CRP-C0290-01 Certification Report Kazumasa Fujie, Chairman Information-technology Promotion Agency, Japan Target of Evaluation Application date/ID 2010-10-04 (ITC-0309) Certification No. C0290 Sponsor Konica Minolta Business Technologies, Inc. Name of TOE Japanese: bizhub 652 / bizhub 602 / bizhub 552 / bizhub 502 / ineo 652 / ineo 602 / ineo 552 / ineo 502 Zentai Seigyo Software English: bizhub 652 / bizhub 602 / bizhub 552 / bizhub 502 / ineo 652 / ineo 602 / ineo 552 / ineo 502 Control Software Version of TOE A2WU0Y0-0100-GM0-00 PP Conformance None Assurance Package EAL3 Developer Konica Minolta Business Technologies, Inc. Evaluation Facility Mizuho Information & Research Institute, Inc. Center for Evaluation of Information Security This is to report that the evaluation result for the above TOE is certified as follows. 2011-05-30 Takumi Yamasato, Technical Manager Information Security Certification Office IT Security Center Evaluation Criteria, etc.: This TOE is evaluated in accordance with the following criteria prescribed in the "IT Security Evaluation and Certification Scheme". - Common Criteria for Information Technology Security Evaluation Version 3.1 Release 3 - Common Methodology for Information Technology Security Evaluation Version 3.1 Release 3 Evaluation Result: Pass "Japanese: bizhub 652 / bizhub 602 / bizhub 552 / bizhub 502 / ineo 652 / ineo 602 / ineo 552 / ineo 502 Zentai Seigyo Software, English: bizhub 652 / bizhub 602 / bizhub 552 / bizhub 502 / ineo 652 / ineo 602 / ineo 552 / ineo 502 Control Software Version A2WU0Y0-0100-GM0-00" has been evaluated in accordance with the provision of the "IT Security Certification Procedure" by Information-technology Promotion Agency, Japan, and has met the specified assurance requirements. CRP-C0290-01 2 Notice: This document is the English translation version of the Certification Report published by the Certification Body of Japan Information Technology Security Evaluation and Certification Scheme. CRP-C0290-01 3 Table of Contents 1. Executive Summary............................................................................... 5 1.1 Product Overview ............................................................................ 5 1.1.1 Assurance Package ....................................................................... 5 1.1.2 TOE and Security Functionality...................................................... 5 1.1.2.1 Threats and Security Objectives ................................................... 6 1.1.2.2 Configuration and Assumptions.................................................... 7 1.1.3 Disclaimers ................................................................................. 7 1.2 Conduct of Evaluation ...................................................................... 7 1.3 Certification ................................................................................... 7 2. Identification ....................................................................................... 8 3. Security Policy...................................................................................... 9 3.1 Roles related to TOE ........................................................................ 9 3.2 Security Function Policies ............................................................... 10 3.2.1 Threats and Security Function Policies .......................................... 10 3.2.1.1 Threats .................................................................................. 10 3.2.1.2 Security Function Policies against Threats .................................. 12 3.2.2 Organisational Security Policies and Security Function Policies ........ 15 3.2.2.1 Organisational Security Policies................................................. 15 3.2.2.2 Security Function Policies to Organisational Security Policies ........ 15 4. Assumptions and Clarification of Scope .................................................. 17 4.1 Usage Assumptions ........................................................................ 17 4.2 Environment Assumptions............................................................... 17 4.3 Clarification of scope ...................................................................... 18 5. Architectural Information .................................................................... 19 5.1 TOE boundary and component ......................................................... 19 5.2 IT Environment ............................................................................. 20 6. Documentation ................................................................................... 22 7. Evaluation conducted by Evaluation Facility and Results.......................... 23 7.1 Evaluation Approach ...................................................................... 23 7.2 Overview of Evaluation Activity ....................................................... 23 7.3 IT Product Testing ......................................................................... 23 7.3.1 Developer Testing ....................................................................... 23 7.3.2 Evaluator Independent Testing ..................................................... 26 7.3.3 Evaluator Penetration Testing ...................................................... 28 7.4 Evaluated Configuration ................................................................. 32 7.5 Evaluation Results......................................................................... 32 7.6 Evaluator Comments/Recommendations ............................................ 33 8. Certification ....................................................................................... 34 CRP-C0290-01 4 8.1 Certification Result........................................................................ 34 8.2 Recommendations .......................................................................... 34 9. Annexes............................................................................................. 35 10. Security Target ................................................................................ 35 11. Glossary.......................................................................................... 36 12. Bibliography .................................................................................... 39 CRP-C0290-01 5 1. Executive Summary This Certification Report describes the content of certification result in relation to IT Security Evaluation of "Japanese: bizhub 652 / bizhub 602 / bizhub 552 / bizhub 502 / ineo 652 / ineo 602 / ineo 552 / ineo 502 Zentai Seigyo Software, English: bizhub 652 / bizhub 602 / bizhub 552 / bizhub 502 / ineo 652 / ineo 602 / ineo 552 / ineo 502 Control Software Version A2WU0Y0-0100-GM0-00" (hereinafter referred to as "the TOE") developed by Konica Minolta Business Technologies, Inc., and evaluation of the TOE was finished on 2011-05 by Mizuho Information & Research Institute, Inc. Center for Evaluation of Information Security (hereinafter referred to as "Evaluation Facility"). It reports to the sponsor, Konica Minolta Business Technologies, Inc. and provides information to the users and system operators who are interested in this TOE. The reader of the Certification Report is advised to read the Security Target (hereinafter referred to as "the ST") that is the appendix of this report together. Especially, details of security functional requirements, assurance requirements and rationale for sufficiency of these requirements of the TOE are described in ST. This certification report assumes "general consumers" to be a reader. Note that the Certification Report presents the certification result based on assurance requirements to which the TOE conforms, and does not guarantee individual IT product itself. 1.1 Product Overview Overview of the TOE functions and operational conditions is as follows. Refer to from Chapter 2 onwards for details. 1.1.1 Assurance Package Assurance Package of the TOE is EAL3. 1.1.2 TOE and Security Functionality The bizhub 652, bizhub 602, bizhub 552, bizhub 502, ineo 652, ineo 602, ineo 552 and ineo 502, which this TOE is installed, are digital Multi Functional Peripheral, provided by Konica Minolta Business Technologies, Inc., composed by selecting and combining copy, print, scan and FAX functions. (Multi Functional Peripheral, hereinafter all the products are referred to as "MFP".) The TOE is the "bizhub 652 / bizhub 602 / bizhub 552 / bizhub 502 / ineo 652 / ineo 602 / ineo 552 / ineo 502 Control Software" that controls the entire operation of MFP, including the operation control processing and the image data management triggered by the panel of the main body of MFP or through the network. TOE supports the protection function from exposure of the highly confidential documents stored in the MFP. Moreover, for the danger of illegally bringing out HDD that is the medium to store image data in MFP, the TOE can prevent from unauthorized access by encrypting all the data including image data written in HDD by using ASIC. Besides, TOE provides the function that deletes all the data of HDD completely by deletion method compliant with various overwrite deletion standards and the function that controls the access from the FAX public line against the danger using Fax function as a steppingstone to access internal network. CRP-C0290-01 6 Regarding these security functionalities, the validity of the design policy and the accuracy of the implementation were evaluated in the range of the assurance package. Threats and assumptions that this TOE assumes are described in the next clause. 1.1.2.1 Threats and Security Objectives This TOE counters each threat with the following security functions. - It is assumed as threat that information leaks from MFP after lease-return or discard of MFP. To counter this threat, the TOE has the function to delete the information in storage medium. - It is assumed as threat that HDD is stolen from MFP and information is leaked from stolen HDD. To counter this threat, the TOE encrypts and writes information in HDD by using the encryption function of ASIC outside of the TOE. - It is assumed as threat that the unauthorized access is done to the user box file stored in the private user box, the public user box or the group user box. To counter this threat, the TOE identifies and authenticates user and determines the availability of access based on the information of users and user box file that the TOE keeps. - It is assumed as threat that the unauthorized access is done to the secure print file or ID & print file. To counter this threat, the TOE identifies and authenticates user and permits only the person who stored the secure print files and ID & print files to operate these files. - It is assumed as threat that information leaks by the following causes. > To transmit the user box file to the different address which the user does not intend, when transmitted it from the TOE. > To pretend to be the TOE and exploit the secure print file and ID & print file. > To store the user box files to the different user box which the user does not intend, when TOE received them. To counter this threat, the TOE confirms whether a user is an administrator by identification and authentication, and permits only the administrator to operate the setting of the address, setting of impersonating the TOE and setting of the destination. - It is assumed as threat that the leak of information cannot prevent because the setting of enhanced security function is changed. To counter this threat, the TOE confirms whether a user is an administrator or a service engineer by identification and authentication, and permits only the administrator or the service engineer to change the setting of enhanced security function. - It is assumed as threat that backup function or restore function is abused and resulted in a leak of information or a change of setting value. To counter this threat, The TOE confirms whether a user is an administrator by identification and authentication, and permits only the administrator to use the backup function and the restore function. (Supplement) The TOE has user authentication function, but it can also perform user authentication by using Active Directory that is outside of TOE. CRP-C0290-01 7 1.1.2.2 Configuration and Assumptions The evaluated product is assumed to be operated under the following configuration and assumptions. It assumes that the MFP including this TOE is installed in the office which is managed by organizations such as a company or the section, and is connected to the intra-office LAN. In this environment, the MFP is managed not to be accessed from an external network (which is outside of the organization such as internet) when LAN is connected to an external network, and the communication through the LAN is managed not to be wiretapped. It assumes that an administrator and a service engineer are reliable and the other users can keep the secret about his/her own password. It assumes that this TOE is used in the condition where the setting of the enhanced security function is enabled. 1.1.3 Disclaimers - Active Directory function, in case of selecting external server authentication method for the user authentication function, is not assured in this evaluation. - The encryption function by ASIC installed in MFP is not assured in this evaluation. - Fax unit control function is valid only when the Fax unit as an optional part is installed. 1.2 Conduct of Evaluation Evaluation Facility conducted IT security evaluation and completed on 2011-05 based on functional requirements and assurance requirements of the TOE according to the publicized documents "IT Security Evaluation and Certification Scheme"[1], "IT Security Certification Procedure"[2], "Evaluation Facility Approval Procedure"[3] provided by Certification Body. 1.3 Certification The Certification Body verifies the Evaluation Technical Report [13] and Observation Reports prepared by Evaluation Facility and evaluation evidence materials, and confirmed that the TOE evaluation is conducted in accordance with the prescribed procedure. Certification oversight review is also prepared for those concerns found in the certification process. Those concerns pointed out by the Certification Body are fully resolved, and the Certification Body confirmed that the TOE evaluation is appropriately conducted in accordance with CC ([4][5][6] or [7][8][9]) and CEM (either of [10][11]). The Certification Body prepared this Certification Report based on the Evaluation Technical Report submitted by Evaluation Facility and fully concluded certification activities. CRP-C0290-01 8 2. Identification The TOE is identified as follows: Name of the TOE: Japanese: bizhub 652 / bizhub 602 / bizhub 552 / bizhub 502 / ineo 652 / ineo 602 / ineo 552 / ineo 502 Zentai Seigyo Software English: bizhub 652 / bizhub 602 / bizhub 552 / bizhub 502 / ineo 652 / ineo 602 / ineo 552 / ineo 502 Control Software Version of the TOE: A2WU0Y0-0100-GM0-00 Developer: Konica Minolta Business Technologies, Inc. At the time of TOE installation, etc., a user can ask a service engineer to confirm that the product is the evaluated and certified TOE. TOE version and checksum are displayed by panel operation of service engineer. A user can confirm that the installed product is the evaluated and certified TOE, by confirming TOE version and that checksum is same as one in a service manual. CRP-C0290-01 9 3. Security Policy This chapter describes the security function policies and the organizational security policies adopted to counter the TOE against the threats. This TOE operates the following data. - Secure Print file - ID & print file - User Box file To protect these data from unintended leak, the TOE identifies and authenticates a person who accesses these data or the related data, and controls access. Moreover, the TOE provides an encryption function with ASIC and a data deletion function to prevent the leak from storage medium that stores these data or the related data. This TOE realizes followings for customer's demand. - A function to prevent the leak from the communication path of these data - Structure not to permit access from an FAX public line port of MFP to an internal network 3.1 Roles related to TOE The roles related to this TOE are defined as follows. (1) User An MFP user who is registered into MFP. In general, the employee in the office is assumed. (2) Administrator An MFP user, who manages the operations of MFP, manages MFP's mechanical operations and users. In general, it is assumed that the person elected among the employees in the office plays this role. (3) Service engineer A user, who manages the maintenance of MFP, performs the repair and adjustment of MFP. In general, the person-in-charge of the sales companies who performs the maintenance service of MFP in cooperation with Konica Minolta Business Technologies, Inc., is assumed. (4) Responsible person of the organization that uses the MFP A responsible person of the organization that manages the office where the MFP is installed. An administrator who manages the operation of MFP is assigned. (5) Responsible person of the organization that manages the maintenance of the MFP A responsible person of the organization that manages the maintenance of MFP. A service engineer who manages the maintenance of MFP is assigned. Besides this, though not a user of TOE, those who go in and out the office are assumed as accessible person to TOE. CRP-C0290-01 10 3.2 Security Function Policies The TOE possesses security functions to counter threats shown in 3.2.1 and to fulfill the organisational security policies shown in 3.2.2. 3.2.1 Threats and Security Function Policies 3.2.1.1 Threats This TOE assumes such threats presented in Table 3-1 and provides functions against them. Table 3-1 Assumed Threats Identifier Threat T.DISCARD-MFP (Lease-return and discard of MFP) When leased MFPs are returned or discarded MFPs are collected, secure print files, user box files, ID & print files, on-memory image files, stored image files, HDD-remaining image files, image-related files, transmission address data files, and various passwords which were set up can be leaked by the person with malicious intent when he/she analyzes the HDD or NVRAM in the MFP. T.BRING-OUT-STORAGE (Unauthorized bringing out HDD) - Secure print files, user box files, ID & print files, on-memory image files, stored image files, HDD-remaining image files, image-related files, transmission address data files, and various passwords which were set up can be leaked by a malicious person or a user illegally when he/she brings out and analyzes HDD in the MFP. - A person or a user with malicious intent illegally replaces the HDD in MFP. In the replaced HDD, newly created files such as secure print files, user box files, ID & print files, on-memory image files, stored image files, HDD-remaining image files, image-related files, transmission address data files and various passwords which were set up are accumulated. A person or a user with malicious intent takes out to analyze the replaced HDD, so that such image files will be leaked. T.ACCESS-PRIVATE-BOX (Unauthorized access to the personal user box which used a user function) Exposure of the user box file when a person or a user with malicious intent accesses the user box where other user owns, and operates the user box file, such as copies, moves, downloads, prints, transmits, and so on. T.ACCESS-PUBLIC-BOX (Unauthorized access to public user box which used a user function) Exposure of the user box file when a person or a user with malicious intent accesses the public user box which is not permitted to use, and operates the user box file, such as copies, moves, downloads, prints transmits, and so on. CRP-C0290-01 11 Identifier Threat T.ACCESS-GROUP-BOX (Unauthorized access to the group user box which used a user function) Exposure of the user box file when a person or a user with malicious intent accesses the group user box which the account where a user does not belong to owns, and operates the user box file, such as copies, moves, downloads, prints transmits, and so on. T.ACCESS-SECURE-PRIN T (Unauthorized access to the secure print file or ID & print file by utilizing the user function) - Secure print files are exposed by a malicious person or user when he/she operates (prints etc.) those files to which access is not allowed. - ID & print files are exposed by a malicious person or user when he/she operates (prints etc.) those files which were stored by other users. T.UNEXPECTED-TRANSM ISSION (Transmission to unintended address) - Malicious person or user changes the network settings that are related to the transmission of a user box file. Even an address is set precisely, a user box file is transmitted (the E-mail transmission or the FTP transmission) to the entity which a user does not intend to, so that a user box file is exposed. > Setup related to the SMTP server > Setup related to the DNS server - Malicious person or user changes the network settings which set in MFP to identify MFP itself where the TOE installed, by setting to the value of the entity such as another unauthorized MFP from the value of MFP (NetBIOS name, AppleTalk printer name, IP address, etc.) that the TOE is originally installed, so that secure print files or ID & print files are exposed. - Malicious person or user changes the TSI receiving settings. A user box file is stored to the entity which a user does not intend to, so that a user box file is exposed. - Malicious person or user changes the PC-FAX reception settings. By changing the setting of the storing for the public user box to store to common area for all users, a user box file is stored to the entity which a user does not intend to, so that a user box file is exposed. * This threat exists only in the case that the setting of PC-FAX reception is meant to work as the operation setting for box storing. T.ACCESS-SETTING (An unauthorized change of a function setting condition related to security) The possibility of leaking user box files, secure print files, or ID & print files rises because a malicious person or user changes the settings related to the enhanced security function. CRP-C0290-01 12 Identifier Threat T.BACKUP-RESTORE (Unauthorized use of backup function and restoration function) User box files, secure print files, or ID & print files can be leaked by a malicious person or user using the backup function and the restoration function illegally. Also highly confidential data such as passwords can be exposed, so that settings might be falsified. 3.2.1.2 Security Function Policies against Threats This TOE counters the threats shown in Table 3-1 by the following security function policies. (1) Security function to counter the threat [T.DISCARD-MFP (Lease return and discard of MFP)] This threat assumes the possibility of leaking information from MFP collected from the user. The TOE provides the function to overwrite data for the deletion of all area of HDD and initializes the settings like passwords that is set in NVRAM (referred as "All area overwrite deletion function"), so it prevents the leakage of the protected assets and the security settings in HDD and NVRAM connected to leased MFPs that were returned or discarded MFPs. (2) Security function to counter the threat [T.BRING-OUT-STORAGE (Unauthorized bringing out HDD)] This threat assumes the possibility that the data in HDD to be leaked by being stolen from the operational environment under MFP used or by installing the unauthorized HDD and bringing out with the data accumulated in it. This TOE provides the generation function of encryption key to encrypt the data written in the HDD (referred as "encryption key generation function") and supporting function with the ASIC (referred as "ASIC operation support function") by using the encryption function of ASIC outside of the TOE, so that the encrypted data is stored in HDD and it makes it difficult to decode the data even if the information is read out from HDD. (3) Security function to counter the threat [T.ACCESS-PRIVATE-BOX (Unauthorized access to personal user box using user function)] This threat assumes the possibility that an unauthorized operation is done by using the user function for the personal user box which each user uses to store the image file. When you use various functions of MFP with this TOE, the change in settings of users and personal user boxes is limited only to administrator and the permitted users, and the operation of personal user box is restricted only to the normal users, and it prevents from unauthorized operation by using user functions, by maintaining functions such as the identification and authentication function of users and administrators (referred as "user function" and "administrator function"), the access control function for personal user box (referred as "user box function") and the function that limits the changes in settings of users and personal user box to administrators and users (referred as "administrator function", "user function" and "user box function"). Furthermore, this TOE provides the function to get the authentication information from CRP-C0290-01 13 the user information management server of Active Directory (referred as "External server authentication operation support function"), which is out of this TOE, in the user identification authentication function. (4) Security function to counter the threat [T.ACCESS-PUBLIC-BOX (Unauthorized access to public user box using user function)] This threat assumes the possibility that an unauthorized operation is done by using the user function for the public user box which each user shares to store the image files. When you use various functions of MFP with this TOE, the change in settings of public user box and the users is limited only to administrators and the permitted users, and the operation of public user box is restricted only to the normal users, and it prevents from unauthorized operation by using user functions, by maintaining functions such as the identification and authentication function of users and administrators (referred as "user function" and "administrator function"), the identification and authentication function on the access of public user box, access control function for public user box, the function that limits the changes in settings of public user box to administrators and permitted users (referred as "user box function") and the functions that limits the changes in settings of users to administrators and permitted users (referred as "administrator function" and "user function"). Furthermore, this TOE provides the function to get the authentication information from the user information management server of Active Directory (referred as "External server authentication operation support function"), which is out of this TOE, in the user identification authentication function. (5) Security function to counter the threat [T.ACCESS-GROUP-BOX (Unauthorized access to a group user box using user function)] This threat assumes the possibility that an unauthorized operation is performed by using the user function for the group user box that is a storage area of image file used by user who is permitted the use of the account, or the user box file in it. When you use various functions of MFP with this TOE, the change in settings of group user box and the users is limited only to administrators and the permitted users, and the operation of group user box is restricted only to the normal users, and it prevents from unauthorized operation by using user functions, by maintaining functions such as the identification and authentication function of users and administrators (referred as "user function" and "administrator function"), the access control function for group user box, the function that limits the changes in settings of group user box to administrators and users (referred as "user box function") and the functions that limits the changes in settings of users to administrators and users (referred as "administrator function" and "user function"). Furthermore, this TOE provides the function to get the authentication information from the user information management server of Active Directory (referred as "External server authentication operation support function"), which is out of this TOE, in the user identification authentication function. (6) Security function to counter the threat [T.ACCESS-SECURE-PRINT (Unauthorized access to a secure print file and ID& Print file using user function)] This threat assumes the possibility that an unauthorized operation is done to the secure print file and ID & print file using user function. CRP-C0290-01 14 When you use various functions of MFP with this TOE, the changes in settings of secure print are limited to administrators, and the changes of user settings are limited only to administrators and the permitted users, and the operation of secure print files and ID & print files are restricted only to the normal users, and it prevents from unauthorized operation by using user functions, by maintaining functions such as the identification and authentication function of users and administrators (referred as "user function" and "administrator function"), the authentication function with secure print password and identification and authentication function of user registered ID & print file, access control function for secure print files and ID & print files, the function that limits the changes in settings of secure print files and ID & print files to administrators (referred as "secure print function") and the functions that limits the changes in settings of users to administrators and permitted users (referred as "administrator function" and "user function"). Furthermore, this TOE provides the function to get the authentication information from the user information management server of Active Directory (referred as "External server authentication operation support function"), which is out of this TOE, in the user identification authentication function. (7) Security function to counter the threat [T.UNEXPECTED-TRANSMISSION (Transmission to unintended address)] This threat assumes the possibility of sending the information to the address that isn't intended, when the network setting related to the transmission, the network setting related to MFP address, PC-FAX operational setting, or TSI receiving setting is illegally changed. The change of network setting, PC-FAX operation setting and TSI receiving setting is restricted only to administrators, and it prevents the possibility of transmission to the address that isn't intended, by maintaining functions such as the identification and authentication function of administrator and functions to limit the changes of settings such as network installation, PC-FAX operation setting and TSI receiving setting only to administrators (referred as "administrator function") with this TOE. (8) Security function to counter the threat [T.ACCESS-SETTING (Unauthorized change of function setting condition related to security)] This threat assumes the possibility of developing consequentially into the leakage of the user box files, the secure print files and ID & print files by having been changed the specific function setting which relates to security. The change of the specific function setting related to security is restricted only to administrators and service engineers, and as a result, it prevents the possibility of leakage of the user box file, the secure print file or ID & print file, by maintaining the identification and authentication function of administrators (referred as "administrator function" and "SNMP manager function"), the identification and authentication function of service engineers (referred as "service mode function", and restricting function for setting the specific function related to security only to administrators and service engineers (referred as "administrator function", "SNMP manager function" and "service mode function") with this TOE. (9) Security function to counter the threat [T.BACKUP-RESTORE (Unauthorized use of back-up function and restoration function)] CRP-C0290-01 15 This threat has a possibility that user box files, secure print files, and ID & print files may be leaked by being used the back-up function and the restoration function illegally. Moreover, this assumes the possibility that user box files, secure print files, and ID & print files may be leaked as a result of leaking confidential data such as the passwords or of falsifying various setting values. The use of back-up function and restore function is restricted only to administrator, and it prevents the possibility of leakage of user box files, secure print files, ID & print files and confidential data such as passwords, by maintaining the function to restrict the use of following functions, the identification and authentication function of administrator, back-up function and restore function, only to administrator (referred as "administrator function") with this TOE. 3.2.2 Organisational Security Policies and Security Function Policies 3.2.2.1 Organisational Security Policies Organizational security policies required in use of the TOE is presented in Table 3-2. Table 3-2 Organisational Security Policies Identifier Organisational Security Policy P.COMMUNICATION-DATA (secure communication of image file) Highly confidential image files (secure print files, user box files, and ID & print files) which transmitted or received between IT equipments must be communicated via a trusted pass to the correct destination, or encrypted when the organisation or the user expects to be protected. P.REJECT-LINE (Access prohibition from public line) An access to internal network from public line via the Fax public line portal must be prohibited. The term "between IT equipments" here indicates between client PC and MFP that the user uses. 3.2.2.2 Security Function Policies to Organisational Security Policies The TOE provides the functions to fulfill the organisational security policies shown in Table 3-2. (1) Security function to satisfy the organisational security policy [P.COMMUNICATION-DATA (secure communication of image file)] This organisational security policy regulates carrying out processing via trusted path to a correct destination or encrypting to ensure the confidentiality about the image file which flows on a network in the case of the organization or the user expect to be protected. As this corresponds as one's request, there is no need to provide secure communication function for all communication. At least one measure between MFP and client PC, which is used by a user(s), needs to be provided when managing the secure print file, ID & print file and the user box file. CRP-C0290-01 16 This TOE provides the functions such as the function to support the trusted channel to correct destination in the transmission and reception of images between MFP and client PC, for the user box file, the secure print file, and ID & print file (referred as "trusted channel function"), the encryption key generation function to transmit the user box file by S/MIME, the encryption function of user box file, the encryption function of encrypted key for S/MIME transmission (referred as "S/MIME encryption processing function"), the identification and authentication function of administrator, and the function to limit the change in settings related to the trusted channel and S/MIME only to administrators (referred as "administrator function"), so that it realizes to transmit to correct destination by transmitting image data confidentially in the network and restricting the change of settings only to administrators. (2) Security function to satisfy the organisational security policy [P.REJECT-LINE (Access prohibition from public line)] This organisational security policy regulates to prohibit the access to the internal network via the Fax public line port on Fax unit installed to MFP. This function is provided when Fax unit is installed in MFP. This TOE provides the function which prohibits the access to the data existing in the internal network from public line via the Fax public line port (referred as "Fax unit control function"), so that it realizes to prohibit the access to the internal network via the Fax public line port. CRP-C0290-01 17 4. Assumptions and Clarification of Scope This chapter describes assumptions and operational environment to operate this TOE, as useful information for assumed readers to judge the use of this TOE. 4.1 Usage Assumptions Assumptions to operate the TOE are shown in Table 4-1. The effective performance of the TOE security functions are not assured unless these assumptions are satisfied. Table 4-1 Assumptions in Use of the TOE Identifier Assumptions A.ADMIN (Personnel conditions to be an administrator) Administrators, in the role given to them, will not carry out a malicious act during the series of permitted operations given to them. A.SERVICE (Personnel conditions to be a service engineer) Service engineers, in the role given to them, will not carry out a malicious act during series of permitted operations given to them. A.NETWORK (Network connection conditions for MFP) - The intra-office LAN where the MFP with the TOE will be installed is not intercepted. - When the intra-office LAN where the MFP with the TOE will be installed is connected to an external network, access from the external network to the MFP is not allowed. A.SECRET (Operating condition on secret information) Each password and encryption passphrase does not leak from each user in the use of the TOE. A.SETTING (Operational setting condition enhanced security function ) The enhanced security function is enabled when a user uses the TOE. 4.2 Environment Assumptions This TOE is installed in any one of bizhub 652, bizhub 602, bizhub 552, bizhub 502, ineo 652, ineo 602, ineo 552, ineo 502, which is the MFP provided by Konica Minolta Business Technologies, Inc. It assumes that the MFP including this TOE is installed in the office which is managed by organizations of a company or the section, and is connected to the intra-office LAN. If the external server authentication method is selected as for the user identification and authentication, Active Directory, that is the directory service provided by Windows Server 2000 (or later), is needed to consolidate the user's information under the Windows platform CRP-C0290-01 18 network environment as the external server. The reliability of hardware, shown in this configuration, and cooperated software is outside the scope of this evaluation. (It shall be regarded as reliable enough.) 4.3 Clarification of scope The reliability of ASIC and Active Directory below is not the scope of this evaluation. - The TOE has the function to encrypt and write the information in HDD. However, the operation of the encryption is a function done by ASIC which is a part of MFP, so that it is the outside of the TOE and is not the scope of this evaluation. - The TOE has the function to authenticate users. If the external server authentication method is selected as for the user authentication function, it uses Active Directory, the directory service of an external server, to process the authentication. If the external server authentication method is selected, this TOE provides the user identification and authentication function by inquiring the authentication information to an external server and receiving the authentication information. The authentication function done by Active Directory of the external server is the outside of the TOE and is not the scope of this evaluation. CRP-C0290-01 19 5. Architectural Information This chapter explains the scope of this TOE and the main configuration (subsystems). 5.1 TOE boundary and component The TOE is the MFP control software and is installed in the SSD on the MFP controller in the main body of MFP. It is loaded and run on the RAM when main power is switched ON. The relation between TOE and MFP is shown in Figure 5-1. Device I/F kit and FAX unit are optional parts of MFP. For the environment of the TOE operation, it assumes that the device interface kit is installed when a user uses Bluetooth device and FAX unit is installed when a user uses the FAX function. MFP Controller CPU RAM ASIC RS-232C Ethernet USB *USB keyboard etc. NVRAM SSD - TOE - Message data etc. HDD *FAX unit Main/Sub Power Panel - Scanner Unit - Automatic Document Feeder Printer Unit Public line Operator Operator Paper Paper MFP USB * Device interface kit Figure 5-1 Hardware configuration relevant to TOE The TOE is composed of OS part and application part which controls the MFP. The application part which controls the MFP is composed of the following parts further. - The part which provides interface through the network It controls Ethernet and provides communication function of TCP/IP base. The function of encryption for communication is provided in this part. - The part which provides interface via the panel It has the function which receives the input from the panel and the function which draws the screen of the panel. - The part which controls job Job means the unit managing an execution control and operation order, of copy, print, scan, Fax, user box file operation and so on. When "the part which controls each device" receives the operation from "the part which provides interface through the network" or "the part which provides interface via the panel" and the reception from the Fax unit, the job is generated and registered. The execution of the actual job is realized using a following "the part which executes common management," "the part which handles HDD" and "the part which controls each device". CRP-C0290-01 20 - The part which executes common management This part manages every kind of setting values and provides measure for which another part of TOE accesses to the setting value. Every kind of setting values includes information used to execute security function, such as the authentication information. This part provides the function executing identification and authentication and the function of access control. - The part which handles HDD This part provides the function of the processing image data and of the inputting/outputting to the HDD. In input/output function to the HDD, an encryption at the time of writing and a decryption at the time of reading are done by ASIC. - The part which controls each device This part controls scanner unit, printer unit and Fax unit, and realizes the actual operation of copy, print, scan and Fax. Moreover, the mechanism does not allow to access an internal network from Fax unit. - The part which provides support function This part provides functions used for support of the MFP (function for diagnostics of the MFP and function for updating the TOE). 5.2 IT Environment The configuration of IT environment of this TOE in Figure 5-1 is shown as follows. (1) SSD A storage medium that stores the object code of the "MFP Control Software," which is the TOE. In addition to the TOE, it stores the message data expressed in each country's language to display the response to access through the panel and network. (2) NVRAM A nonvolatile memory. This storage medium stores various settings that MFP needs for the processing of the TOE. These setting values are managed in "the part which executes common management." (3) ASIC An integrated circuit for specific applications which implements a HDD encryption functions for enciphering the data written in HDD. ASIC is used from "the part which handles HDD." (4) HDD A hard disk drive of 250GB in capacity. This is used not only for storing image data as files but also as an area to save image data and destination data temporarily during extension conversion and so on. It is read and written from "the part which handles HDD." (5) Main/sub power supply Power switches for activating MFP. (6) Panel An exclusive control device for the operation of the MFP, equipped with a touch panel of a liquid crystal monitor, ten-key, start key, stop key, screen switch key, etc. It is controlled by "the part which provides interface via the panel." CRP-C0290-01 21 (7) Scanner unit/ automatic document feeder A device that scans images and photos from paper and converts them into digital data. It is controlled by "the part which controls each device." (8) Printer unit A device that actually prints the image data which were converted for printing when receiving a print request by the MFP controller. It is controlled by "the part which controls each device." (9) Ethernet Supports 10BASE-T, 100BASE-TX, and Gigabit Ethernet. It is controlled by "the part which provides interface through the network." (10) USB Copying image file to an external memory, copying or printing image file from an external memory, update of the TOE, and so on can be performed through this interface. It is usable as connection interface of the optional parts. For the optional parts, there is the device interface kit which is need for copy or print from Bluetooth device and the USB keyboard to complement key entry from the panel, and it needs to be used, including an external memory. (11) RS-232C Serial connection using D-sub 9 pins is possible. The maintenance function is usable through this interface in the case of failure. It is also possible to use the remote diagnostic function by connecting with the public line and a modem. It is controlled by "the part which provides support function." (12) FAX Unit A device that has a port of Fax public line that is used for communications for FAX-data transmission and remote diagnostic via the public line. It is controlled by "the part which controls each device." It is not pre-installed in the MFP as a standard function for selling circumstances, but sold as an optional part. Fax unit is purchased when the organization needs it, and the installation is not indispensable. CRP-C0290-01 22 6. Documentation The identification of documents attached to the TOE is listed below. TOE users are required full understanding and compliance with the following documents in order to satisfy the assumptions. < For administrators and users > - bizhub 602 / 502 User's Guide Security Functions (Japanese) Ver.1.02 - bizhub 652 / 602 / 552 / 502 User's Guide [Security Operations] Ver.1.02 - ineo 652 / 552 User's Guide [Security Operations] Ver.1.02 - ineo 602 / 502 User's Guide [Security Operations] Ver.1.02 < For service engineers > - bizhub 602 / 502 Service Manual Security Functions (Japanese) Ver.1.00 - bizhub 652 / 602 / 552 / 502 SERVICE MANUAL SECURITY FUNCTION Ver.1.00 - ineo 652 / 602 / 552 / 502 SERVICE MANUAL SECURITY FUNCTION Ver.1.00 CRP-C0290-01 23 7. Evaluation conducted by Evaluation Facility and Results 7.1 Evaluation Approach Evaluation was conducted by using the evaluation methods prescribed in CEM in accordance with the assurance components in CC Part 3. Details for evaluation activities are reported in the Evaluation Technical Report. In the Evaluation Technical Report, it explains the summary of the TOE, the content of evaluation and verdict of each work unit. 7.2 Overview of Evaluation Activity The history of evaluation conducted was presented in the Evaluation Technical Report as follows. Evaluation has started on 2010-10 and concluded by completion of the Evaluation Technical Report dated 2011-05. The evaluator received a full set of evaluation deliverables necessary for evaluation provided by the developer, and examined the evidences in relation to a series of evaluation conducted. Additionally, the evaluator directly visited the development and manufacturing sites on 2011-01 and 2011-02 and examined procedural status conducted in relation to each work unit for configuration management, delivery and operation and lifecycle by investigating records and staff interview. Further, the evaluator executed the sampling check of the developer testing and the evaluator testing by using developer testing environment at developer site on 2011-01. Concerns found in evaluation activities for each work unit were all issued as Observation Report and were reported to the developer. These concerns were reviewed by the developer and all concerns were solved eventually. Concerns that the Certification Body found in the evaluation process was described as a certification oversight review, and it was sent to Evaluation Facility. After Evaluation Facility and the developer examined it, these concerns were reflected in the evaluation report. 7.3 IT Product Testing The evaluator confirmed the validity of the testing that the developer had executed. As a result of the evidence shown by the process of the evaluation and those confirmed validity, the evaluator executed the reappearance testing, additional testing and penetration testing based on vulnerability assessments judged to be necessary. 7.3.1 Developer Testing The evaluator evaluated the integrity of the developer testing that the developer executed and the testing documentation of actual test results. The overview of evaluated tests performed by the developer is shown as follows; 1) Developer Testing Environment Testing configuration performed by the developer is showed in Figure 7-1. CRP-C0290-01 24 Figure 7-1 Configuration of the Developer Testing The developer testing is executed in the same TOE testing environment as TOE configuration identified in the ST. 2) Summary of Developer Testing Summary of the developer testing is as follows. a. Developer Testing Outline CRP-C0290-01 25 Outline of the developer testing is as follows; The testing was conducted to execute security functions through the external interface when the functions which have the external interfaces that the developer can use. It was conducted to obtain and analyze the executed results of security functions through dump tool or capturing tool of communication data when functions do not have the external interfaces that the developer can use. Table 7-1 Tools for the Developer Testing Name of tool Outline and Purpose of use KONICA MINOLTA 652/502 Series PCL Ver.1.1.0.0 XPS Ver.1.1.0.0 Exclusive printer driver software included in the bundled CD of bizhub 652 / 602 / 552 / 502. Internet Explorer Ver. 6.0.2800.1106 (Win2000) Ver. 6.0.2900.2180 (WinXP) General purpose browser software. Used to execute PSWC on the supplementary PC. Also used as SSL/TLS confirmation tool. Fiddler Ver. 2.2.2.0 Monitor and analyzing software tool of Web access of http and etc. Use HTTP protocol to confirm and test between MFP and supplementary PC. Open API test software tool Ver. 7.2.0.5 Exclusive test software tool for the Open API evaluation. For most of the tests for Open API, this tool software is used to confirm the functions at the message level. SocketDebugger Ver. 1.12 Used as the test software tool for TCP-Socket. WireShark Ver. 1.2.2 Software tool for monitoring and analyzing the communication on the LAN. Used for getting communication log. Mozilla ThunderBird Ver. 2.0.0.21 General purpose mailer software. Used as the confirmation tool of S/MIME mail on the supplementary PC. Open SSL Ver.0.9.8k (25-May-2009) Encryption software tool for SSL and hash function. MG-SOFT MIB Browser Professional SNMPv3 Edition Ver. 10.0.0.4044 MIB exclusive browser software. Used for tests related to SNMP. Tera Term Pro Ver. 4.29 Terminal software executed on the terminal PC. Used to connect with MFP and to operate the terminal software installed in the MFP to monitor the state of the TOE. Disk dump editor Ver. 1.4.3 Software tool to display the contents in the HDD. Stirling Ver. 1.31 Binary editor software tool. Used to confirm the contents of the encryption key and decode S/MIME messages and to edit the print file. CRP-C0290-01 26 Name of tool Outline and Purpose of use FFFTP Ver. 1.92a Used as FTP client software. MIME Base64 Encode/Decode Ver. 1.0 Software tool to encode/decode of MIME Base64. Used as a tool to confirm encode/decode of S/MIME messages. Pagescope Data Administrator with Device Set-Up and Utilities Ver. 1.0.03310.08201 Device management software tool for administrator corresponding to plural MFPs. (Activation of the following plug-in software is possible.) HDD Backup Utility (Plug-in) Ver. 1.3.06000 468 HDD Backup Utility is the utility to backup (store) and restore (recover) the recorded media installed in the MFP on the network. PageScope Box Operator (PSBO) Ver. 3.2.06000 Software tool to acquire and print the image document stored in the HDD. Used as the confirmation tool of trusted channel. sslproxy Ver. 1.2 Proxy software in the supplementary PC operating between MFP main body and the browser software of the supplementary PC. By communicating with main body through SSL and with browser software through non-SSL, it makes Fiddler and SocketDebugger possible to monitor, avoiding SSL encryption by sslproxy. Blank Jumbo Dog Ver. 4.2.2 Simple server software for intranet. Used as mailer server and FTP server function. CSRC center software Ver. 2.6.1 Server software for CSRC center. CSRC is a maintenance service to manage the state of MFP which Konica Minolta business technologies, Inc. offers by remote. b. Scope of Execution of the Developer Testing The developer testing is executed on 216 items by the developer. By the coverage analysis, it was verified that all security functions and external interfaces described in the functional specification had been tested. By the depth analysis, it was verified that all the subsystems and subsystem interfaces described in the TOE design had been tested enough. c. Result The evaluator confirmed an approach of the executing developer testing and legitimacy of tested items, and confirmed consistencies between testing approach described in the testing plan and actual testing approach. The evaluator confirmed consistencies between the testing results expected by the developer and the actual testing results executed by the developer. 7.3.2 Evaluator Independent Testing The evaluator executed the sample testing to reconfirm the execution of the security function by the test items extracted from the developer testing. And the evaluator executed the evaluator independent testing (hereinafter referred to as "The Independent Testing") to reconfirm that security functions are certainly implemented from the evidence shown by the process of the evaluation. It explains the independent testing executed by the evaluator as follows. CRP-C0290-01 27 1) Independent Testing Environment The configuration of the testing performed by the evaluator is the same configuration as developer testing. Independent Testing is performed in the same TOE test environment as the TOE configuration identified in the ST. Only bizhub 652 / bizhub 502 are selected as the MFP which TOE is installed, however it is judged not to have any problems in the result of the following confirmation by the evaluator. - ineo 652 / ineo 602 / ineo 552 / ineo 502 are the products for OEM of bizhub 652 / bizhub 602 / bizhub 552 / bizhub 502. - It was confirmed by documents offered from developer that the difference of bizhub 652 / bizhub 602 / bizhub 552 / bizhub 502 lies only copy / print speed and the durability guarantee value. 2) Summary of Independent Testing Independent testing performed by the evaluator is as follows. a. Viewpoints of Independent Testing The viewpoint of the independent testing devised by evaluator from the developer testing and the provided evaluation evidence are shown follows. (1) Based on the situation of the developer test, it applies to all security functions. (2) Test targets are all probabilistic and permutable mechanism. (3) Test behaviors depending on the differences of password input methods to TSFI for the test of the probabilistic and permutable mechanism. (4) Based on the strictness of the developer test, test the necessary variations. (5) Based on the complexity of interfaces, test the necessary variations. (6) For the interfaces with innovative and unusual characters, test the necessary variations. b. Outline of Independent Testing Outline of independent testing performed by the evaluator is as follows; The testing was conducted to execute security functions through external interface when the functions have the external interfaces that evaluator can use. It was conducted to obtain and analyze the executed results of security functions through dump tool or capturing tool of transmitted data when functions do not have the external interfaces that the evaluator can use. The tools, etc., are the same as those used at the developer testing. Testing outline for each independent test viewpoint is shown in Table 7-2. Table 7-2 Independent Testing performed CRP-C0290-01 28 Viewpoints for Independent Testing Overview of Testing (1) Viewpoint Testing was performed, which were judged to be necessary in addition to developer testing. (2) Viewpoint Testing was performed with changing the digit number of characters and the types of characters by paying attention to the probabilistic and permutable mechanism at identification and authentication, etc., by the user. (3) Viewpoint Testing was performed with considering the operated interfaces to confirm the behavior, depending on the difference of password input method. (4) Viewpoint Testing was performed to confirm the WebDAV server password modification function, based on the closeness of the test done by the developer. (5) Viewpoint Testing was performed to confirm the action at changing the types of user boxes by considering the complexity of various user boxes combination. (6) Viewpoint Testing was performed to confirm the action by judging the behavior of Fax unit control function and the abnormal behavior of Bluetooth device, to be innovative or not general. c. Result All the executed independent testing was correctly completed, and the evaluator confirmed the behavior of TOE. The evaluator confirmed consistencies between the expected behavior and all the testing results. 7.3.3 Evaluator Penetration Testing The evaluator devised and executed the necessary evaluator penetration testing (hereinafter referred to as "the penetration testing") about the possibility of exploitable concern at assumed environment of use and attack level. It explains the penetration testing executed by the evaluator as follows. 1) Summary of the Penetration Testing Summary of the penetration testing performed by the evaluator is as follows; a. Vulnerability of concern The evaluator searched into the provided evidence and the public domain information for the potential vulnerabilities, and then identified the following vulnerabilities which require the penetration testing. (1) Possibility to be activated the unexpected service that relates to the component used for the TOE. (2) Concerns of the existence of the vulnerabilities within the public domain that relates to the components used for the TOE. (3) Parameters to be input through the network are determined with the functional specification, but the unexpected input by the functional specification is available depending on the input method, and it is concerned to affect TOE behavior. CRP-C0290-01 29 (4) It makes it difficult to confirm that there is no concern when searching for the developer's documentations whether takeover of session is easily done or not, that is generally considered as the concern for Web interface, since it is known that it has Web interface from the functional specification. (5) Concerns were detected to be bypassed or falsified the security functions, depending on the timing of the power ON/OFF, when it is retrieved it to the documentations. (6) Several types of interface supporting the authentication function exist, as it is known from the ST. It is concerned that the possibility to be operated by an operator with different authority by considering when it competes with the authentication from different types of interface, from the documentations. (7) It is known that the setting of the enhanced security function is not on the HDD from the development documentations, but it could not be sure that the exchange of HDD does not affect the enhanced security function. b. Outline of Penetration Testing The evaluator conducted the following penetration testing to determine the exploitable potential vulnerability. Figure 7-2 shows the penetration test configuration used by the evaluator. CRP-C0290-01 30 Figure 7-2 Configuration of Penetration Testing Penetration tests were done by the following methods. - Method to check by the visual observation of the behavior after stimulating the TOE with operating from the operational panel. - Method to check by the visual observation of the behavior after accessing the TOE through the network with operating the supplementary PC. - Method to check by the test tool of the behavior after tampering parameters by using test tool. CRP-C0290-01 31 - Method to scan the publicly known vulnerabilities by the vulnerability checking tool with operating the inspection PC. Test Configuration Environment Details Inspection object (TOE) - TOE installed in bizhub 652 / bizhub 502 (Version: A2WU0Y0-0100-GM0-00) - Network configuration Penetration Testing was done by connecting each MFP with hub or cross-cable. Supplementary PC - PC with network terminal operated on Windows XP (SP2) or Windows 2000 (SP4). - Using the tools shown in Table 7-1. (Fiddler, OpenAPI test tool, SocketDebugger etc.) - Access the MFP by using PSWC (abbreviation of "PageScope Web Connection"), HTTPS, TCPSocket, OpenAPI, SNMP, etc., and it can setup the network etc. Furthermore, possible to use TamperIE. Inspection PC - Inspection PC is a PC with network terminal operated on Windows XP SP3, and is connected to MFP with cross-cable to perform vulnerability tests. - Explanation of test tools (Plug-in and vulnerability database are applied the latest version on Jan. 12, 2011.) (1)snmpwalk Version 3.6.1 MIB information acquiring tool (2)openSSL Version 0.9.8q encryption tool of SSL and hash function (3)Nessus 4.4.0.(build 15045) Security scanner to inspect the vulnerabilities existing on the System (4)TamperIE 1.0.1.13 Web proxy tool to tamper the transmitted data from general Web browser such as Internet Explorer to arbitrary data (5)sslproxy v 1.2 2000/01/29 SSL proxy server software (6)Fiddler 2.3.1.0 Web debugger to monitor HTTP operation offered by MS. (7)WireShark 1.4.2 Packet analyzer software that can analyze protocols more than 800 (8)Nikto Version 2.1.3 Publicly known vulnerability inspection tool of CGI The concerned vulnerabilities and the corresponding penetration testing are shown in Table 7-3. Table 7-3 Concerned vulnerabilities and Overview of Testing CRP-C0290-01 32 Concerned vulnerabilities Overview of Testing (1) Vulnerability Testing was performed to confirm possibility of abusing by using the tool such as Nessus and behavior inspection. (2) Vulnerability Testing was performed to confirm possibility of abusing by using the tool such as Nessus and result analysis. (3) Vulnerability Testing was performed to confirm that there is no influence on the security function behavior (domain separation, by-pass, interference and etc.) by transmitting of edited parameters input through network. (4) Vulnerability Testing was performed to confirm that the mechanism for holding session has a unique identification. (5) Vulnerability Testing was performed to confirm that the forced power ON/OFF does not affect the security function of initialization process, screen display and etc. (6) Vulnerability Testing was performed to confirm the exclusive control by the access from operational panel and network simultaneously. (7) Vulnerability Testing was performed to confirm that the exchange of HDD does not affect the setting of the enhanced security function. c. Result In the conducted evaluator penetration testing, the exploitable vulnerabilities that attackers who have the assumed attack potential could exploit were not found. 7.4 Evaluated Configuration (1) Operating model It is assumed that this TOE is installed in any one of bizhub 652, bizhub 602, bizhub 552, bizhub 502, ineo 652, ineo 602, ineo 552, ineo 502 which is MFP provided by Konica Minolta Business Technologies, Inc. Because of the reasons shown in 7.3.2, the evaluation is considered to be conducted in all models though the evaluation was not conducted in these all models. (2) Setting of TOE The evaluation was conducted in the following setting. - The enhanced security function is "valid" - The user authentication method is the following either > "Machine authentication" > "External server authentication" with Active Directory use These setting are as the setting shown in the ST. 7.5 Evaluation Results The evaluator had the conclusion that the TOE satisfies all work units prescribed in CEM by submitting the Evaluation Technical Report. In the evaluation, the following were confirmed. - PP Conformance: none CRP-C0290-01 33 - Security functional requirements: Common Criteria Part 2 Extended - Security assurance requirements: Common Criteria Part 3 Conformant As a result of the evaluation, the verdict "PASS" was confirmed for the following assurance components. - All assurance components of EAL3 package The result of the evaluation is applied to the composed by corresponding TOE to the identification described in the chapter 2. 7.6 Evaluator Comments/Recommendations The evaluator recommendations for users are not mentioned. CRP-C0290-01 34 8. Certification The certification body conducted the following certification based on each materials submitted by Evaluation Facility during evaluation process. 1. Contents pointed out in the Observation Report shall be adequate. 2. Contents pointed out in the Observation Report shall properly be reflected. 3. Evidential materials submitted were sampled, its contents were examined, and related work units shall be evaluated as presented in the Evaluation Technical Report. 4. Rationale of evaluation verdict by the evaluator presented in the Evaluation Technical Report shall be adequate. 5. The evaluator's evaluation methodology presented in the Evaluation Technical Report shall conform to the CEM. Concerns found in certification process were prepared as a certification oversight review and were sent to Evaluation Facility. The Certification Body confirmed such concerns pointed out in Observation Report and the certification oversight review were solved in the ST and the Evaluation Technical Report and issued this certification report. 8.1 Certification Result As a result of verification of submitted Evaluation Technical Report, Observation Reports and related evaluation deliverables, Certification Body determined that the TOE satisfies all components of the EAL3 in the CC part 3. 8.2 Recommendations - This TOE depends on the following functions to counter threats. (Refer to 4.3) > ASIC installed in MFP > Active Directory (In case that the external server authentication method is selected as for the user authentication function) The reliability of these functions is not assured in this evaluation, and it depends on operator's judgment. - If FAX unit as an optional part is not installed, FAX unit control function that is security function is invalid. (It does not affect the operation of other security functions.) CRP-C0290-01 35 9. Annexes There is no annex. 10. Security Target Security Target[12] of the TOE is provided within a separate document of this certification report. bizhub 652 / bizhub 602 / bizhub 552 / bizhub 502 / ineo 652 / ineo 602 / ineo 552 / ineo 502 Control Software A2WU0Y0-0100-GM0-00 Security Target Version 1.03 (March 18, 2011) Konica Minolta Business Technologies, Inc. CRP-C0290-01 36 11. Glossary The abbreviations relating to CC used in this report are listed below. CC Common Criteria for Information Technology Security Evaluation CEM Common Methodology for Information Technology Security Evaluation EAL Evaluation Assurance Level PP Protection Profile ST Security Target TOE Target of Evaluation TSF TOE Security Functionality The abbreviations relating to TOE used in this report are listed below. API Application Programming Interface DNS Domain Name System FTP File Transfer Protocol HDD Hard Disk Drive HTTPS HyperText Transfer Protocol Security MFP Multiple Function Peripheral MIB Management Information Base NVRAM Non-Volatile Random Access Memory RAM Random Access Memory SMTP Simple Mail Transfer Protocol SNMP Simple Network Management Protocol SSD Solid State Drive SSL/TLS Secure Socket Layer/Transport Layer Security S/MIME Secure Multipurpose Internet Mail Extensions TSI Transmitting Subscriber Identification USB Universal Serial Bus WebDAV Web-based Distributed Authoring and Versioning The definition of terms used in this report is listed below. Administrator mode State possible for administrator to conduct the permitted operation to the MFP Bluetooth One of the short distance wireless communication technology used for connection between the devices, such as mobile device, in several meters DNS Protocol to manage the relationship of the domain name and IP address CRP-C0290-01 37 in the internet Encryption passphrase Original information to generate the encryption key to encrypt and decrypt on ASIC External network Network that access is restricted with intra-office LAN, which the TOE is connected, by firewall, etc. FTP File Transfer Protocol used at TCP/IP network. HTTPS Protocol adding with the encryption function of SSL to hold a secure communication between Web server and client PC Intra-office LAN Network which the TOE is connected and being secured by using switching hub and eavesdropping detection device in the office environment, also being securely connected to the external network through firewall MIB Various setting information that the various devices managed using SNMP opened publicly NVRAM Random access memory that has a non-volatile and memory keeping character at the power OFF PageScope Web Connection Tool installed in the MFP to confirm and set the MFP state by using browser PC-FAX operation Operation to process sorting the received image data into storage user boxes based on the information specified at the FAX receiving Service Mode State possible for service engineers to conduct the permitted operation to the MFP Secure Print password Password to confirm whether permitted user or not before the operation to the secure print file Secure Print file Image file registered by secure print Secure Print Printing method that restricts by the password authentication. Specify the password by the printer driver and printing by the MFP is allowed only when the password is authenticated. SMTP Protocol to transfer e-mail in TCP/IP SNMP Protocol to manage various devices through network SNMP password Generic term of password (Privacy password, Authentication password) to CRP-C0290-01 38 confirm the user at the use of SNMP v3 used in TOE SSL/TLS Protocol to transmit by encrypting information through the Internet S/MIME Standard of e-mail encryption method. Transmitting and receiving the encrypted message using RSA public key encryption system. Electric certification published by certification organization is necessary. TSI reception Function to designate the storing user box for each sender User Box file Image file stored in the user box, public user box and group user box. WebDAV Protocol to manage files on the Web server with expanded specification of HTTP1.1 CRP-C0290-01 39 12. Bibliography [1] IT Security Evaluation and Certification Scheme, May 2007, Information-technology Promotion Agency, Japan, CCS-01 [2] IT Security Certification Procedure, May 2007, Information-technology Promotion Agency, Japan, CCM-02 [3] Evaluation Facility Approval Procedure, May 2007, Information-technology Promotion Agency, Japan, CCM-03 [4] Common Criteria for Information Technology Security Evaluation Part1: Introduction and general model, Version 3.1 Revision 3, July 2009, CCMB-2009-07-001 [5] Common Criteria for Information Technology Security Evaluation Part2: Security functional components, Version 3.1 Revision 3, July 2009, CCMB-2009-07-002 [6] Common Criteria for Information Technology Security Evaluation Part3: Security assurance components, Version 3.1 Revision 3, July 2009, CCMB-2009-07-003 [7] Common Criteria for Information Technology Security Evaluation Part 1: Introduction and general model, Version 3.1 Revision 3, July 2009, CCMB-2009-07-001, (Japanese Version 1.0, December 2009) [8] Common Criteria for Information Technology Security Evaluation Part 2: Security functional components, Version 3.1 Revision 3, July 2009, CCMB-2009-07-002, (Japanese Version 1.0, December 2009) [9] Common Criteria for Information Technology Security Evaluation Part 3: Security assurance components, Version 3.1 Revision 3, July 2009, CCMB-2009-07-003, (Japanese Version 1.0, December 2009) [10] Common Methodology for Information Technology Security Evaluation: Evaluation Methodology, Version 3.1 Revision 3, July 2009, CCMB-2009-07-004 [11] Common Methodology for Information Technology Security Evaluation: Evaluation Methodology, Version 3.1 Revision 3, July 2009, CCMB-2009-07-004, (Japanese Version 1.0, December 2009) [12] bizhub 652 / bizhub 602 / bizhub 552 / bizhub 502 / ineo 652 / ineo 602 / ineo 552 / ineo 502 Control Software A2WU0Y0-0100-GM0-00 Security Target Version 1.03 (March 18, 2011) Konica Minolta Business Technologies, Inc. [13] bizhub 652 / bizhub 602 / bizhub 552 / bizhub 502 / ineo 652 / ineo 602 / ineo 552 / ineo 502 Control Software Evaluation Technical Report First Version (May 20, 2011) Mizuho Information & Research Institute, Inc. Center for Evaluation of Information Security