SERTIT, Postboks 814, 1306 Sandvika, NORWAY Phone: +47 67 86 40 00 Fax: +47 67 86 40 09 E-mail: post@sertit.no Internet: www.sertit.no Sertifiseringsmyndigheten for IT-sikkerhet Norwegian Certification Authority for IT Security SERTIT-089 CR Certification Report Issue 1.0 10 October 2016 DMT-CBS-CE3D3 Family (DMT-CBS-CE3D3/CC080/CC048) Dual Interface smart card chips with HAL library version 1.0 CERTIFICATION REPORT - SERTIT STANDARD REPORT TEMPLATE SD 009 VERSION 2.1 11.11.2011 DMT-CBS-CE3D3 Family (DMT-CBS- CE3D3/CC080/CC048) Dual Interface smart card chips with HAL library EAL 4+ BSI-CC-PP-0084-2014 V1.0 Page 2 of 18 SERTIT-089 CR Issue 1.0 10 October 2016 ARRANGEMENT ON THE RECOGNITION OF COMMON CRITERIA CERTIFICATES IN THE FIELD OF INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY SECURITY SERTIT, the Norwegian Certification Authority for IT Security, is a member of the above Arrangement and as such this confirms that the Common Criteria certificate has been issued by or under the authority of a Party to this Arrangement and is the Party’s claim that the certificate has been issued in accordance with the terms of this Arrangement The judgements contained in the certificate and Certification Report are those of SERTIT which issued it and the Norwegian e valuation facility (EVIT) which carried out the evaluation. There is no implication of acceptance by other Members of the Agreement Group of liability in respect of those judgements or for loss sustained as a result of reliance placed upon those judgements by a third party. The recognition under CCRA is limited to cPP related assurance packages or EAL2 and ALC_FLR CC part 3 components . MUTUAL RECOGNITION AGREEMENT OF INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY SECURITY EVALUATION CERTIFICATES (SOGIS MRA) SERTIT, the Norwegian Certification Authority for IT Security, is a member of the above Agreement and as such this confirms that the Common Criteria certificate has been issued by or under the authority of a Party to this Agreement and is the Party’s claim that the certificate has been issued in accordance with the terms of this Agreement The judgements contained in the certificate and Certification Report are those of SERTIT which issued it and the Norwegian evaluation facility (EVIT) which carried out the evaluation. There is no implication of acceptance by other Members of the Agreement Group of liability in respect of those judgements or for loss sustained as a result of reliance placed upon tho se judgements by a third party. Mutual recognition under SOGIS MRA applies to components up to EAL4. DMT-CBS-CE3D3 Family (DMT-CBS- CE3D3/CC080/CC048) Dual Interface smart card chips with HAL library EAL 4+ BSI-CC-PP-0084-2014 V1.0 SERTIT-089 CR Issue 1.0 10 October 2016 Page 3 of 18 Contents 1 Certification Statement ..................................... 5 2 Abbreviations ................................................... 6 3 References ....................................................... 7 4 Executive Summary ........................................... 8 4.1 Introduction 8 4.2 Evaluated Product 8 4.3 TOE Scope 8 4.4 Prote ction Profile Conformance 8 4.5 Assurance Level 9 4.6 Securi ty Policy 9 4.7 Securi ty Claims 9 4.8 Thre ats Countered 9 4.9 Thre ats Countered by the TOE’s environment 9 4.10 Thre ats and Attacks not Countered 9 4.11 Environmental Assumpti ons and Dependencies 9 4.12 IT Security Objectives 9 4.13 Non-IT Security Objecti ves 10 4.14 Securi ty Functional Requi rements 10 4.15 Securi ty Function Poli cy 10 4.16 Evaluati on Conduct 11 4.17 General Poi nts 11 5 Evaluation Findings .......................................... 13 5.1 Introduction 14 5.2 Delivery 14 5.3 Installation and Guidance Documentation 14 5.4 Misuse 14 5.5 Vulnerabili ty Analysis 14 5.6 Developer Tests 15 5.7 Evaluator Tests 15 6 Evaluation Outcome ......................................... 17 6.1 Certification Result 17 6.2 Recommendations 17 Annex A: Evaluated Configuration ............................... 18 TOE Identification 18 TOE Documentation 18 TOE Configurati on 18 DMT-CBS-CE3D3 Family (DMT-CBS- CE3D3/CC080/CC048) Dual Interface smart card chips with HAL library EAL 4+ BSI-CC-PP-0084-2014 V1.0 Page 4 of 18 SERTIT-089 CR Issue 1.0 10 October 2016 DMT-CBS-CE3D3 Family (DMT-CBS- CE3D3/CC080/CC048) Dual Interface smart card chips with HAL library EAL 4+ BSI-CC-PP-0084-2014 V1.0 Page 6 of 18 SERTIT-089 CR Issue 1.0 10 October 2016 2 Abbreviations API Application Programming Interface CC Common Criteria for Information Technology Security Evaluation (ISO/IEC 15408) CCRA Arrangement on the Recognition of Common Criteria Certificates in the Field of Information Technology Security CEM Common Methodology for Information Technology Security Evaluation DEMA Differential Electro Magnetic Analysis DES Data Encryption Standard DPA Differential Fault Analysis EAL Evaluation Assurance Level EEPROM Electrically Erasable Programmable Read Only Memory EMFI Electro-Magnetic Fault Injection EOR Evaluation Observation Report ETR Evaluation Technical Report EVIT Evaluation Facility under the Norwegian Certification Scheme for IT Security FBBI Forward-Body Bias Injection IC Integrated Circuit OSP Organizational Security Policy RAM Random Access Memory RNG Random Number Generator ROM Read Only Memory RSA Rivest, Shamir, Adleman Public Key Encryption SERTIT Norwegian Certification Authority for IT Security SEMA Simple Electro Magnetic Analysis SFR Security Functional Requirements SPA Simple Power Analysis ST Security Target TOE Target of Evaluation TSF TOE Security Functions TSP TOE Security Policy DMT-CBS-CE3D3 Family (DMT-CBS- CE3D3/CC080/CC048) Dual Interface smart card chips with HAL library EAL 4+ BSI-CC-PP-0084-2014 V1.0 SERTIT-089 CR Issue 1.0 10 October 2016 Page 7 of 18 3 References [1] DMT-CBS-CE3D3 Family (DMT-CBS-CE3D3/CC080/CC048) Dual interface smart card chips with HAL library version 1.0, Security Target lite, Version 0.9, 29 August 2016. [2] Common Criteria Part 1, CCMB-2012-09-001, Version 3.1 R4, September 2012. [3] Common Criteria Part 2, CCMB-2012-09-002, Version 3.1 R4, September 2012. [4] Common Criteria Part 3, CCMB-2012-09-003, Version 3.1 R4, September 2012. [5] The Norwegian Certification Scheme, SD001E, Version 8.0, 20 August 2010. [6] Common Methodology for Information Technology Security Evaluation, Evaluation Methodology, CCMB-2012-09-004, Version 3.1 R4, September 2012. [7] JIL Attack Methods for Smartcards and Similar Devices, Version 2.2, January 2013. [8] JIL Application of Application Attack Potential to Smart Cards, Version 2.9, May 2013. [9] AIS20/31 A proposal for Functionality classes for random number generators, Version 2.0, 18 September 2011. [10] Evaluation Technical Report of DMT-CBS-CE3D3 Family (DMT-CBS- CE3D3/CC080/CC048) Dual Interface smart card chips with HAL library , Brightsight report 16-RPT-365 Version 2.0, 3 October 2016. [11] DMT-CBS-CE3D3 Family (DMT-CBS-CE3D3/CC080/CC048) Operational User Guidance, Version 1.6, 31 August 2016. [12] DMT-CBS-CE3D3 Family (DMT-CBS-CE3D3/CC080/CC048) Preparative Procedures, Version 1.2, 31 August 2016. [13] Security IC Platform Protection Profile with Augmentation Packages, BSI - CC-PP-0084-2014, Version 1.0, January 2014. DMT-CBS-CE3D3 Family (DMT-CBS- CE3D3/CC080/CC048) Dual Interface smart card chips with HAL library EAL 4+ BSI-CC-PP-0084-2014 V1.0 Page 8 of 18 SERTIT-089 CR Issue 1.0 10 October 2016 4 Executive Summary 4.1 Introduction This Certification Report states the outcome of the Common Criteria security evaluation of DMT-CBS-CE3D3 Family (DMT-CBS-CE3D3/CC080/CC048) Dual Interface smart card chips with HAL library version 1.0 to the Sponsor, Datang Microelectronics Technology Co., Ltd (DMT) , and is intended to assist prospective consumers when judging the suitability of the IT security of the product for their particular requirements. Prospective consumers are advised to read this report in conjunction with the Security Target[1] which specifies the functional, environmental and assurance evaluation requirements. 4.2 Evaluated Product The version of the product evaluated was DMT-CBS-CE3D3 Family (DMT-CBS- CE3D3/CC080/CC048) Dual Interface smart card chips with HAL library version 1.0. This product is also described in this report as the Target of Evaluation (TOE). The developer was Datang Microelectronics Technology Co., Ltd (DMT). The TOE is suitable for instance to support a Java Card OS, ID cards, Banking cards, etc. It consists of: x A dual-interface DMT-CBS-CE3D3 microcontroller, which exists in two derivatives: DMT-CBS-CE3D3/CC080 (80KB EEPROM) and DMT-CBS- CE3D3/CC048 (48KB EEPROM). The DMT-CBS-CE3D3/CC0xx provides cryptographic coprocessors for AES and TDES and a numerical coprocessor to support RSA computations. In addition, a true random number generator meeting class PTG.2 of AIS20/31 is availabl e. x A HAL library, which provides easy access to the hardware components for cryptographic operations, EEPROM access and retrieval of random numbers. Details of the evaluated configuration, including the TOE’s supporting guidance documentation, are given in Annex A. 4.3 TOE Scope The TOE scope is described in the Security Target[1], Section 1.3. 4.4 Protection Profile Conformance The Security Target[1] claims conformance to the following protection profile: BSI-CC-PP-0084-2014 V1.0 DMT-CBS-CE3D3 Family (DMT-CBS- CE3D3/CC080/CC048) Dual Interface smart card chips with HAL library EAL 4+ BSI-CC-PP-0084-2014 V1.0 SERTIT-089 CR Issue 1.0 10 October 2016 Page 9 of 18 4.5 Assurance Level The Security Target[1] specifies the assurance requirements for the evaluation. The assurance incorporates the predefined evaluation assurance level EAL 4+, augmented by AVA_VAN.5, ATE_DPT.2 and ALC_DVS.2. Common Criteria Part 3[4] describes the scale of assurance given by predefined assurance levels EAL1 to EAL7. An overview of CC is given in CC Part 1[2]. 4.6 Security Policy The TOE security policies are detailed in Security Target[1] , Section 3.3. 4.7 Security Claims The Security Target[1] fully specifies the TOE’s security objectives, the threats and OSP’s which these objectives counter or meet and security functional requirements and security functions to elaborate the objectives. Most of the SFR’s are taken from CC Part 2[3]; use of this standard facilitates comparison with other evaluated products. The following SFR’s are defined in the Protection Profile [13]:FCS_RNG.1, FMT_LIM.1, FMT_LIM.2, FAU_SAS.1, FDP_SDC.1. 4.8 Threats Countered All threats that are countered are described in the Security Target [1], Section 3.2. 4.9 Threats Countered by the TOE’s environment There are no threats countered by the TOE’s environment. 4.10 Threats and Attacks not Countered No threats or attacks are described that are not countered. 4.11 Environmental Assumptions and Dependencies The assumptions that apply to this TOE are described in the Security Target [1], Section 3.4. 4.12 IT Security Objectives The security objectives that apply to this TOE are described in the Security Target[1], Section 4.1. The security objectives for the Security IC Embedded Software are described in the Security Target[1], Section 4.2. DMT-CBS-CE3D3 Family (DMT-CBS- CE3D3/CC080/CC048) Dual Interface smart card chips with HAL library EAL 4+ BSI-CC-PP-0084-2014 V1.0 Page 10 of 18 SERTIT-089 CR Issue 1.0 10 October 2016 4.13 Non-IT Security Objectives The security objectives for the environment are described in the Security Target[1], Section 4.3. 4.14 Security Functional Requirements The following Security Functional Requirements are directly taken from the Protection Profile[13]. Except for FAU_SAS.1, FDP_SDC.1, FDP_SDI.2, FCS_RNG.1 and FCS_COP.1 all assignments and selections are completely defined in the Protection Profile[13]. Security functional requirement Title FRU_FLT.2 Li mi ted faul t tol erance FPT_FLS.1 Fai l ure wi th preservati on of secure state FMT_LIM.1 Li mi ted capabi l i ti es FMT_LIM.2 Li mi ted avai l abi l i ty FAU_SAS .1 Audi t storage FPT_PHP.3 Resi stance to physi cal attack FDP_ITT.1 Basi c i nternal transfer protecti on FDP_IFC.1 Subset i nformati on fl ow control FPT_ITT.1 Basi c i nternal TSF data transfer protecti on FDP_SDC.1 Stored data confi denti al i ty FDP_SDI.2 Stored data i ntegri ty moni tori ng and acti on FCS_RNG.1 [P TG.2 ] Qual i ty metri c for random numbers FCS_COP.1[TD ES ] Cryptographi c operati on – TDES FCS_COP.1[AES] Cryptographi c operati on - AES FCS_COP.1[RS A] Cryptographi c operati on - RSA 4.15 Security Function Policy The TOE is suitable for instance to support a Java Card OS, ID cards, Banking cards, etc. The TOE consists of hardware and IC dedicated software. The hardware is based on a 32-bit CPU with ROM (Non-Volatile Read-Only Memory), EEPROM (Non-volatile Programmable Memory) and RAM (Volatile Memory). The hardware of the TOE also incorporates communication peripherals and cryptographic coprocessors for execution and acceleration of symmetric and asymmetric cryptographic algorithms. DMT-CBS-CE3D3 Family (DMT-CBS- CE3D3/CC080/CC048) Dual Interface smart card chips with HAL library EAL 4+ BSI-CC-PP-0084-2014 V1.0 SERTIT-089 CR Issue 1.0 10 October 2016 Page 11 of 18 The IC dedicated software consists of a hardware abstraction (HAL) library that provides cryptographic services and EEPROM access support. The TOE supports the following communication interfaces: ISO/IEC 7816 contact interface. ISO/IEC 14443 contactless interface The TOE is delivered to a composite product manufacturer. The security IC embedded software is developed by the composite product manufacturer. The security IC embedded software is sent to Datang Microelectronics Technology Co., Ltd (DMT) to be implemented in ROM and delivered back to the composite product manufacturer together with the TOE. The security IC embedded software is not part of the TOE. 4.16 Evaluation Conduct The evaluation was carried out in accordance with the requirements of the Norwegian Certification Scheme for IT Security as described in SERTIT Document SD001E[5]. The Scheme is managed by the Norwegian Certification Authority for IT Security (SERTIT). As stated on page 2 of this Certification Report, SERTIT is a member of the Arrangement on the Recognition of Common Criteria Certificates in the Field of Information Technology Se curity (CCRA), and the evaluation was conducted in accordance with the terms of this Arrangement. The purpose of the evaluation was to provide assurance about the effectiveness of the TOE in meeting its Security Target[1], which prospective consumers are advised to read. To ensure that the Security Target [1] gives an appropriate baseline for a CC evaluation, it was first itself evaluated. The TOE was then evaluated against this baseline. Both parts of the evaluation were performed in accordance with CC Part 3[4] and the Common Evaluation Methodology (CEM) [6]. Interpretations[7][8][9] are used. SERTIT monitored the evaluation which was carried out by Brightsight B.V. as Commercial Evaluation Facility (CLEF/EVIT). The evaluation was completed when the EVIT submitted the final Evaluation Technical Report (ETR) [10] to SERTIT on 3 October 2016. As a result SERTIT then produced this Certification Report. 4.17 General Points The evaluation addressed the security functionality claimed in the Security Target[1] with reference to the assumed operating environment specified by the Security Target[1]. The evaluated configuration was that specified in Annex A. Prospective consumers are advised to check that this matches their identified requirements and give due consideration to the recommendations and caveats of this report. Certification does not guarantee that the IT product is free from security vulnerabilities. This Certification Report and the belonging Certificate only reflect the view of SERTIT at the time of certification. It is furthermore the responsibility DMT-CBS-CE3D3 Family (DMT-CBS- CE3D3/CC080/CC048) Dual Interface smart card chips with HAL library EAL 4+ BSI-CC-PP-0084-2014 V1.0 Page 12 of 18 SERTIT-089 CR Issue 1.0 10 October 2016 of users (both existing and prospective) to check whether any security vulnerabilities have been discovered since the date shown in this report. This Certification Report is not an endorsement of the IT product by SERTIT or any other organization that recognizes or gives effect to this Cer tification Report, and no warranty of the IT product by SERTIT or any other organization that recognizes or gives effect to this Certification Report is either expressed or implied. DMT-CBS-CE3D3 Family (DMT-CBS- CE3D3/CC080/CC048) Dual Interface smart card chips with HAL library EAL 4+ BSI-CC-PP-0084-2014 V1.0 SERTIT-089 CR Issue 1.0 10 October 2016 Page 13 of 18 5 Evaluation Findings The evaluators examined the following assurance class es and components taken from CC Part 3[4]. These classes comprise the EAL4 assurance package augmented by AVA_VAN.5, ATE_DPT.2 and ALC_DVS.2. Assurance class Assurance components Development ADV_ARC.1 Security architecture description ADV_FSP.4 Complete functional specification ADV_IMP.1 Implementation representation of the TSF ADV_TDS.3 Basic modular design Guidance documents AGD_OPE.1 Operational user guidance AGD_PRE.1 Preparative procedures Life-cycle support ALC_CMC.4 Production support, acceptance procedures and automation ALC_CMS.4 Problem tracking CM coverage ALC_DEL.1 Delivery procedures ALC_DVS.2 Sufficiency of security measures ALC_LCD.1 Developer defined life-cycle model ALC_TAT.1 Well-defined life-cycle model Security Target evaluation ASE_CCL.1 Conformance claims ASE_ECD.1 Extended components definition ASE_INT.1 ST introduction ASE_REQ.2 Derived security requirements ASE_SPD.1 Security problem definition ASE_OBJ.2 Security objectives ASE_TSS.1 TOE summary specification Tests ATE_COV.2 Analysis of coverage ATE_DPT.2 Testing: security enforcing modules ATE_FUN.1 Functional testing ATE_IND.2 Independent testing - sample Vulnerability assessment AVA_VAN.5 Advanced methodical vulnerability analysis All assurance classes were found to be satisfactory and were awarded an overall “pass” verdict. DMT-CBS-CE3D3 Family (DMT-CBS- CE3D3/CC080/CC048) Dual Interface smart card chips with HAL library EAL 4+ BSI-CC-PP-0084-2014 V1.0 Page 14 of 18 SERTIT-089 CR Issue 1.0 10 October 2016 5.1 Introduction The evaluation addressed the requirements specified in the Security Target[1]. The results of this work were reported in the ETR[10] under the CC Part 3[4] headings. The following sections note considerations that are of particular relevance to either consumers or those involved with subsequent assurance maintenance and re-evaluation of the TOE. 5.2 Delivery On receipt of the TOE, the consumer is recommended to check that the evaluated version of its constituent components has been supplied, and to check that the security of the TOE has not been compromised in delivery. The delivery procedure is described in the supporting document [12]. 5.3 Installation and Guidance Documentation Installation procedures are described in detail in the supporting document [12]. 5.4 Misuse There is always a risk of intentional and unintentional misconfigurations that could possibly compromise confidential information. Security IC Embedded Software shall follow the guidance documentation[11][12] for the TOE in order to ensure that the TOE is operated in a secure manner. The guidance documents adequately describe the mode of operation of the TOE, all assumptions about the intended environment and all requirements for external security. Sufficient guidance is provided for the consumer to effectively use the TOE’s security functions. 5.5 Vulnerability Analysis The Evaluators’ vulnerability analysis was based on both public domain sources and the visibility of the TOE given by the evaluation process. An independent vulnerability analysis was done, consisting of the following steps: A design and implementation review on the TOE was done to identify weaknesses in the TOE that could potentially be exploited by attackers. A code review of the crypto library and boot code was also executed. Validation tests of security features performed in the ATE class are taken into account for the following vulnerability analysis. A vulnerability analysis based on the design and implementation review results and the validation test results of security features, was performed considering the well-known attacks from the “JIL Attack Methods for Smartcards and Similar Devices”[7]. User guidance is also taken into consideration while analysing potential vulnerabilities. A penetration test plan is established based on the results of the vulnerability analysis. DMT-CBS-CE3D3 Family (DMT-CBS- CE3D3/CC080/CC048) Dual Interface smart card chips with HAL library EAL 4+ BSI-CC-PP-0084-2014 V1.0 SERTIT-089 CR Issue 1.0 10 October 2016 Page 15 of 18 Practical penetration tests are performed according the pene tration test plan. 5.6 Developer Tests The developer tests consist of four parts: 1) Testing on engineering samples Developer tests performed on engineering samples (cards or Dual -In-Line- Package ICs) 2) Testing on wafer Developer tests performed on wafers 3) Testing on simulation tools Developer tests were done on simulation tools in the chip development environment, which were used to verify the logical functions. 4) Testing on an emulation board Developer tests were done on an emulation board (FPGA), mainly for the HAL. 5.7 Evaluator Tests The evaluator’s responsibility for independent testing is required by the ATE_IND class. Since developer’s testing procedures were found to be extensive and thorough, and developer’s hardware testing tools are not generally available to allow reproduction of developer test cases in the evaluator’s test lab, the choice was made to perform the evaluator independent testing by witnessing of the developer’s test cases, using the developer’s tools, at the premises of the developer. The evaluator used a sampling strategy to select developer tests to validate the developer’s test results. The sampling strategy is as follows: Tests on TSFI’s are sampled Tests on Interfaces of SFR-enforcing modules are sampled Tests on Security Mechanisms are sampl ed All the testing methods (Wafer/Sample/ Simulation/Emulator) will be sampled In addition to this, the evaluator has defined additional test cases, prompted by study of the developer documentation. The test strategy is as shown below: Augmentation of developer testing for interfaces by varying parameters to more rigorously test the interface Supplementation of developer testing strategy, for example by applying the tests performed on engineering samples to wafer samples DMT-CBS-CE3D3 Family (DMT-CBS- CE3D3/CC080/CC048) Dual Interface smart card chips with HAL library EAL 4+ BSI-CC-PP-0084-2014 V1.0 Page 16 of 18 SERTIT-089 CR Issue 1.0 10 October 2016 The considerations that are taken during the selection of the interfaces to be tested are: Observation and understanding during the performance of the wor k units in ATE_COV, DPT and FUN Significance of the interfaces with respect to security These tests are also performed using the developer’s tools at the premises of the developer. The evaluator witnessed the whole process of the tests. DMT-CBS-CE3D3 Family (DMT-CBS- CE3D3/CC080/CC048) Dual Interface smart card chips with HAL library EAL 4+ BSI-CC-PP-0084-2014 V1.0 SERTIT-089 CR Issue 1.0 10 October 2016 Page 17 of 18 6 Evaluation Outcome 6.1 Certification Result After due consideration of the ETR[10] as produced by the Evaluators, and of the conduct of the evaluation as witnessed by the Certifier, SERTIT has determined that DMT-CBS-CE3D3 Family (DMT-CBS-CE3D3/CC080/CC048) Dual Interface smart card chips with HAL library meets the Common Criteria Part 3 conformant requirements of Evaluation Assurance Level EAL 4+ augmented with AVA_VAN.5, ATE_DPT.2 and ALC_DVS.2 for the specified Common Criteria Part 2 extended functionality and Protection Profile BSI-CC-PP-0084-2014 V1.0, in the specified environment. 6.2 Recommendations Prospective consumers of DMT-CBS-CE3D3 Family (DMT-CBS-CE3D3/CC080/CC048) Dual Interface smart card chips with HAL library should understand the specific scope of the certification by reading this report in conjunction with the Security Target[1]. The TOE should be used in accordance with a number of environmental considerations as specified in the Security Target. Only the evaluated TOE configuration should be installed. This is specified in Annex A with further relevant information given ab ove under Section 4.3 “TOE Scope ” and Chapter 5 “Evaluation Findings”. The TOE should be used in accordance with the supporting guidance documentation included in the evaluated configuration. The above “Evaluation Findings” include a number of recommendations relating to the secure receipt, installation, configuration and operation of the TOE. DMT-CBS-CE3D3 Family (DMT-CBS- CE3D3/CC080/CC048) Dual Interface smart card chips with HAL library EAL 4+ BSI-CC-PP-0084-2014 V1.0 Page 18 of 18 SERTIT-089 CR Issue 1.0 10 October 2016 Annex A: Evaluated Configuration TOE Identification The TOE consists of: Type Name Version Package Hardw are DMT-CBS-CE3D3 Family (DMT-CBS-CE3D3/CC080/CC048) V1.0 die, module Softw are HAL V1.0 Softw are library in ROM Manual DMT-CBS-CE3D3 Family (DMT-CBS- CE3D3/CC080/CC048) Preparative Procedures[12] V1.2 document DMT-CBS-CE3D3 Family (DMT-CBS- CE3D3/CC080/CC048) Operational User Guidance[11] V1.6 document TOE Documentation The supporting guidance documents evaluated were: [a] DMT-CBS-CE3D3 Family (DMT-CBS-CE3D3/CC080/CC048) Operational User Guidance, Version 1.6, 31 August 2016[11] [b] DMT-CBS-CE3D3 Family (DMT-CBS-CE3D3/CC080/CC048) Preparative Procedures, Version 1.2, 31 August 2016[12] Further discussion of the supporting guidance material is given in Section 5.3 “Installation and Guidance Documentation”. TOE Configuration The TOE configuration used for testing was the same used for developer tests, this is described in Section 5.6 of this report.