TrustCB B.V.
Registered address:
Van den Berghlaan 48, 2132 AT
Hoofddorp, The Netherlands
nscib@trustcb.com
https://trustcb.com/common-criteria/nscib/
https://nscib.nl
TrustCB B.V. is a registered company at the
Netherlands Chamber of Commerce (KVK),
under number 858360275.
Version
2024-12
®
TrustCB
is
a
registered
trademark.
Any
use
or
application
requires
prior
approval.
Certification Report
SECORA™ ID X v2 Applet Collection with ePasslet Suite
v4.0 by cryptovision GmbH, version 1.0 – Java Card applet
configuration providing Secure Signature Creation Device
with Key generation (SSCD)
Sponsor: Infineon Technologies AG
Am Campeon 1-15
85579 Neubiberg
Germany
Developer: cv cryptovision GmbH
Munscheidstr. 14
45886 Gelsenkirchen
Germany
Evaluation facility: SGS Brightsight B.V.
Brassersplein 2
2612 CT Delft
The Netherlands
Report number: NSCIB-CC-2400169-01-CR
Report version: 1
Project number: NSCIB-2400169-01
Author(s): Alireza Rohani
Date: 19 May 2025
Number of pages: 12
Number of appendices: 0
Reproduction of this report is authorised only if the report is reproduced in its entirety.
Page: 2/12 of report number: NSCIB-CC-2400169-01-CR, dated 19 May 2025
®
TrustCB
is
a
registered
trademark.
Any
use
or
application
requires
prior
approval.
CONTENTS
Foreword 3
Recognition of the Certificate 4
International recognition 4
European recognition 4
1 Executive Summary 5
2 Certification Results 6
2.1 Identification of Target of Evaluation 6
2.2 Security Policy 6
2.3 Assumptions and Clarification of Scope 6
2.3.1 Assumptions 6
2.3.2 Clarification of scope 6
2.4 Architectural Information 6
2.5 Documentation 7
2.6 IT Product Testing 8
2.6.1 Testing approach and depth 8
2.6.2 Independent penetration testing 8
2.6.3 Test configuration 9
2.6.4 Test results 9
2.7 Reused Evaluation Results 9
2.8 Evaluated Configuration 9
2.9 Evaluation Results 9
2.10 Comments/Recommendations 9
3 Security Target 11
4 Definitions 11
5 Bibliography 12
Page: 3/12 of report number: NSCIB-CC-2400169-01-CR, dated 19 May 2025
®
TrustCB
is
a
registered
trademark.
Any
use
or
application
requires
prior
approval.
Foreword
The Netherlands Scheme for Certification in the Area of IT Security (NSCIB) provides a third-party
evaluation and certification service for determining the trustworthiness of Information Technology (IT)
security products. Under this NSCIB, TrustCB B.V. has the task of issuing certificates for IT security
products, as well as for protection profiles and sites.
Part of the procedure is the technical examination (evaluation) of the product, protection profile or site
according to the Common Criteria assessment guidelines published by the NSCIB. Evaluations are
performed by an IT Security Evaluation Facility (ITSEF) under the oversight of the NSCIB Certification
Body, which is operated by TrustCB B.V. in cooperation with the Ministry of the Interior and Kingdom
Relations.
An ITSEF in the Netherlands is a commercial facility that has been licensed by TrustCB B.V. to
perform Common Criteria evaluations; a significant requirement for such a licence is accreditation to
the requirements of ISO Standard 17025 “General requirements for the accreditation of calibration and
testing laboratories”.
By awarding a Common Criteria certificate, TrustCB B.V. asserts that the product or site complies with
the security requirements specified in the associated (site) security target, or that the protection profile
(PP) complies with the requirements for PP evaluation specified in the Common Criteria for
Information Security Evaluation. A (site) security target is a requirements specification document that
defines the scope of the evaluation activities.
The consumer should review the (site) security target or protection profile, in addition to this
certification report, to gain an understanding of any assumptions made during the evaluation, the IT
product's intended environment, its security requirements, and the level of confidence (i.e., the
evaluation assurance level) that the product or site satisfies the security requirements stated in the
(site) security target.
Reproduction of this report is authorised only if the report is reproduced in its entirety.
Page: 4/12 of report number: NSCIB-CC-2400169-01-CR, dated 19 May 2025
®
TrustCB
is
a
registered
trademark.
Any
use
or
application
requires
prior
approval.
Recognition of the Certificate
Presence of the Common Criteria Recognition Arrangement (CCRA) and the SOG-IS logos on the
certificate indicates that this certificate is issued in accordance with the provisions of the CCRA and
the SOG-IS Mutual Recognition Agreement (SOG-IS MRA) and will be recognised by the participating
nations.
International recognition
The CCRA was signed by the Netherlands in May 2000 and provides mutual recognition of certificates
based on the Common Criteria (CC). Since September 2014 the CCRA has been updated to provide
mutual recognition of certificates based on cPPs (exact use) or STs with evaluation assurance
components up to and including EAL2+ALC_FLR.
For details of the current list of signatory nations and approved certification schemes, see
http://www.commoncriteriaportal.org.
European recognition
The SOG-IS MRA Version 3, effective since April 2010, provides mutual recognition in Europe of
Common Criteria and ITSEC certificates at a basic evaluation level for all products. A higher
recognition level for evaluation levels beyond EAL4 (respectively E3-basic) is provided for products
related to specific technical domains. This agreement was signed initially by Finland, France,
Germany, The Netherlands, Norway, Spain, Sweden and the United Kingdom. Italy joined the SOG-IS
MRA in December 2010.
For details of the current list of signatory nations, approved certification schemes and the list of
technical domains for which the higher recognition applies, see https://www.sogis.eu.
Page: 5/12 of report number: NSCIB-CC-2400169-01-CR, dated 19 May 2025
®
TrustCB
is
a
registered
trademark.
Any
use
or
application
requires
prior
approval.
1 Executive Summary
This Certification Report states the outcome of the Common Criteria security evaluation of the
SECORA™ ID X v2 Applet Collection with ePasslet Suite v4.0 by cryptovision GmbH, version 1.0 –
Java Card applet configuration providing Secure Signature Creation Device with Key generation
(SSCD). The developer of the SECORA™ ID X v2 Applet Collection with ePasslet Suite v4.0 by
cryptovision GmbH, version 1.0 – Java Card applet configuration providing Secure Signature Creation
Device with Key generation (SSCD) is cv cryptovision GmbH located in Gelsenkirchen, Germany and
Infineon Technologies AG was the sponsor of the evaluation and certification. A Certification Report is
intended to assist prospective consumers when judging the suitability of the IT security properties of
the product for their particular requirements.
The TOE is a Java Card (SECORA™ ID X v2 Applet Collection with ePasslet Suite v4.0 by
cryptovision GmbH, version 1.0) configured to provide a secure signature creation device (SSCD) with
key generation for the creation of legally binding qualified electronic signatures and qualified electronic
seals as defined in the eIDAS regulation. To allow secure access to the signature functionality over
the contactless interface, it provides an optional PACE mechanism to build up a secure channel for
the signature PIN.
The TOE has been evaluated by SGS Brightsight B.V. located in Delft, The Netherlands. The
evaluation was completed on 19 May 2025 with the approval of the ETR. The certification procedure
has been conducted in accordance with the provisions of the Netherlands Scheme for Certification in
the Area of IT Security [NSCIB].
The scope of the evaluation is defined by the security target [ST], which identifies assumptions made
during the evaluation, the intended environment for the SECORA™ ID X v2 Applet Collection with
ePasslet Suite v4.0 by cryptovision GmbH, version 1.0 – Java Card applet configuration providing
Secure Signature Creation Device with Key generation (SSCD), the security requirements, and the
level of confidence (evaluation assurance level) at which the product is intended to satisfy the security
requirements. Consumers of the SECORA™ ID X v2 Applet Collection with ePasslet Suite v4.0 by
cryptovision GmbH, version 1.0 – Java Card applet configuration providing Secure Signature Creation
Device with Key generation (SSCD) are advised to verify that their own environment is consistent with
the security target, and to give due consideration to the comments, observations and
recommendations in this certification report.
The results documented in the evaluation technical report [ETR] 1 for this product provide sufficient
evidence that the TOE meets the EAL5 augmented (EAL5+) assurance requirements for the evaluated
security functionality. This assurance level is augmented with ALC_DVS.2 (Sufficiency of security
measures) and AVA_VAN.5 (Advanced methodical vulnerability analysis).
The evaluation was conducted using the Common Methodology for Information Technology Security
Evaluation, CEM:2022 [CEM] for conformance to the Common Criteria for Information Technology
Security Evaluation, CC:2022 [CC].
TrustCB B.V., as the NSCIB Certification Body, declares that the evaluation meets all the conditions
for international recognition of Common Criteria Certificates and that the product will be listed on the
NSCIB Certified Products list. Note that the certification results apply only to the specific version of the
product as evaluated.
The TOE is stated as a Qualified Signature Creation Device and Qualified Seal Creation Device for
the purposes of electronic identification and trust services as detailed by the [EU-REG]. The
evaluation by SGS Brightsight included an examination of the TOE according to the eIDAS Dutch
Conformity Assessment Process Version 6.0.
TrustCB B.V., as the Dutch eIDAS-Designated Body responsible in The Netherlands for the
assessment of the conformity of qualified electronic signature and/or qualified electronic seal creation
devices declares that the evaluation meets the conditions for eIDAS certification for listing on the EU
eIDAS compiled list of Qualified Signature/Seal Creation Devices.
1 The Evaluation Technical Report contains information proprietary to the developer and/or the
evaluator, and is not available for public review.
Page: 6/12 of report number: NSCIB-CC-2400169-01-CR, dated 19 May 2025
®
TrustCB
is
a
registered
trademark.
Any
use
or
application
requires
prior
approval.
2 Certification Results
2.1 Identification of Target of Evaluation
The Target of Evaluation (TOE) for this evaluation is the SECORA™ ID X v2 Applet Collection with
ePasslet Suite v4.0 by cryptovision GmbH, version 1.0 – Java Card applet configuration providing
Secure Signature Creation Device with Key generation (SSCD) from cv cryptovision GmbH located in
Gelsenkirchen, Germany.
The TOE is comprised of the following main components:
Delivery
item type
Identifier Version
Hardware Hardware Platform IFX_CCI_00005D
Software
Asymmetric Crypto Library (ACL) 03.35.001
Symmetric Crypto Library (SCL) 02.15.000
Hardware Support Library (HSL) 03.52.9708
Hash Crypto Library (HCL) version 01.13.002
UMSLC 01.30.0564
Embedded OS ‘01 00 07 FA 15 00 00 13 05’
Applet Collection with ePasslet Suite v4.0
by cryptovision
‘0405’ (V4.0)
To ensure secure usage a set of guidance documents is provided, together with the SECORA™ ID X
v2 Applet Collection with ePasslet Suite v4.0 by cryptovision GmbH, version 1.0 – Java Card applet
configuration providing Secure Signature Creation Device with Key generation (SSCD). For details,
see section 2.5 “Documentation” of this report.
For a detailed and precise description of the TOE lifecycle, see the [ST], Chapter 1.4.7.
2.2 Security Policy
The TOE is a Java Card (SECORA™ ID X v2 Applet Collection with ePasslet Suite v4.0 by
cryptovision GmbH, version 1.0) configured to provide a secure signature creation device (SSCD) with
key generation for the creation of legally binding qualified electronic signatures and qualified electronic
seals according to [EN419211-2]. To allow secure access to the signature functionality over the
contactless interface, it provides an optional PACE mechanism to build up a secure channel for the
signature PIN. Details of security policy can be found in [ST].
2.3 Assumptions and Clarification of Scope
2.3.1 Assumptions
The assumptions defined in the Security Target are not covered by the TOE itself. These aspects lead
to specific Security Objectives to be fulfilled by the TOE-Environment. For detailed information on the
security objectives that must be fulfilled by the TOE environment, see section 3.4 of the [ST].
2.3.2 Clarification of scope
The evaluation did not reveal any threats to the TOE that are not countered by the evaluated security
functions of the product.
2.4 Architectural Information
The TOE consists of:
Page: 7/12 of report number: NSCIB-CC-2400169-01-CR, dated 19 May 2025
®
TrustCB
is
a
registered
trademark.
Any
use
or
application
requires
prior
approval.
Figure 1 Schematic view on the Target of Evaluation (TOE) and its boundaries. The TOE is based on
the Schematic view on the Target of Evaluation (TOE) and its boundaries. The TOE is based on the
certified hardware and Javacard OS. Besides the SECORA™ ID X v2 Applet Collection with ePasslet
Suite v4.0 by cryptovision GmbH, version 1.0 code in non-volatile memory and the applet instantiated
from it which forms the TOE of this security target, it may also contain additional applets which are not
part of the TOE.
• the circuitry of the chip (the integrated circuit, IC) including the contact-based interface with
hard-ware for the contactless interface including contacts for the antenna, providing basic
cryptographic functionalities,
• the platform with the Java Card operation system SECORA ID X v2.02 (please refer to the
platform security target [PL-ST] for details),
• the guidance documentation of SECORA ID X v2.02 according to [PL-ST],
• SECORA™ ID X v2 Applet Collection with ePasslet Suite v4.0 by cryptovision GmbH, version
1.0 – Java Card applet configuration providing a secure signature creation device (SSCD) with
key generation,
• the associated guidance documentation: Administrator and User Guidance in PDF format.
The whole applet code resides in the Flash memory; the applets providing these different
configurations are instantiated into Flash memory. Multiple configurations (and hence support for
different applications) can be present at the same time by instantiating multiple applets with their
distinct configurations. A common combination could be an ICAO MRTD applet and an SSCD applet
providing a travel application with LDS data and EAC authentication together with a signature
application.
2.5 Documentation
The following documentation is provided with the product by the developer to the customer:
Identifier Version
Secora ID X v2 Applet Collection v1.0 with cryptovision ePasslet Suite v4 –
Java Card Applet Suite providing Electronic ID Documents applications.
Guidance Manual
Version 1.3, 2025-
03-28.
Page: 8/12 of report number: NSCIB-CC-2400169-01-CR, dated 19 May 2025
®
TrustCB
is
a
registered
trademark.
Any
use
or
application
requires
prior
approval.
Secora ID X v2 Applet Collection v1.0 with cryptovision ePasslet Suite v4.0
– Java Card applet configuration providing a Secure Signature Creation
Device application with on-chip key generation / key import - Preparation
Guidance (AGD_PRE).
Version 1.5, 2025-
03-28.
Secora ID X v2 Applet Collection v1.0 with cryptovision ePasslet Suite v4.0
– Java Card applet configuration providing a Secure Signature Creation
Device application with on-chip key generation / key import - Operational
Guidance (AGD_OPE).
Version 1.5, 2025-
04-23.
SECORA ID v2.02, Security Guide 1.3, 2024-11-14
SECORA ID v2.02, Administration Guide 1.2, 2024-09-13
SECORA ID v2.02, Extended Datasheet 1.1, 2024-07-30
SECORA™ ID (SLJ38Gxymmmap) Product API Specification 1.00.1193, 2024-
03-05
SECORA™ ID v2 Sandbox Application Programmer's Reference Manual 1.0, 2024-04-23
SECORA_ID_v2_Erratasheet 1.1, 2024-12-13
2.6 IT Product Testing
Testing (depth, coverage, functional tests, independent testing): The evaluators examined the
developer’s testing activities documentation and verified that the developer has met their testing
responsibilities.
2.6.1 Testing approach and depth
The developer performed extensive testing on functional specification, subsystem and module level.
All parameter choices were addressed at least once. All boundary cases identified were tested
explicitly, and additionally the near-boundary conditions were covered probabilistically. The testing
was largely automated using industry standard and proprietary test suites. Test scripts were used
extensively to verify that the functions return the expected values.
The underlying hardware and crypto-library test results are extendable to composite evaluations,
because the underlying platform is operated according to its guidance and the composite evaluation
requirements are met.
For the testing performed by the evaluators, the developer provided samples and a test environment.
The evaluators reproduced a selection of the developer tests, as well as a small number of test cases
designed by the evaluator.
2.6.2 Independent penetration testing
The methodical analysis performed was conducted along the following steps: When evaluating the
evidence in the classes ASE, ADV and AGD the evaluator considers whether potential vulnerabilities
can already be identified due to the TOE type and/or specified behavior in such an early stage of the
evaluation.
For ADV_IMP a thorough implementation representation review is performed on the TOE. During this
attack oriented analysis the protection of the TOE is analyzed using the knowledge gained from all
previous evaluation classes. This results in the identification of (additional) potential vulnerabilities. For
this analysis will be performed according to the attack methods in [JIL-AP] and [JIL-AM]. An important
source for assurance in this step is the technical report [PL-ETRfC] of the underlying platform.
The total test effort expended by the evaluators was two weeks for testing and reporting. During that
test campaign, 0% was on Perturbation Attacks, 100% was on software attacks, 0% was on Physical
Attacks, %0 on Overcoming Sensors and Filters, 0% on Retrieving Keys with DFA, 0% on Side
Channel Attacks, 0% on Exploitation of Test Features, 0% on Attacks on RNG and 0% on Application
isolation.
Page: 9/12 of report number: NSCIB-CC-2400169-01-CR, dated 19 May 2025
®
TrustCB
is
a
registered
trademark.
Any
use
or
application
requires
prior
approval.
2.6.3 Test configuration
The TOE was tested in the following configurations:
• TOE configured in initialization stage
• TOE personalized as SSCD
Functional testing was carried out by witnessing of the developer testing and by repeating some tests
by the laboratory. A combination of the standard commercial and proprietary developers tools were
used. Penetration testing was performed by using the lab’s equipment.
2.6.4 Test results
The testing activities, including configurations, procedures, test cases, expected results and observed
results are summarised in the [ETR], with references to the documents containing the full details.
The developer’s tests and the independent functional tests produced the expected results, giving
assurance that the TOE behaves as specified in its [ST] and functional specification.
No exploitable vulnerabilities were found with the independent penetration tests.
The algorithmic security level of cryptographic functionality has not been rated in this certification
process, but the current consensus on the algorithmic security level in the open domain, i.e., from the
current best cryptanalytic attacks published, has been taken into account.
2.7 Reused Evaluation Results
There is no reuse of evaluation results in this certification.
2.8 Evaluated Configuration
The TOE is defined uniquely by its name and version number SECORA™ ID X v2 Applet Collection
with ePasslet Suite v4.0 by cryptovision GmbH, version 1.0 – Java Card applet configuration providing
Secure Signature Creation Device with Key generation (SSCD). The guidance documents describe
how to verify the TOE and configure it.
2.9 Evaluation Results
The evaluation lab documented their evaluation results in the [ETR], which references an ASE
Intermediate Report and other evaluator documents.
The verdict of each claimed assurance requirement is “Pass”.
Based on the above evaluation results the evaluation lab concluded the SECORA™ ID X v2 Applet
Collection with ePasslet Suite v4.0 by cryptovision GmbH, version 1.0 – Java Card applet
configuration providing Secure Signature Creation Device with Key generation (SSCD), to be CC Part
2 conformant, CC Part 3 conformant, and to meet the requirements of EAL5 augmented with
ALC_DVS.2 and AVA_VAN.5. This implies that the product satisfies the security requirements
specified in Security Target [ST].
The Security Target claims ’strict’ conformance to the Protection Profile [EN419211-2].
2.10 Comments/Recommendations
The user guidance as outlined in section 2.5 “Documentation” contains necessary information about
the usage of the TOE. Certain aspects of the TOE’s security functionality, in particular the
countermeasures against attacks, depend on accurate conformance to the user guidance of both the
software and the hardware part of the TOE. There are no particular obligations or recommendations
for the user apart from following the user guidance. Please note that the documents contain relevant
details concerning the resistance against certain attacks.
In addition, all aspects of assumptions, threats and policies as outlined in the Security Target not
covered by the TOE itself must be fulfilled by the operational environment of the TOE.
The customer or user of the product shall consider the results of the certification within his system risk
management process. For the evolution of attack methods and techniques to be covered, the
Page: 10/12 of report number: NSCIB-CC-2400169-01-CR, dated 19 May 2025
®
TrustCB
is
a
registered
trademark.
Any
use
or
application
requires
prior
approval.
customer should define the period of time until a re-assessment for the TOE is required and thus
requested from the sponsor of the certificate.
The strength of the cryptographic algorithms and protocols was not rated in the course of this
evaluation. This specifically applies to the following proprietary or non-standard algorithms, protocols
and implementations: None.
Page: 11/12 of report number: NSCIB-CC-2400169-01-CR, dated 19 May 2025
®
TrustCB
is
a
registered
trademark.
Any
use
or
application
requires
prior
approval.
3 Security Target
The SECORA™ ID X V2 Applet Collection with ePasslet Suite v4.0 by cryptovision GmbH, version 1.0
- Java Card applet configuration providing Secure Signature Creation Device with Key generation
(SSCD), v0.9, 2025-04-23 [ST] is included here by reference.
Please note that, to satisfy the need for publication, a public version [ST-lite] has been created and
verified according to [ST-SAN].
4 Definitions
This list of acronyms and definitions contains elements that are not already defined by the CC or CEM:
BAC Basic Access Control
DCAP eIDAS Dutch Conformity Assessment Process
EAC Extended Access Control
eMRTD electronic MRTD
ICAO International Civil Aviation Organisation
IT Information Technology
ITSEF IT Security Evaluation Facility
JIL Joint Interpretation Library
NSCIB Netherlands Scheme for Certification in the area of IT Security
PP Protection Profile
QSCD Qualified Signature/Seal Creation Device
SCD Signature Creation device
TOE Target of Evaluation
Page: 12/12 of report number: NSCIB-CC-2400169-01-CR, dated 19 May 2025
®
TrustCB
is
a
registered
trademark.
Any
use
or
application
requires
prior
approval.
5 Bibliography
This section lists all referenced documentation used as source material in the compilation of this
report.
[CC] Common Criteria for Information Technology Security Evaluation, Parts 1 to 5,
CC:2022 Revision 1, November 2022
[CEM] Common Methodology for Information Technology Security Evaluation,
CEM:2022 Revision 1, November 2022
[eIDAS-REP] Assessment Reporting Sheet eIDAS, 25-RPT-187, version 0.1
[EN419211-2] EN 419 211-2:2013, Protection profiles for secure signature creation device -
Part 2: Device with key generation, V2.0.1, 2013, registered under the
reference BSI-CC-PP-0059-2009-MA-02.
[ETR] Evaluation Technical Report “SECORA™ ID X v2 Applet Collection with
ePasslet Suite v4.0 by cryptovision GmbH, version 1.0”, 25-RPT-136, version
3.0, date: 12 May 2025
[EU-REG] REGULATION (EU) No 910/2014 OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND
OF THE COUNCIL of 23 July 2014 on electronic identification and trust
services for electronic transactions in the internal market and repealing
Directive 1999/93/EC
[PL-CERT] Certificate, NSCIB-CC-2400063-01, SECORA™ ID v2.02 (SLJ38Gxymm2ap),
EAL6 augmented with ALC_FLR.1, 20-12-2024
[PL-ETRfC] ETR for Composition SECORA™ ID v2.02 (SLJ38Gxymm2ap), 24-RPT-1336
version 2.0, 2024-12-19
[PL-ST] SECORA™ ID v2.02 (SLJ38Gxymm2ap) Security Target, Rev 1.1, 2024-12-19
[JIL-AAPS] JIL Application of Attack Potential to Smartcards, Version 3.2.1, February 2024
[JIL-AMS] Attack Methods for Smartcards and Similar Devices, Version 2.5, May 2022
(sensitive with controlled distribution)
[JIL_QSCD] Security Evaluation and Certification of Qualified, Electronic Signature/Seal
Creation Devices, JIL Interpretations for Security Certification according to
eIDAS Regulation 910/2014, Version 1.0, July 2022
[NSCIB] Netherlands Scheme for Certification in the Area of IT Security, Version 2.6,
02 August 2022
[ST] SECORA™ ID X V2 Applet Collection with ePasslet Suite v4.0 by cryptovision
GmbH, version 1.0 - Java Card applet configuration providing Secure Signature
Creation Device with Key generation (SSCD), v0.9, 2025-04-23
[ST-lite] SECORA™ ID X V2 Applet Collection with ePasslet Suite v4.0 by cryptovision
GmbH, version 1.0 - Java Card applet configuration providing Secure Signature
Creation Device with Key generation (SSCD), Security Target Lite, v0.9, 2025-
04-23
[ST-SAN] ST sanitising for publication, CC Supporting Document CCDB-2006-04-004,
April 2006
(This is the end of this report.)