Seagate® BarraCuda™ 515 SSD, Firmware Version ECPM13.1 Security Target Version 1.1 March 2023 Document prepared by www.lightshipsec.com Seagate Security Target Page 2 of 31 Document History Version Date Description 0.1 19 Jul 2022 Initial draft 0.2 25 Jul 2022 Address vendor comments 0.3 11 Aug 2022 Addressed evaluator ORs 0.4 30 Sep 2022 Update TOE Name 0.5 13 Oct 2022 Update TOE controller version 0.6 20 Dec 2022 Miscellaneous updates. 1.0 9 Feb 2023 Miscellaneous updates. 1.1 3 March 2023 Miscellaneous updates. Seagate Security Target Page 3 of 31 Table of Contents 1 Introduction ........................................................................................................................... 4 1.1 Overview ........................................................................................................................ 4 1.2 Identification ................................................................................................................... 4 1.3 Conformance Claims...................................................................................................... 4 1.4 Terminology.................................................................................................................... 5 2 TOE Description.................................................................................................................... 8 2.1 Type ............................................................................................................................... 8 2.2 Usage ............................................................................................................................. 8 2.3 Security Functions / Logical Scope................................................................................ 8 2.4 Physical Scope............................................................................................................... 9 3 Security Problem Definition............................................................................................... 11 3.1 Threats ......................................................................................................................... 11 3.2 Assumptions................................................................................................................. 12 3.3 Organizational Security Policies................................................................................... 13 4 Security Objectives............................................................................................................. 14 5 Security Requirements....................................................................................................... 15 5.1 Conventions ................................................................................................................. 15 5.2 Extended Components Definition................................................................................. 15 5.3 Functional Requirements ............................................................................................. 16 5.4 Assurance Requirements............................................................................................. 24 6 TOE Summary Specification.............................................................................................. 25 6.1 Cryptographic Support (FCS)....................................................................................... 25 6.2 User Data Protection (FDP) ......................................................................................... 28 6.3 Security Management (FMT) ....................................................................................... 29 6.4 Protection of the TSF (FPT) ......................................................................................... 29 7 Rationale.............................................................................................................................. 31 7.1 Conformance Claim Rationale ..................................................................................... 31 7.2 Security Objectives Rationale ...................................................................................... 31 7.3 Security Requirements Rationale................................................................................. 31 List of Tables Table 1: Evaluation identifiers ......................................................................................................... 4 Table 2: NIAP Technical Decisions ................................................................................................. 4 Table 3: Terminology....................................................................................................................... 5 Table 4: CAVP Certificates.............................................................................................................. 8 Table 5: TOE Hardware / Firmware................................................................................................. 9 Table 6: Threats............................................................................................................................. 11 Table 7: Assumptions .................................................................................................................... 12 Table 8: Security Objectives for the Operational Environment ..................................................... 14 Table 9: Extended Components.................................................................................................... 15 Table 10: Summary of SFRs ......................................................................................................... 16 Table 11: Security Assurance Requirements ................................................................................ 24 Table 12: Cryptographic Key Usage, Storage, and Destruction ................................................... 26 Table 13: TSF Self-Tests............................................................................................................... 30 Seagate Security Target Page 4 of 31 1 Introduction 1.1 Overview 1 This Security Target (ST) defines the Seagate® BarraCuda™ 515 SSD, Firmware Version ECPM13.1 Target of Evaluation (TOE) for the purposes of Common Criteria (CC) evaluation. 2 Seagate® BarraCuda™ 515 SSD, Firmware Version ECPM13.1 provide for AES encryption and decryption of user data stored on NAND flash, offered on NVMe PCIe and SATA III Self-Encrypting Drives (SEDs). 1.2 Identification Table 1: Evaluation identifiers TOE Name Seagate® BarraCuda™ 515 SSD, Firmware Version ECPM13.1 Security Target Seagate® BarraCuda™ 515 SSD, Firmware Version ECPM13.1 Security Target, v1.1 1.3 Conformance Claims 3 This ST supports the following conformance claims: a) CC version 3.1 revision 5 b) CC Part 2 extended c) CC Part 3 conformant d) collaborative Protection Profile for Full Drive Encryption – Encryption Engine, v2.0 + Errata 20190201 (referenced within as CPP_FDE_EE) e) NIAP Technical Decisions per Table 2 Table 2: NIAP Technical Decisions TD # Name Rationale if n/a TD0458 FIT Technical Decision for FPT_KYP_EXT.1 evaluation activities TD0460 FIT Technical Decision for FPT_PWR_EXT.1 non- compliant power saving states TD0464 FIT Technical Decision for FPT_PWR_EXT.1 compliant power saving states TD0606 FIT Technical Recommendation for Evaluating a NAS against the FDE AA and FDEE The TOE is not a NAS device. Seagate Security Target Page 5 of 31 1.4 Terminology Table 3: Terminology Term Definition AA Authorization Acquisition AES Advanced Encryption Standard BEV Border Encryption Value BIOS Basic Input Output System CBC Cipher Block Chaining CC Common Criteria CEM Common Evaluation Methodology CMOS Complementary Metal-Oxide Semiconductor CPP Collaborative Protection Profile DAR Data At Rest DEK Data Encryption Key DRBG Deterministic Random Bit Generator DSS Digital Signature Standard EE Encryption Engine EEPROM Electrically Erasable Programmable Read-Only Memory FIPS Federal Information Processing Standards FDE Full Drive Encryption GUI Graphical User Interface HMAC Keyed-Hash Message Authentication Code HW Hardware IEEE Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers IT Information Technology ISO/IEC International Organization for Standardization / International Electrotechnical Commission Seagate Security Target Page 6 of 31 Term Definition IV Initialization Vector KEK Key Encryption Key KMD Key Management Description KW Key Wrap MBR Master Boot Record NIST National Institute of Standards and Technology NVMe PCIe Non-Volatile Memory Express Peripheral Component Interconnect Express OS Operating System OTP One-Time Programmable PBKDF Password-Based Key Derivation Function PRF Pseudo Random Function RBG Random Bit Generator RNG Random Number Generator RSA Rivest Shamir Adleman Algorithm RTU Root of Trust for Update SATA Serial Advanced Technology Attachment SAR Security Assurance Requirements SED Self-Encrypting Drive SHA Secure Hash Algorithm SFR Security Functional Requirements SSD Solid-State Drive ST Security Target SPD Security Problem Definition TCG Opal Trusted Computing Group Opal TOE Target of Evaluation Seagate Security Target Page 7 of 31 Term Definition TSF TOE Security Functionality TSS TOE Summary Specification USB Universal Serial Bus XOR Exclusive or XTS XEX (XOR Encrypt XOR) Tweakable Block Cipher with Ciphertext Stealing Seagate Security Target Page 8 of 31 2 TOE Description 2.1 Type 4 The TOE is a solid state self-encrypting drive that provides encryption and decryption of stored user data. 2.2 Usage 5 The TOE provides full drive encryption to protect data at rest on a lost or stolen device. The Encryption Engine (EE) ensures that the data is encrypted using FIPS- validated algorithms. It manages the encryption and decryption of the stored data, policy enforcement, and key management. 2.3 Security Functions / Logical Scope 6 The TOE provides the following security functions: a) Data Protection. The TOE enables encryption and decryption of user data on a SED to protect it from unauthorized disclosure. b) Secure Key Material. The TOE ensures key material used for storage encryption is properly generated and protected from disclosure. It also implements cryptographic key and key material destruction during transitioning to a Compliant power saving state, or when all keys and key material are no longer needed. c) Secure Management. The TOE enables management of its security functions, including: i) Changing and erasing the DEK ii) Updating the TOE firmware d) Trusted Update. The TOE ensures the authenticity and integrity of firmware updates through digital signatures using RSA 2048 with SHA-256. e) Self-Testing. The TOE ensures its integrity and operation by performing self- tests. f) Cryptographic Operations. The TOE performs cryptographic operations as shown in Table 4, which includes relevant Cryptographic Algorithm Validation Program (CAVP) certificates. Table 4: CAVP Certificates Capability Certificate AES-XTS – Encrypt/Decrypt C1358 HMAC-DRBG – Deterministic Random Bit Generation C1358 HMAC – Message Authentication C1358 AES-KW – Key Wrapping C1358 Seagate Security Target Page 9 of 31 Capability Certificate RSA - Sig Ver C1358 SHS – Password Protection C1358 PBKDF2 – Password Derivation A1725 2.4 Physical Scope 7 The physical boundary of the TOE encompasses the Seagate® BarraCuda™ 515 SSD, Firmware Version ECPM13.1 firmware running on the SEDs identified in Table 5. The TOE hardware is delivered to customers via trusted courier with the firmware preinstalled. 8 The TOE models support either NVMe PCIe or SATA III interfaces. All TOE models incorporate an ARM Cortex-R5 processor (ARMv7-R microarchitecture). Table 5: TOE Hardware / Firmware Module Drive Capacity Controller FW Version Seagate® BarraCuda™ 515 SSD ZP256MC30012 256GB PS5012-E12 ECPM13.1 ZP512MC30012 512GB ZP1024MC30012 1024GB ZP2048MC30012 2048GB ZP256MC30022 256GB ZP512MC30022 512GB ZP1024MC30022 1024GB ZP2048MC30022 2048GB 2.4.1 Guidance Documents 9 The TOE includes the following guidance documents: a) Seagate® BarraCuda™ 515 SSD, Firmware Version ECPM13.1 Common Criteria Guide, v1.1 (PDF) 2.4.2 Non-TOE Components 10 The TOE operates with the following components in the environment: a) Authorization Acquisition. KLC CipherDrive v1.2.2 software installed on a 128 MB read-only Shadow MBR partition on the SED. This supplies the Border Encryption Value (BEV) for locking and unlocking the drives. The KLC software provides the GUI used for performing the security management functions described within this ST. Seagate Security Target Page 10 of 31 b) Protected OS. The TOE supports protection of commonly used operating systems, such as Linux Operating Systems/Linux based Hypervisors and Windows Operating Systems. c) Computer Hardware. Intel based UEFI booted systems that supports Intel Secure Key Technology. CC Testing performed using CPUs: i) Intel Core i3-8100 ii) Intel Core i5-9600 2.4.3 Security Functions not included in the TOE Evaluation 11 The evaluation is limited to those security functions identified in section 2.3. 12 The following configuration has not been evaluated: a) Use of multiple drives. Seagate Security Target Page 11 of 31 3 Security Problem Definition 13 The Security Problem Definition is reproduced from the CPP_FDE_EE. 3.1 Threats Table 6: Threats Identifier Description T.UNAUTHORIZED_ DATA_ACCESS The cPP addresses the primary threat of unauthorized disclosure of protected data stored on a storage device. If an adversary obtains a lost or stolen storage device (e.g., a storage device contained in a laptop or a portable external storage device), they may attempt to connect a targeted storage device to a host of which they have complete control and have raw access to the storage device (e.g., to specified disk sectors, to specified blocks). T.KEYING_MATERIA L_COMPROMISE Possession of any of the keys, authorization factors, submasks, and random numbers or any other values that contribute to the creation of keys or authorization factors could allow an unauthorized user to defeat the encryption. The cPP considers possession of keying material of equal importance to the data itself. Threat agents may look for keying material in unencrypted sectors of the storage device and on other peripherals in the operating environment (OE), e.g. BIOS configuration, SPI flash, or TPMs. T.AUTHORIZATION_ GUESSING Threat agents may exercise host software to repeatedly guess authorization factors, such as passwords and PINs. Successful guessing of the authorization factors may cause the TOE to release DEKs or otherwise put it in a state in which it discloses protected data to unauthorized users. T.KEYSPACE_ EXHAUST Threat agents may perform a cryptographic exhaust against the key space. Poorly chosen encryption algorithms and/or parameters allow attackers to exhaust the key space through brute force and give them unauthorized access to the data. T.KNOWN_ PLAINTEXT Threat agents know plaintext in regions of storage devices, especially in uninitialized regions (all zeroes) as well as regions that contain well known software such as operating systems. A poor choice of encryption algorithms, encryption modes, and initialization vectors along with known plaintext could allow an attacker to recover the effective DEK, thus providing unauthorized access to the previously unknown plaintext on the storage device. T.CHOSEN_ PLAINTEXT Threat agents may trick authorized users into storing chosen plaintext on the encrypted storage device in the form of an image, document, or some other file. A poor choice of encryption algorithms, encryption modes, and initialization vectors along with the chosen plaintext could allow attackers to recover the effective DEK, thus providing unauthorized access to the previously unknown plaintext on the storage device. Seagate Security Target Page 12 of 31 Identifier Description T.UNAUTHORIZED_ UPDATE Threat agents may attempt to perform an update of the product which compromises the security features of the TOE. Poorly chosen update protocols, signature generation and verification algorithms, and parameters may allow attackers to install software that bypasses the intended security features and provides them unauthorized access to data. T.UNAUTHORIZED_ FIRMWARE_ UPDATE An attacker attempts to replace the firmware on the SED via a command from the AA or from the host platform with a malicious firmware update that may compromise the security features of the TOE. T.UNAUTHORIZED_ FIRMWARE_MODIFY An attacker attempts to modify the firmware in the SED via a command from the AA or from the host platform that may compromise the security features of the TOE. 3.2 Assumptions Table 7: Assumptions Identifier Description A.TRUSTED_ CHANNEL Communication among and between product components (e.g., AA and EE) is sufficiently protected to prevent information disclosure. In cases in which a single product fulfils both cPPs, then the communication between the components does not extend beyond the boundary of the TOE (e.g., communication path is within the TOE boundary). In cases in which independent products satisfy the requirements of the AA and EE, the physically close proximity of the two products during their operation means that the threat agent has very little opportunity to interpose itself in the channel between the two without the user noticing and taking appropriate actions. A.INITIAL_DRIVE_ STATE Users enable Full Drive Encryption on a newly provisioned storage device free of protected data in areas not targeted for encryption. It is also assumed that data intended for protection should not be on the targeted storage media until after provisioning. The cPP does not intend to include requirements to find all the areas on storage devices that potentially contain protected data. In some cases, it may not be possible - for example, data contained in “bad” sectors. While inadvertent exposure to data contained in bad sectors or unpartitioned space is unlikely, one may use forensics tools to recover data from such areas of the storage device. Consequently, the cPP assumes bad sectors, un-partitioned space, and areas that must contain unencrypted code (e.g., MBR and AA/EE pre-authentication software) contain no protected data. Seagate Security Target Page 13 of 31 Identifier Description A.TRAINED_USER Users follow the provided guidance for securing the TOE and authorization factors. This includes conformance with authorization factor strength, using external token authentication factors for no other purpose and ensuring external token authorization factors are securely stored separately from the storage device and/or platform. The user should also be trained on how to power off their system. A.PLATFORM_STATE The platform in which the storage device resides (or an external storage device is connected) is free of malware that could interfere with the correct operation of the product. A.POWER_DOWN The user does not leave the platform and/or storage device unattended until the device is in a Compliant power saving state or has fully powered off. This properly clears memories and locks down the device. Authorized users do not leave the platform and/or storage device in a mode where sensitive information persists in non-volatile storage (e.g., lock screen or sleep state). Users power the platform and/or storage device down or place it into a power managed state, such as a “hibernation mode”. A.STRONG_CRYPTO All cryptography implemented in the Operational Environment and used by the product meets the requirements listed in the cPP. This includes generation of external token authorization factors by a RBG. A.PHYSICAL The platform is assumed to be physically protected in its Operational Environment and not subject to physical attacks that compromise the security and/or interfere with the platform’s correct operation. 3.3 Organizational Security Policies 14 None defined. Seagate Security Target Page 14 of 31 4 Security Objectives 15 The security objectives are reproduced from the CPP_FDE_EE. Table 8: Security Objectives for the Operational Environment Identifier Description OE.TRUSTED_ CHANNEL Communication among and between product components (i.e., AA and EE) is sufficiently protected to prevent information disclosure. OE.INITIAL_DRIVE_ STATE The OE provides a newly provisioned or initialized storage device free of protected data in areas not targeted for encryption. OE.PASSPHRASE_ STRENGTH An authorized administrator will be responsible for ensuring that the passphrase authorization factor conforms to guidance from the Enterprise using the TOE. OE.POWER_DOWN Volatile memory is cleared after entering a Compliant power saving state or turned off so memory remnant attacks are infeasible. OE.SINGLE_USE_ET External tokens that contain authorization factors will be used for no other purpose than to store the external token authorization factor. OE.STRONG_ ENVIRONMENT_ CRYPTO The Operating Environment will provide a cryptographic function capability that is commensurate with the requirements and capabilities of the TOE and Appendix A. OE.TRAINED_USERS Authorized users will be properly trained and follow all guidance for securing the TOE and authorization factors. OE.PHYSICAL The Operational Environment will provide a secure physical computing space such than an adversary is not able to make modifications to the environment or to the TOE itself. Seagate Security Target Page 15 of 31 5 Security Requirements 5.1 Conventions 16 This document uses the following font conventions to identify the operations defined by the CC: a) Assignment. Indicated with italicized text. b) Refinement. Indicated with bold text and strikethroughs. c) Selection. Indicated with underlined text. d) Assignment within a Selection: Indicated with italicized and underlined text. e) Iteration. Indicated by appending parentheses that contain a letter that is unique for each iteration, e.g. (a), (b), (c) and/or with a slash (/) followed by a descriptive string for the SFR’s purpose, e.g. /Server. 17 Note: Operations performed within the Security Target are denoted within brackets []. Operations shown without brackets are reproduced from the PP. 5.2 Extended Components Definition 18 The following Extended Components are defined in Appendix C.2 of the CPP_FDE_EE: Table 9: Extended Components Requirement Title FCS_CKM_EXT.4(a) Cryptographic Key and Key Material Destruction (Destruction Timing) FCS_CKM_EXT.4(b) Cryptographic Key and Key Material Destruction (Power Management) FCS_CKM_EXT.6 Cryptographic Key Destruction Types FCS_KYC_EXT.2 Key Chaining (Recipient) FCS_SNI_EXT.1 Cryptographic Operation (Salt, Nonce, and Initialization Vector Generation) FCS_VAL_EXT.1 Validation FDP_DSK_EXT.1 Protection of Data on Disk FPT_KYP_EXT.1 Protection of Key and Key Material FPT_PWR_EXT.1 Power Saving States FPT_PWR_EXT.2 Timing of Power Saving States FPT_TST_EXT.1 TSF Testing FPT_TUD_EXT.1 Trusted Update Seagate Security Target Page 16 of 31 Requirement Title Selection based FCS_KDF_EXT.1 Cryptographic Key Derivation FCS_RBG_EXT.1 Random Bit Generation FPT_FUA_EXT.1 Firmware Update Authentication 5.3 Functional Requirements Table 10: Summary of SFRs Requirement Title FCS_CKM.1(c) Cryptographic Key Generation (Data Encryption Key) FCS_CKM.4(a) Cryptographic Key Destruction (Power Management) FCS_CKM_EXT.4(a) Cryptographic Key and Key Material Destruction (Destruction Timing) FCS_CKM_EXT.4(b) Cryptographic Key and Key Material Destruction (Power Management) FCS_CKM_EXT.6 Cryptographic Key Destruction Types FCS_KYC_EXT.2 Key Chaining (Recipient) FCS_SNI_EXT.1 Cryptographic Operation (Salt, Nonce, and Initialization Vector Generation) FCS_VAL_EXT.1 Validation FDP_DSK_EXT.1 Protection of Data on Disk FMT_SMF.1 Specification of Management Functions FPT_KYP_EXT.1 Protection of Key and Key Material FPT_PWR_EXT.1 Power Saving States FPT_PWR_EXT.2 Timing of Power Saving States FPT_TST_EXT.1 TSF Testing FPT_TUD_EXT.1 Trusted Update Selection based FCS_CKM.1(b) Cryptographic Key Generation (Symmetric Keys) FCS_CKM.4(b) Cryptographic Key Destruction (TOE-Controlled Hardware) Seagate Security Target Page 17 of 31 Requirement Title FCS_COP.1(a) Cryptographic Operation (Signature Verification) FCS_COP.1(b) Cryptographic Operation (Hash Algorithm) FCS_COP.1(c) Cryptographic Operation (Message Authentication) FCS_COP.1(d) Cryptographic Operation (Key Wrapping) FCS_COP.1(f) Cryptographic Operation (AES Data Encryption/Decryption) FCS_KDF_EXT.1 Cryptographic Key Derivation FCS_RBG_EXT.1 Random Bit Generation FPT_FUA_EXT.1 Firmware Update Authentication 5.3.1 Cryptographic Support (FCS) FCS_CKM.1(b) Cryptographic Key Generation (Symmetric Keys) FCS_CKM.1.1(b) Refinement: The TSF shall generate symmetric cryptographic keys using a Random Bit Generator as specified in FCS_RBG_EXT.1 and specified cryptographic key sizes [256 bit] that meet the following: [no standard]. FCS_CKM.1(c) Cryptographic Key Generation (Data Encryption Key) FCS_CKM.1.1(c) Refinement: The TSF shall generate cryptographic keys in accordance with a specified cryptographic key generation algorithm method [ • generate a DEK using the RBG as specified in FCS_RBG_EXT.1,] and specified cryptographic key sizes [256 bits] that meet the following: [assignment: list of standards]. FCS_CKM.4(a) Cryptographic Key Destruction (Power Management) FCS_CKM.4.1(a) Refinement: The TSF shall [erase] cryptographic keys and key material from volatile memory when transitioning to a Compliant power saving state as defined by FPT_PWR_EXT.1 that meets the following: [a key destruction method specified in FCS_CKM_EXT.6]. Seagate Security Target Page 18 of 31 FCS_CKM.4(b) Cryptographic Key Destruction (TOE-Controlled Hardware) FCS_CKM.4.1(b) Refinement: The TSF shall destroy cryptographic keys in accordance with a specified cryptographic key destruction method [ • For volatile memory, the destruction shall be executed by a [ o single overwrite consisting of [ ▪ zeroes], o removal of power to the memory]; • For non-volatile memory [ o that employs a wear-leveling algorithm, the destruction shall be executed by a [ ▪ single overwrite consisting of zeroes, ▪ overwrite with a new value of a key of the same size, ▪ block erase]; and if the read-verification of the overwritten data fails, the process shall be repeated again up to [zero] times, whereupon an error is returned.] ] that meets the following: [no standard]. FCS_CKM_EXT.4(a) Cryptographic Key and Key Material Destruction (Destruction Timing) FCS_CKM_EXT.4.1(a) The TSF shall destroy all keys and key material when no longer needed. FCS_CKM_EXT.4(b) Cryptographic Key and Key Material Destruction (Power Management) FCS_CKM_EXT.4.1(b) The TSF shall destroy all key material, BEV, and authentication factors stored in plaintext when transitioning to a Compliant power saving state as defined by FPT_PWR_EXT.1. FCS_CKM_EXT.6 Cryptographic Key Destruction Types FCS_CKM_EXT.6.1 The TSF shall use [FCS_CKM.4(b)] key destruction methods. Seagate Security Target Page 19 of 31 FCS_COP.1(a) Cryptographic Operation (Signature Verification) FCS_COP.1.1(a) Refinement: The TSF shall perform [cryptographic signature services (verification)] in accordance with a [ • RSA Digital Signature Algorithm with a key size (modulus) of [2048-bit]; ] that meet the following: [ • FIPS PUB 186-4, “Digital Signature Standard (DSS)”, Section 5.5, using PKCS #1 v2.1 Signature Schemes RSASSA-PSS and/or RSASSA-PKCS1-v1_5; ISO/IEC 29 9796-2, Digital signature scheme 2 or Digital Signature scheme 3, for RSA schemes] FCS_COP.1(b) Cryptographic Operation (Hash Algorithm) FCS_COP.1.1(b) Refinement: The TSF shall perform [cryptographic hashing services] in accordance with a specified cryptographic algorithm [SHA-256] and cryptographic key sizes [assignment: cryptographic key sizes] that meet the following [ISO/IEC 10118-3:2004]. FCS_COP.1(c) Cryptographic Operation (Message Authentication) FCS_COP.1.1(c) Refinement: The TSF shall perform cryptographic [message authentication] in accordance with a specified cryptographic algorithm [HMAC-SHA-256] and cryptographic key sizes [256 bits [HMAC]] that meet the following: [ISO/IEC 9797-2:2011, Section 7 “MAC Algorithm 2”]. FCS_COP.1(d) Cryptographic Operation (Key Wrapping) FCS_COP.1.1(d) Refinement: The TSF shall perform [key wrapping] in accordance with a specified cryptographic algorithm [AES] in the following modes [KW] and the cryptographic key size [256 bits] that meet the following: [AES as specified in ISO/IEC 18033-3, [NIST SP 800-38F]]. FCS_COP.1(f) Cryptographic Operation (AES Data Encryption/Decryption) FCS_COP.1.1(f) Refinement: The TSF shall perform [data encryption and decryption] in accordance with a specified cryptographic algorithm [AES used in [XTS] mode] and cryptographic key sizes [256 bits] that meet the following: [AES as specified in ISO/IEC 18033-3, [XTS as specified in IEEE 1619]]. Seagate Security Target Page 20 of 31 FCS_KDF_EXT.1 Cryptographic Key Derivation FCS_KDF_EXT.1.1 The TSF shall accept [a conditioned password submask] to derive an intermediate key, as defined in [ • NIST SP 800-132], using the keyed-hash functions specified in FCS_COP.1(c), such that the output is at least of equivalent security strength (in number of bits) to the BEV. FCS_KYC_EXT.2 Key Chaining (Recipient) FCS_KYC_EXT.2.1 The TSF shall accept a BEV of at least [256 bits] from [the AA]. FCS_KYC_EXT.2.2 The TSF shall maintain a chain of intermediary keys originating from the BEV to the DEK using the following method(s): [ • symmetric key generation as specified in FCS_CKM.1(b), • key derivation as specified in FCS_KDF_EXT.1, • key wrapping as specified in FCS_COP.1(d)] while maintaining an effective strength of [256 bits] for symmetric keys and an effective strength of [not applicable] for asymmetric keys. FCS_RBG_EXT.1 Cryptographic Operation (Random Bit Generation) FCS_RBG_EXT.1.1 The TSF shall perform all deterministic random bit generation services in accordance with [[NIST SP 800-90A]] using [HMAC_DRBG (any)]. FCS_RBG_EXT.1.2 The deterministic RBG shall be seeded by at least one entropy source that accumulates entropy from [ • [1] hardware-based noise source(s),] with a minimum of [256 bits] of entropy at least equal to the greatest security strength, according to ISO/IEC 18031:2011 Table C.1 “Security Strength Table for Hash Functions”, of the keys and hashes that it will generate. FCS_SNI_EXT.1 Cryptographic Operation (Salt, Nonce, and Initialization Vector Generation) FCS_SNI_EXT.1.1 The TSF shall [use salts that are generated by a [DRBG as specified in FCS_RBG_EXT.1]]. FCS_SNI_EXT.1.2 The TSF shall use [unique nonces with a minimum size of [64] bits]. FCS_SNI_EXT.1.3 The TSF shall create IVs in the following manner [ • XTS: No IV. Tweak values shall be non-negative integers, assigned consecutively and starting at an arbitrary non-negative integer]. Seagate Security Target Page 21 of 31 FCS_VAL_EXT.1 Validation FCS_VAL_EXT.1.1 The TSF shall perform validation of the [BEV] using the following method(s): [ • Key wrap as specified in FCS_COP.1(d)] FCS_VAL_EXT.1.2 The TSF shall require validation of the [BEV] prior to [allowing access to TSF data after exiting a Compliant power saving state]. FCS_VAL_EXT.1.3 The TSF shall [ • require power cycle/reset the TOE after [an administrator configurable number between 1 and 20] of consecutive failed validation attempts]. 5.3.2 User Data Protection (FDP) FDP_DSK_EXT.1 Protection of Data on Disk FDP_DSK_EXT.1.1 The TSF shall perform Full Drive Encryption in accordance with FCS_COP.1(f), such that the drive contains no plaintext protected data. FDP_DSK_EXT.1.2 The TSF shall encrypt all protected data without user intervention. 5.3.3 Security Management (FMT) FMT_SMF.1 Specification of Management Functions FMT_SMF.1.1 Refinement: The TSF shall be capable of performing the following management functions: [ a) change the DEK, as specified in FCS_CKM.1, when re-provisioning or when commanded, b) erase the DEK, as specified in FCS_CKM.4(a), c) initiate TOE firmware/software updates, d) [no other functions]]. 5.3.4 Protection of the TSF (FPT) FPT_FUA_EXT.1 Firmware Update Authentication FPT_FUA_EXT.1.1 The TSF shall authenticate the source of the firmware update using the digital signature algorithm specified in FCS_COP.1(a) using the RTU that contains [hash value of the public key as specified in FCS_COP.1(b)]. FPT_FUA_EXT.1.2 The TSF shall only allow installation of update if the digital signature has been successfully verified as specified in FCS_COP.1(a). FPT_FUA_EXT.1.3 The TSF shall only allow modification of the existing firmware after the successful validation of the digital signature, using a mechanism as described in FPT_TUD_EXT.1.2. Seagate Security Target Page 22 of 31 FPT_FUA_EXT.1.4 The TSF shall return an error code if any part of the firmware update process fails. FPT_KYP_EXT.1 Protection of Key and Key Material FPT_KYP_EXT.1.1 The TSF shall [ • only store keys in non-volatile memory when wrapped, as specified in FCS_COP.1(d), or encrypted, as specified in FCS_COP.1(g) or FCS_COP.1(e)]. FPT_PWR_EXT.1 Power Saving States FPT_PWR_EXT.1.1 The TSF shall define the following Compliant power saving states: [D3]. FPT_PWR_EXT.2 Timing of Power Saving States FPT_PWR_EXT.2.1 For each Compliant power saving state defined in FPT_PWR_EXT.1.1, the TSF shall enter the Compliant power saving state when the following conditions occur: user-initiated request, [no other conditions]. FPT_TST_EXT.1 TSF Testing FPT_TST_EXT.1.1 The TSF shall run a suite of the following self-tests [during initial start-up (on power on)] to demonstrate the correct operation of the TSF: [ • Firmware integrity • DRBG health • Known Answer Tests (KATs): o AES XTS encrypt/decrypt o AES key wrap/unwrap o DRBG o SHA-2 o HMAC o PBKDF2 ] Seagate Security Target Page 23 of 31 FPT_TUD_EXT.1 Trusted Update FPT_TUD_EXT.1.1 Refinement: The TSF shall provide [authorized users] the ability to query the current version of the TOE [firmware] software/firmware. FPT_TUD_EXT.1.2 Refinement: The TSF shall provide [authorized users] the ability to initiate updates to TOE [firmware] software/firmware. FPT_TUD_EXT.1.3 Refinement: The TSF shall verify updates to the TOE [firmware] using a [authenticated firmware update mechanism as described in FPT_FUA_EXT.1] by the manufacturer prior to installing those updates. Seagate Security Target Page 24 of 31 5.4 Assurance Requirements 19 The TOE security assurance requirements are summarized in Table 11. Table 11: Security Assurance Requirements Assurance Class Assurance Components Security Target (ASE) Conformance Claims (ASE_CCL.1) Extended Components Definition (ASE_ECD.1) ST Introduction (ASE_INT.1) Security Objectives for the Operational Environment (ASE_OBJ.1) Stated Security Requirements (ASE_REQ.1) Security Problem Definition (ASE_SPD.1) TOE Summary Specification (ASE_TSS.1) Development (ADV) Basic Functional Specification (ADV_FSP.1) Guidance Documents (AGD) Operational User Guidance (AGD_OPE.1) Preparative Procedures (AGD_PRE.1) Life Cycle Support (ALC) Labelling of the TOE (ALC_CMC.1) TOE CM Coverage (ALC_CMS.1) Tests (ATE) Independent Testing – Sample (ATE_IND.1) Vulnerability Assessment (AVA) Vulnerability Survey (AVA_VAN.1) 20 In accordance with section 6.1 of the CPP_FDE_EE, the following refinement is made to ASE: a) ASE_TSS.1.1C Refinement: The TOE summary specification shall describe how the TOE meets each SFR, including a proprietary Key Management Description (Appendix E), and [Entropy Essay]. Seagate Security Target Page 25 of 31 6 TOE Summary Specification 21 The following sections describe how the TOE fulfils each SFR included in section 5.3. 6.1 Cryptographic Support (FCS) 6.1.1 FCS_CKM.1(c) Cryptographic Key Generation (Data Encryption Key) 22 The TOE generates the Data Encryption Key (DEK) using the Change DEK option in the GUI. The process invokes the internal HMAC_DRBG when generating the DEK. 6.1.2 FCS_CKM.1(b) Cryptographic Key Generation (Symmetric Keys) 23 The TOE generates a 256-bit AES DEK which is protected by the Key Encryption Key (KEK) using the key wrap function. 6.1.3 FCS_CKM.4(a) Cryptographic Key Destruction (Power Management) 24 The TOE erases cryptographic keys and key material from volatile memory when transitioning to a Compliant power saving state. All keys in the chain (DEK, KEK, and BEV) are erased from volatile memory by performing a single overwrite consisting of zeroes. 25 For non-volatile memory, the DEK is erased in two stages. First, the old key is overwritten with the new key value and then stored in a new location in memory. The old block location (where the original key was stored) is erased using a wear-leveling program. User KEKs are erased from non-volatile memory by performing a single overwrite consisting of zeroes. The BEV is not stored in non-volatile memory. 26 Additional information on key usage, storage, and destruction can be found in Table 12 below. Seagate Security Target Page 26 of 31 6.1.4 FCS_CKM.4(b) Cryptographic Key Destruction (TOE-Controlled Hardware) 27 The following table describes the how cryptographic keys are used, stored and destroyed. Table 12: Cryptographic Key Usage, Storage, and Destruction Key Key Type/Length Initialization Usage Storage Destruction Destruction Timing DEK XTS-AES-256 TOE configuration Data encryption/ decryption Encrypted by KEK and stored in NAND. Plaintext keys stored in DRAM and registers. Replaced by new key followed by a Block erase. Zeroization All keys are destroyed when the following occurs: • When a user password change occurs • After the user session ends • After a power off • When the TOE is uninstalled • When the Change DEK option is executed via the GUI KEK AES Key Wrap 256 TOE configuration Protected, wrapped DEK Encrypted by user password-based key with AES key wrap and stored in NAND. Plaintext keys stored in DRAM and registers. Zeroization BEV PBKDF Output of PBKDF Unwrap of KEK Plaintext keys stored in DRAM and registers. Zeroization 28 Note: The TOE includes both volatile memory (DRAM) and non-volatile memory (NAND). In both cases, the memory is accessed using standard microcontroller memory interface controllers and addressing schemes. The DRAM is bit-level addressable, and NAND flash is block-level readable and writable. The TOE does not persistently store plaintext keys. Only protected keys and copies are persistently stored in NAND with parity bits. All protected keys used for the microcontroller are stored in a single block of NAND that is inaccessible to the host. 6.1.5 FCS_CKM_EXT.4(a) Cryptographic Key and Key Material Destruction (Destruction Timing) 29 Details regarding the timing of key and key material destruction can be found in Table 12. 6.1.6 FCS_CKM_EXT.4(b) Cryptographic Key and Key Material Destruction (Power Management) 30 Details regarding key destruction when entering a Compliant power saving state are provided in sections 6.1.3 and 6.1.4 above. 6.1.7 FCS_CKM_EXT.6 Cryptographic Key Destruction Types 31 All keys are destroyed as per the methods described in FCS_CKM.4(b). The TOE’s key chain is described in the KMD. Seagate Security Target Page 27 of 31 6.1.8 FCS_COP.1(a) and FCS_COP.1(b) Cryptographic Operation (Signature Verification and Hash Algorithm) 32 All firmware binaries are signed by Phison. Phison is the primary developer of the TOE firmware and is the only authorized source for code signing. Phison assigns a dedicated code signing key for each customer. Code signing key “B” is used for the Seagate. 33 The TOE performs signature verification using RSA 2048 with SHA-256 for trusted updates as follows: a) TOE updates are signed with the code signing private key. b) The obfuscated public key is embedded in the TOE binary. c) When the user triggers the TOE update, the TOE compares a hash of the public key with the stored hash of the public key, and then verifies the digital signature. d) If the digital signature verification succeeds, the upgrade process is carried out. e) If the digital signature verification fails, the upgrade process is aborted, and an error is displayed to the user. 6.1.9 FCS_COP.1(c) Cryptographic Operation (Keyed Hash Algorithm) 34 The TOE implements HMAC-SHA-256 with the following characteristics: a) Key length. 256 bits. b) Block size. 512 bits. c) MAC length. 256 bits. 6.1.10 FCS_COP.1(d) Cryptographic Operation (Key Wrapping) 35 The TOE key wrap function is used to protect the DEK using AES-256. 6.1.11 FCS_COP.1(f) Cryptographic Operation (AES Data Encryption/Decryption) 36 The TOE performs data encryption/decryption using AES-XTS with 256-bit keys. 6.1.12 FCS_KDF_EXT.1 Cryptographic Key Derivation 37 Passwords are conditioned via PBKDF2 using HMAC-SHA-256 with 1,000 iterations, resulting in a 256-bit key in accordance with NIST SP 800-132. 6.1.13 FCS_KYC_EXT.2 Key Chaining (Recipient) 38 The TOE key chain is described in the KMD. 6.1.14 FCS_RBG_EXT.1 Cryptographic Operation (Random Bit Generation) 39 The TOE uses a hardware-based deterministic random bit generator (DRBG) that complies with NIST SP 800-90A for all cryptographic operations. The DRBG is seeded with at least 256-bits of entropy from thermal noise generated by the complementary metal-oxide semiconductor (CMOS). Seagate Security Target Page 28 of 31 6.1.15 FCS_SNI_EXT.1 Cryptographic Operation (Salt, Nonce, and Initialization Vector Generation) 40 The TOE generates 32 byte salts using RAND_bytes at the time of encryption which are then stored in a database for use during decryption. Salts are generated using the DRBG as described in FCS_RBG_EXT.1. 41 Unique 16 byte nonces are generated using the hardware Random Number Generator (RNG) and are appended to the encrypted data. 42 The Logical Block Address (LBA) of the SSD is used as the tweak value. Tweak values are non-negative integers, assigned consecutively, and start at an arbitrary non-negative integer. The tweak value is converted to a little‐endian byte array, where encryption of the tweak is done using AES-XTS. 6.1.16 FCS_VAL_EXT.1 Validation 43 The TOE will validate a BEV using key wrap as specified in FCS_COP.1(d). As per the application note in the CPP_FDE_PP, when the key wrap in FCS_COP.1(d) is used, the validation is performed inherently. 44 Successful validation of the BEV per above is required prior to allowing decryption of the drive and granting access to any TSF data after exiting a compliant power saving state. 45 After a configurable number of failed authentication attempts is reached, the system will stop responding until it is rebooted at which point the counter is reset. An administrator can set this threshold to a value between 1 and 20 failed attempts. 6.2 User Data Protection (FDP) 6.2.1 FDP_DSK_EXT.1 Protection of Data on Disk 46 The first 128MB of media data on the drive (Shadow MBR data) and the disk partition tables are read only and not encrypted. Once provisioned, all other data written to disk is encrypted without user intervention using AES-XTS. Data being written to disk is encrypted before being programmed to NAND storage. 47 The following initialization activities ensure the encryption function works when first provisioning the drive: 1. Examine the tamper evidence and check the module has not been tampered. 2. StartSession SID of AdminSP with MSID password, and then set new password for SID password. The new password shall be at least 20 bytes. 3. Disable AdminSP “Makers” Authority. 4. Execute TCG activate command to have the module enter TCG active mode. 5. StartSession Admin1 of LockingSP with new password of SID in Step2, and then set new password for Admin1-4 passwords and User1-9 passwords of LockingSP. The new passwords shall be at least 20 bytes. 6. Configure all LockingRanges of LockinSP by setting ReadLockEnabled and WriteLockEnabled columns to TRUE. 7. Power cycle the module. Seagate Security Target Page 29 of 31 8. Check if the module is in the FIPS approved mode by using the Identify command response data byte 506 bit1 (SATA) or the Identify controller command response data byte 4093 bit1 (NVMe). The bit1 shall be set to 1. 9. Check the module’s firmware version using the Identify command response data dword 23-26 (SATA) or the Identify controller command response data byte 64-71 (NVME). 48 Once provisioned, the following boot initialization process is performed each time the TOE transitions from a power saving state: 1. CTL ROM code conducts KAT of SHA-256bit/RSA 2048 bit as listed in FPT_TST_EXT.1, Table 13. 2. FW code is loaded from NAND. 3. CTL ROM code conducts firmware integrity check of the FW binary via RSA 2048 SHA256 PSS Signature Verification. 4. FW code is executed (only if integrity check is successful). 5. FW code conducts all firmware power-on self-test as listed in FPT_TST_EXT.1, Table 13. 6. When all self-tests have passed, the module enters a ready state awaiting host/use commands. 6.3 Security Management (FMT) 6.3.1 FMT_SMF.1 Specification of Management Functions 49 The DEK can only be changed by generating a new one. DEKs are generated by using the Change DEK option via the GUI. DEKs are erased as per FCS_CKM.4(a) described in section 6.1.3 above. 50 Users of the TOE must contact the vendor to obtain firmware updates. Firmware updates are manually installed by authorized administrators. 6.4 Protection of the TSF (FPT) 6.4.1 FPT_FUA_EXT.1 Firmware Update Authentication 51 Firmware running on the TOE exists in ROM. The RTU uses a SHA-256 hash of the public key, as specified in FCS_COP.1(b), to authenticate the source of firmware updates. The public key hash is stored in one-time programmable (OTP) memory. The ROM code loads the firmware update and checks the hash of the public key embedded in the firmware binary. ROM code is hardcoded in the controller hardware and cannot be modified post-production. 6.4.2 FPT_KYP_EXT.1 Protection of Key and Key Material 52 Keys stored in non-volatile memory are wrapped, as specified in FCS_COP.1(d). 6.4.3 FPT_PWR_EXT.1 Power Saving States 53 The TOE supports the following Compliant power saving states: a) D3. Powered Off – user initiated, dependent on the OS parameters. Seagate Security Target Page 30 of 31 6.4.4 FPT_PWR_EXT.2 Timing of Power Saving States 54 The TOE enters a Compliant power saving state as prompted by the protected OS and user-initiated requests as described in Section 6.4.3 above. 6.4.5 FPT_TST_EXT.1 TSF Testing 55 The following self-tests are performed by the TOE: Table 13: TSF Self-Tests Self Test Description Rom Code SHA 256 bit KAT Rom Code RSA 2048 bit KAT Boot Loader Integrity Firmware integrity test Firmware AES XTS 256 bit Encrypt KAT Firmware AES XTS 256 bit Decrypt KAT Firmware SHA 256 bit KAT Firmware HMAC SHA 256 KAT Firmware AES Key Wrap KAT Firmware AES Key Unwrap KAT Firmware DRBG KAT Firmware DRBG Health Tests SP 800-90A Section 11.3 Health Tests Firmware SP 800-132 PBKDF2 KAT DRBG Continuous RNG test for DRBG NDRNG Continuous RNG test for NDRNG 6.4.6 FPT_TUD_EXT.1 Trusted Update 56 Update files are digitally signed (RSA per FCS_COP.1(a)) by Phison and verified prior to installation. Additional process details are described in Section 6.1.8 above. Seagate Security Target Page 31 of 31 7 Rationale 7.1 Conformance Claim Rationale 57 The following rationale is presented with regard to the PP conformance claims: a) TOE type. As identified in section 2.1, the TOE is consistent with the CPP_FDE_EE. b) Security problem definition. As shown in section 3, the threats, OSPs and assumptions are reproduced directly from the CPP_FDE_EE. c) Security objectives. As shown in section 0, the security objectives are reproduced directly from the CPP_FDE_EE. d) Security requirements. As shown in section 5, the security requirements are reproduced directly from the CPP_FDE_EE. No additional requirements have been specified. 7.2 Security Objectives Rationale 58 All security objectives are drawn directly from the CPP_FDE_EE. 7.3 Security Requirements Rationale 59 All security requirements are drawn directly from the CPP_FDE_EE. No optional SFRs are included in the ST. The following selection based SFRs have been included: a) FCS_CKM.1(b) b) FCS_CKM.4(b) c) FCS_COP.1(a) d) FCS_COP.1(b) e) FCS_COP.1(c) f) FCS_COP.1(d) g) FCS_COP.1(f) h) FCS_KDF_EXT.1 i) FCS_RBG_EXT.1 j) FPT_FUA_EXT.1