National Information Assurance Partnership
Common Criteria Evaluation and Validation Scheme
Validation Report
TheJoin, Inc., Join-Virtual Mobile Platform 6.1.0
Report Number: CCEVS-VR-VID11450-2024
Dated: February 8, 2024
Version: 1.0
National Institute of Standards and Technology Department of Defense
Information Technology Laboratory ATTN: NIAP, Suite 6982
100 Bureau Drive 9800 Savage Road
Gaithersburg, MD 20899 Fort Meade, MD 20755-6982
TheJoin, Inc., Join-Virtual Mobile Validation Report Version 1.0, February 8, 2024
Platform 6.1.0
ii
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
Validation Team
Jenn Dotson
Randy Heimann
Lori Sarem
Chris Thorpe
The MITRE Corporation
Common Criteria Testing Laboratory
Raymond Smoley
Rizheng Sun
Gossamer Security Solutions, Inc.
Columbia, MD
TheJoin, Inc., Join-Virtual Mobile Validation Report Version 1.0, February 8, 2024
Platform 6.1.0
iii
Table of Contents
1 Executive Summary.................................................................................................... 1
2 Identification............................................................................................................... 2
3 Architectural Information ........................................................................................... 3
3.1 TOE Description................................................................................................. 3
3.2 TOE Evaluated Platforms ................................................................................... 3
3.3 TOE Architecture................................................................................................ 3
3.4 Physical Boundaries............................................................................................ 3
4 Security Policy............................................................................................................ 4
4.1 Cryptographic support ........................................................................................ 4
4.2 User data protection ............................................................................................ 4
4.3 Identification and authentication......................................................................... 4
4.4 Security management.......................................................................................... 4
4.5 Privacy ................................................................................................................ 4
4.6 Protection of the TSF.......................................................................................... 4
4.7 Trusted path/channels ......................................................................................... 5
5 Assumptions & Clarification of Scope ....................................................................... 6
5.1 Assumptions........................................................................................................ 6
5.2 Clarification of scope.......................................................................................... 6
6 Documentation............................................................................................................ 7
7 IT Product Testing ...................................................................................................... 8
7.1 Developer Testing............................................................................................... 8
7.2 Evaluation Team Independent Testing ............................................................... 8
8 Evaluated Configuration ............................................................................................. 9
9 Results of the Evaluation .......................................................................................... 11
9.1 Evaluation of the Security Target (ASE).......................................................... 11
9.2 Evaluation of the Development (ADV) ............................................................ 11
9.3 Evaluation of the Guidance Documents (AGD) ............................................... 11
9.4 Evaluation of the Life Cycle Support Activities (ALC) ................................... 12
9.5 Evaluation of the Test Documentation and the Test Activity (ATE) ............... 12
9.6 Vulnerability Assessment Activity (VAN)....................................................... 12
9.7 Summary of Evaluation Results........................................................................ 13
10 Validator Comments/Recommendations .............................................................. 14
11 Annexes................................................................................................................. 15
12 Security Target...................................................................................................... 16
13 Glossary ................................................................................................................ 17
14 Bibliography ......................................................................................................... 18
TheJoin, Inc., Join-Virtual Mobile Validation Report Version 1.0, February 8, 2024
Platform 6.1.0
1
1 Executive Summary
This report documents the assessment of the National Information Assurance Partnership
(NIAP) validation of the evaluation of the Join-Virtual Mobile Platform 6.1.0 client provided
by TheJoin, Inc. It presents the evaluation results, their justifications, and the conformance
results. This Validation Report (VR) is not an endorsement of the Target of Evaluation (TOE)
by any agency of the U.S. government, and no warranty is either expressed or implied.
The evaluation was performed by the Gossamer Security Solutions (Gossamer) Common
Criteria Testing Laboratory (CCTL) in Columbia, MD, United States of America, and was
completed in February 2024. The information in this report is largely derived from the
Evaluation Technical Report (ETR) and associated test reports, all written by Gossamer
Security Solutions. The evaluation determined that the product is both Common Criteria Part
2 Extended and Part 3 Extended, and meets the assurance requirements of the Protection
Profile for Application Software, Version 1.4, 07 October 2021 (ASPP14) with the
Functional Package for Transport Layer Security (TLS), Version 1.1, 01 March 2019
(PKGTLS11).
The TOE is the TheJoin, Inc., Join-Virtual Mobile Platform 6.1.0. The TOE identified in
this VR has been evaluated at a NIAP approved Common Criteria Testing Laboratory
(CCTL) using the Common Methodology for IT Security Evaluation (Version 3.1, Rev 5)
for conformance to the Common Criteria for IT Security Evaluation (Version 3.1, Rev 5).
This VR applies only to the specific version of the TOE as evaluated. The evaluation has
been conducted in accordance with the provisions of the NIAP Common Criteria Evaluation
and Validation Scheme (CCEVS) and the conclusions of the testing laboratory in the ETR
are consistent with the evidence provided.
The Validation team monitored the activities of the Evaluation team, provided guidance on
technical issues and evaluation processes, and reviewed the individual work units and
successive versions of the ETR. The Validation team found that the evaluation showed that
the product satisfies all of the functional requirements and assurance requirements stated in
the Security Target (ST). Therefore, the Validation team concludes that the testing
laboratory’s findings are accurate, the conclusions justified, and the conformance results are
correct. The conclusions of the testing laboratory in the evaluation technical report are
consistent with the evidence produced.
The technical information included in this report was obtained from the TheJoin, Inc., Join-
Virtual Mobile Platform 6.1.0 Security Target, version 0.8, January 26, 2024 and analysis
performed by the Validation team.
TheJoin, Inc., Join-Virtual Mobile Validation Report Version 1.0, February 8, 2024
Platform 6.1.0
2
2 Identification
The CCEVS is a joint National Security Agency (NSA) and National Institute of Standards
and Technology (NIST) effort to establish commercial facilities to perform trusted product
evaluations. Under this program, security evaluations are conducted by commercial testing
laboratories called Common Criteria Testing Laboratories (CCTLs) using the Common
Evaluation Methodology (CEM) in accordance with National Voluntary Laboratory
Assessment Program (NVLAP) accreditation.
The NIAP Validation Body assigns Validators to monitor the CCTLs to ensure quality and
consistency across evaluations. Developers of information technology products desiring a
security evaluation contract with a CCTL and pay a fee for their product’s evaluation. Upon
successful completion of the evaluation, the product is added to NIAP’s Validated Products
List.
Table 1 provides information needed to completely identify the product, including:
• The TOE: the fully qualified identifier of the product as evaluated.
• The ST, describing the security features, claims, and assurances of the product.
• The conformance result of the evaluation.
• The Protection Profile to which the product is conformant.
• The organizations and individuals participating in the evaluation.
Table 1: Evaluation Identifiers
Item Identifier
Evaluation Scheme United States NIAP Common Criteria Evaluation and Validation Scheme
TOE TheJoin, Inc., Join-Virtual Mobile Platform 6.1.0
Protection Profile Protection Profile for Application Software, Version 1.4, 07 October 2021
(ASPP14) with the Functional Package for Transport Layer Security (TLS),
Version 1.1, 01 March 2019 (PKGTLS11)
ST TheJoin, Inc., Join-Virtual Mobile Platform 6.1.0 Security Target, version 0.8,
January 26, 2024
Evaluation Technical
Report
Evaluation Technical Report for TheJoin, Inc., Join-Virtual Mobile Platform
6.1.0, version 0.3, February 8, 2024
CC Version Common Criteria for Information Technology Security Evaluation, Version 3.1,
rev 5
Conformance Result CC Part 2 extended, CC Part 3 extended
Sponsor TheJoin, Inc.
Developer TheJoin, Inc.
Common Criteria
Testing Lab (CCTL)
Gossamer Security Solutions, Inc.
Columbia, MD
CCEVS Validators Jenn Dotson, Randy Heimann, Lori Sarem, Chris Thorpe
TheJoin, Inc., Join-Virtual Mobile Validation Report Version 1.0, February 8, 2024
Platform 6.1.0
3
3 Architectural Information
Note: The following architectural description is based on the description presented in the
Security Target.
The TOE is the Join-Virtual Mobile Platform (J-VMP) 6.1.0 Virtual Mobile Infrastructure
(VMI) Client application for Android and iOS platforms. The TOE is a thin client providing
access to a VMI server from a mobile device.
3.1 TOE Description
Using the J-VMP client application, users can access the same mobile environment that
includes all their applications and data from any location, without being tied to a single
mobile device. The J-VMP client presents only the interface offered by the VMI server and
ensures that communication with the server utilizes secured protocols.
The TOE, when executed, connects to the specified Virtual Mobile Infrastructure (VMI)
server, authenticating the server's certificate received while negotiating the HTTPS or TLS
session. The TOE is responsible only for protecting data-in-transit between the physical
mobile device and the VMI server.
3.2 TOE Evaluated Platforms
Detail regarding the evaluated configuration is provided in Section 8 below.
3.3 TOE Architecture
The TOE is an application installed onto a physical mobile device from the Google Playstore
or Apple App Store.
3.4 Physical Boundaries
The physical boundary of the TOE is the physical perimeter of the device on which the TOE
resides.
TheJoin, Inc., Join-Virtual Mobile Validation Report Version 1.0, February 8, 2024
Platform 6.1.0
4
4 Security Policy
This section summaries the security functionality of the TOE:
1. Cryptographic support
2. User data protection
3. Identification and authentication
4. Security management
5. Privacy
6. Protection of the TSF
7. Trusted path/channels
4.1 Cryptographic support
The J-VMP client utilizes platform APIs to provide secure network communication using
HTTPS. The client also uses its own cryptography to establish a trusted TLS channel to
transmit data to the VMI Server.
4.2 User data protection
The J-VMP client informs a user of hardware and software resources the TOE accesses. It
uses the platform’s permission mechanism to get a user’s approval for access. The user
initiates a secure network connection to the VMI server using the TOE. In general, sensitive
data resides on the VMI server and not the J-VMP Client, although the client does store
encrypted credentials.
4.3 Identification and authentication
The J-VMP client performs certificate validation checking for TLS connections. Both
Android and iOS applications support OCSP when performing validity checks.
4.4 Security management
The J-VMP client does not include any predefined or default credentials, and utilizes the
platform recommended storage process for configuration options.
4.5 Privacy
The J-VMP client does not collect any PII and does not transmit any PII over a network.
4.6 Protection of the TSF
The J-VMP client relies on the physical boundary of the evaluated platform as well as the
Android and iOS operating system for the protection of the TOE’s application components.
All compiled J-VMP client code is designed to utilize compiler provided anti-exploitation
capabilities. The J-VMP client application is available through the Google Playstore and the
Apple store.
TheJoin, Inc., Join-Virtual Mobile Validation Report Version 1.0, February 8, 2024
Platform 6.1.0
5
4.7 Trusted path/channels
The J-VMP client utilizes platform APIs to establish HTTPS connections to a VMI server.
The client also uses its cryptographic library to establish TLS connections to a VMI server.
TheJoin, Inc., Join-Virtual Mobile Validation Report Version 1.0, February 8, 2024
Platform 6.1.0
6
5 Assumptions & Clarification of Scope
5.1 Assumptions
The Security Problem Definition, including the assumptions, may be found in the following
documents:
• Protection Profile for Application Software, Version 1.4, 07 October 2021 (ASPP14)
• Functional Package for Transport Layer Security (TLS), Version 1.1, 01 March 2019
(PKGTLS11)
That information has not been reproduced here and the ASPP14/PKGTLS11 should be
consulted if there is interest in that material.
The scope of this evaluation was limited to the functionality and assurances covered in the
ASPP14/PKGTLS11 as described for this TOE in the ST. Other functionality included in the
product was not assessed as part of this evaluation. All other functionality provided by the
devices needs to be assessed separately, and no further conclusions can be drawn about their
effectiveness.
5.2 Clarification of scope
All evaluations (and all products) have limitations, as well as potential misconceptions that
need clarification. This text covers some of the more important limitations and clarifications
of this evaluation. Note that:
• As with any evaluation, this evaluation only shows that the evaluated configuration
meets the security claims made with a certain level of assurance (the assurance
activities specified in the Application Software Protection Profile with the TLS
Package and performed by the Evaluation team).
• This evaluation covers only the specific device models and software as identified in
this document, and not any earlier or later versions released or in process.
• Apart from the Admin Guide, additional customer documentation for the specific
Software Application models was not included in the scope of the evaluation and
therefore should not to be relied upon when configuring or operating the device as
evaluated.
• This evaluation did not specifically search for, nor attempt to exploit, vulnerabilities
that were not “obvious” or vulnerabilities to objectives not claimed in the ST. The
CEM defines an “obvious” vulnerability as one that is easily exploited with a
minimum of understanding of the TOE, technical sophistication and resources.
• The functionality evaluated is scoped exclusively to the security functional
requirements specified in the ASPP14/PKGTLS11 and applicable Technical
Decisions. Any additional security related functional capabilities of the TOE were
not covered by this evaluation.
TheJoin, Inc., Join-Virtual Mobile Validation Report Version 1.0, February 8, 2024
Platform 6.1.0
7
6 Documentation
The following documents were available with the TOE for evaluation:
• Join-Virtual Mobile Platform 6.1.0(J-VMP) USER’s Guide, Version 6.1.10,
01/25/2024.
Any additional customer documentation provided with the product, or that is available
online was not included in the scope of the evaluation and, therefore, should not be relied
upon when configuring or operating the device as evaluated.
To use the product in the evaluated configuration, the product must be configured as
specified in the Guidance Documentation listed above. Consumers are encouraged to
download the configuration guides from the NIAP website to ensure the device is
configured as evaluated.
TheJoin, Inc., Join-Virtual Mobile Validation Report Version 1.0, February 8, 2024
Platform 6.1.0
8
7 IT Product Testing
This section describes the testing efforts of the developer and the Evaluation Team. It is
derived from information contained in the proprietary Detailed Test Report for TheJoin, Inc.
Join-Virtual Mobile Platform 6.1.0, Version 0.3, February 8, 2024 (DTR), as summarized in
the evaluation Assurance Activity Report (AAR).
7.1 Developer Testing
No evidence of developer testing is required in the assurance activities for this product.
7.2 Evaluation Team Independent Testing
The Evaluation team verified the product according to a Common Criteria Certification
document and ran the tests specified in the ASPP14/PKGTLS11 including the tests
associated with optional requirements. The AAR, in section 1.1, lists the tested devices. The
DTR provides a list of test tools, and has diagrams of the test environment.
TheJoin, Inc., Join-Virtual Mobile Validation Report Version 1.0, February 8, 2024
Platform 6.1.0
9
8 Evaluated Configuration
The TOE was tested on the following mobile devices:
Device Name Processor Operating System
Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 Mobile Platform Android 13
Apple iPhone X Apple A11 Apple iOS 16
Tested Devices
The following devices are being claimed as equivalent to the tested devices. The TOE runs
on all the Samsung (VID11342, 04/26/2023 and VID11410, 10/23/2023) and Google
(VID11317, 01/24/2023) devices listed below running Android 13. The TOE also runs on
Apple iOS 16 (VID11349, 10/10/2023) on iPhone devices below. The same application runs
on all Android devices and the same application runs on all iPhone devices.
Device Name Operating System
Galaxy S23 Ultra 5G Android 13
Galaxy S22 5G Android 13
Galaxy S21 Ultra 5G Android 13
Galaxy S20+ 5G Android 13
Galaxy Z Flip Android 13
Galaxy XCover Pro Android 13
Galaxy A53 5G Android 13
Galaxy XCover6 Pro Android 13
Galaxy Z Flip5 5G Android 13
Galaxy A52 5G Android 13
Galaxy A71 5G Android 13
Galaxy Tab Active3 Android 13
Galaxy S23 FE Android 13
Google Devices
Google Pixel 7 Pro Android 13
Google Pixel 7 Android 13
Google Pixel 6 Pro Android 13
Google Pixel 6 Android 13
Google Pixel 6a Android 13
Google Pixel 5a-5G Android 13
Google Pixel 5 Android 13
Google Pixel 4a-5G Android 13
Google Pixel 4a Android 13
Apple Devices
iPhone 14 Plus iOS 16
iPhone 14 Pro Max iOS 16
iPhone 14 Pro iOS 16
iPhone 14 iOS 16
iPhone SE (3rd gen) iOS 16
iPhone 13 mini iOS 16
iPhone 13 Pro Max iOS 16
iPhone 13 Pro iOS 16
iPhone 13 iOS 16
TheJoin, Inc., Join-Virtual Mobile Validation Report Version 1.0, February 8, 2024
Platform 6.1.0
10
Device Name Operating System
iPhone 12 mini iOS 16
iPhone 12 Pro Max iOS 16
iPhone 12 Pro iOS 16
iPhone 12 iOS 16
iPhone SE (2nd
gen) iOS 16
iPhone 11 Pro Max iOS 16
iPhone 11 Pro iOS 16
iPhone 11 iOS 16
iPhone XS iOS 16
iPhone XS Max iOS 16
iPhone XR iOS 16
iPhone 8 Plus iOS 16
iPhone 8 iOS 16
Equivalent Devices
TheJoin, Inc., Join-Virtual Mobile Validation Report Version 1.0, February 8, 2024
Platform 6.1.0
11
9 Results of the Evaluation
The results of the assurance requirements are generally described in this section and are
presented in detail in the proprietary ETR. The reader of this document can assume that all
assurance activities and work units received a passing verdict.
A verdict for an assurance component is determined by the resulting verdicts assigned to the
corresponding evaluator action elements. The evaluation was conducted based upon CC
version 3.1 rev 5 and CEM version 3.1 rev 5. The evaluation determined the Join-Virtual
Mobile Platform 6.1.0 TOE to be Part 2 extended, and to meet the SARs contained in the
ASPP14/PKGTLS11.
9.1 Evaluation of the Security Target (ASE)
The Evaluation team applied each ASE CEM work unit. The ST evaluation ensured the ST
contains a description of the environment in terms of policies and assumptions, a statement
of security requirements claimed to be met by the TheJoin, Inc., Join-Virtual Mobile Platform
6.1.0 client that are consistent with the Common Criteria, and product security function
descriptions that support the requirements.
The Validators reviewed the work of the Evaluation team and found that sufficient evidence
and justification was provided by the Evaluation team to confirm that the evaluation was
conducted in accordance with the requirements of the CEM, and that the conclusion reached
by the Evaluation team was justified.
9.2 Evaluation of the Development (ADV)
The Evaluation team applied each ADV CEM work unit. The Evaluation team assessed the
design documentation and found it adequate to aid in understanding how the TSF provides
the security functions. The design documentation consists of a functional specification
contained in the Security Target and Guidance documents. Additionally, the Evaluators
performed the assurance activities specified in the ASPP14/PKGTLS11 related to the
examination of the information contained in the TSS.
The Validators reviewed the work of the Evaluation team and found that sufficient evidence
and justification was provided by the Evaluation team to confirm that the evaluation was
conducted in accordance with the requirements of the CEM, and that the conclusion reached
by the Evaluation team was justified.
9.3 Evaluation of the Guidance Documents (AGD)
The Evaluation team applied each AGD CEM work unit. The Evaluation team ensured the
adequacy of the user guidance in describing how to use the operational TOE. Additionally,
the Evaluation team ensured the adequacy of the administrator guidance in describing how
to securely administer the TOE. All of the guides were assessed during the design and testing
phases of the evaluation to ensure they were complete.
TheJoin, Inc., Join-Virtual Mobile Validation Report Version 1.0, February 8, 2024
Platform 6.1.0
12
The Validators reviewed the work of the Evaluation team and found that sufficient evidence
and justification was provided by the Evaluation team to confirm that the evaluation was
conducted in accordance with the requirements of the CEM, and that the conclusion reached
by the Evaluation team was justified.
9.4 Evaluation of the Life Cycle Support Activities (ALC)
The Evaluation team applied each ALC CEM work unit. The Evaluation team found that the
TOE was identified.
The Validators reviewed the work of the Evaluation team and found that sufficient evidence
and justification was provided by the Evaluation team to confirm that the evaluation was
conducted in accordance with the requirements of the CEM, and that the conclusion reached
by the Evaluation team was justified.
9.5 Evaluation of the Test Documentation and the Test Activity (ATE)
The Evaluation team applied each ATE CEM work unit. The Evaluation team ran the set of
tests specified by the assurance activities in the ASPP14/PKGTLS11 and recorded the results
in a Test Report, summarized in the AAR.
The Validators reviewed the work of the Evaluation team and found that sufficient evidence
and justification was provided by the Evaluation team to confirm that the evaluation was
conducted in accordance with the requirements of the CEM, and that the conclusion reached
by the Evaluation team was justified.
9.6 Vulnerability Assessment Activity (VAN)
The Evaluation team applied each AVA CEM work unit. The vulnerability analysis is in
the DTR prepared by the Evaluators. The vulnerability analysis includes a public search for
vulnerabilities. The public search for vulnerabilities did not uncover any residual
vulnerability.
The Evaluators searched the National Vulnerability Database
(https://web.nvd.nist.gov/view/vuln/search) and Vulnerability Notes Database
(http://www.kb.cert.org/vuls/) on 1/24/2024 with the following search terms:
"FBLPromises", "FirebaseCore", "FirebaseCoreInternal", "FirebaseMessaging",
"FirebaseInstallations", "GoogleDataTransport", "GoogleUtilities", "nanopb",
"vmi.thejoin.co.kr", "thejoin", "J-VMP", "Join-Virtual Mobile Platform", "SKInfosec",
"VMI", "openSSL", "libvmi", "libchromium", "libconscrypt", "conscrypt",
"google.conscrypt", "swift", "libswift", "skia", "AFNetworking", "ASIHTTPRequest",
"Libegal", "Libjpeg", "LibOpenGLRender", "FMDB", "ffmpeg", "G726",
"EGOImageLoading", "MBProgressHUD", "SFHFKeychainUtils", "Rechability", "SBJson",
"SPLockScreen", "TheSideBarController", "JSBadgeView", "X264-152",
"Com.google.code.gson", "Org.samba.jcifs", "Fr.avianey.com.viewpagerindicator",
"Com.github.anzaizai:EasySwipeMenuLayout".
TheJoin, Inc., Join-Virtual Mobile Validation Report Version 1.0, February 8, 2024
Platform 6.1.0
13
The Validators reviewed the work of the Evaluation team and found that sufficient evidence
and justification was provided by the Evaluation team to confirm that the evaluation was
conducted in accordance with the requirements of the CEM, and that the conclusion reached
by the Evaluation team was justified.
9.7 Summary of Evaluation Results
The Evaluation team’s assessment of the evaluation evidence demonstrates that the claims
in the ST are met. Additionally, the Evaluation team’s testing also demonstrated the accuracy
of the claims in the ST.
The Validation team’s assessment of the evidence provided by the Evaluation team is that it
demonstrates that the evaluation team followed the procedures defined in the CEM, and
correctly verified that the product meets the claims in the ST.
TheJoin, Inc., Join-Virtual Mobile Validation Report Version 1.0, February 8, 2024
Platform 6.1.0
14
10 Validator Comments/Recommendations
The Validation team notes that the evaluated configuration is dependent upon the TOE
being configured per the evaluated configuration instructions in the Join-Virtual Mobile
Platform 6.1.0(J-VMP) USER’s Guide, Version 6.1.10, 01/25/2024. No versions of the
TOE and software, either earlier or later, were evaluated.
In addition, the J-VMP client application requires the J-VMP virtualization infrastructure
(VMI server). While testing, the protocol connections for the TOE were fully tested; they
were not tested using a VMI server in the operational environment. The functionality
evaluated is scoped exclusively to the security functional requirements specified in the
Security Target. Other functionality included in the product was not assessed as part of this
evaluation. All other functionality provided by devices, such as the VMI server, in the
operational environment needs to be assessed separately and no further conclusions can be
drawn about their effectiveness.
TheJoin, Inc., Join-Virtual Mobile Validation Report Version 1.0, February 8, 2024
Platform 6.1.0
15
11 Annexes
Not applicable
TheJoin, Inc., Join-Virtual Mobile Validation Report Version 1.0, February 8, 2024
Platform 6.1.0
16
12 Security Target
The Security Target is identified as: TheJoin, Inc., Join-Virtual Mobile Platform 6.1.0
Security Target, Version 0.8, January 26, 2024.
TheJoin, Inc., Join-Virtual Mobile Validation Report Version 1.0, February 8, 2024
Platform 6.1.0
17
13 Glossary
The following definitions are used throughout this document:
• Common Criteria Testing Laboratory (CCTL). An IT security evaluation facility
accredited by the National Voluntary Laboratory Accreditation Program (NVLAP) and
approved by the CCEVS Validation Body to conduct Common Criteria-based
evaluations.
• Conformance. The ability to demonstrate in an unambiguous way that a given
implementation is correct with respect to the formal model.
• Evaluation. The assessment of an IT product against the Common Criteria using the
Common Criteria Evaluation Methodology to determine whether or not the claims made
are justified; or the assessment of a protection profile against the Common Criteria using
the Common Evaluation Methodology to determine if the Profile is complete, consistent,
technically sound and hence suitable for use as a statement of requirements for one or
more TOEs that may be evaluated.
• Evaluation Evidence. Any tangible resource (information) required from the sponsor or
developer by the evaluator to perform one or more evaluation activities.
• Feature. Part of a product that is either included with the product or can be ordered
separately.
• Target of Evaluation (TOE). A group of IT products configured as an IT system, or an
IT product, and associated documentation that is the subject of a security evaluation
under the CC.
• Validation. The process carried out by the CCEVS Validation Body leading to the issue
of a Common Criteria certificate.
• Validation Body. A governmental organization responsible for carrying out validation
and for overseeing the day-to-day operation of the NIAP Common Criteria Evaluation
and Validation Scheme.
TheJoin, Inc., Join-Virtual Mobile Validation Report Version 1.0, February 8, 2024
Platform 6.1.0
18
14 Bibliography
The Validation Team used the following documents to produce this Validation Report:
[1] Common Criteria for Information Technology Security Evaluation: Part 1:
Introduction and General Model, Version 3.1, Revision 5, April 2017.
[2] Common Criteria for Information Technology Security Evaluation Part 2: Security
functional components, Version 3.1, Revision 5, April 2017.
[3] Common Criteria for Information Technology Security Evaluation Part 3: Security
assurance components, Version 3.1 Revision 5, April 2017.
[4] Protection Profile for Application Software, Version 1.4, 07 October 2021 (ASPP14).
[5] Functional Package for Transport Layer Security (TLS), Version 1.1, 01 March 2019
(PKGTLS11).
[6] TheJoin, Inc., Join-Virtual Mobile Platform 6.1.0 Security Target, Version 0.8,
January 26, 2024 (ST).
[7] Assurance Activity Report for TheJoin, Inc., Join-Virtual Mobile Platform 6.1.0,
Version 0.3, February 8, 2024 (AAR).
[8] Detailed Test Report for TheJoin, Inc. Join-Virtual Mobile Platform 6.1.0, Version
0.3, February 8, 2024 (DTR).
[9] Evaluation Technical Report for TheJoin, Inc., Join-Virtual Mobile Platform 6.1.0,
Version 0.3, February 8, 2024 (ETR)