Certification Report Page 1 KECS-CR-19-51 KSignSecureDB V3.5 Certification Report Certification No.: KECS-CISS-0958-2019 2019. 8. 27. IT Security Certification Center Certification Report Page 2 History of Creation and Revision No. Date Revised Pages Description 00 2019.8.27. - Certification report for KSignSecureDB V3.5 - First documentation Certification Report Page 3 This document is the certification report for KSignSecureDB V3.5 of KSign Co., LTD. The Certification Body IT Security Certification Center The Evaluation Facility Korea System Assurance (KOSYAS) Certification Report Page 4 Table of Contents 1. Executive Summary ................................................................................................... 5 2. Identification..............................................................................................................11 3. Security Policy.......................................................................................................... 13 4. Assumptions and Clarification of Scope ................................................................ 13 5. Architectural Information......................................................................................... 13 6. Documentation ......................................................................................................... 14 7. TOE Testing............................................................................................................... 15 8. Evaluated Configuration .......................................................................................... 15 9. Results of the Evaluation......................................................................................... 16 9.1 Security Target Evaluation (ASE) .................................................................. 16 9.2 Life Cycle Support Evaluation (ALC)............................................................. 17 9.3 Guidance Documents Evaluation (AGD) ....................................................... 17 9.4 Development Evaluation (ADV)..................................................................... 18 9.5 Test Evaluation (ATE).................................................................................... 18 9.6 Vulnerability Assessment (AVA) .................................................................... 18 9.7 Evaluation Result Summary.......................................................................... 18 10. Recommendations ................................................................................................... 19 11. Security Target.......................................................................................................... 20 12. Acronyms and Glossary .......................................................................................... 21 13. Bibliography ............................................................................................................. 22 Certification Report Page 5 1. Executive Summary This report describes the certification result drawn by the certification body on the results of the KSignSecureDB V3.5 developed by KSign Co., LTD. with reference to the Common Criteria for Information Technology Security Evaluation (“CC” hereinafter) [1]. It describes the evaluation result and its soundness and conformity. The Target of Evaluation (“TOE” hereinafter) is database encryption software. The TOE provides a variety of security features: security audit, cryptographic operation using cryptographic module (KSignCASE64 v2.5) validated under the Korea Cryptographic Module Validation Program (KCMVP), identification and authentication including mutual authentication between TOE components, security management, the TOE access session management, and the TSF protection function. The evaluation of the TOE has been carried out by Korea System Assurance (KOSYAS) and completed on July 29, 2019. This report grounds on the Evaluation Technical Report (ETR) [6] KOSYAS had submitted and the Security Target (ST) [7]. The ST claims strict conformance to the Korean National Protection Profile for Database Encryption V1.0 [5]. All Security Assurance Requirements (SARs) in the ST are based only upon assurance component in CC Part 3, and the TOE satisfies the SARs of the PP [5]. Therefore the ST and the resulting TOE is CC Part 3 conformant. The Security Functional Requirements (SFRs) are based upon both functional components in CC Part 2 and a newly defined component in the Extended Component Definition chapter of the PP, therefor the ST, and the TOE satisfies the SFRs in the ST. Therefore, the ST and the resulting TOE is CC Part 2 extended. [Figure 1] ~ [Figure 2] shows the operational environment of the TOE. The TOE is comprised of the KSignSecureDB Server, KSignSecureDB DBAgent and KSignSecureDB APIAgent and can be installed 'Plug-in' and 'API' type. The KSignSecureDB Server manages the information on policies established by the authorized administrator and manages the keys and the audit records. It also encrypts the information on a distributed key and loads it on the shared memory. The KSignSecureDB DBAgent is installed inside the Database Server and encrypts the user data received from the Application Server before they are stored in the DB. It decrypts the encrypted user data to be transmitted from the Database Server to the Application Server. The KSignSecureDB APIAgent is installed and operated outside the DB, and performs the encryption and decryption of the important data in accordance with the policy established by the administrator. Certification Report Page 6 [Figure 1] Plug-in type operational environment (Agent, management server separate type) [Figure 2] API-type operational environment (API module, management server separate type) Certification Report Page 7 As other external entities necessary for the operation of the TOE, there is email server to send alerts by email to the authorized administrator. necessary for installation and operation of the TOE are shown in [Table 1]. Component Contents KSignSecureDB Server HW CPU Intel Xeon 2.4 GHz or higher Memory 8 GB or higher HDD Space required for installation of TOE : 3 GB or higher NIC 100/1000 Mbps x 1 EA or higher SW OS CentOS 6.8 kernel 2.6.32 (64 bit) DBMS Oracle 11g R2 etc Java(JDK) 1.8.0_202 Apache Tomcat 8.5.41 KSignSecureDB DBAgent for Oracle_Solaris HW CPU SUN SPARC 1.2 GHz or higher Memory 4 GB or higher HDD Space required for installation of TOE : 1 GB or higher NIC 100/1000 Mbps x 1 EA or higher SW OS Solaris 5.10 (64 bit) DBMS Oracle 12c R2 etc Java(JDK) 1.8.0_202 KSignSecureDB DBAgent for Oracle_HP-UX HW CPU Intel Itanium(IA64) 1.4 GHz or higher Memory 4 GB or higher HDD Space required for installation of TOE : 1 GB or higher NIC 100/1000 Mbps x 1 EA or higher SW OS HP-UX 11.31 (64bit) DBMS Oracle 12c R2 etc Java(JDK) 1.8.0_202 KSignSecureDB DBAgent for Oracle_AIX HW CPU PowerPC POWER5 2.1 GHz or higher Memory 4 GB or higher HDD Space required for installation of TOE : 1 GB or higher NIC 100/1000 Mbps x 1 EA or higher SW OS AIX 7.1 (64 bit) DBMS Oracle 12c R2 etc Java(JDK) 1.8.0_202 KSignSecureDB DBAgent for Tibero_Linux HW CPU Intel Core i3 3.07 GHz or higher Memory 4 GB or higher HDD Space required for installation of TOE : 1 GB or higher NIC 100/1000 Mbps x 1 EA or higher SW OS CentOS 6.8 kernel 2.6.32 (64 bit) DBMS Tibero 6 etc Java(JDK) 1.8.0_202 KSignSecureDB DBAgent for Tibero_Solaris HW CPU SUN SPARC 1.2 GHz or higher Memory 4 GB or higher HDD Space required for installation of TOE Certification Report Page 8 : 1 GB or higher NIC 100/1000 Mbps x 1 EA or higher SW OS Solaris 5.10 (64 bit) DBMS Tibero 6 etc Java(JDK) 1.8.0_202 KSignSecureDB DBAgent for Tibero_HP-UX HW CPU Intel Itanium(IA64) 1.4 GHz or higher Memory 4 GB or higher HDD Space required for installation of TOE : 1 GB or higher NIC 100/1000 Mbps x 1 EA or higher SW OS HP-UX 11.31 (64bit) DBMS Tibero 6 etc Java(JDK) 1.8.0_202 KSignSecureDB DBAgent for Tibero_AIX HW CPU PowerPC POWER5 2.1 GHz or higher Memory 4 GB or higher HDD Space required for installation of TOE : 1 GB or higher NIC 100/1000 Mbps x 1 EA or higher SW OS AIX 7.1 (64 bit) DBMS Tibero 6 etc Java(JDK) 1.8.0_202 KSignSecureDB DBAgent for MSSQL_Windows HW CPU Intel Core i3 3.30 GHz or higher Memory 4 GB or higher HDD Space required for installation of TOE : 1 GB or higher NIC 100/1000 Mbps x 1 EA or higher SW OS Windows Server 2012 R2 (64bit) DBMS MSSQL 2016 etc Java(JDK) 1.8.0_202 KSignSecureDB APIAgent for JAVA_Linux HW CPU Intel Core i3 3.07 GHz or higher Memory 4 GB or higher HDD Space required for installation of TOE : 1 GB or higher NIC 100/1000 Mbps x 1 EA or higher SW OS CentOS 6.8 kernel 2.6.32 (64 bit) etc Java(JDK) 1.8.0_202 KSignSecureDB APIAgent for JAVA_Solaris HW CPU SUN SPARC 1.2 GHz or higher Memory 4 GB or higher HDD Space required for installation of TOE : 1 GB or higher NIC 100/1000 Mbps x 1 EA or higher SW OS Solaris 5.10 (64 bit) etc Java(JDK) 1.8.0_202 KSignSecureDB APIAgent for JAVA_HP-UX HW CPU Intel Itanium(IA64) 1.4 GHz or higher Memory 4 GB or higher HDD Space required for installation of TOE : 1 GB or higher NIC 100/1000 Mbps x 1 EA or higher SW OS HP-UX 11.31 (64bit) etc Java(JDK) 1.8.0_202 KSignSecureDB APIAgent for HW CPU PowerPC POWER5 2.1 GHz or higher Memory 4 GB or higher Certification Report Page 9 JAVA_AIX HDD Space required for installation of TOE : 1 GB or higher NIC 100/1000 Mbps x 1 EA or higher SW OS AIX 7.1 (64 bit) etc Java(JDK) 1.8.0_202 KSignSecureDB APIAgent for C_Linux HW CPU Intel Core i3 3.07 GHz or higher Memory 4 GB or higher HDD Space required for installation of TOE : 1 GB or higher NIC 100/1000 Mbps x 1 EA or higher SW OS CentOS 6.8 kernel 2.6.32 (64 bit) etc Java(JDK) 1.8.0_202 KSignSecureDB APIAgent for C_Solaris HW CPU SUN SPARC 1.2 GHz or higher Memory 4 GB or higher HDD Space required for installation of TOE : 1 GB or higher NIC 100/1000 Mbps x 1 EA or higher SW OS Solaris 5.10 (64 bit) etc Java(JDK) 1.8.0_202 KSignSecureDB APIAgent for C_HP-UX HW CPU Intel Itanium(IA64) 1.4 GHz or higher Memory 4 GB or higher HDD Space required for installation of TOE : 1 GB or higher NIC 100/1000 Mbps x 1 EA or higher SW OS HP-UX 11.31 (64bit) etc Java(JDK) 1.8.0_202 KSignSecureDB APIAgent for C_AIX HW CPU PowerPC POWER5 2.1 GHz or higher Memory 4 GB or higher HDD Space required for installation of TOE : 1 GB or higher NIC 100/1000 Mbps x 1 EA or higher SW OS AIX 7.1 (64 bit) etc Java(JDK) 1.8.0_202 KSignSecureDB APIAgent for C_Windows HW CPU Intel Core i3 3.30 GHz or higher Memory 4 GB or higher HDD Space required for installation of TOE : 1 GB or higher NIC 100/1000 Mbps x 1 EA or higher SW OS Windows Server 2012 R2 (64bit) etc Java(JDK) 1.8.0_202 [Table 1] Hardware and Software required by TOE Administrator uses the pc that can operate web browser to use the security management. Administrator pc minimum requirements are shown in [Table 2] Component Contents HW CPU Intel Core i5 2.30 GHz or higher Memory 4 GB or higher HDD 100 GB or higher Certification Report Page 10 NIC 100/1000 Mbps x 1 EA or higher SW OS Windows 7 Professional Service Pack 1 (64 bit) Web Browser Google Chrome 73.0 [Table 2] Administrator PC Requirements. In addition, external IT entities linked to the TOE operation are as follows. Mail Server: Send email to authorized administrator Certification Validity: The certificate is not an endorsement of the IT product by the government of Republic of Korea or by any other organization that recognizes or gives effect to this certificate, and no warranty of the IT product by the government of Republic of Korea or by any other organization recognizes or gives effect to the certificate, is either expressed or implied. Certification Report Page 11 2. Identification The TOE reference is identified as follows. TOE KSignSecureDB V3.5 Version V3.5.2 TOE Components KSignSecureDB Server V3.5.2 - (KSDBV35-Server_V3.5.2.tar) KSignSecureDB DBAgent For Oracle_Solaris V3.5.2 - (KSDBV35-DBAgent_For_Oracle_Solaris_V3.5.2.tar) KSignSecureDB DBAgent For Oracle_HP-UX V3.5.2 - (KSDBV35-DBAgent_For_Oracle_ HP-UX_V3.5.2.tar) KSignSecureDB DBAgent For Oracle_AIX V3.5.2 - (KSDBV35-DBAgent_For_Oracle_AIX_V3.5.2.tar) KSignSecureDB DBAgent For Tibero_Linux V3.5.2 - (KSDBV35-DBAgent_For_Tibero_Linux_V3.5.2.tar) KSignSecureDB DBAgent For Tibero_Solaris V3.5.2 - (KSDBV35-DBAgent_For_Tibero_Solaris_V3.5.2.tar) KSignSecureDB DBAgent For Tibero_HP-UX V3.5.2 - (KSDBV35-DBAgent_For_Tibero_HP-UX_V3.5.2.tar) KSignSecureDB DBAgent For Tibero_AIX V3.5.2 - (KSDBV35-DBAgent_For_Tibero_AIX_V3.5.2.tar) KSignSecureDB DBAgent For MSSQL_Windows V3.5.2 - (KSDBV35-DBAgent_For_MSSQL_Windows_V3.5.2.zip) KSignSecureDB APIAgent For JAVA_Linux V3.5.2 - (KSDBV35-APIAgent_For_API_JAVA_Linux_V3.5.2.tar) KSignSecureDB APIAgent For JAVA_Solaris V3.5.2 - (KSDBV35-APIAgent_For_API_JAVA_Solaris_V3.5.2.tar) KSignSecureDB APIAgent For JAVA_HP-UX V3.5.2 - (KSDBV35-APIAgent_For_API_JAVA_HP-UX_V3.5.2.tar) KSignSecureDB APIAgent For JAVA_AIX V3.5.2 - (KSDBV35-APIAgent_For_API_JAVA_AIX_V3.5.2.tar) KSignSecureDB APIAgent For C_Linux V3.5.2 - (KSDBV35-APIAgent_For_API_C_Linux_V3.5.2.tar) Certification Report Page 12 KSignSecureDB APIAgent For C_Solaris V3.5.2 - (KSDBV35-APIAgent_For_API_C_Solaris_V3.5.2.tar) KSignSecureDB APIAgent For C_HP-UX V3.5.2 - (KSDBV35-APIAgent_For_API_C_HP-UX_V3.5.2.tar) KSignSecureDB APIAgent For C_AIX V3.5.2 - (KSDBV35-APIAgent_For_API_C_AIX_V3.5.2.tar) KSignSecureDB APIAgent For C_Windows V3.5.2 - (KSDBV35-APIAgent_For_API_C_Windows_V3.5.2.zip) Guidance Documents KSignSecureDB V3.5 Preparative Procedure V1.3 - (KSignSecureDB V3.5 Preparative Procedure V1.3.pdf) KSignSecureDB V3.5 Operation Guide V1.3 - (KSignSecureDB V3.5 Operation Guide V1.3.pdf) [Table 3] TOE identification The TOE is delivered contained in a CD-ROM. [Table 4] summarizes additional information for scheme, developer, sponsor, evaluation facility, certification body, etc. Scheme Korea Evaluation and Certification Guidelines for IT Security (August 24, 2017) Korea Evaluation and Certification Regulation for IT Security (September 12, 2017) TOE KSignSecureDB V3.5 Common Criteria Common Criteria for Information Technology Security Evaluation, Version 3.1 Revision 5, CCMB-2017-04-001 ~ CCMB-2017-04-003, April 2017 Protection Profile Korean National Protection Profile for Database Encryption V1.0, KECS-PP-0820-2017, August 18, 2017 Developer KSign Co., LTD. Sponsor KSign Co., LTD. Evaluation Facility Korea System Assurance (KOSYAS) Completion Date of Evaluation July 29, 2019 Certification Body IT Security Certification Center [Table 4] Additional identification information Certification Report Page 13 3. Security Policy The TOE complies security policies defined in the ST [7] by security requirements. Thus the TOE provides following security features. For more details refer to the ST [7]. TSF Explanation Security Audit The TOE generates audit records of security relevant events. Cryptographic Support The TOE performs cryptographic key management, cryptographic operation, and random bit generation using the cryptographic modules(KSignCASE 64 v2.5) validated under the KCMVP User Data Protection The TOE provides users with column-by-column encryption and decryption of user data. Identification and Authentication The TOE identifies and authenticates administrators with ID and PW. Security Management Only authorized administrators can perform security management functions. Protection of the TSF To protect TSF data transmitted between TOE components encryption communication is carried out. The TOE performs self-test on the main process at startup or periodically during operation. TOE Access The TOE manages management connection sessions based on access IP addresses and administrator rights [Table 5] The TOE Security Functions 4. Assumptions and Clarification of Scope There is no explicit security problem definition chapter, therefore, no assumptions section, in the low assurance ST. Some Security aspects of the operational environment are added to those of the PP in which the TOE will be used or is intended to be used (For the detailed and precise definition of the security objectives of the operational environment, refer to the ST, chapter 3) 5. Architectural Information The physical scope of the TOE consists of the KSignSecureDB Server, KSignSecureDB DBAgent, KSignSecureDB APIAgent and guidance. The following security functions are provided by the TOE Logical scope and boundary of TOE is shown in [Figure 4] Certification Report Page 14 [Figure 3] TOE Logical scope 6. Documentation The following documentation is evaluated and provided with the TOE by the developer to the customer. Identifier Version Date KSignSecureDB V3.5 Preparative Procedure V1.3 V1.3 May 24, 2019 KSignSecureDB V3.5 Operation Guide V1.3 V1.3 May 24, 2019 [Table 6] Documentation Certification Report Page 15 7. TOE Testing The developer took a testing approach based on the security services provided by each TOE component based on the operational environment of the TOE. Each test case includes the following information:  Test no : Identifier of each test case  Test Purpose: Includes the security functions and modules to be tested  Test Configuration: Details about the test configuration  Test Procedure detail: Detailed procedures for testing each security function  Expected result: Result expected from testing  Actual result: Result obtained by performing testing  Test result compared to the expected result: Comparison between the expected and actual result The developer correctly performed and documented the tests according to the assurance component ATE_FUN.1. The evaluator has installed the product using the same evaluation configuration and tools as the developer’s test and performed all tests provided by the developer. The evaluator has confirmed that, for all tests, the expected results had been consistent with the actual results. In addition, the evaluator conducted penetration testing based upon test cases devised by the evaluator resulting from the independent search for potential vulnerabilities. The evaluator testing effort, the testing approach, configuration, depth, and results are summarized in the ETR [6]. 8. Evaluated Configuration The TOE is software consisting of the following components: TOE: KSignSecureDB V3.5 (V3.5.2) - KSignSecureDB Server V3.5.2 - KSignSecureDB DBAgent For Oracle_Solaris V3.5.2 - KSignSecureDB DBAgent For Oracle_HP-UX V3.5.2 - KSignSecureDB DBAgent For Oracle_AIX V3.5.2 - KSignSecureDB DBAgent For Tibero_Linux V3.5.2 - KSignSecureDB DBAgent For Tibero_Solaris V3.5.2 - KSignSecureDB DBAgent For Tibero_HP-UX V3.5.2 - KSignSecureDB DBAgent For Tibero_AIX V3.5.2 Certification Report Page 16 - KSignSecureDB DBAgent For MSSQL_Windows V3.5.2 - KSignSecureDB APIAgent For JAVA_Linux V3.5.2 - KSignSecureDB APIAgent For JAVA_Solaris V3.5.2 - KSignSecureDB APIAgent For JAVA_HP-UX V3.5.2 - KSignSecureDB APIAgent For JAVA_AIX V3.5.2 - KSignSecureDB APIAgent For C_Linux V3.5.2 - KSignSecureDB APIAgent For C_Solaris V3.5.2 - KSignSecureDB APIAgent For C_HP-UX V3.5.2 - KSignSecureDB APIAgent For C_AIX V3.5.2 - KSignSecureDB APIAgent For C_Windows V3.5.2 The Administrator can identify the complete TOE reference after installation using the product’s Info check menu. And the guidance documents listed in this report chapter 6, [Table 6] were evaluated with the TOE 9. Results of the Evaluation The evaluation facility provided the evaluation result in the ETR [6] which references Single Evaluation Reports for each assurance requirement and Observation Reports. The evaluation result was based on the CC [1] and CEM [2]. As a result of the evaluation, the verdict PASS is assigned to all assurance components 9.1 Security Target Evaluation (ASE) The ST Introduction correctly identifies the ST and the TOE, and describes the TOE in a narrative way at three levels of abstraction (TOE reference, TOE overview and TOE description), and these three descriptions are consistent with each other. Therefore, the verdict PASS is assigned to ASE_INT.1. The Conformance Claim properly describes how the ST and the TOE conform to the CC and how the ST conforms to PPs and packages. Therefore, the verdict PASS is assigned to ASE_CCL.1. The Security Objectives for the operational environment are clearly defined. Therefore, the verdict PASS is assigned to ASE_OBJ.1. The Extended Components Definition has been clearly and unambiguously defined, and it is necessary. Therefore, the verdict PASS is assigned to ASE_ECD.1. Certification Report Page 17 The Security Requirements is defined clearly and unambiguously, and they are internally consistent. Therefore, the verdict PASS is assigned to ASE_REQ.1. The TOE Summary Specification addresses all SFRs, and it is consistent with other narrative descriptions of the TOE. Therefore, the verdict PASS is assigned to ASE_TSS.1. Thus, the ST is sound and internally consistent, and suitable to be used as the basis for the TOE evaluation. The verdict PASS is assigned to the assurance class ASE. 9.2 Life Cycle Support Evaluation (ALC) The developer has clearly identified the TOE. Therefore, the verdict PASS is assigned to ALC_CMC.1. The configuration management document verifies that the configuration list includes the TOE and the evaluation evidence. Therefore, the verdict PASS is assigned to ALC_CMS.1. Also the evaluator confirmed that the correct version of the software is installed in device. The verdict PASS is assigned to the assurance class ALC. 9.3 Guidance Documents Evaluation (AGD) The procedures and steps for the secure preparation of the TOE have been documented and result in a secure configuration. Therefore, the verdict PASS is assigned to AGD_PRE.1. The operational user guidance describes for each user role the security functionality and interfaces provided by the TSF, provides instructions and guidelines for the secure use of the TOE, addresses secure procedures for all modes of operation, facilitates prevention and detection of insecure TOE states, or it is misleading or unreasonable. Therefore, the verdict PASS is assigned to AGD_OPE.1. Thus, the guidance documents are adequately describing the user can handle the TOE in a secure manner. The guidance documents take into account the various types of users (e.g. those who accept, install, administrate or operate the TOE) whose incorrect actions could adversely affect the security of the TOE or of their own data. The verdict PASS is assigned to the assurance class AGD. Certification Report Page 18 9.4 Development Evaluation (ADV) The functional specifications specify a high-level description of the SFR-enforcing and SFR-supporting TSFIs, in terms of descriptions of their parameters. Therefore, the verdict PASS is assigned to ADV_FSP.1. The verdict PASS is assigned to the assurance class ADV. 9.5 Test Evaluation (ATE) The developer correctly performed and documented the tests in the test documentation. Therefore, the verdict PASS is assigned to ATE_FUN.1. By independently testing a subset of the TSFI, the evaluator confirmed that the TOE behaves as specified in the functional specification and guidance documentation. Therefore, the verdict PASS is assigned to ATE_IND.1. Thus, the TOE behaves as described in the ST and as specified in the evaluation evidence (described in the ADV class). The verdict PASS is assigned to the assurance class ATE. 9.6 Vulnerability Assessment (AVA) By penetrating testing, the evaluator confirmed that there are no exploitable vulnerabilities by attackers possessing basic attack potential in the operational environment of the TOE. Therefore, the verdict PASS is assigned to AVA_VAN.1. Thus, potential vulnerabilities identified, during the evaluation of the development and anticipated operation of the TOE or by other methods (e.g. by flaw hypotheses), don’t allow attackers possessing basic attack potential to violate the SFRs. The verdict PASS is assigned to the assurance class AVA. 9.7 Evaluation Result Summary Assurance Class Assurance Component Evaluator Action Elements Verdict Evaluator Action Elements Assurance Component Assurance Class ASE ASE_INT.1 ASE_INT.1.1E PASS PASS PASS ASE_INT.1.2E PASS ASE_CCL.1 ASE_CCL.1.1E PASS PASS ASE_OBJ.1 ASE_OBJ.1.1E PASS PASS Certification Report Page 19 ASE_ECD.1 ASE_ECD.1.1E PASS PASS ASE_ECD.1.2E PASS ASE_REQ.1 ASE_REQ.1.1E PASS PASS ASE_TSS.1 ASE_TSS.1.1E PASS PASS ASE_TSS.1.2E PASS ALC ALC_CMS.1 ALC_CMS.1.1E PASS PASS PASS ALC_CMC.1 ALC_CMC.1.1E PASS PASS AGD AGD_PRE.1 AGD_PRE.1.1E PASS PASS PASS AGD_PRE.1.2E PASS PASS AGD_OPE.1 AGD_OPE.1.1E PASS PASS ADV ADV_FSP.1 ADV_FSP.1.1E PASS PASS PASS ADV_FSP.1.2E PASS PASS ATE ATE_FUN.1 ATE_FUN.1.1E PASS PASS PASS ATE_IND.1 ATE_IND.1.1E PASS PASS ATE_IND.1.2E PASS AVA AVA_VAN.1 AVA_VAN.1.1E PASS PASS PASS AVA_VAN.1.2E PASS AVA_VAN.1.3E PASS [Table 7] Evaluation Result Summary 10. Recommendations The TOE security functionality can be ensured only in the evaluated TOE operational environment with the evaluated TOE configuration, thus the TOE shall be operated by complying with the followings:  The TOE must be installed and operated in a physically secure environment accessible only by authorized administrators and should not allow remote management from outside.  The administrator shall maintain a safe state such as application of the latest security patches, eliminating unnecessary service, change of the default ID/password, etc., of the operating system and DBMS in the TOE operation.  The administrator should periodically check a spare space of audit data storage in case of the audit data loss, and carries out the audit data backup to prevent audit data loss.  The developer who uses the TOE with application server and DBMS fully understands the preparation procedure and user operation manual install and operate the security function. Certification Report Page 20  The developer who uses the TOE to interoperate with the user identification and authentication function in the operational environment of the business system shall ensure that the security functions of the TOE are securely applied in accordance with the requirements of the manual provided with the TOE. 11. Security Target KSignSecureDB V3.5 Security Target V1.7 is included in this report for reference Certification Report Page 21 12. Acronyms and Glossary CC Common Criteria EAL Evaluation Assurance Level PP Protection Profile SAR Security Assurance Requirement SFR Security Functional Requirement ST Security Target TOE Target of Evaluation TSF TOE Security Functionality TSFI TSF Interface Approved cryptographic algorithm A cryptographic algorithm selected by Korea Cryptographic Module Validation Authority for block cipher, secure hash algorithm, message authentication code, random bit generation, key agreement, public key cipher, digital signatures cryptographic algorithms considering safety, reliability and interoperability Column A set of data values of a particular simple type, one for each row of the table in a relational database Database A set of data that is compiled according to a certain structure in order to receive, save, and provide data in response to the demand of multiple users to support multiple application duties at the same time. The database related to encryption by column, which is required by this PP, refers to the relational database. DBMS (Database Management System) A software system composed to configure and apply the database. The DBMS related to encryption by column, which is required by this PP, refers to the database management system based on the relational database model. Certification Report Page 22 Self-test Pre-operational or conditional test executed by the cryptographic module 13. Bibliography The certification body has used following documents to produce this report. [1] Common Criteria for Information Technology Security Evaluation, Version 3.1 Revision 5, CCMB-2017-04-001 ~ CCMB-2017-04-003, April, 2017 Part 1: Introduction and general model Part 2: Security functional components Part 3: Security assurance components [2] Common Methodology for Information Technology Security Evaluation, Version 3.1 Revision 5, CCMB-2017-04-004, April, 2017 [3] Korea Evaluation and Certification Guidelines for IT Security (August 24, 2017) [4] Korea Evaluation and Certification Scheme for IT Security (September 12, 2017) [5] Korean National Protection Profile for Database Encryption V1.0, August 18, 2017 [6] KSignSecureDB V3.5 Evaluation Technical Report Lite V2.00, July 29, 2019 [7] KSignSecureDB V3.5 Security Target V1.7, July 22, 2019