JISEC-CC-CRP-C0777-01-2023
Certification Report
TOMITA Tatsuo, Chairman
Information-technology Promotion Agency, Japan
2-28-8 Honkomagome, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo
IT Product (TOE)
Reception Date of Application
(Reception Number)
2022-07-04 (ITC-2820)
Certification Identification JISEC-C0777
Product Name Xerox VersaLink B405DN
Version and Release Numbers Controller ROM Ver. 1.90.3
Product Manufacturer FUJIFILM Business Innovation Corp.
Evaluation Sponsor Xerox Corporation
Conformance of Functionality PP conformant functionality, CC Part 2 Extended
Protection Profile Conformance
Protection Profile for Hardcopy Devices 1.0
dated September 10, 2015
(Certification Identification: JISEC-C0553)
Name of IT Security
Evaluation Facility
Information Technology Security Center,
Evaluation Department
This is to report that the evaluation result for the above TOE has been certified as follows.
2023-03-05
YANO Tatsuro, Technical Manager
IT Security Technology Evaluation Department
IT Security Center
Evaluation Criteria, etc.: This TOE is evaluated in accordance with the following
standards prescribed in the "IT Security Evaluation and
Certification Scheme Document."
- Common Criteria for Information Technology Security Evaluation
Version 3.1 Release 5
- Common Methodology for Information Technology Security Evaluation
Version 3.1 Release 5
Evaluation Result: Pass
JISEC-CC-CRP-C0777-01-2023
" Xerox VersaLink B405DN, Version Controller ROM Ver. 1.90.3" has been evaluated
based on the standards required, in accordance with the provisions of the
"Requirements for IT Security Certification" by Information-technology Promotion
Agency, Japan, and has met the specified assurance requirements.
Notice:
This document is the English translation version of the Certification Report published by
the Certification Body of Japan Information Technology Security Evaluation and
Certification Scheme.
JISEC-CC-CRP-C0777-01-2023
Table of Contents
1. Executive Summary............................................................................................................. 1
1.1 Product Overview............................................................................................................. 1
1.1.1 Protection Profile or Assurance Package...................................................................... 1
1.1.2 TOE and Security Functionality ................................................................................... 1
1.1.2.1 Threats and Security Objectives ................................................................................ 2
1.1.2.2 Configuration and Assumptions................................................................................. 2
1.1.3 Disclaimers ..................................................................................................................... 2
1.2 Conduct of Evaluation...................................................................................................... 3
1.3 Certification...................................................................................................................... 3
2. Identification ........................................................................................................................ 4
3. Security Policy...................................................................................................................... 5
3.1 Users.................................................................................................................................. 5
3.2 Assets ................................................................................................................................ 5
3.3 Threats.............................................................................................................................. 6
3.4 Organizational Security Policies..................................................................................... 6
4. Assumptions and Clarification of Scope............................................................................. 8
4.1 Usage Assumptions .......................................................................................................... 8
4.2 Environmental Assumptions........................................................................................... 8
4.3 Clarification of Scope ......................................................................................................11
5. Architectural Information ................................................................................................. 12
5.1 TOE Boundary and Components .................................................................................. 12
5.2 IT Environment.............................................................................................................. 13
6. Documentation................................................................................................................... 14
7. Evaluation conducted by Evaluation Facility and Results............................................. 15
7.1 Evaluation Facility......................................................................................................... 15
7.2 Evaluation Approach...................................................................................................... 15
7.3 Overview of Evaluation Activity.................................................................................... 15
7.4 IT Product Testing.......................................................................................................... 16
7.4.1 Developer Testing ......................................................................................................... 16
7.4.2 Evaluator Independent Testing................................................................................... 16
7.4.3 Evaluator Penetration Testing .................................................................................... 18
7.5 Evaluated Configuration ............................................................................................... 21
7.6 Evaluation Results......................................................................................................... 22
7.7 Evaluator Comments/Recommendations ..................................................................... 22
8. Certification........................................................................................................................ 23
8.1 Certification Result........................................................................................................ 23
8.2 Recommendations .......................................................................................................... 23
JISEC-CC-CRP-C0777-01-2023
9. Annexes............................................................................................................................... 24
10. Security Target................................................................................................................... 24
11. Glossary .............................................................................................................................. 25
12. Bibliography....................................................................................................................... 27
JISEC-CC-CRP-C0777-01-2023
1
1. Executive Summary
This Certification Report describes the content of the certification result in relation to IT
Security Evaluation of "Xerox VersaLink B405DN, Version Controller ROM Ver. 1.90.3"
(hereinafter referred to as the "TOE") developed by FUJIFILM Business Innovation Corp.,
and the evaluation of the TOE was completed on 2023-01-30 by Information Technology
Security Center, Evaluation Department (hereinafter referred to as the "Evaluation
Facility"). It is intended to report to the sponsor, Xerox Corporation, and provide security
information to procurement entities and consumers who are interested in the TOE.
Readers of this Certification Report are advised to read the Security Target (hereinafter
referred to as the "ST") described in Chapter 10. Especially, details of security functional
requirements, assurance requirements and rationale for sufficiency of these requirements
of the TOE are described in the ST.
This Certification Report assumes procurement entities who purchase the TOE to be
readers. Note that the Certification Report presents the certification result based on
assurance requirements to which the TOE conforms, and does not guarantee an individual
IT product itself.
1.1 Product Overview
An overview of the TOE functions and operational conditions is described below. Refer to
Chapter 2 and subsequent chapters for details.
1.1.1 Protection Profile or Assurance Package
The TOE conforms to the following Protection Profile [14][15] (hereinafter referred to as
the "Conformance PP").
Protection Profile for Hardcopy Devices 1.0 dated September 10, 2015
(Certification Identification: JISEC-C0553)
1.1.2 TOE and Security Functionality
The TOE is a multifunction device (hereinafter referred to as "MFD"), which has functions
such as copy, scan, print, and fax.
The TOE provides security functions required by the Conformance PP to prevent the
document data processed by the MFD and the setting data etc. affecting security from
unauthorized disclosure and alteration.
For these security functions, the validity of the design policy and the accuracy of the
implementation were evaluated within the scope of the assurance requirements of the
Conformance PP.
Threats and assumptions assumed for the TOE are described in the following sections.
JISEC-CC-CRP-C0777-01-2023
2
1.1.2.1 Threats and Security Objectives
The following threats are assumed for the TOE.
There are threats that document data of users and data affecting security functions, which
are assets to be protected by the TOE, may be disclosed or altered by unauthorized
operation of the TOE or unauthorized access to the network to which the TOE is connected.
There are also threats that security functions of the TOE may be compromised by the
failure of the TOE itself or installation of unauthorized software.
The TOE provides security functions required by the Conformance PP such as
identification and authentication, access control, encryption, and digital signature to
counter these threats.
1.1.2.2 Configuration and Assumptions
The TOE is assumed to be operated under the following configuration and assumptions.
The TOE is assumed to be operated in an environment where unauthorized physical access
to the TOE is restricted and connected to a LAN separated from the Internet.
The setting, administration and maintenance of the TOE must be performed in accordance
with the guidance documents by a trusted administrator. Users of the TOE must have been
trained in order to use the TOE securely.
1.1.3 Disclaimers
The following operation is not ensured by this evaluation:
- An environment different from that described in "4.2 Environmental Assumptions"
- TOE with settings different from those described in "7.5 Evaluated Configuration"
JISEC-CC-CRP-C0777-01-2023
3
1.2 Conduct of Evaluation
Under the IT Security Evaluation and Certification Scheme that the Certification Body
operates, the Evaluation Facility conducted IT security evaluation and completed in
2023-01, based on functional requirements and assurance requirements of the TOE
according to the publicized documents "IT Security Evaluation and Certification Scheme
Document"[1], "Requirements for IT Security Certification"[2], and "Requirements for
Approval of IT Security Evaluation Facility"[3] provided by the Certification Body.
1.3 Certification
The Certification Body verified the Evaluation Technical Report [13] and the Observation
Reports prepared by the Evaluation Facility as well as evaluation documentation, and
confirmed that the TOE evaluation was conducted in accordance with the prescribed
procedure. The certification oversight reviews were also prepared for those concerns found
in the certification process. The Certification Body confirmed that those concerns pointed
out by the Certification Body were fully resolved, and that the TOE evaluation had been
appropriately conducted in accordance with the CC ([4][5][6] or [7][8][9]) and the CEM
(either of [10][11]). The Certification Body prepared this Certification Report based on the
Evaluation Technical Report and fully concluded certification activities.
JISEC-CC-CRP-C0777-01-2023
4
2. Identification
The TOE is identified as follows:
TOE Name: Xerox VersaLink B405DN
TOE Version: Controller ROM Ver. 1.90.3
Users can verify that a product is the TOE, which is evaluated and certified, by the
following means.
Users confirm the following information displayed on the control panel of the TOE as
described in the guidance document.
- Vendor name: "Xerox"
- Model name: "VersaLink B405DN"
- Version: Version of Controller ROM
JISEC-CC-CRP-C0777-01-2023
5
3. Security Policy
The TOE provides the basic functions of the MFD such as copy, scan, print, and fax. It has
the functionality to store the user document data in the TOE and to communicate with user
terminals and various servers via a network.
The TOE provides security functions that satisfy the requirements of the Conformance PP,
to protect the document data processed by the MFD and setting data etc. affecting security.
As the background of the security functions provided by the TOE, the user roles, assets,
threats, and organizational security policies assumed for the TOE are described in
following Section 3.1 to 3.4. Details of the security functions of the TOE are described in
Chapter 5.
3.1 Users
The user roles assumed for the TOE are shown in Table 3-1.
Table 3-1 User Roles
Designation Definition
Normal User A User who has been identified and authenticated
and does not have an administrative role
Administrator A User who has been identified and authenticated
and has an administrative role
Note that "administrator" is called as "system administrator" in the TOE, so the terms
"administrator" and "system administrator" have the same meaning in this report.
3.2 Assets
The assets assumed to be protected by the TOE are shown in Table 3-2, Table 3-3 and Table
3-4. There are two categories of the assets, User Data and TSF Data, as shown in Table 3-2.
Furthermore, User Data is classified as shown in Table 3-3 and TSF Data is as shown in
Table 3-4.
Table 3-2 Assets
Designation Category Definition
D.USER User Data Data created by and for Users that do not affect
the operation of the TSF
D.TSF TSF Data Data created by and for the TOE that might affect
the operation of the TSF
Table 3-3 Assets (User Data)
Designation Type Definition
D.USER.DOC User Document
Data
Information contained in a User's Document, in
electronic or hardcopy form
D.USER.JOB User Job Data Information related to a User's Document or
Document Processing Job
JISEC-CC-CRP-C0777-01-2023
6
Table 3-4 Assets (TSF Data)
Designation Type Definition
D.TSF.PROT Protected TSF
Data
TSF Data for which alteration by a User who is
neither the data owner nor in an Administrator
role might affect the security of the TOE, but for
which disclosure is acceptable
D.TSF.CONF Confidential
TSF Data
TSF Data for which either disclosure or alteration
by a User who is neither the data owner nor in an
Administrator role might affect the security of the
TOE
3.3 Threats
The threats assumed for the TOE are shown in Table 3-5.
Table 3-5 Threats
Designation Definition
T.UNAUTHORIZED_ACCESS An attacker may access (read, modify, or delete)
User Document Data or change (modify or delete)
User Job Data in the TOE through one of the
TOE's interfaces.
T.TSF_COMPROMISE An attacker may gain Unauthorized Access to TSF
Data in the TOE through one of the TOE's
interfaces.
T.TSF_FAILURE A malfunction of the TSF may cause loss of
security if the TOE is permitted to operate.
T.UNAUTHORIZED_UPDATE An attacker may cause the installation of
unauthorized software on the TOE.
T.NET_COMPROMISE An attacker may access data in transit or
otherwise compromise the security of the TOE by
monitoring or manipulating network
communication.
3.4 Organizational Security Policies
The organizational security policies required for the TOE are shown in Table 3-6.
Table 3-6 Organizational Security Policies
Designation Definition
P.AUTHORIZATION Users must be authorized before performing
Document Processing and administrative
functions.
P.AUDIT Security-relevant activities must be audited and
the log of such actions must be protected and
transmitted to an External IT Entity.
P.COMMS_PROTECTION The TOE must be able to identify itself to other
devices on the LAN.
JISEC-CC-CRP-C0777-01-2023
7
P.STORAGE_ENCRYPTION If the TOE stores User Document Data or
Confidential TSF Data on Field-Replaceable
Nonvolatile Storage Devices, it will encrypt such
data on those devices.
P.KEY_MATERIAL Cleartext keys, submasks, random numbers, or
any other values that contribute to the creation of
encryption keys for Field-Replaceable Nonvolatile
Storage of User Document Data or Confidential
TSF Data must be protected from unauthorized
access and must not be stored on that storage
device.
P.FAX_FLOW If the TOE provides a PSTN fax function, it will
ensure separation between the PSTN fax line and
the LAN.
P.IMAGE_OVERWRITE Upon completion or cancellation of a Document
Processing job, the TOE shall overwrite residual
image data from its Field-Replaceable Nonvolatile
Storage Devices.
JISEC-CC-CRP-C0777-01-2023
8
4. Assumptions and Clarification of Scope
This chapter describes the assumptions and the operational environment to operate the
TOE as useful information for the assumed readers to determine whether to use the TOE.
4.1 Usage Assumptions
Table 4-1 shows assumptions to operate the TOE. The effective performances of the TOE
security functions are not assured unless these assumptions are satisfied.
Table 4-1 Assumptions
Designation Definition
A.PHYSICAL Physical security, commensurate with the value of
the TOE and the data it stores or processes, is
assumed to be provided by the environment.
A.NETWORK The Operational Environment is assumed to
protect the TOE from direct, public access to its
LAN interface.
A.TRUSTED_ADMIN TOE Administrators are trusted to administer the
TOE according to site security policies.
A.TRAINED_USERS Authorized Users are trained to use the TOE
according to site security policies.
4.2 Environmental Assumptions
Figure 4-1 shows the operational environment assumed for the TOE. The TOE is installed
in a general office and used in an environment connected to the PSTN and a LAN which is
the internal network of the organization. Users operate the control panel of the TOE or a
client PC (i.e. General User Client or System Administrator Client) connected to the LAN
to use the TOE.
JISEC-CC-CRP-C0777-01-2023
9
Figure 4-1 Operational Environment of the TOE
The operational environment of the TOE consists of the following components.
1) General User Client
A general user client is a general-purpose PC for general users. The following software is
required:
- OS: Windows 10
- Web browser: Microsoft Edge
- Printer driver (Provided by Xerox Corporation)
PCL6 5.887.3.0
2) System Administrator Client
A system administrator client is a general-purpose PC for system administrators. The
following software is required:
- OS: Windows 10
JISEC-CC-CRP-C0777-01-2023
10
- Web browser: Microsoft Edge
3) Mail Server
A mail server is used to send user document data from the TOE. Software supporting the
SMTP protocol with TLS 1.2 is required. The following software was used in this
evaluation:
- OS: Cent OS 7.6
- Mail Server: Postfix version 2.10.1
4) Audit Server
An audit server is a server to store audit logs generated by the TOE. The following
software is required:
- OS: Windows 10
- PowerShell script to retrieve audit logs from the TOE (described in the TOE guidance)
- PowerShell Version 5.1 (OS built-in tool)
It should be noted that the reliability of the hardware and the software other than the TOE
shown in this configuration is outside the scope of this evaluation. Those are assumed to be
trustworthy.
JISEC-CC-CRP-C0777-01-2023
11
4.3 Clarification of Scope
There are the following restrictions on the security functions provided by the TOE or
ensured by this evaluation.
1) Servers and client PCs
System administrators are responsible for operating servers and client PCs cooperating
with the TOE securely.
2) Audit server operation
An audit server polls the TOE periodically to read out audit logs stored on the TOE. The
TOE sends all the stored audit logs on the polling, regardless of whether they have
already been read out. System administrators are responsible for distinguishing newly
generated audit logs from duplicated data and extracting necessary audit logs.
3) Overwrite residual image data function
The function that overwrites and deletes the image data stored in the TOE's internal
storage (eMMC) is not ensured by this evaluation.
JISEC-CC-CRP-C0777-01-2023
12
5. Architectural Information
This chapter explains the scope and the main components of the TOE.
5.1 TOE Boundary and Components
The TOE is the entire MFD with the necessary option.
The functions provided by the TOE consist of the basic functions of the MFD and the
security functions. Regarding the basic functions of the MFD such as copy, scan, print, and
fax, please refer to Chapter 11. The security functions of the TOE are described below.
1) Identification and Authentication
This function is to identify and authenticate users of the TOE with their IDs and
passwords. This function is applied when the TOE is used as follows:
- When users use the TOE with the control panel of MFD, or Web browser on client PC,
or printer driver on client PC. (Only the identification of a user ID is performed when
using printer driver on client PC.)
- When an audit server retrieves the audit logs from the TOE. (The ID and password of
System Administrator is used.)
This function has the following functionality to strengthen the identification and
authentication.
- Restriction on the minimum password length.
- Suspending the identification and authentication on continuous unsuccessful
authentication attempts.
- Termination of the session if there is no operation for a certain time after the successful
authentication.
2) Access Control
This function is to control the access to the user data when users operate the basic
functions of the MFD on them. The access control is based on the owner information of
the user data and on the user's identification information and role.
3) Data Encryption
This function is to encrypt the data stored in the TOE and the communication data. The
encryption of the stored data uses AES CBC mode with a 256-bit key. The encryption of
communication data is used in the encryption communication protocol described in "4)
Trusted Communication. "
Encryption keys are generated using a random bit generator with enough entropy that is
difficult to guess.
4) Trusted Communication
This function is to protect communication data between the TOE and IT devices using
JISEC-CC-CRP-C0777-01-2023
13
encryption communication protocol, TLS 1.2.
5) Security Management
This function is to restrict the setting, etc. of the security functions to system
administrators. For general users, it permits them to change their own passwords.
6) Security Audit
This function is to generate audit logs on audit events relevant to the security functions
and enable an audit server and system administrators to retrieve them.
Generated audit logs are stored in the TOE. When the stored logs exceed the storage
capacity, the oldest one is deleted to store a new audit log.
7) Trusted Operation
This function consists of the following functionality:
- Verification of the check sum of the firmware and the correct operation of the random
bit generation at start-up of the TOE.
- Verification of the digital signature of new firmware when the firmware is updated.
8) PSTN Fax-Network Separation
This function is to separate the Public Switched Telephone Network (PSTN) and the
LAN. It prevents sending and receiving data from the PSTN to the LAN via the TOE.
5.2 IT Environment
The TOE communicates with servers and client PCs via LAN. The function of the TOE
described in "4) Trusted Communication" works in cooperation with those IT devices and
uses the following protocols:
- Client PC (Web browser): HTTP over TLS
- Client PC (Printer driver): IPP over TLS
- Audit Server: HTTP over TLS
- Mail Server: SMTP over TLS
JISEC-CC-CRP-C0777-01-2023
14
6. Documentation
The identification of the guidance documents of the TOE is listed in Table 6-1. TOE users
are required to fully understand and comply with the following documents in order to
satisfy the assumptions.
Table 6-1 Guidance (English)
Name Version
Xerox VersaLink B405 Multifunction Printer User Guide Version 1.6
Xerox VersaLink Series Multifunction and Single Function
Printers System Administrator Guide
Version 2.1
Xerox VersaLink B405 Quick Use Guide Rev A
Xerox VersaLink B405DN Multifunction Printer Security
Function Supplementary Guide
Version 1.0
(20221019)
JISEC-CC-CRP-C0777-01-2023
15
7. Evaluation conducted by Evaluation Facility and Results
7.1 Evaluation Facility
Information Technology Security Center, Evaluation Department that conducted the
evaluation as the Evaluation Facility is approved under JISEC and is accredited by NITE
(National Institute of Technology and Evaluation), the Accreditation Body, which joins
Mutual Recognition Arrangement of ILAC (International Laboratory Accreditation
Cooperation). It is periodically confirmed that the above Evaluation Facility meets the
requirements on the appropriateness of the management and evaluators for maintaining
the quality of evaluation.
7.2 Evaluation Approach
The evaluation was conducted in accordance with the assurance requirements in the CC
Part 3 required by the Conformance PP using the evaluation methods prescribed in the
CEM and the assurance activities of the Conformance PP.
Details for evaluation activities were reported in the Evaluation Technical Report. The
Evaluation Technical Report explains the summary of the TOE as well as the content of the
evaluation and the verdict for each work unit in the CEM and assurance activity of the
Conformance PP.
7.3 Overview of Evaluation Activity
The history of the evaluation conducted is described in the Evaluation Technical Report as
follows.
The evaluation started in 2022-07 and concluded upon completion of the Evaluation
Technical Report dated 2023-01. The Evaluation Facility received a full set of evaluation
deliverables necessary for evaluation provided by the developer, and examined the evidence
in relation to a series of evaluation conducted. Furthermore, the evaluator conducted the
evaluator testing at the developer site in 2022-08 and 2022-09.
Concerns found in evaluation activities were issued as the Observation Reports and
reported to the developer. Those concerns were reviewed by the developer, and all the
concerns were solved eventually.
Concerns in the evaluation process that the Certification Body found were described as the
certification oversight reviews and sent to the Evaluation Facility. After the Evaluation
Facility and the developer examined the concerns, those were reflected in the Evaluation
Technical Report.
JISEC-CC-CRP-C0777-01-2023
16
7.4 IT Product Testing
As the verification results of the evidence shown in the evaluation process, the evaluator
performed the evaluator independent testing to ensure that the security functions of the
product are accurately implemented, and the evaluator penetration testing based on
vulnerability assessments.
7.4.1 Developer Testing
The developer testing is not included in the assurance requirements of this evaluation.
7.4.2 Evaluator Independent Testing
The evaluator performed the evaluator independent testing (hereinafter referred to as the
"independent testing") based on the evidence shown in the evaluation process to ensure
that the security functions of the product are accurately implemented. The independent
testing performed by the evaluator is explained below.
1) Independent Testing Environment
The environment for the independent testing is based on the operational environment of
the TOE shown in Figure 4-1. The components used in the independent testing
environment are shown in Table 7-1.
Table 7-1 Components for the Independent Testing
Components Description
TOE Xerox VersaLink B405DN
Version: Controller ROM Ver. 1.90.3
Client PC
(General User
Client)
- OS: Microsoft Windows 10, Microsoft Windows 10 Professional
- Web browser: Microsoft Edge
- Printer Driver: PCL6 5.887.3.0
Client PC
(System
Administrator
Client)
- OS: Microsoft Windows 10, Microsoft Windows 10 Professional
- Web browser: Microsoft Edge
Mail Server - OS: Cent OS ver7.6
- Postfix version 2.10.1
Audit Server - OS: Microsoft Windows 10, Microsoft Windows 10 Professional
- PowerShell Version 5.1
- PowerShell Script (described in the guidance)
The TOE tested by the evaluator has the same identification as the TOE identification in
Chapter 2.
The configuration of the independent testing except the TOE is different from the TOE
configuration identified in the ST in the points described below. The evaluator determined
that there are no problems with the differences and that the security functions of the TOE
configuration identified in the ST can be considered properly tested.
JISEC-CC-CRP-C0777-01-2023
17
(1) Using a modified firmware for testing
In the independent testing, a firmware modified for testing was used to verify the
encryption functions instead of the firmware of the TOE. The evaluator determined that
the testing on the modified firmware is valid because its modules of the encryption
functions are the same as that of the TOE, and the modification for testing does not affect
the encryption functions.
(2) Using additional tools for testing
In the independent testing, some tools for testing were used to confirm and alter the
communication data. Those tools for testing were validated by the evaluator.
2) Summary of the Independent Testing
A summary of the independent testing performed by the evaluator is described below.
a. Viewpoints of the Independent Testing
Viewpoints of the independent testing devised by the evaluator based on the
requirements of the Conformance PP and on the provided evaluation documentation are
as follows.
<Viewpoints of the Independent Testing>
(1) Confirm security functions for each Security Functional Requirement (SFR).
(2) Confirm if the implementation of the cryptographic algorithms is correct.
b. Independent Testing Outline
An outline of the independent testing performed by the evaluator is as follows.
<Independent Testing Approach>
The behavior of the TOE on inputs using the control panel of the TOE, the client PC, the
audit server and the testing tools was confirmed by following means:
- If the behavior can be confirmed from the external interfaces of the TOE, the external
interfaces of the TOE are used.
- If the behavior cannot be confirmed from the external interfaces of the TOE, the
developer interface of the TOE and the firmware for testing are used.
<Content of the Performed Independent Testing>
The evaluator performed the independent testing of 19 items.
Table 7-2 shows contents of the independent testing corresponding to the viewpoints.
JISEC-CC-CRP-C0777-01-2023
18
Table 7-2 Performed Independent Testing
Viewpoint Outline of the Independent Testing
(1) <Confirmation of security functions>
Confirm that all security functions work as the specification with the test
items created based on the assurance activities of the Conformance PP for
each SFR or the requirements of the SFR.
(2) <Confirmation of implementation of cryptographic algorithms>
Confirm the following cryptographic algorithms are implemented as the
specification.
- RSA (key generation, signature generation/verification)
- ECDSA (key generation, signature generation/verification)
- AES-CBC-128, AES-CBC-256, AES-GCM-128, AES-GCM-256
- SHA-1, SHA-256, SHA-384, SHA-512
- HMAC-SHA-1, HMAC-SHA-256, HMAC-SHA-384
- CTR_DRBG (AES)
c. Result
All the independent testing performed by the evaluator was correctly completed, and the
evaluator confirmed the behavior of the TOE. The evaluator confirmed consistencies
between the expected behavior and all the test results.
7.4.3 Evaluator Penetration Testing
The evaluator devised and performed the necessary evaluator penetration testing
(hereinafter referred to as the "penetration testing") on the potentially exploitable
vulnerabilities of concern under the assumed environment of use and attack level from the
evidence shown in the process of the evaluation. The penetration testing performed by the
evaluator is explained below.
1) Summary of the Penetration Testing
A summary of the penetration testing performed by the evaluator is as follows.
a. Vulnerability of Concern
The evaluator searched into the provided documentation and the publicly available
information for the potential vulnerabilities, and then identified the following
vulnerabilities which require the penetration testing.
(1) There is a concern that unintended network ports of the TOE may be open, and
known vulnerabilities may exist in the network services running on the TOE.
(2)There is a concern that known vulnerabilities may exist in the Web interface of the
TOE.
(3)There is a concern that known vulnerabilities may exist in the print processing of
the TOE.
(4)There is a concern that the identification and authentication function may be
JISEC-CC-CRP-C0777-01-2023
19
bypassed by the malicious input from the control panel of the TOE, printer driver or
Web interface.
(5)There is a concern that USB ports of the TOE may be exploited.
b. Penetration Testing Outline
The evaluator performed the following penetration testing to identify potentially
exploitable vulnerabilities.
<Penetration Testing Environment>
The penetration testing was performed in the same environment as that of the evaluator
independent testing, except for the additional PC with tools for penetration testing. Table
7-3 shows the tools used in the penetration testing.
Table 7-3 Penetration Testing Tools
Name Outline and Purpose of Use
Nmap
Version 7.92
A tool to detect available network service ports.
Nessus
Version 10.3.0
A tool to detect known vulnerabilities at network ports.
OWASP ZAP
Version 2.11.1
A tool to detect known vulnerabilities at Web application.
Fiddler
Version 5.0.20211.51073
The tool is used to refer to and alter the communication data
between Web browser and Web server (TOE).
PRET
Version 0.40
A tool to inspect various vulnerabilities in a printing
processing.
<Content of the Performed Penetration Testing>
Table 7-4 shows contents of the penetration testing corresponding to the vulnerabilities
of concern.
Table 7-4 Outline of the Penetration Testing
Vulnerability Penetration Testing Outline
(1) - Confirm that unexpected network ports of the TOE are not open using
Nmap.
- Confirm that there is no known vulnerability in the network services
running on the TOE using Nessus.
(2) - Confirm that there is no known vulnerability in the Web interface of
the TOE using OWASP ZAP.
- Confirm that the identification and authentication function and the
access control function cannot be bypassed even if the data from Web
browser to the TOE are altered using Fiddler.
(3) - Confirm that there is no known vulnerability in print processing of the
TOE using PRET and exploit codes available at the Internet.
JISEC-CC-CRP-C0777-01-2023
20
(4) - Confirm that unexpected behaviour is not observed even if the
character strings that may cause buffer overflow or unauthrised
processing are input for the user ID or password in the control panel,
printer driver and Web interfaces of the TOE.
(5) - Confirm that the USB port of the TOE cannot be used using the PC for
the penetration tesing and bootable USB flash drive.
c. Result
In the penetration testing performed by the evaluator, the evaluator did not find any
exploitable vulnerabilities that attackers who have the assumed attack potential could
exploit.
JISEC-CC-CRP-C0777-01-2023
21
7.5 Evaluated Configuration
The conditions of the TOE configuration, that are prerequisites for this evaluation, are as
described in the guidance documents listed in Chapter 6. In order to use the TOE securely
as ensured by the evaluation, the TOE must be set as described in the guidance documents.
Different settings are not subject to assurance by this evaluation.
JISEC-CC-CRP-C0777-01-2023
22
7.6 Evaluation Results
The evaluator had concluded that the TOE satisfies all work units prescribed in the CEM
and all assurance activities in the Conformance PP as per the Evaluation Technical Report.
In the evaluation, the following were confirmed.
- PP Conformance:
Protection Profile for Hardcopy Devices 1.0 dated September 10, 2015
Protection Profile for Hardcopy Devices - v1.0 Errata #1, June 2017
Guideline for Certification Application with HCD-PP Conformance [16]
- Treatment regarding FCS_RBG_EXT.1 Test
- Treatment regarding FCS_TLS_EXT.1.1 Test
- Security functional requirements: Common Criteria Part 2 Extended
- Security assurance requirements: Common Criteria Part 3 Conformant
As a result of the evaluation, the verdict "PASS" was confirmed for the following assurance
components required by the Conformance PP.
ASE_INT.1, ASE_CCL.1, ASE_SPD.1, ASE_OBJ.1, ASE_ECD.1,
ASE_REQ.1, ASE_TSS.1, ADV_FSP.1, AGD_OPE.1, AGD_PRE.1,
ALC_CMC.1, ALC_CMS.1, ATE_IND.1, AVA_VAN.1
The result of the evaluation is only applied to those which are composed by the TOE
corresponding to the identification described in the Chapter 2.
7.7 Evaluator Comments/Recommendations
There is no evaluator recommendation to be addressed to procurement entities.
JISEC-CC-CRP-C0777-01-2023
23
8. Certification
The Certification Body performed the certification from the following viewpoints based on
the materials submitted by the Evaluation Facility during the evaluation process.
1. Contents pointed out in the Observation Report shall be adequate.
2. Contents pointed out in the Observation Report shall properly be solved.
3. The submitted documentation was sampled, the content was examined, and the related
work units in the CEM and assurance activities of the Conformance PP shall be
evaluated as presented in the Evaluation Technical Report.
4. Rationale of the evaluation verdict by the evaluator presented in the Evaluation
Technical Report shall be adequate.
5. The evaluator's evaluation methodology presented in the Evaluation Technical Report
shall conform to the CEM and the assurance activities of the Conformance PP.
Concerns found in the certification process were prepared as the certification oversight
reviews, and those were sent to the Evaluation Facility. The Certification Body confirmed
such concerns pointed out in the certification oversight reviews were solved in the ST and
the Evaluation Technical Report and issued this Certification Report.
8.1 Certification Result
As a result of verification of the Evaluation Technical Report, Observation Report and
related evaluation documentation submitted by the Evaluation Facility, the Certification
Body determined that the TOE evaluation satisfies the assurance requirements required
by the Conformance PP.
8.2 Recommendations
Procurement entities who are interested in the TOE are advised to refer "4.2
Environmental Assumptions" and "7.5 Evaluated Configuration" to make sure the scope of
the evaluation and the operational requirements of the TOE meet the operational
conditions assumed by each user.
It is necessary that an audit server polls the TOE periodically to read out audit logs from
the TOE. The system administrator for the TOE needs to determine the interval time of
polling based on the consideration of your operational policy for audit logs and your usage
of the TOE. Note that if the polling interval is too short, the audit server might run short of
storage area because the TOE sends all stored audit logs every polling. Also note that if the
polling interval is too long, audit logs might be lost.
JISEC-CC-CRP-C0777-01-2023
24
9. Annexes
There is no annex.
10. Security Target
Security Target [12] of the TOE is provided as a separate document from this Certification
Report.
Title: Xerox VersaLink B405DN
Security Target
Version: V 1.09
Publication Date: January 19, 2023
Author: FUJIFILM Business Innovation Corp.
JISEC-CC-CRP-C0777-01-2023
25
11. Glossary
The abbreviations relating to the CC used in this report are listed below.
CC Common Criteria for Information Technology Security Evaluation
CEM Common Methodology for Information Technology Security Evaluation
PP Protection Profile
SFR Security Functional Requirement
ST Security Target
TOE Target of Evaluation
TSF TOE Security Functionality
The abbreviations relating to the TOE used in this report are listed below.
eMMC Embedded Multi-Media Card
MFD Multi-Function Device
PSTN Public Switched Telephone Network
The abbreviations relating to information technology used in this report are listed below.
AES Advanced Encryption Standard
CBC Cipher Block Chaining
CTR_DRBG Counter (CTR) mode block cipher algorithm DRBG
DRBG Deterministic Random Bit Generator
ECDSA Elliptic Curve Digital Signature Algorithm
GCM Galois/Counter Mode
HMAC Keyed-Hash Message Authentication Code
HTTP Hypertext Transfer Protocol
IPP Internet Printing Protocol
RSA Rivest Shamir Adleman
SHA Secure Hash Algorithm
SMTP Simple Mail Transfer Protocol
TLS Transport Layer Security
JISEC-CC-CRP-C0777-01-2023
26
The definitions of terms used in this report are listed below.
Copy Function A function to scan paper documents by operating the
control panel and duplicate them.
Fax Function
(fax send, fax receive)
A function to send and receive fax data via Public
Switched Telephone Network. Fax send functionality is
to scan paper documents by operating the control panel
and send the scanned user document data using the
standard fax protocol. Fax receive functionality is to
receive user document data using the standard fax
protocol and print them by operating the control panel of
the MFD.
Print Function A function to receive user document data from the printer
driver of a user client, and then print out them by
operating control panel of the MFD.
Scan Function A function to scan paper documents by operating the
control panel and send the scanned user document data
to a mail server.
Assurance Activity Evaluation work to be performed by an evaluator in order
to conform to a PP. It is a supplement of the CEM. In the
case of the Conformance PP [14], it is described in the
Conformance PP.
JISEC-CC-CRP-C0777-01-2023
27
12. Bibliography
[1] IT Security Evaluation and Certification Scheme Document, October 2020,
Information-technology Promotion Agency, Japan, CCS-01
[2] Requirements for IT Security Certification, October 2020,
Information-technology Promotion Agency, Japan, CCM-02
[3] Requirements for Approval of IT Security Evaluation Facility, October 2021,
Information-technology Promotion Agency, Japan, CCM-03
[4] Common Criteria for Information Technology Security Evaluation Part 1:
Introduction and general model, Version 3.1 Revision 5, April 2017,
CCMB-2017-04-001
[5] Common Criteria for Information Technology Security Evaluation Part 2: Security
functional components, Version 3.1 Revision 5, April 2017, CCMB-2017-04-002
[6] Common Criteria for Information Technology Security Evaluation Part 3: Security
assurance components, Version 3.1 Revision 5, April 2017, CCMB-2017-04-003
[7] Common Criteria for Information Technology Security Evaluation Part 1:
Introduction and general model, Version 3.1 Revision 5, April 2017,
CCMB-2017-04-001, (Japanese Version 1.0, July 2017)
[8] Common Criteria for Information Technology Security Evaluation Part 2: Security
functional components, Version 3.1 Revision 5, April 2017, CCMB-2017-04-002,
(Japanese Version 1.0, July 2017)
[9] Common Criteria for Information Technology Security Evaluation Part 3: Security
assurance components, Version 3.1 Revision 5, April 2017, CCMB-2017-04-003,
(Japanese Version 1.0, July 2017)
[10] Common Methodology for Information Technology Security Evaluation: Evaluation
methodology, Version 3.1 Revision 5, April 2017, CCMB-2017-04-004
[11] Common Methodology for Information Technology Security Evaluation: Evaluation
methodology, Version 3.1 Revision 5, April 2017, CCMB-2017-04-004,
(Japanese Version 1.0, July 2017)
[12] Xerox VersaLink B405DN Security Target, Version V1.09, January 19, 2023,
FUJIFILM Business Innovation Corp.
[13] Xerox VersaLink B405DN Evaluation Technical Report, Version 1.3, January 30, 2023,
Information Technology Security Center, Evaluation Department
[14] Protection Profile for Hardcopy Devices 1.0 dated September 10, 2015 (Certification
Identification: JISEC-C0553)
[15] Protection Profile for Hardcopy Devices - v1.0 Errata #1, June 2017
[16] Guideline for Certification Application with HCD-PP Conformance, Version 1.8,
November 11, 2020, Information-technology Promotion Agency, Japan,
JISEC-CERT-2020-A18