Certification Report
EAL 2 Evaluation of Network Chemistry Inc.
Network Chemistry RFprotect™ Distributed v6.1.2, RFprotect™
Sensor v6.1.22, and RFprotect™ Mobile v6.1.2
Issued by:
Communications Security Establishment
Certification Body
Canadian Common Criteria Evaluation and Certification Scheme
© 2007 Government of Canada, Communications Security Establishment
Evaluation number: 383-4-66-CR
Version: 1.0
Date: 15 May 2007
Pagination: i to v, 1 to 12
CCS Certification Report Network Chemistry Inc.
RFprotect™
___________________________________________________________________________
Version 1.0 15 May 2007
- Page i of v -
DISCLAIMER
The Information Technology (IT) product identified in this certification report, and its
associated certificate, has been evaluated at an approved evaluation facility – established
under the Canadian Common Criteria Evaluation and Certification Scheme (CCS) – using
the Common Methodology for Information Technology Security Evaluation, Version 2.3, for
conformance to the Common Criteria for Information Technology Security Evaluation,
Version 2.3. This certification report, and its associated certificate, apply only to the
identified version and release of the product in its evaluated configuration. The evaluation
has been conducted in accordance with the provisions of the CCS, and the conclusions of the
evaluation facility in the evaluation report are consistent with the evidence adduced. This
report, and its associated certificate, are not an endorsement of the IT product by the
Communications Security Establishment (CSE), or any other organization that recognizes or
gives effect to this report, and its associated certificate, and no warranty for the IT product by
the CSE, or any other organization that recognizes or gives effect to this report, and its
associated certificate, is either expressed or implied.
CCS Certification Report Network Chemistry Inc.
RFprotect™
___________________________________________________________________________
Version 1.0 15 May 2007
- Page ii of v -
FOREWORD
The Canadian Common Criteria Evaluation and Certification Scheme (CCS) provides a
third-party evaluation service for determining the trustworthiness of Information Technology
(IT) security products. Evaluations are performed by a commercial Common Criteria
Evaluation Facility (CCEF) under the oversight of the CCS Certification Body, which is
managed by the Communications Security Establishment (CSE).
A CCEF is a commercial facility that has been approved by the CCS Certification Body to
perform Common Criteria evaluations; a significant requirement for such approval is
accreditation to the requirements of ISO Standard 17025, General requirements for the
accreditation of calibration and testing laboratories. Accreditation is performed under the
Program for the Accreditation of Laboratories Canada (PALCAN), administered by the
Standards Council of Canada.
The CCEF that carried out this evaluation is Electronic Warfare Associates-Canada, Ltd.
located in Ottawa, Ontario.
By awarding a Common Criteria certificate, the CCS Certification Body asserts that the
product complies with the security requirements specified in the associated security target. A
security target is a requirements specification document that defines the scope of the
evaluation activities. The consumer of certified IT products should review the security
target, in addition to this certification report, in order to gain an understanding of any
assumptions made during the evaluation, the IT product's intended environment, its security
requirements, and the level of confidence (i.e., the evaluation assurance level) that the
product satisfies the security requirements.
This certification report is associated with the certificate of product evaluation dated 15 May
2007, and the security target identified in Section 4 of this report.
The certification report, certificate of product evaluation and security target are posted on the
CCS Certified Products list at: http://www.cse-cst.gc.ca/services/common-criteria/trusted-
products-e.html and on the official Common Criteria Program website at
http://www.commoncriteriaportal.org/
CCS Certification Report Network Chemistry Inc.
RFprotect™
___________________________________________________________________________
Version 1.0 15 May 2007
- Page iii of v -
This certification report makes reference to the following trademarked or registered
trademarks:
• RFprotect™ is a trademark symbol of Network Chemistry Inc.
• Microsoft, and Windows are either trademarks or registered trademarks of Microsoft
Corporation in the United States and/or other countries,
• CVE is a trademark of MITRE Corporation,
• Intel and Pentium are registered trademarks of Intel,
• Linux is a registered trademark of Linus Torvalds. Inc.
• Red Hat is a registered trademark of Red Hat, Inc.
• SANS is a trademark of SANS/ESCAL.
• Sun and Solaris are trademarks of Sun Microsystems, Inc. in the United States and other
countries,
• UNIX is a registered trademark in the United States and other countries, exclusively
licensed through X/Open Company, Ltd.
Reproduction of this report is authorized provided the report is reproduced in its entirety.
CCS Certification Report Network Chemistry Inc.
RFprotect™
___________________________________________________________________________
Version 1.0 15 May 2007
- Page iv of v -
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Disclaimer....................................................................................................................................... i
Foreword........................................................................................................................................ii
Executive Summary...................................................................................................................... 1
1 Identification of Target of Evaluation ................................................................................ 3
2 TOE Description ................................................................................................................... 3
3 Evaluated Security Functionality........................................................................................ 3
4 Security Target...................................................................................................................... 4
5 Common Criteria Conformance.......................................................................................... 4
6 Security Policy....................................................................................................................... 4
7 Assumptions and Clarification of Scope............................................................................. 5
7.1 SECURE USAGE ASSUMPTIONS................................................................................... 5
7.2 ENVIRONMENTAL ASSUMPTIONS ............................................................................... 5
7.3 CLARIFICATION OF SCOPE.......................................................................................... 5
8 Architectural Information ................................................................................................... 6
9 Evaluated Configuration...................................................................................................... 7
10 Documentation ...................................................................................................................... 7
11 Evaluation Analysis Activities ............................................................................................. 8
12 ITS Product Testing.............................................................................................................. 8
12.1 ASSESSMENT OF DEVELOPER TESTS .......................................................................... 9
12.2 INDEPENDENT FUNCTIONAL TESTING ........................................................................ 9
12.3 INDEPENDENT PENETRATION TESTING....................................................................... 9
12.4 CONDUCT OF TESTING ............................................................................................. 10
12.5 TESTING RESULTS.................................................................................................... 10
13 Results of the Evaluation.................................................................................................... 10
14 Evaluator Comments, Observations and Recommendations ......................................... 10
15 Glossary ............................................................................................................................... 10
CCS Certification Report Network Chemistry Inc.
RFprotect™
___________________________________________________________________________
Version 1.0 15 May 2007
- Page v of v -
15.1 ACRONYMS, ABBREVIATIONS AND INITIALIZATIONS ............................................... 11
16 References............................................................................................................................ 12
CCS Certification Report Network Chemistry Inc.
RFprotect™
___________________________________________________________________________
Version 1.0 15 May 2007
- Page 1 of 12 -
Executive Summary
The Network Chemistry RFprotect™ Distributed v6.1.2, RFprotect™ Sensor v6.1.22, and
RFprotect™ Mobile v6.1.2, from Network Chemistry Inc. (hereafter referred to as
RFprotect™) is the Target of Evaluation (TOE) for this Evaluation Assurance Level (EAL)
EAL 2 evaluation.
The RFprotect™ is a wireless intrusion detection system (IDS) coupled with intrusion
prevention functionality. This system uses wireless network sensors to detect and respond to
suspicious activity and to determine the impact of network attacks, based on collected
forensic data. It analyzes the authorized wireless network, checking for and responding to
identified vulnerabilities. Wireless intrusion prevention capabilities allow the RFprotect™
to prevent “rogue” wireless stations (including wireless access points, wireless network
clients, and ad-hoc wireless devices) from operating within the range of the product, and to
neutralize threats after identification of an attack by terminating an attacker’s wireless
session.
Electronic Warfare Associates-Canada, Ltd. is the Common Criteria Evaluation Facility that
conducted the evaluation. This evaluation was completed on 19 April 2007 and was carried
out in accordance with the rules of the Canadian Common Criteria Evaluation and
Certification Scheme (CCS).
The scope of the evaluation is defined by the security target, which identifies assumptions
made during the evaluation, the intended environment for the RFprotect™, the security
requirements, and the level of confidence (evaluation assurance level) at which the product is
intended to satisfy the security requirements. Consumers are advised to verify that their
operating environment is consistent with that specified in the security target, and to give due
consideration to the comments, observations and recommendations in this certification
report.
The results documented in the Evaluation Technical Report (ETR)1
for this product provide
sufficient evidence that it meets the EAL 2 assurance requirements for the evaluated security
functionality. The evaluation was conducted using the Common Methodology for
Information Technology Security Evaluation, Version 2.3 (with applicable final
interpretations), for conformance to the Common Criteria for Information Technology
Security Evaluation, version 2.3.
The Communications Security Establishment, as the CCS Certification Body, declares that
the RFprotect™ evaluation meets all the conditions of the Arrangement on the Recognition
of Common Criteria Certificates and that the product will be listed on the CCS Certified
Products list (CPL) at http://www.cse-cst.gc.ca/services/common-criteria/trusted-products-
1
The ETR is a CCS document that contains information proprietary to the developer and/or the evaluator, and
is not releasable for public review.
CCS Certification Report Network Chemistry Inc.
RFprotect™
___________________________________________________________________________
Version 1.0 15 May 2007
- Page 2 of 12 -
e.html and on the official International Common Criteria Program website at
http://www.commoncriteriaportal.org.
CCS Certification Report Network Chemistry Inc.
RFprotect™
___________________________________________________________________________
Version 1.0 15 May 2007
- Page 3 of 12 -
1 Identification of Target of Evaluation
The Target of Evaluation (TOE) for this Evaluation Assurance Level EAL 2 evaluation is the
Network Chemistry RFprotect™ Distributed v6.1.2, RFprotect™ Sensor v6.1.22, and
RFprotect™ Mobile v6.1.2, from Network Chemistry Inc. (hereafter referred to as
RFprotect™).
2 TOE Description
The RFprotect™ is a wireless intrusion detection and prevention system which uses wireless
sensors to collect information about target systems and networks. The system contains an
analyzer component to support analysis of the data and to initiate actions in response to its
findings.
The following TOE components can be instantiated on separate inter-dependent devices to
form the first TOE configuration, or they can be combined onto one device (typically a
mobile laptop workstation) to form the second TOE configuration:
a. The RFprotect™ Server is a software package which is installed on standard server
hardware and functions as the central management and analysis server for the
RFprotect™ system;
b. The RFprotect™ Sensor is a self-contained appliance which is used to scan the
channels defined in the 802.11 wireless networking specifications for unauthorized,
malicious, or otherwise suspicious traffic, report its findings back to the RFprotect™
Server, and respond to unauthorized or undesirable network traffic as directed by the
Server;
c. The RFprotect™ Client is a software package which is installed on standard Personal
Computer (PC) hardware and is used to manage the Server and the Sensors and to
view reports on wireless network activity; and
d. The RFprotect™ Mobile software is made up of functionality from RFprotect™
Sensor, RFprotect™ Server and RFprotect™ Mobile Client. It is installed on a
standard PC workstation, typically a laptop computer, to provide mobility.
3 Evaluated Security Functionality
The complete list of evaluated security functionality for the RFprotect™ is identified in
Section 5 of the Security Target (ST).
CCS Certification Report Network Chemistry Inc.
RFprotect™
___________________________________________________________________________
Version 1.0 15 May 2007
- Page 4 of 12 -
4 Security Target
The ST associated with this Certification Report is identified by the following nomenclature:
Title: Network Chemistry RFprotect™ Distributed v6.1.2, RFprotect™ Sensor v6.1.22, and
RFprotect™ Mobile v6.1.2 Security Target, Version: 1.0, Date: 16 April 2007.
5 Common Criteria Conformance
The evaluation was conducted using the Common Methodology for Information Technology
Security Evaluation, Version 2.3, for conformance to the Common Criteria for Information
Technology Security Evaluation, version 2.3.
The RFprotect™ is:
a. Common Criteria Part 2 extended; with functional requirements based upon functional
components in Part 2;
b. Common Criteria Part 3 conformant, with security assurance requirements based only
upon assurance components in Part 3; and
c. Common Criteria EAL 2 conformant, with all the security assurance requirements in the
EAL 2 package.
6 Security Policy
The following statements are representative of the Security Policy:
Authentication. Users must authenticate to the RFprotect™ to be able to access its security
functions, event data, and audit data. A user authenticating to the RFprotect™ must provide a
user name and password for a valid user account. The RFprotect™ implements role based
access control. A role is assigned to an administrator when the administrator account is
created. Login is not permitted if there is no associated role for the administrator.
Protection of Data Transmitted Between RFprotect™ Components. All TOE Security
Function (TSF) data communicated between the physically-separated components of the
Sensor and the Server is protected from disclosure by using direct protection via Network
Chemistry's implementation of AES. The Sensor and Server are configured with a shared
secret to validate their identity and protect their communications.
NOTE: Assessment of Network Chemistry's AES implementation did not form part of this
CC evaluation and was not separately validated under the Cryptographic Module Validation
Program.
For security policy enforcement please refer to the RFprotect™ Security Target.
CCS Certification Report Network Chemistry Inc.
RFprotect™
___________________________________________________________________________
Version 1.0 15 May 2007
- Page 5 of 12 -
7 Assumptions and Clarification of Scope
Consumers of the RFprotect™ product should consider assumptions about usage and
environmental settings as requirements for the product’s installation and its operating
environment. This will ensure the proper and secure operation of the TOE.
7.1 Secure Usage Assumptions
The following Secure Usage assumptions are listed in the ST:
• There will be one or more competent individuals assigned to manage the RFprotect™
and the security information it contains;
• The authorized administrators are not careless, willfully negligent, or hostile, and will
follow and abide by the instructions provided by the RFprotect™ documentation; and
• The TOE can only be accessed by authorized administrators.
7.2 Environmental Assumptions
The following Environmental Assumptions are listed in the ST:
• The host machine upon which RFprotect™ is installed resides in a physically secure
location and only authorized individuals are granted physical access to the host;
• The RFprotect™ hardware and software critical to security enforcement by the TOE
will be protected from unauthorized physical access;
• The RFprotect™ is appropriately scalable to the IT System the TOE monitors;
• The RFprotect™ has access to all the IT System data it needs; and
• The RFprotect™ will be installed such that all network traffic will flow through it.
For more information about the RFprotect™ security environment, refer to Section 3 of the
ST (TOE Security Environment).
7.3 Clarification of Scope
The RFprotect™ provides a level of protection that is appropriate for a non-hostile and well-
managed user community. It is designed to protect its user community against inadvertent or
casual attempts to breach system security. It is not intended for situations in which hostile
and well-funded attackers use sophisticated attacks from within the physical zone.
NOTE: Assessment of Network Chemistry's AES implementation did not form part of this
CC evaluation and was not separately validated under the Cryptographic Module Validation
Program.
CCS Certification Report Network Chemistry Inc.
RFprotect™
___________________________________________________________________________
Version 1.0 15 May 2007
- Page 6 of 12 -
8 Architectural Information
The RFprotect™ is composed of the following component subsystems:
a. RFprotect™ Sensor
The sensor is a self-contained, purpose build hardware appliance that contains an RF
radio and processor that operates the ipOS 6.8 operating system, licensed from Ubicom,
Inc. The Sensor is used to scan the channels defined in the 802.11 wireless networking
specifications for unauthorized, malicious, or otherwise suspicious traffic, report its
findings back to the RFprotect Server, and respond to unauthorized or undesirable
network traffic as directed by the Server.
.
b. RFprotect™ Mobile
The RFprotect Mobile software is made up of functionality from RFprotect Sensor,
RFprotect Server and RFprotect Mobile Client. It is installed on a standard PC
workstation, typically a laptop computer, to provide mobility. RFprotect™ Mobile is
fitted with a Peripheral Component Interconnect (PCI) card as part of the TOE
environment. This is currently a commercial-off-the-shelf card with the Atheros
AR5004X chipset; however any Atheros chipset may be used to communicate with the
modified version of the Atheros driver used in RFprotect™ Mobile.
c. RFprotect™ Server
The RFprotect Server is a software package which is installed on standard server
hardware and functions as the central management and analysis server for the RFprotect
system. The Server provides scanning policies to the RFprotect Sensors deployed on the
local network and receives wireless traffic reports from them. The Server stores the
reports from all of the Sensors on the network and continuously analyzes the complete
wireless traffic dataset. If the complete dataset indicates that suspicious or malicious
activity is or may be occurring, the Server may be configured to respond by instructing
one or more Sensors to take appropriate actions to mitigate the threat. The Server allows
authorized users to view events generated by the Sensors via the RFprotect Client
software.
d. RFprotect™ Client
The RFprotect Client is a software package which is installed on standard Personal
Computer (PC) hardware. It is used to manage the Server and the Sensors and to view
reports on wireless network activity. The Client provides a Graphical User Interface
(GUI) to manage users and their associated roles, system policies, and alarms associated
with specific events. It also provides a means to view the status of all deployed Sensors
and can display reports generated by the Server to provide summary information about
attacks, activity graphs, and analysis of event trends.
CCS Certification Report Network Chemistry Inc.
RFprotect™
___________________________________________________________________________
Version 1.0 15 May 2007
- Page 7 of 12 -
9 Evaluated Configuration
The RFprotect™ Security Target defines the following systems in the evaluated
configuration:
a. Distributed; and
b. Mobile.
There are three components which combine to form the first evaluated configuration:
• RFProtect Sensor
• RFProtect Server running on either of the following OS:
i. Windows (XP Professional Service Pack 2 or Windows 2003 Server
Service Pack 1)
ii. Linux (Redhat Enterprise 9, Fedora Core 3, or SUSE Enterprise 9.1)
• RFProtect Client running on either of the following OS:
i. Windows XP Professional Service Pack 2
ii. Windows 2003 Server Service Pack 1
Functionality of the three components can be combined on one device (typically a mobile
laptop) to form the second configuration using either Windows XP Professional Service Pack
2 or Windows 2003 Server Service Pack 1.
The correct configuration is described in detail in the RFprotect™ Distributed Users Guide
chapter 1.
10 Documentation
The Network Chemistry Inc. documents provided to the consumer are as follows:
a. Network Chemistry RFprotect™ Distributed 6.1.2 Release Notes;
b. Network Chemistry RFprotect™ Sensor User Manual 802.11a/b/g;
c. Network Chemistry RFprotect™ Distributed 6 Quick Start Guide;
d. Network Chemistry RFprotect™ Distributed User Guide;
e. Network Chemistry RFprotect™ Mobile 6.1.2 Release Notes;
f. Administrator Guidance Supplement; and
CCS Certification Report Network Chemistry Inc.
RFprotect™
___________________________________________________________________________
Version 1.0 15 May 2007
- Page 8 of 12 -
g. Installation Guide 6.1.2 Supplement.
11 Evaluation Analysis Activities
The evaluation analysis activities involved a structured evaluation of the Network Chemistry
RFprotect™ Distributed v6.1.2, RFprotect™ Sensor v6.1.22, and RFprotect™ Mobile
v6.1.2, including the following areas:
Configuration management: An analysis of the RFprotect™ CM system and associated
documentation was performed. The evaluators found that the RFprotect™ configuration
items were clearly marked, and could be modified and controlled. The developer’s
configuration management system was observed during a site visit, and it was found to be
mature and well developed.
Secure delivery and operation: The evaluators examined the delivery documentation and
determined that it described all of the procedures required to maintain the integrity of the
RFprotect™ during distribution to the consumer. The evaluators examined and tested the
installation, generation and start-up procedures, and determined that they were complete and
sufficiently detailed to result in a secure configuration.
Design documentation: The evaluators analysed the RFprotect™ functional specification
and high-level design; they determined that the documents were internally consistent, and
completely and accurately instantiated all interfaces and security functions. The evaluators
also independently verified that the correspondence mappings between the design documents
were correct.
Guidance documents: The evaluators examined the RFprotect™ user and administrator
guidance documentation and determined that it sufficiently and unambiguously described
how to securely use and administer the product, and that it was consistent with the other
documents supplied for evaluation.
Vulnerability assessment: The RFprotect™ ST’s strength of function claims were validated
through independent evaluator analysis. The evaluators also validated the developer’s
vulnerability analysis and found that it sufficiently described each of the potential
vulnerabilities along with a sound rationale as to why it was not exploitable in the intended
environment. Additionally, the evaluators conducted an independent review of public domain
vulnerability databases, and all evaluation deliverables to provide assurance that the
developer has considered all potential vulnerabilities.
All these evaluation activities resulted in PASS verdicts.
12 ITS Product Testing
Testing at EAL2 consists of the following three steps: assessing developer tests, performing
independent functional tests, and performing independent penetration tests.
CCS Certification Report Network Chemistry Inc.
RFprotect™
___________________________________________________________________________
Version 1.0 15 May 2007
- Page 9 of 12 -
12.1 Assessment of Developer Tests
The evaluators verified that the developer had met their testing responsibilities by reviewing
the developer’s test plan, test approach, test procedure and test results, and examining their
test evidence, as documented in the Evaluation Technical Report (ETR)2
.
The evaluators analyzed the developer’s test coverage analysis, and found that the
correspondence between tests identified in the developer’s test documentation and the
functional specification was complete and accurate.
12.2 Independent Functional Testing
During this evaluation, the evaluator developed independent functional tests by examining
design and guidance documentation, examining the developer's test documentation,
executing a sample of the developer's test cases, and creating test cases that augmented the
developer tests.
All testing was planned and documented to a sufficient level of detail to allow repeatability
of the testing procedures and results. These tests focused on:
• Identification and authentication;
• Audit;
• Security Management;
• Basic product functionality.
12.3 Independent Penetration Testing
Subsequent to the examination of the developer's vulnerability analysis and the independent
review of public domain vulnerability databases and all evaluation deliverables, limited
independent evaluator penetration testing was conducted. The penetration tests focused on:
• Generic vulnerabilities;
• Bypassing;
• Tampering; and
• Direct attacks.
The evaluator conducted a port scan of the RFprotect™. The only ports found to be open
were ones that would be expected. The evaluator used a publicly available tool to scan the
2
The ETR is a CCS document that contains information proprietary to the developer and/or the evaluator, and
is not releasable for public review.
CCS Certification Report Network Chemistry Inc.
RFprotect™
___________________________________________________________________________
Version 1.0 15 May 2007
- Page 10 of 12 -
RFprotect™ for weaknesses, and none were found. The evaluator also used a publicly
available packet capture tool to examine output from the RFprotect™ during startup,
shutdown and normal operations. The evaluator searched the captured results in an attempt to
extract information which might be useful to a potential attacker; no useful information was
uncovered. In addition, the evaluator performed direct attacks on the RFprotect™, attempting
to bypass or break the TOE’s database mechanism.
The independent penetration testing did not uncover any exploitable vulnerabilities in the
anticipated operating environment.
12.4 Conduct of Testing
The RFprotect™ was subjected to a comprehensive suite of formally documented,
independent functional and penetration tests. The testing took place at the ITSET Facility at
EWA-Canada located in Ottawa, Ontario. The CCS Certification Body witnessed a portion
of the independent testing.
The detailed testing activities, including configurations, procedures, test cases, expected
results and observed results are documented in the ETR.
12.5 Testing Results
The developer’s tests and the independent functional tests yielded the expected results,
giving assurance that the RFprotect™ behaves as specified in its ST and functional
specification. The penetration testing resulted in a PASS verdict, as the evaluators were
unable to exploit any of the identified potential vulnerabilities in the RFprotect™ in its
intended operating environment.
13 Results of the Evaluation
This evaluation has provided the basis for an EAL 2 level of assurance. The overall verdict
for the evaluation is PASS. These results are supported by evidence in the ETR.
14 Evaluator Comments, Observations and Recommendations
The complete documentation for the RFprotect™ includes a comprehensive Installation and
Users Guide.
The RFprotect™ is straightforward to configure, use and integrate into a corporate network.
Network Chemistry Inc. Configuration Management (CM) and Quality Assurance (QA)
provide the requisite controls for managing all CM/QA activities.
15 Glossary
This section expands any acronyms, abbreviations and initializations used in this report.
CCS Certification Report Network Chemistry Inc.
RFprotect™
___________________________________________________________________________
Version 1.0 15 May 2007
- Page 11 of 12 -
15.1 Acronyms, Abbreviations and Initializations
Acronym/Abbreviation/
Initialization
Description
ACLs Access Control Lists
CCEF Common Criteria Evaluation Facility
CCS Canadian Common Criteria Evaluation and
Certification Scheme
CIAC Computer Incident Advisory Capability
CPL Certified Products list
CM Configuration Management
CSE Communications Security Establishment
CVE Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures
DoD Department of Defense
EAL Evaluation Assurance Level
ETR Evaluation Technical Report
IAVM Information Assurance Vulnerability
Management
IT Information Technology
ITSET Information Technology Security Evaluation
and Testing
NIST National Institute of Standards and
Technology
OS Operating System
PALCAN Program for the Accreditation of Laboratories
Canada
PCI Peripheral Component Interconnect
QA Quality Assurance
SANS SysAdmin, Audit, Network, Security
SFP Security Function Policy
SNMP Simple Network Management Protocol
ST Security Target
TOE Target of Evaluation
CCS Certification Report Network Chemistry Inc.
RFprotect™
___________________________________________________________________________
Version 1.0 15 May 2007
- Page 12 of 12 -
Acronym/Abbreviation/
Initialization
Description
TSF TOE Security Function
US-CERT United States Computer Emergency
Readiness Team
16 References
This section lists all documentation used as source material for this report:
a. Canadian Common Criteria Evaluation and Certification Scheme (CCS) and CCS
Publication #4, Technical Oversight, Version 1.0.
b. Common Criteria for Information Technology Security Evaluation, version 2.3
Revision 326, December 2004.
c. Common Methodology for Information Technology Security Evaluation, CEM,
version 2.3 Revision 326, December 2004.
d. Network Chemistry RFprotect™ Distributed v6.1.2, RFprotect™ Sensor v6.1.22, and
RFprotect™ Mobile v6.1.2 Security Target, Revision No. 1.0, 16 April 2007.
e. Evaluation Technical Report (ETR) Network Chemistry RFprotect™ Distributed
v6.1.2, RFprotect™ Sensor v6.1.22, and RFprotect™ Mobile v6.1.2, EAL 2
Evaluation, Common Criteria Evaluation Number: 383-4-66, Document No. 1527-
000-D002, Version 1.2, 19 April 2007.