The evaluators verified that the developer has met their testing responsibilities by examining
their test evidence, and reviewing their test results, as documented in the ETR1
.
The evaluators analyzed the developer’s test coverage analysis and found it to be complete
and accurate. The correspondence between the tests identified in the developer’s test
documentation and the functional specification was complete.
10.2 Independent Functional Testing
During this evaluation, the evaluator developed independent functional tests by examining
design and guidance documentation.
All testing was planned and documented to a sufficient level of detail to allow repeatability
of the testing procedures and results. Resulting from this test coverage approach is the
following list of test goals:
a. Repeat of Developer's Tests: The objective of this test goal is to repeat a subset of the
developer's tests;
b. Generation of Audit records: The objective of this test goal is to confirm the generation
of audit records not tested by the developer;
c. Authentication via LDAP: The objective of this test goal is to confirm that the TOE
supports LDAP authentication;
d. Discovery and Review of CI’s over SSH: The objective of this test goal is to confirm
that the TOE can discover and review configuration items over SSH;
e. Create a policy: The objective of this test goal is to demonstrate that TOE admins can
create policies and view the change history of a CI;
f. User Privileges: The objective of this test goal is test user privileges; and
g. SSL comunication: The objective of this is to confirm that the UCMDB server
communicates with the CM and UD Probe over TLS.
1
The ETR is a CCS document that contains information proprietary to the developer and/or the evaluator, and
is not releasable for public review.
CCS Certification Report HP Universal CMDB and Universal Discovery v10.21
Hewlett Packard Enterprise Development LP
___________________________________________________________________________
Version 1.0 14 March 2016
- Page 9 of 11 -
10.3 Independent Penetration Testing
Subsequent to the independent review of public domain vulnerability databases and all
evaluation deliverables, limited independent evaluator penetration testing was conducted.
The penetration tests focused on:
a. Use of automated vulnerability scanning tools to discover potential network, platform and
application layer vulnerabilities(For example Heartbleed, Freak, Poodle, Ghost,
Shellshock)
The independent penetration testing did not uncover any exploitable vulnerabilities in the
intended operating environment.
10.4 Conduct of Testing
HP Universal CMDB and Universal Discovery v10.21 was subjected to a comprehensive
suite of formally documented, independent functional and penetration tests. The detailed
testing activities, including configurations, procedures, test cases, expected results and
observed results are documented in a separate Test Results document.
10.5 Testing Results
The developer’s tests and the independent functional tests yielded the expected results,
providing assurance that HP Universal CMDB and Universal Discovery v10.21 behaves as
specified in its ST and functional specification.
11 Results of the Evaluation
This evaluation has provided the basis for a EAL 2+ level of assurance. The overall verdict
for the evaluation is PASS. These results are supported by evidence in the ETR.
CCS Certification Report HP Universal CMDB and Universal Discovery v10.21
Hewlett Packard Enterprise Development LP
___________________________________________________________________________
Version 1.0 14 March 2016
- Page 10 of 11 -
12 Acronyms, Abbreviations and Initializations
Acronym/Abbreviation/
Initialization
Description
CCEF Common Criteria Evaluation Facility
CCS Canadian Common Criteria Evaluation and
Certification Scheme
CI Configuration Item
CIT Configuration Item Type
CPL Certified Products List
CM Configuration Management
CMDB Configuration Management Database
CMS Configuration Management System
EAL Evaluation Assurance Level
ETR Evaluation Technical Report
IT Information Technology
ITSET Information Technology Security
Evaluation and Testing
PALCAN Program for the Accreditation of
Laboratories - Canada
SFR Security Functional Requirement
ST Security Target
TOE Target of Evaluation
TSF TOE Security Function
UD Universal Discovery
CCS Certification Report HP Universal CMDB and Universal Discovery v10.21
Hewlett Packard Enterprise Development LP
___________________________________________________________________________
Version 1.0 14 March 2016
- Page 11 of 11 -
13 References
This section lists all documentation used as source material for this report:
a. CCS Publication #4, Technical Oversight, Version 1.8, October 2010.
b. Common Criteria for Information Technology Security Evaluation, Version 3.1
Revision 4, September 2012.
c. Common Methodology for Information Technology Security Evaluation, CEM,
Version 3.1 Revision 4, September 2012.
d. Security Target: Hewlett Packard Enterprise Development LP HP Universal CMDB
and Universal Discovery v10.21 Security Target, version 1.1, March 11, 2016
e. Hewlett Packard Enterprise Development LP HP Universal CMDB and Universal
Discovery v10.21 Common Criteria EAL2 Evaluation Technical Report v0.4,March
14, 2016 .