Certification Report
EAL 4+ Evaluation of TNM v3.4 Software with CEP 10
VSE, CEP 100 VSE, CEP 1000 VSE, and CEP 10G VSE
running CEP v2.1.1 Firmware
Issued by:
Communications Security Establishment Canada
Certification Body
Canadian Common Criteria Evaluation and Certification Scheme
© Government of Canada, Communications Security Establishment Canada, 2012
Document number: 383-4-165-CR
Version: 1.0
Date: 18 December 2012
Pagination: i to iii, 1 to 11
CCS Certification Report Certes Networks, Inc
Certes TNM v3.4 and CEP v2.1.1
___________________________________________________________________________
Version 1.0 18 December 2012
- Page i of iii -
DISCLAIMER
The Information Technology (IT) product identified in this certification report, and its
associated certificate, has been evaluated at an approved evaluation facility – established
under the Canadian Common Criteria Evaluation and Certification Scheme (CCS) – using
the Common Methodology for Information Technology Security Evaluation, Version 3.1
Revision 3, for conformance to the Common Criteria for Information Technology Security
Evaluation, Version 3.1 Revision 3. This certification report, and its associated certificate,
apply only to the identified version and release of the product in its evaluated configuration.
The evaluation has been conducted in accordance with the provisions of the CCS, and the
conclusions of the evaluation facility in the evaluation report are consistent with the evidence
adduced. This report, and its associated certificate, are not an endorsement of the IT product
by the Communications Security Establishment Canada, or any other organization that
recognizes or gives effect to this report, and its associated certificate, and no warranty for the
IT product by the Communications Security Establishment Canada, or any other organization
that recognizes or gives effect to this report, and its associated certificate, is either expressed
or implied.
CCS Certification Report Certes Networks, Inc
Certes TNM v3.4 and CEP v2.1.1
___________________________________________________________________________
Version 1.0 18 December 2012
- Page ii of iii -
FOREWORD
The Canadian Common Criteria Evaluation and Certification Scheme (CCS) provides a
third-party evaluation service for determining the trustworthiness of Information Technology
(IT) security products. Evaluations are performed by a commercial Common Criteria
Evaluation Facility (CCEF) under the oversight of the CCS Certification Body, which is
managed by the Communications Security Establishment Canada.
A CCEF is a commercial facility that has been approved by the CCS Certification Body to
perform Common Criteria evaluations; a significant requirement for such approval is
accreditation to the requirements of ISO/IEC 17025:2005, the General Requirements for the
Competence of Testing and Calibration Laboratories. Accreditation is performed under the
Program for the Accreditation of Laboratories - Canada (PALCAN), administered by the
Standards Council of Canada.
The CCEF that carried out this evaluation is CGI Security Evaluation and Test Facility.
By awarding a Common Criteria certificate, the CCS Certification Body asserts that the
product complies with the security requirements specified in the associated security target. A
security target is a requirements specification document that defines the scope of the
evaluation activities. The consumer of certified IT products should review the security target,
in addition to this certification report, in order to gain an understanding of any assumptions
made during the evaluation, the IT product's intended environment, its security requirements,
and the level of confidence (i.e., the evaluation assurance level) that the product satisfies the
security requirements.
This certification report is associated with the certificate of product evaluation dated 18
December 2012, and the security target identified in Section 4 of this report.
The certification report, certificate of product evaluation and security target are posted on the
CCS Certified Products list (CPL) and the Common Criteria portal (the official website of
the Common Criteria Project).
Reproduction of this report is authorized provided the report is reproduced in its entirety.
CCS Certification Report Certes Networks, Inc
Certes TNM v3.4 and CEP v2.1.1
___________________________________________________________________________
Version 1.0 18 December 2012
- Page iii of iii -
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Disclaimer....................................................................................................................................... i
Foreword........................................................................................................................................ii
Executive Summary...................................................................................................................... 1
1 Identification of Target of Evaluation ................................................................................ 3
2 TOE Description ................................................................................................................... 3
3 Evaluated Security Functionality........................................................................................ 3
4 Security Target...................................................................................................................... 4
5 Common Criteria Conformance.......................................................................................... 4
6 Security Policy....................................................................................................................... 4
7 Assumptions and Clarification of Scope............................................................................. 5
7.1 SECURE USAGE ASSUMPTIONS................................................................................... 5
7.2 ENVIRONMENTAL ASSUMPTIONS ............................................................................... 5
7.3 CLARIFICATION OF SCOPE.......................................................................................... 5
8 Evaluated Configuration...................................................................................................... 6
9 Documentation ...................................................................................................................... 6
10 Evaluation Analysis Activities ............................................................................................. 6
11 ITS Product Testing.............................................................................................................. 8
11.1 ASSESSMENT OF DEVELOPER TESTS .......................................................................... 8
11.2 INDEPENDENT FUNCTIONAL TESTING ........................................................................ 8
11.3 INDEPENDENT PENETRATION TESTING....................................................................... 9
11.4 CONDUCT OF TESTING ............................................................................................... 9
11.5 TESTING RESULTS...................................................................................................... 9
12 Results of the Evaluation.................................................................................................... 10
13 Evaluator Comments, Observations and Recommendations ......................................... 10
14 Acronyms, Abbreviations and Initializations................................................................... 10
15 References............................................................................................................................ 11
CCS Certification Report Certes Networks, Inc
Certes TNM v3.4 and CEP v2.1.1
___________________________________________________________________________
Version 1.0 18 December 2012
- Page 1 of 11 -
Executive Summary
TNM v3.4 Software with CEP 10 VSE, CEP 100 VSE, CEP 1000 VSE, and CEP 10G VSE
running CEP v2.1.1 Firmware (hereafter referred to as Certes TNM v3.4 and CEP v2.1.1),
from Certes Networks, Inc, is the Target of Evaluation for this Evaluation Assurance Level 4
augmented evaluation.
Certes TNM v3.4 and CEP v2.1.1 consists of the Certes Enforcement Point (CEP) appliance
hardware and appliance software and the TrustNet Manager (TNM) software-only
management interface. The TOE is a custom-built hardware encryption appliance, configured
and managed using custom-written application software. The TOE provides Layer 2 Ethernet
frame encryption and Layer 3 IP packet encryption, encryption keys required for the
encryption, and GUIs and Command Line Interfaces (CLI) for the management of its
functionality. CEPs are the policy enforcement points. According to the policies received,
CEPs can encrypt and decrypt traffic, send traffic in the clear, or drop traffic.
CGI Security Evaluation and Test Facility is the CCEF that conducted the evaluation. This
evaluation was completed on 22 November 2012 and was carried out in accordance with the
rules of the Canadian Common Criteria Evaluation and Certification Scheme (CCS).
The scope of the evaluation is defined by the security target, which identifies assumptions
made during the evaluation, the intended environment for Certes TNM v3.4 and CEP v2.1.1,
the security requirements, and the level of confidence (evaluation assurance level) to which it
is asserted that the product satisfies its security requirements. Consumers are advised to
verify that their operating environment is consistent with that specified in the security target,
and to give due consideration to the comments, observations and recommendations in this
certification report.
The results documented in the Evaluation Technical Report (ETR)1
for this product provide
sufficient evidence that it meets the EAL 4 augmented assurance requirements for the
evaluated security functionality. The evaluation was conducted using the Common
Methodology for Information Technology Security Evaluation, Version 3.1 Revision 3, for
conformance to the Common Criteria for Information Technology Security Evaluation,
Version 3.1 Revision 3. The following augmentation is claimed: ALC_FLR.3 – Systematic
Flaw Remediation.
Communications Security Establishment Canada, as the CCS Certification Body, declares
that the Certes TNM v3.4 and CEP v2.1.1 evaluation meets all the conditions of the
Arrangement on the Recognition of Common Criteria Certificates and that the product will
1
The ETR is a CCS document that contains information proprietary to the developer and/or the evaluator, and
is not releasable for public review.
CCS Certification Report Certes Networks, Inc
Certes TNM v3.4 and CEP v2.1.1
___________________________________________________________________________
Version 1.0 18 December 2012
- Page 2 of 11 -
be listed on the CCS Certified Products List (CPL) and the Common Criteria portal (the
official website of the Common Criteria Project).
CCS Certification Report Certes Networks, Inc
Certes TNM v3.4 and CEP v2.1.1
___________________________________________________________________________
Version 1.0 18 December 2012
- Page 3 of 11 -
1 Identification of Target of Evaluation
The Target of Evaluation (TOE) for this Evaluation Assurance Level (EAL) 4 augmented
evaluation is TNM v3.4 Software with CEP 10 VSE, CEP 100 VSE, CEP 1000 VSE, and
CEP 10G VSE running CEP v2.1.1 Firmware (hereafter referred to as Certes TNM v3.4 and
CEP v2.1.1), from Certes Networks, Inc.
2 TOE Description
Certes TNM v3.4 and CEP v2.1.1 consists of the Certes Enforcement Point (CEP) appliance
hardware and appliance software and the TrustNet Manager (TNM) software-only
management interface. The TOE is a custom-built hardware encryption appliance, configured
and managed using custom-written application software. The TOE provides Layer 2 Ethernet
frame encryption and Layer 3 IP packet encryption, encryption keys required for the
encryption, and GUIs and Command Line Interfaces (CLI) for the management of its
functionality. CEPs are the policy enforcement points. According to the policies received,
CEPs can encrypt and decrypt traffic, send traffic in the clear, or drop traffic. The CEP can
be managed by authorized administrators via the Web GUI or directly via CLI commands.
Through the GUI into TrustNet Manager, an administrator can configure and manage
multiple appliances from a single centralized location. In addition, security policies defining
how and where the encryption will take place can be created.
A detailed description of the Certes TNM v3.4 and CEP v2.1.1 architecture is found in
Section 1.5 of the Security Target (ST).
3 Evaluated Security Functionality
The complete list of evaluated security functionality for Certes TNM v3.4 and CEP v2.1.1 is
identified in Section 6 of the ST.
The following cryptographic modules were evaluated to the FIPS 140-2 standard:
Cryptographic Module Certificate #
CEP10G VSE 1797
CEP10-R, CEP10 VSE and CEP10-C 1798
CEP100, CEP100 VSE, CEP100-XSA, CEP1000,
CEP1000-DP and CEP1000 VSE
1799
The following Government of Canada approved cryptographic algorithms were evaluated for
correct implementation in Certes TNM v3.4 and CEP v2.1.1:
CCS Certification Report Certes Networks, Inc
Certes TNM v3.4 and CEP v2.1.1
___________________________________________________________________________
Version 1.0 18 December 2012
- Page 4 of 11 -
Cryptographic Algorithm Standard Certificate #
Triple-DES (3DES) FIPS 46-3 482, 673, 1195, 1258
Advanced Encryption Standard (AES) FIPS 197 465, 762, 779, 1842, 1932
Rivest Shamir Adleman (RSA) FIPS 186-2 998
Secure Hash Algorithm (SHA-1) FIPS 180-2 1697
Keyed-Hash Message Authentication
Code (HMAC)
FIPS 198 416, 417, 426, 1141, 1166
4 Security Target
The ST associated with this Certification Report is identified by the following nomenclature:
Title: TNM v3.4 Software with CEP 10 VSE, CEP 100 VSE, CEP 1000 VSE, and CEP
10G VSE running CEP v2.1.1 Firmware
Version: 1.3
Date: 21 November 2012
5 Common Criteria Conformance
The evaluation was conducted using the Common Methodology for Information Technology
Security Evaluation, Version 3.1 Revision 3, for conformance to the Common Criteria for
Information Technology Security Evaluation, Version 3.1 Revision 3.
Certes TNM v3.4 and CEP v2.1.1 is:
a. Common Criteria Part 2 conformant, with security functional requirements based only
upon functional components in Part 2;
b. Common Criteria Part 3 conformant, with security assurance requirements based only
upon assurance components in Part 3; and
c. Common Criteria EAL 4 augmented, containing all security assurance requirements in
the EAL 4 package, as well as the following: ALC_FLR.3 – Systematic Flaw
Remediation.
6 Security Policy
Certes TNM v3.4 and CEP v2.1.1 implements a role-based access control policy to control
administrator access to the system, as well as an information flow control policy that applies
a set of rules to Ethernet or IP traffic passing through the TOE. Depending on the operation
identified in the security policy, the TOE will determine whether to pass user traffic in the
clear, discard it, or apply encryption to it. Details of these security policies can be found in
Section 6 of the ST.
In addition, Certes TNM v3.4 and CEP v2.1.1 implements policies pertaining to security
audit, cryptographic support, identification and authentication, security management,
CCS Certification Report Certes Networks, Inc
Certes TNM v3.4 and CEP v2.1.1
___________________________________________________________________________
Version 1.0 18 December 2012
- Page 5 of 11 -
protection of the TSF, TOE access and trusted channels. Further details on these security
policies may be found in Section 6 of the ST.
7 Assumptions and Clarification of Scope
Consumers of Certes TNM v3.4 and CEP v2.1.1 should consider assumptions about usage
and environmental settings as requirements for the product’s installation and its operating
environment. This will ensure the proper and secure operation of the TOE.
7.1 Secure Usage Assumptions
The following Secure Usage Assumptions are listed in the ST:
 There are one or more competent individuals assigned to manage the TOE and the
security of the information it contains.
 The users who manage the TOE are non-hostile, appropriately trained, and follow all
guidance.
7.2 Environmental Assumptions
The following Environmental Assumptions are listed in the ST:
 The TOE is installed on the appropriate, dedicated hardware and operating system.
 The TOE environment provides the network connectivity required to allow the TOE
to perform its intended functions.
 The IT environment provides TrustNet Manager with the necessary reliable
timestamps.
 The connections between the CEP and TNM management workstation, which is
connected to TNM and TOE Environmental components, (the NTP, SNMP, and
syslog servers) are all located within a controlled access facility on a secured
network.
7.3 Clarification of Scope
Certes TNM v3.4 and CEP v2.1.1 offers protection against inadvertent or casual attempts to
breach system security by unsophisticated attackers possessing enhanced-basic attack
potential. Certes TNM v3.4 and CEP v2.1.1 is not intended for situations which involve
determined attempts by hostile or well-funded attackers using sophisticated attack
techniques.
CCS Certification Report Certes Networks, Inc
Certes TNM v3.4 and CEP v2.1.1
___________________________________________________________________________
Version 1.0 18 December 2012
- Page 6 of 11 -
8 Evaluated Configuration
The evaluated configuration for Certes TNM v3.4 and CEP v2.1.1 comprises the CEP10-
VSE, CEP100-VSE, CEP1000-VSE, CEP10G-VSE Certes encryption appliances running the
CEP v2.1.1 Software and the Linux Operating System (OS) and the TrustNet Manager v3.4
software.
The publication entitled Certes Networks, Inc. TNM v3.4 Software with CEP 10, CEP 100,
CEP 1000, and CEP 10G VSEs Running CEP v2.1.1 Firmware Guidance Documentation
Supplement version 0.9 describes the procedures necessary to install and operate Certes
TNM v3.4 and CEP v2.1.1 in its evaluated configuration.
9 Documentation
The Certes Networks, Inc documents provided to the consumer are as follows:
a. CEP VSE Certes Enforcement Point CLI User Guide, Version 2.1.1;
b. CEP VSE Certes Enforcement Point CLI Installation Guide, Version 2.1.1;
c. CEP VSE Release Note, Version 2.1.1;
d. TrustNet Manager User Guide, Version 3.4;
e. TrustNet Manager Installation Guide, Version 3.4;
f. TrustNet Manager Release Notes, Version 3.4; and
g. Certes Networks, Inc. TNM v3.4 Software with CEP 10, CEP 100, CEP 1000, and CEP
10G VSEs Running CEP v2.1.1 Firmware Guidance Documentation Supplement,
Version 0.9.
10 Evaluation Analysis Activities
The evaluation analysis activities involved a structured evaluation of Certes TNM v3.4 and
CEP v2.1.1, including the following areas:
Development: The evaluators analyzed the Certes TNM v3.4 and CEP v2.1.1 functional
specification, design documentation, and a subset of the implementation representation; they
determined that the design accurately describes the TOE security functionality (TSF)
interfaces and the TSF subsystems and modules, and how the TSF implements the security
functional requirements (SFRs). The evaluators analyzed the Certes TNM v3.4 and CEP
v2.1.1 security architectural description and determined that the initialization process is
secure and that the security functions are protected against tamper and bypass, and that
CCS Certification Report Certes Networks, Inc
Certes TNM v3.4 and CEP v2.1.1
___________________________________________________________________________
Version 1.0 18 December 2012
- Page 7 of 11 -
security domains are maintained. The evaluators also independently verified that the
correspondence mappings between the design documents are correct.
Guidance Documents: The evaluators examined the Certes TNM v3.4 and CEP v2.1.1
preparative user guidance and operational user guidance and determined that it sufficiently
and unambiguously describes how to securely transform the TOE into its evaluated
configuration and how to use and administer the product. The evaluators examined and tested
the preparative and operational guidance, and determined that they are complete and
sufficiently detailed to result in a secure configuration.
Life-cycle support: An analysis of the Certes TNM v3.4 and CEP v2.1.1 configuration
management system and associated documentation was performed. The evaluators found that
the Certes TNM v3.4 and CEP v2.1.1 configuration items were clearly marked and could be
modified and controlled by automated tools. The developer’s configuration management
system was observed during a site visit, and it was found to be mature and well-developed
and operated in accordance with the CM plan. The evaluators confirmed that the access
control measures as described in the CM plan are effective in preventing unauthorised access
to the configuration items.
The evaluators examined the delivery documentation and determined that it described all of
the procedures required to maintain the integrity of Certes TNM v3.4 and CEP v2.1.1 during
distribution to the consumer.
The evaluators examined the development security procedures during a site visit and
determined that they detailed sufficient security measures for the development environment
to protect the confidentiality and integrity of the Certes TNM v3.4 and CEP v2.1.1 design
and implementation. The evaluators determined that the developer has used a documented
model of the TOE life-cycle and well-defined development tools that yield consistent and
predictable results.
The evaluators reviewed the flaw remediation procedures used by Certes Networks, Inc for
Certes TNM v3.4 and CEP v2.1.1. During a site visit, the evaluators also examined the
evidence generated by adherence to the procedures. The evaluators concluded that the
procedures are adequate to track and correct security flaws, and distribute the flaw
information and corrections to consumers of the product.
Vulnerability Assessment: The evaluators conducted an independent vulnerability analysis
of Certes TNM v3.4 and CEP v2.1.1. Additionally, the evaluators conducted a review of
public domain vulnerability databases and a focused search of all evaluation deliverables.
The evaluators identified potential vulnerabilities for testing applicable to Certes TNM v3.4
and CEP v2.1.1 in its operational environment.
All these evaluation activities resulted in PASS verdicts.
CCS Certification Report Certes Networks, Inc
Certes TNM v3.4 and CEP v2.1.1
___________________________________________________________________________
Version 1.0 18 December 2012
- Page 8 of 11 -
11 ITS Product Testing
Testing at EAL 4 consists of the following three steps: assessing developer tests, performing
independent functional tests, and performing penetration tests.
11.1 Assessment of Developer Tests
The evaluators verified that the developer has met their testing responsibilities by examining
their test evidence, and reviewing their test results, as documented in the ETR2
.
The evaluators analyzed the developer’s test coverage and depth analysis and found them to
be complete and accurate. The correspondence between the tests identified in the developer’s
test documentation and the functional specification, TOE design and security architecture
description was complete.
11.2 Independent Functional Testing
During this evaluation, the evaluator developed independent functional tests by examining
design and guidance documentation, examining the developer's test documentation,
executing a sample of the developer's test cases, and creating test cases that augmented the
developer tests.
All testing was planned and documented to a sufficient level of detail to allow repeatability
of the testing procedures and results. Resulting from this test coverage approach is the
following list of CGI Security Evaluation and Test Facility test goals:
a. Repeat of Developer's Tests: The objective of this test goal is to repeat a subset of the
developer's tests;
b. Trusted Channel: The objective of this test goal is to demonstrate that CEP CLI traffic is
protected with SSH;
c. Security Management: The objective of this test goal is to demonstrate that user accounts
on CEP can be enabled and disabled and verifies that a user cannot log in to the CEP with
the disabled account;
d. Administrator Roles TMN: The objective of this test goal is to demonstrate the privileges
associated with different roles on TMN; and
e. Administrator Roles CEP: The objective of this test goal is to demonstrate the privileges
associated with different roles on CEP.
2
The ETR is a CCS document that contains information proprietary to the developer and/or the evaluator, and
is not releasable for public review.
CCS Certification Report Certes Networks, Inc
Certes TNM v3.4 and CEP v2.1.1
___________________________________________________________________________
Version 1.0 18 December 2012
- Page 9 of 11 -
11.3 Independent Penetration Testing
Subsequent to the independent review of public domain vulnerability databases and a
focused review of all evaluation deliverables, limited independent evaluator penetration
testing was conducted. The penetration tests focused on:
a. Port Scanning. The objective of this test is to scan for open ports using nmap to compare
against those that should be open;
b. Vulnerability Scanning. The objective of this test is to scan for known vulnerabilities
with an open source vulnerability scanner;
c. Session Fixation. The objective of this test is to test the TNM web user interface to verify
that the session ID cannot be determined by an attacker and whether the session ID is
randomly generated;
d. Cross-Site Request Forgery .The objective of this test is to test the TNM web user
interface to verify whether the TMN web user interface is susceptible to Cross-Site
Request Forgery;
e. SQL and XSS: The objective of this test is to test the TNM web user interface to verify
whether it is susceptible to SQL injection attacks and XSS attacks; and
f. SNMP: The objective of this test is to test the SNMP agent on CEP to verify that it
should not present itself as an unmanaged/undocumented interface to the CEP.
The independent penetration testing did not uncover any exploitable vulnerabilities in the
intended operating environment.
11.4 Conduct of Testing
Certes TNM v3.4 and CEP v2.1.1 was subjected to a comprehensive suite of formally
documented, independent functional and penetration tests. The testing took place at the
Information Technology Security Evaluation and Test (ITSET) Facility at CGI Security
Evaluation and Test Facility. The CCS Certification Body witnessed a portion of the
independent testing. The detailed testing activities, including configurations, procedures, test
cases, expected results and observed results are documented in a separate Test Results
document.
11.5 Testing Results
The developer’s tests and the independent functional tests yielded the expected results,
giving assurance that Certes TNM v3.4 and CEP v2.1.1 behaves as specified in its ST,
functional specification, TOE design and security architecture description.
CCS Certification Report Certes Networks, Inc
Certes TNM v3.4 and CEP v2.1.1
___________________________________________________________________________
Version 1.0 18 December 2012
- Page 10 of 11 -
12 Results of the Evaluation
This evaluation has provided the basis for an EAL 4+ level of assurance. The overall verdict
for the evaluation is PASS. These results are supported by evidence in the ETR.
13 Evaluator Comments, Observations and Recommendations
It is strongly recommended that the end customer shall consult ST section 1.5.3 and the
Guidance Documentation Supplement to understand the evaluation configuration so that the
TOE shall be configured in an evaluated and secure way.
14 Acronyms, Abbreviations and Initializations
Acronym/Abbreviation/
Initialization
Description
3DES Triple-Des
AES Advanced Encryption Standard
CCEF Common Criteria Evaluation Facility
CCS Canadian Common Criteria Evaluation and
Certification Scheme
CEP Certes Enforcement Point
CLI Command Line Interface
CPL Certified Products list
EAL Evaluation Assurance Level
ETR Evaluation Technical Report
HMAC Keyed-Hash Message Authentication Code
IT Information Technology
ITSET Information Technology Security Evaluation
and Testing
NTP Network Time Protocol
PALCAN Program for the Accreditation of Laboratories
- Canada
RSA Rivest Shamir Adleman
SHA-1 Secure Hash Algoritm
SNMP Simple Network Management Protocol
SQL Structured Query Language
SSH Secure Shell
ST Security Target
TNM TrustNet Manager
TOE Target of Evaluation
VSE Variable Speed Encryptors
XSS Cross Site Scripting
CCS Certification Report Certes Networks, Inc
Certes TNM v3.4 and CEP v2.1.1
___________________________________________________________________________
Version 1.0 18 December 2012
- Page 11 of 11 -
15 References
This section lists all documentation used as source material for this report:
a. CCS Publication #4, Technical Oversight, Version 1.8, October 2010.
b. Common Criteria for Information Technology Security Evaluation, Version 3.1
Revision 3, July 2009.
c. Common Methodology for Information Technology Security Evaluation, CEM,
Version 3.1 Revision 3, July 2009.
d. Certes Networks, Inc. TNM v3.4 Software with CEP 10 VSE, CEP 100 VSE, CEP
1000 VSE, and CEP 10G VSE running CEP v2.1.1 Firmware, 1.4, 14 December
2012 Security Target.
e. Certes Networks, Inc TNM v3.4 Software with CEP 10 VSE, CEP 100 VSE, CEP
1000 VSE, and CEP 10G VSE running CEP v2.1.1 Firmware Common Criteria
EAL4+ Evaluation Technical Report version 1.3, 14 December 2012.